Do you prefer realistic female armor in vidya, or the fantasy ''protect the nipple'' armor?
>>339607106
Whatever makes her look cute :DDD
>>339607106
>female armor
>realistic
>>339607106
Depends on the setting
>>339607259
Is that Chibi and CWC blended together?
>>339607106
Realistic. More immersive. I like the mystery of not knowing what her body is like. Sluts showing everything does not do it
a balance of both sexy and practical
>>339607106
>female armor
>realistic
>>339607362
Yes.
practical armor is far better
what bothers me is that from what vague bits I can recall their hair is always impractical, though
I like both.
>females in videogames
>she takes off 'realistic' armor and there's sexy armor underneath
>he doesn't know about the uterus
>>339607106Post the other picture.
they're all good
Each in it's time and place
>>339607510
How else we gonna get vidya related waifus, cosplayers, and fap material
>>339607106
Realistic as in Kitchen armor?
They wore armor in the kitchen?
Realistic. Nothing is better than a cutie grill under tank armor.
>>339607106
>lamellar armour
>with a crusader style helm
>that for some reason has a hinged visor
>and plate cuisses and poleyns
>to top it all off, long unbound hair that's guaranteed to get caught in the scales
2/10, utterly anachronistic and impractical, but she is at least wearing an arming jack.
>why not both?
There is no armor for women because women didn't fight. They're pretty useless in that regard as they are weak and get scared easily (nevermind the other problems with their biology like menstruation and having tits)
>>339607106
I prefer obtuse fringe armour styles.
>>339607106
I prefer realistic settings where females don't fight at all outside of rare exceptions.
It depends on the game, with games like Dark Souls, Warcraft, or TES I'd prefer realistic. Ones that are more cartoony/anime can do the cover the nip and slit ones.
>>339607706
Only thing matters is how sexy the armor looks.
I don't care if there's a girl inside or if it's a titty armor.
>>339607106
What do you need armour for in the kitchen?
>>339607883
this
>>339607106
It depends. I'm glad From games are realistic, and i'm glad my anime games are all about the sex appeal.
>>339607106
realistic armor in low fantasy, bikini armor in high fantasy
>>339607909
Females fight over everything.
>>339607106
Fantasy armors, whether chainmail bikinis or pauldrons to the sky are universally less aesthetically pleasing than the curves of good, practical armor
Give me something based off of seven hundred years of human ingenuity and trial by fire instead of something dreamed up in ten minutes by an art major from California
>>339607106
Since women fighting is already not realistic I would just go full fantasy and make it look hot
How does the breastplate work if they have huge tits?
>>339608005
this
>>339607106
>realistic
>female
>armor
the one decent enough to protect them will be to heavy for them.
they can dress in light armor but it wont protect them.
and any male will still wreck their shit no matter the armor.
>>339608053
yeah
I'll take hot. In realistic armor, I wouldn't even see my character anymore, which would mean my work in making said character has gone to waste.
>>339608005
Ah, yes this. And it's also worth saying that I don't mind ridiculous male armor in high fantasy either. When you're protected by magic anyway, what's the point in wearing a dumb big suit of armor?
>>339607936
game without damage threshold.jpg
game with damage resistance.jpg
fallout 3 power armor.jpg
>>339607862
shouldn't the "idealized" female slot also be using a sword? Archers do kind of dress lightly I believe.
>>339608158
Griffith?
I honestly prefer cute armor/clothes. Long skirt and fluffy frills, something like this, not so sexualized.
What games aside from the Souls series get female armor right?
>>339608140
>the one decent enough to protect them will be to heavy for them.
Armor isn't that heavy.
As long as it looks good, I don't give a fuck if it's realistic or not.
Some realistic armor looks awesome, some realistic armor looks boring. Some unrealistc armor looks awesome, some unrealistic armor looks dumb.
