25th anniversary predictions?
Sonic Adventure 3?
Sonic Generations 2?
Something new?
New Classic Sonic game with Taxman engine?
Lets take best on how many posts until
>Amyposting/general lewds
>Unleashedfag
>Classic Sonic post no. 39403495895
>Somebody unironically defends Sonic 2006
>People calling boost formula "boost to win" even though it's not
>Sonic x MLP shitposters
>>339730191
best? bets*
>>339729940
>25th anniversary predictions?
>Sonic Adventure 3?
Sure why not. If they're going to do this, then they might actually be trying. If they're doing 3D, at least give us real platforming, he like what the boost games give us.
>Sonic Generations 2?
God no. Enough with this boost 2 win crap. Unfortunately, this is probably a ly what it is.
>Something new?
"Something new" hasn't worked for sonic in 2 decades.
>New Classic Sonic game with Taxman engine?
This is the best possible scenario, which is why it won't be what happens.
>>339729940
>New Classic Sonic game with Taxman engine?
You joker. Be serious, Sega don't want our money and you know it.
You get mobile phone game with no physics take it or leave it.
Best course of action as I see it is to make both a 3D Sonic game with the best qualities of the Adventures/Unleashed, and a 2D one with the Taxman engine alongside it. Up until Colors, they always had two separate branches of the franchise. I don't see why we can't go back to that, it was tried-and-tested.
>>339730191
MFW animatedjames will no longer be fan fiction
>Sonic Adventure 3
>New Classic Sonic game with Taxman engine
Seem to be the safest bets to me.
I'm fine with anything as long as the chao garden comes back
>>339732208
>he didnt like the best 3d sonic game
>>339729940
Crossover.
>>339736284
When the fuck is Sega going to make a mobile Chao Garden game already so people can fucking shut up about this? These things didn't add anything to the Adventure games. They were only there to pad them out.
>>339730191
>take bets how long until someone calls the boost formula boost to win
>>339732208
>two posts later
>enough with this boost 2 win crap
fucking keksimus maximus
>>339737327
But they were (objectively) fun. I enjoyed them, and so did a bunch of people.
>inb4 w-well if you like it, then you're a f-fag!
>>339737563
That's all fine and dandy but it really doesn't have any place in a main series game anymore which is why I suggest they should make a mobile game with it instead. Think about it. The whole concept would be perfect for mobile and it makes more sense there than being forced into a console game.
>>339737327
Chao Garden worked precisely because it was an extension of another game, and all of the power-ups for the Chao had to be earned through the main campaign levels. By itself it would be a fun time waster but it'll never capture the Tamagotchi or Neko Atsume market.
>>339737327
Autistic vocal minority.
>>339729940
I want a game with varied gameplay like SA1.
I thought all the playable characters were fun except for Big
>>339729940
Are you kidding, Sonic will do what sonic does best and ride Mario's coattails
Mark my words theres gonna be a Mario Maker type sonic game, for classic and 3d sonic generations/colors/lost world levels that anyone can makei wont even be mad desu
>>339739186
>a Mario Maker type sonic game, for classic and 3d sonic generations/colors/lost world levels that anyone can make
>>339729940
All I want is a good Sonic game again. It hasn't been that long, Sonic Advance 1 was well designed in terms of levels and had the classic physics. There, something from around the exact same time as people's beloved SA1/2 and yet was infinitely better.
It doesn't even need to be Sonic, but absolutely nobody seems to want to indulge my desire for momentum.
>>339737198
Generations is not a good game.
Just because it plays around with your nostalgia doesn't mean it doesn't stop having shit physics and literally no difficulty outside of the 3rd boss