does /v/ remember this game?
thoughts on it?
thought some of the shit was pretty neat like destructible environments/cover and good enemy death animations
>>339991452
>destructible environments/cover
wasn't that listed as an innovation of one of the later battlefield games, like bad company?
I wonder if there's a list out there of all the times this has happened. Like the Call of Duty dogs thing.
>>339991452
Always thought it was mediocre shooter, but the destruction stuff made it worth it to experience.
>>339991452
Pretty good gun porn, but utterly bland beyond that.
>>339991452
For some reason i remember the EGM article called "That guy again?" It pointed out all of Blacks 5 enemies.
This is literally Gun Porn: The Game
May look like a generic shooter nowadays but this shit really needs to comebackwhich actually tried, there was a sequel but it was cancelled to make a fucking piece of shit game called bodycount, which costed them alot of money, hence killing any chance of this game to come to life
>>339991651
Blacks destruction was very selective; could only do certain walls, objects.
Red faction was pretty much the figurehead on the subject and it came out in 2001, RF2 was 2002 and toned the "destroy everything" down somewhat.
Bad company 2 was the first multiplayer focused game that did it properly iirc.
>>339991452
I got an original xbox last month and gave this game a try because I remember liking it a lot 10 years ago, but goddamn it plays like fucking shit, the controls dont have a sensivity option so it controls like you are a 1,500lb fatso, and the lack of enemies is one of its weaker points
>>339991452
racist
>>339992982
>>339991452
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu2rluUb8ck
>>339991452
>dat awful cover
showing bullets was against sharia law or something?