>>339607106
>realistic female armor
So.. fantasy armor? Because the amount of women fighting in armor was extremely low. You have tribes and such ye, but armor clad women? Nothing but a few exceptions
Might as well go with nipple armor because its both fantasy anyway
>>339607106
someone link the nude set
>>339607106
>fantasy "protect the nipple" armor
educate yourself. Pic related.
>>339608239
Griffith is way more cute
>>339608158
Griffith finally got himself a sex change
>>339608273
Realistic as in non-sexualised, as in >>339607862
>>339608239
i think it was supposed to be a rule 63 griffith, yeah.
>>339607862
Why do males need to be sexualized?
>boobplate
>Realistic
>Female armor
Literally does not exist. The crusaders were male. The Roman legions were male. The samurai were male. 99.9% of frontline soldiers in WW1, 2 and today are male.
Women have never in history had enough significant population of fighters and have never had armor made for them.
Any armor that doesn't have a flat chest piece is fucking retarded. Do you want sword blows to get directed at your heart? Seems like a great way to get killed.
>>339608287
this meme needs to stop.
That's how we like our girls armour.
So stfu.
>>339608332
I found the chink in your armor.
>>339608342
But Griifith is way cuter than thatand has a saber, not a straight sword
It depends on the game. If everyone else is wearing sensible armor then the women should too. And no, breast indentions in a chest plate are not sensible. If everyone is wearing some outlandish fantasy armor then whatever, enchanted adamantium two piece bikini is fine.
>Implying female warriors didn't cut their tits off
>>339608319
But that's wrong
It wasn't because of mobility > Protection
It was Murder > Protection.
The capacity to fuck shit up surpassed the ability to defend from those attack by a fucking long shot
>>339608419Female armour is just male armour worn by a female.
>>339608348
Why not?
>>339608490
That's a retarded armor concept if I've ever seen one.
And it doesn't even have the benefits of being properly sexy.
>>339608436
i dunno man, artists can do whatever they want.
>>339608052
subtle bait
What I think people need to realize is that armor in video games doesn't hold the same value as it does in real life. Armor in games are simply points into your defense stat, where as in real life you would wear it to cover parts of your body. So really it just comes down to what you like. Personally, I'm a fan of both in the right situations, I personally don't think every game has to be realistic or be completely practical.
>>339608424
Being a woman in battle is already a great way to get killed.
>>339608319
That's completely fucking wrong. Knights went into battle wearing armor because it doesn't fucking matter how mobile you are if you're a walking fortress.
>>339608590
What's the bait?
>>339608287
The argument about bikini armor is so old that even the Crypt Keeper calls it "grandpa".
Does anybody remember Runescape? The MMO that did realistic armor, and every character was an interchangeable suit of plate mail as a result? You could be a black woman with neon pink hair and it made no fucking difference - plate mail for you. Face concealing helmet.
>>339608246
Variety is always the ticket. Very few games really do go in for the bikini armor anyway, and certainly not exclusively when they do.
>>339608543
Women wearing male armor is not realistic either. They didn't do it in history and it is not tailored for them anyway.
'Realistic' female armor is a complete myth.
>>339608590
>>339608647
Faggot probably doesn't know about half-swording
>>339607106
>Do you prefer realistic female armor in vidya, or the fantasy ''protect the nipple'' armor?
It depends on the game. I like both styles but on completly different games.
I don't care as long as it fits the theme of the game and is fun. If it detracts from the game for much realism then it was a bad choice.
>>339608724
>muh memeswording
stop right fucking now you faggots
>>339608647
memeswording
>>339608724
That's maudhau not half swording, even though it's just backwards half swording they gave it it's own name, because medieval people enjoyed shit like that
>>339608590
just posting pics
>>339608319
I wonder what else was invented in the 17th century...
nah, probably nothing. People just realized they were dumb and took their armor off.
>>339607106
And just what "realistic" armor is your pic based off of?
>>339608732
You laugh but if she was wearing oven mitts she would have the full set, giving her 50% fire resistance.
