[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
So since the RDR remaster is essentially confirmed at this point,
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 41
Thread images: 8
File: TUXNOKG.jpg (453 KB, 1550x835) Image search: [Google]
TUXNOKG.jpg
453 KB, 1550x835
So since the RDR remaster is essentially confirmed at this point, do you think they will show it at E3 and if so what presentation? Considering they showed the GTA V remake at Sony's I can see them doing it again here.

Also, will RDR finally experience a PC release?
>>
>>339851431
>So since the RDR remaster is essentially confirmed at this point
Fuck off retard
>>
>>339851491
>this guy
>not knowing about all the leaks and clear evidence about the HD release

Kek, you'll be sucking my dick come announcement day
>>
Before any gullible fags get excited, let me just point out the main points:

>No remake is confirmed
>They explicitly said a PC release will NEVER happen
>There have been no leaks even hinting at this news
>OP is implying there is to gain your curiosity, attention, and trust because this is all he has left in his life
>>
>game went 6 years with no PC port
>he thinks they'll suddenly remaster it and port it to PC

Oh anon... no. Anyway, it would be much better for everyone if they just worked on a new game, not re-release the same fucking game on the newest console. Even if it's a masterpiece like RDR, the last thing we need is more remasters. Just play it on 360/PS3.
>>
>>339851690
Damn, you're really trying to guard yourself from disappointment huh

>explain that picture
>very clearly the updated RAGE engine, with John Marston and palmettos
>>
Im confused...I thought they were making a sequel, and not just a remake?
>>
>>339851431
From what I've heard the game's code is a mess, if they tried to port it the whole thing would fall apart
>>
i can see it happening
rockstar already did 1 remaster ( gta 5 was more like port ) which was bully
>>
>>339851431
What the fuck is this? Looks worse than RDR on the 360.
>>
>>339851431
While I sincerely doubt this will happen, it is funny that Rockstar cancelled RDRs backwards compatibility on XBone
>>
>>339851583
Then why dont you post pics or a new article idiot?
>>
>>339852519
I don't know when you last played 360 RDR, but OP's picture definitely has far more detail and high resolution textures than any scene in that game.
>>
I heard the coding to the metal of Xbox 360 and PS3 is why the PC version never happened. Like it was completely optimized for consoles to the point no one outside of the original programmers knew how to untangle it.

Xbox One can already run Red Dead Redemption per backwards compatibility mode. I don't know why PS4 faggots INSIST on everything in existence having to be Remastered so Sony can get extra money from repurchases. Seriously, you are such a fucking cancer mate.
>>
Just found out that Rockstar will be at E3.

RDR2 will be happpening.
>>
>>339852682
>why don't you post pics

Well you could start with the fucking screenshot in my post

The map also leaked quite a while ago too
>>
>>339851431
if that really happens, not releasing on PC would be dumb as fuck

at least a third of the sales confirmed
>>
>>339852005
well, Bully was released in 2006, and the PC port in 2009.
>>
I played it on the PS3, but I still want a PC release, along with The last of us.
Console shooter controls are just so fucking bad.
>>
Why do pc fags want a dog shooting simulator anyway? Every time I saw anyone playing this game they were

>shooting dogs for pelts
>pelts for money
>money for bullets to shoot more dogs

Seems like a bad game.
>>
File: 8d0.jpg (18 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
8d0.jpg
18 KB, 500x500
>>339853321
>>
>>339853321
idk maybe play the game idiot ?
i dont judge a game because some guy acts like a retard
>>
File: RDR.jpg (685 KB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
RDR.jpg
685 KB, 1280x720
>>339852736
Not really.
>>
>>339854148
The buildings in that picture have worse textures and far less detail than OPs and the lighting is more basic, you're not helping your point.
>>
>>339851431
While you're probably wrong/full of shit, I have a feeling that you're right. I don't know if it'll be a remake or a sequel but something Red Dead related is going to happen
>>
File: RDR5.jpg (877 KB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
RDR5.jpg
877 KB, 1280x720
>>339854486
this is how the game looks on my xb360
>>
File: 1464983049144.png (479 KB, 541x464) Image search: [Google]
1464983049144.png
479 KB, 541x464
>>339854486
>The buildings in that picture have worse textures
Get your eyes checked. Textures in OPs image are much blurrier.
>>
>>339855083
Wow that still looks quite nice.
>>
>>339851431
That is a GTAV chromatic aberration filter right there. Looks shitty, but it is indicative of an engine update.
>>
File: RDR.png (2 MB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
RDR.png
2 MB, 1280x720
>>339855083
Super blurry, probably because capture device, but still looks nice.
>>
>>339855646
The lack of clarity is more the result of the picture than the texture it seems like. Anyway the textures in the OP still have more variation and detail and seem to have an actual 3D effect to them as opposed to the flat brick wall in that image.
>>
>>339855083
>>339855731
I've played RDR on ps3 and 360. Even though the game is like 7 years old, I replayed it last month and it still looks great compared to games currently coming out. I'd say it looks better than GTAV on last gen. Plus screenshots don't do it justice.
>>
>>339852779
>Xbox One can already run Red Dead Redemption per backwards compatibility mode.
>I don't know why PS4 faggots INSIST on everything in existence having to be Remastered
PS4 doesn't have backwards compatibility. Sonyggers are so fucking retarded that they'll buy the remaster because PS4 has what, Bloodborne and...????
>>
>>339852779
So you want to continue playing the game in 720p @20fps instead of a remaster with better graphics, higher resolution + framerates and possibly a PC version. Who's the cancer here? You are, faggot.
>>
RDR on PC is literally the one thing I want in life
>>
File: 1464745851299.gif (3 MB, 640x266) Image search: [Google]
1464745851299.gif
3 MB, 640x266
>>339856942
Funny thing about that is RDR's backwards compatibility was cancelled by Rockstar.

>Also, partaking in useless consolefag wars over who is less dogshit
>>
>>339857861
No it wasn't. It's being held back so when Red Dead 3 is announced at Microsoft's E3 this year Phil can say "And Red Dead Redemption available NOW on Xbox One."

Either that or RD3 will come with a code for RDR like Dark Souls and Fallout.
>>
>>339851431
>This screenshot
>A leaked map
>Postponing/cancelling backwards compatibility for the game
>Rockstar will be at E3

Face it anons, it sounds like it's happening

I agree with this >>339858127 anon
>>
why would you want a remake for a tech demo is beyond me
>>
File: hqdefault (3).jpg (24 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]
hqdefault (3).jpg
24 KB, 480x360
Game looks good enough as it is. I want a sequal!

Will there be extra content you think
>>
>>339851431
How does this screenshot prove anything? It just looks like the original RDR. Look at the shitty trees in the background ffs

I'm still hoping all the rumours are true
Thread replies: 41
Thread images: 8

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.