>>339608809
>>339608805
Halfsword my cock you fucking faggot
>Realistic FEMALE armor
I want realism, but not TOO much realism!
>>339607106
Prefer realistic., since I don't masturbate to vidya and would prefer something that didn't make it look like I'm a massive autist.
But if it's something like Bayonetta where it's part of the character then it's fine.
>>339607387
I only know that armor thanks to XCOM 2 modding.
>>339607106
>realistic female armor not pictured
>>339608720
>>339607106
There isn't a "realistic female armor" because there was never a reason for females to wear armor and there were never any realistic and practical designs made for women only use. The premise of females wearing armor is not realistic in itself.
>>339607106
>manjaw
That's a man in realistic male armor
>>339609015
Realistic =/= Historical
Realistic, but realistic armor for females is just 'man' armor anyway. But some fantasy designs can look good, but most of the time people draw women in armored bikinis and it ruins any immersion the game tries to create.
>>339608626
Well they rode horses. Foot soldiers went to battle in leather armor with a bunch of steel plates inserted into the leather. That shit's heavy. You're not actually meant to march while wearing full plate.
>>339609024
That's not a manjaw you mouthbreather
>>339607106
A woman's nipples and uterus are her most important parts so do you really need to protect anything else?
>>339608886
Looks like something the Cataphracts wore.
>>339607106
Both. Let me choose what the PC wears and as long as the NPC armors make sense in context it's ok. Also, don't make the female version a metal bikini and the male version a tin can.
>>339609015
>>>/pol/
>>339609068
a woman wearing armor now is even less realistic than 500 years ago
>>339607106
Doesn't matter
>>339607106
>Female wears armor
>Gets hit by blunt force
>Bones crumble due to inherent low density
Woman are absolute garbage at fighting
>>339609072
>but most of the time people draw women in armored bikinis
no they don't
the bikini armor meme is way overblown
>>339607862
>realistic
I remember those armors from /tg/ and even they're not realistic to any era or type. Just as much rule of k3wl as anything else on that pic.
>>339607106
>>339608158
>>339608236
>>339608332
>>339608342
>>339608343
>>339608428
>>339608490
>"full plate"
>no helmet
>>339609170
>>339609068
That's the point. A "realistic female armor" doesn't exist because it was never made. If it was a woman wearing armor it was woman wearing armor made for male use.
>>339607717
Boys are a million times better at being all three of those things.
I like both, I like women, I wish I was a women
>>339609010
where is this art from?
>>339607106
top-tier is not wearing armour at alland wearing practical non-sexualized leather garbs instead
>>339608720
It's an issue of internal consistency. If a woman was to go to war, would she wear armor? If at all possible, yes. Your odds of survival skyrocket with armor on. Would the armor look any different? It would be tailored to fit her frame, like any other commissioned armor, but the curves and angles would be near identical because they are shaped that way for maximum survivability. It is realistic that a woman would wear nigh-identical armor to a man the same way that a realistic talking dog would probably be dumb as a sack of bricks and not a philosopher.
>>339609263
>>339607106
>Do you prefer realistic female armor in vidya
Yes, I think it's hotter.
>>339609068
For something to be Realistic it usually has to be based off something Real.
Female armor has never been Real and do is not realistic.
>>339609168
Watching your kind to try and dismiss reality as bogeymen of your choice will never cease to amuse me.
>>339609197
>send women to the frontlines
>they die
>you now last most of your ability to create new soldiers
>>339609239
How would you know they're perfectly made-up qtpis if they wore a helmet?
>>339608886
That's central asian lamellar armour. Kind of a poor man's brigandine, where the plates are held together by cloth or leather bindings instead of being riveted to a textile shell. It certainly wouldn't go with the European late medieval/renaissance leg protection she's got and whatever that fucking helmet is supposed to be.
I love mages in armor.
>>339607106
that armor looks like it is made for defense against slashing, but the rope holding the plates together is cheap looking and exposed, if the armor took a hit, it looks like that shit would cut and fall apart. Also, looks like pretty much any straight sword would find its way in between those scales.
>>339609208
I'm exaggerating, but that's not to say people don't come up with ridiculous designs for female armor. Same goes for male armor too though,
>>339609263
>Female pictured here wearing an *empty* male plate carrier
>>339609168
>Boudica
>Literally one of the 5 females in history who were military leaders
>>339607106
realistic gives me a hard pee pee
skin tight realistic gives me a diamond willy
>>339609403
I accept liberty but heels
Leave it to casual or party clothes, but not fucking armor.
I love woman in heels but this pisses me off so much.
>realistic female armour
No such thing. Only meme civilisations put women in armour, like the amazons or the french.
>>339607371
/thread
Skimpyness is overrated. Skin tight clothes just make you look like a whore anyway give me some armor like Keldry any day
>>339609403
fag
>>339607706
is she doing a heman pose in the 3rd frame? is that supposed to be a double joke or am i overlooking this
>>339607706
>that last panel
I fucking keked.
>>339607106
I prefer to have both. Diversity is best.
>>339607106
>Female
>In any class that requires physical strength
How does this meme keep living?
this is what real female armor looks like
>>339609263
>female combat units
>>339609546
this is so incredibly retarded
delete this picture right fucking now
>>339609335
>It's an issue of internal consistency. If a woman was to go to war, would she wear armor?
She better be a noble and heavily guarded or she's going to be the cumdump of the barracks
>>339608549
It's a play on early plate armor with a lot of chainmail, somewhat realistic way too complicated for period though and loses it's sense since would cost the same as real full plate.
>>339608969
The burden of proof is on you champ. Cite anything describing females going into battle in male armor.
>realistic female armor
You mean a house?
>>339609623
By the power of my dick
>>339607106
>lamellar with crusader helmet
>realistic
>>339609493
it's probably just soft armor, it's china.
you're acting like plate carriers are heavy though, and they're definitely not.
>>339609174
I still love you Vindictus. Heard it just got updated.
Maybe this time I'll go back and finally stomach the mammoth random grind to get decent gear for once.
>>339607106
Both, depending on what the game is aiming to be.
Women can't even take on adolescent males, how the fuck could they ever survive warfare.
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-28/matildas-face-backlash-after-loss-to-boys-team/7456458
>>339609602
It's just a reference
>>339609168
Boudica is usually depicted as not wearing armor. A lot of times when you hear about female warriors, they often come from a level of wealth, influence, or nobility that they ride on horseback and act as commanders rather than front line soldiers. You don't hear about them meeting challenges or fighting toe to toe with other officers or anything.
Joan of Arc is often depicted in armor, but it's your standard plate. If you care about "realism" it's important to remember that all that armor weighs a ton. We're talking 70 to 100 lbs or something. It was tiring for men to march around in and getting women to that level of fitness requires a lot of effort on the woman's part. Dressing women up in a bunch of heavy infantry armor really wasn't done.
So any fictional depiction relies on the artist's vision, really.
>>339609369
No, Realistic has nothing to do with how historical it is. I can't tell if you're trolling or if you're missing the point entirely.
>>339609623
video games are primarily classified in the "fiction" genre
>>339609318
Rune factory something I'd guess.
>>339607106
Realistic. Qt's covered in plate or chain are top tier.
Realistic armor is usually the most unrealistic.
>>339607862
>sexualized male showing much less skin than kratos
>>339609691
That's a good pic
>>339608526
mobility can stop you from getting killed; armor cannot. It's that simple.
>>339607106
I prefer realistic women in vidya: running away or hiding when men are are fighting.
/v/ is incredibly sexist. Gamers are in general, they don't like change and they don't like women in their video games or women having anything to do with the creative process behind them.
Women should definitely be treated equally in gaming. Less bikini and boob armor, more armor such as the kind a male character would win. Less cleavage, less tummy showing, this all for sex appeal.
I absolutely support equal standards for women in games, strong female leads and female game designers.
>>339609630
And that's definitely battle armor
What could go wrong with wearing a giant skirt?
>>339609739
cut that number in half, armor was nowhere near that heavy.
>>339607106
Oh hey. That set is pretty great.
>>339607106
Stupid designs kill me so hard I really love realistic suits of armor. It's not like armor cares about gender or anything, if it suits a certain build then having boobs or not won't change jack shit.
So yeah, realistic armor fuck yeah. If you're going to have women fighting, then have them fight in realistic armor.
...I wouldn't mind some kinky armor for off-time purposes though, fetishes are great.
Women did not fight in medieval war. The entire notion of a female warrior is fantasy. If you're going to portray women in such a ridiculous fashion as wearing armor like men and pretend they go to war with sword and shield, then it makes more sense to portray them in the style of ancient mythology, dressed as goddesses and valkyries. Dressing women up in "practical" armor is not only unrealistic, but it's completely silly as it was literally heresy in the ancient world for women to dawn a man's armor and would be imprisoned/executed for it, just like Joan of Arc.
>no one's posted realistic armor yet
guess i'll do it
what's frustrating about the female armor debate is that centers on the battlefield-esque armor, of knights and soldiers, etc. Which is ideal for a certain type of vidya, admittedly.
Realistically, women in crusade-era times didn't march off into battle, and if they did they disguised themselves and wore "male armor." But there was another type of armor that ladies wore, which was the dress and air of court. While men went to war, women gained power and influence through aristocracy, marriage and money. The full-blown lady-gown WAS the protective armor of the day.
"cutesy" dress clothes are a way more realistic armor choice for women in vidya. Maybe they don't look like they belong on the battlefield... but NO woman of any status would roam around in the widlerness in an armor bikini. They would either be disguised as male, or wearing the full dress of court.
>>339608881
people still wore armor when guns were first invented. your average rich guys big army rarely had people with armor because armor still cost a lot of money. you could have an extra 200 guys with guns for the same price price
theres some australian hero who made a big metal suit and shot a bunch of cops. he only died because he wasnt wearing enough armor
>>339609915
bait
>>339609739
>it's important to remember that all that armor weighs a ton. We're talking 70 to 100 lbs or something
What in the actual fuck. It's more like 40-50lbs. Modern soldiers carry more than that.
>>339608881
>can barely penetrate armor
>responsible for people stop using it
No.
>>339607909
>RRRRREEEEE I FUCKING HATE WOMEN THIS VIDEO GAME SET IN A FICTIONAL UNIVERSE ISN'T REALISTIC ENOUGH STOP HAVING WOMEN IN GAMES STOP IT STOP IT STOP IIIIIIIIIIIIIT
>>339609739
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RR6I-BLKbQ
Protect the Nipple.
Video games are make-believe by default so it really shouldn't be a topic.
>>339609981
the fact that people use this as bait or that you think it's bait kinda proves him right, bait or not.
>>339609915
It's not sexist if women are dumb bitches
>>339609915
I bet she spent most of her time in pain in that chain mail. Her hair probably got caught in it once ever 10 seconds. I know this from experience.
>>339609963
>>339609981
It's not bait, nothing I said was baitworthy, nothing I said was offensive, demeaning or wrong. Why don't you support women as equals?
>come to the thread hoping for some armor smut
>they're debating
>>339609335
>If a woman was to go to war
There is literally no conceivable situation where this could ever happen. If there are no males, the population is already dead from the get go. If there are, there is no reason why men wouldn't be sent instead as men are objectively superior in all physical aspects.
Sending women instead of men to engage in warfare has never and will never happen.
>>339609917
what could go wrong with sending women into battle
>>339607862
>>339609963
Which is totally why fantasy games about women fighitng orcs should use frilly dresses for female armor.
>>339609939
Who's the grill? make up and armor together triggers me but she's hot as fuck
>>339609623
>IT'S NOT REAAAAALISTIC RRRRREEEEEEE
both have its charms, but if the game is more serious then bikini ruins the mood
>>339610020
>can barely penetrate armor
>>339609961
Not all video games are historical or set in our universe. However, if the video games want to stay realistic, they would have to obey the same law of nature as our universe, and therefor a full body armor is more practical than a nipple cover.
Game of thrones is an example of a realistic tv show which is set in a different universe than ours.
>>339608343
crowfall is going to be so DOA it makes me sad because i like the artwork
>>339609915
nigga plz
>>339607106
Neither.
I want female characters to look fucking cool like
>>339609691
I don't care how "realistic" or "historical" or even sexualized it is. It's just that the majority of the time hypersexualized women look either really shitty or are overdesigned weebshit
>>339610032
says the guy complaining that women in video games arent wearing realistic armor
werent women common in conscripted crossbow regiments? i thought that was literally the appeal of crossbows, any retard (even women lol!!!!) could use them
>>339610142
kek
>>339607106
>realistic female armor
>>339610119
I know right? I just want to see some good looking armor, not see a bunch of dumb /r9k/ faggots whine about what isn't realistic because women are supposed to be stupid and dumb and weak unlike us superior godly men.
>>339609915
Except that sex appeal works differently for men and women. A square-jawed motherfucker in full plate without an inch of his skin shown that looks wealthy and confident is already sexually appealing to a woman. You don't need to show man skin to make women horny, you understand? Men and women are different. Their brains work differently. They prioritize different areas. They find different things appealing. Your "equality" is never going to fucking work because it is the matter of defying biology on a scale equal to pretending that we don't actually need to breathe and that breathing is for losers and squares.
>>339610120
women have been in numerous conflicts over history and there are plenty of noteworthy examples, stop pretending like it never happened.
no one is saying that they are equal to men in strength or endurance, but that doesn't mean they can't fight.
>>339610174
No idea.
>Women
>Fighting
If I wanted fantasy I'd play Senran Kagura
>>339610020
>Accounts of muskets penetrating three ranks of soldiers
>can barely penetrate armor
>>339610248
"Practical" armor. There's a difference between a video game having internal consistency and a video game being realistic, dumbass.
>>339610174
http://g.e-hentai.org/g/291684/26dbf4d3e0/
>>339610142
Best one
>>339610210
If game obeyed the same law of nature, women wouldnt be fighting
>>339610256
lol no
>>339610314
If women had to join a battle, it meant that the situation was already FUBAR.
>>339610314
lol
>>339610191
fuck him up yoda
>>339610409
Women didn't fight because of cultural and historical reasons. In a different universe however women could potentially fight, and if that is the case, they would not use a nipple cover.
Do you understand my point?
>>339609915
I know this is probably bait I actually agree with equal standards and actually being able kill female characters and treat them as flawed and not perfect flowers. Also the bullshit where women can't possibly be stronger than men is retarded. Sure the average male is stronger than the average female is true but I know most of the fatasses on this sight aren't as strong as female weightlifters.
>>339610314
this is what /v/ actually believes
>>339610426
yeah, probably, what's your point? it still happened and still happens today.
>>339610334
why is this meme so strong? sure there weren't serf women enlisted for pikers, arbalist etc.
but some nobles did fight, women did fight specially before christianity became so powerful
yes minuscule percent from total population but rule only confirms exceptions
>>339610210
Yeah I don't like seeing female human warriors in games or movies, it just breaks my immersion. But I have no problem with elves or whatever because they're not rooted in our universe like humans.
I don't mind if it doesn't look realistic, but it should at least look somewhat practical.
I'm far more annoyed when a character and their weapon of choice don't match at all.
Like if a scrawny loli wields a giant two-hander while the average Joe uses a longsword. That shit will never not trigger me.
>>339609965
Of course they still wore armor. If you already had armor kicking around, why wouldn't you use it. It's just that from that point forward war shifted from medieval formations to pike, guns, and cavalry. Armor still played a role, hell, the term bullet proofed comes from shooting your armor to show a bullet wouldn't pass through it, but they were less full suits and more cuirasses.
>>339610020
Might not kill you in one shot, but line up a hundred guys and they all get a shot which will knock you on your heavily plated ass and spook your horse to shit if they don't blow it to bits. Then they do the old Crecy armpit stab and your armor has become a giant waste of Florins or whatever money was hip at the time and place.
>>339610314
Boudica and Joan of Arc were more like cheerleaders.
They were symbols, meant to inspire real fighters.
There are no historical records that would suggest they were doing anything by themselves.
>>339610506
Women did not fight because a 10 men with 1000 women can sustain a population while 10 women with 1000 men can't.
So it all comes down to the eggs.
>>339610314
>that doesn't mean they can't fight.
War is about winning, not inclusion. Sending women to do things they are by nature not designed to do is fucking retarded. Wars don't need every person, they only need the strongest and the fittest.
>>339610397
Thanks a lot mate
>>339610129
I dunno
Liberating the Kingdom of France from the English dogs and ending one of the longest and bloodiest conflict in history?
>Lamellar and some weird cuirass looking lamellar with a great-helm and plate leggings.
>>339609765
>>339610176
>My disbelief can be suspended to the moon in the name of tits
Putting a woman on a job that man can above and beyond do better is just ridiculous no matter what era. It doesn't scream "fantasy," it screams "cheap fanservice for virgins"
>>339610549
who makes this shit
>>339610314
Women in general absolutely cannot fight. If they could they would be used in war.
>>339610549
knight (n.) Look up knight at Dictionary.com
Old English cniht "boy, youth; servant, attendant," a word common to the nearby Germanic languages (Old Frisian kniucht, Dutch knecht, Middle High German kneht "boy, youth, lad," German Knecht "servant, bondman, vassal"), of unknown origin. For pronunciation, see kn-. The plural in Middle English sometimes was knighten.
Meaning "military follower of a king or other superior" is from c. 1100. It began to be used in a specific military sense in the Hundred Years War, and gradually rose in importance until it became a rank in the nobility from 16c. Hence in modern British use, a social privilege or honorary dignity conferred by a sovereign as a reward, without regard for birth or deeds at arms. In 17c.-19c. a common jocularism was to call a craftsman or tradesman a knight of the and name some object associated with his work; e.g. knight of the brush for "painter." Knight in shining armor in figurative sense is from 1917, from the man who rescues the damsel in distress in romantic dramas (perhaps especially "Lohengrin"). For knight-errant, see errant.
The horse-headed chess piece so called from mid-15c. Knights of Columbus, society of Catholic men, founded 1882 in New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.; Knights of Labor, trade union association, founded in Philadelphia, 1869; Knights of Pythias, secret order, founded in Washington, 1864.
Please.
>>339610691
Who cares nerd
>>339607106
"Realistic" armor generally looks better and is more attractive for either gender than the latter anyway.
Ideally the designer will have put in some actual fucking effort into researching armor design and will know proper aesthetics but "realistic" armor is a decent stopgap measure since it limits the atrocities that a designer without limits can inflict upon the eyes.
>>339607106
Usually Realistic, unless the game is not known for its realism, then skimpy for slutty/silly characters, realistic with some sensuality to it for more "serious" characters.
>>339607106
Realistic
>>339610210
>game of thrones
>realistic
btw that knight girl is actually dead since 3 books ago the show version is an asspull like pretty much everything since season 2
>>339610549
memes
>>339610630
>>339610748
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_combat
>>339607106
Depends on the game really.
