>18%
>Despite evident passion for the material, Jones rarely musters the persuasive punch needed to bridge the gaps.
>>339485759
Im glad a movie based on such a problematic game is not doing very well
>>339485759
>problematic
what is problematic about it? what problem do the SJWs have with wow?
>>339487142
>>339486887
wrong post linked
>>339487209
Something along the line of "white people are the only good ones, and the monorities (niggers) are portrayed as savages
>>339486887
The film is actually doing very well so far, only critics hate it because its not muh deep drama
Doesn't Rotten Tomatoes have a massive boner for Marvel movies and detest anything that isn't Marvel or Disney?
>>339487507
Not one of those reviews is from a critic
>>339487507
Pixels is actually doing very well so far, only critics hate it because its not muh social commentary
>>339487691
It can't because it's basically just metacritic for films.
>>339487813
pixels made 3 times its budget so yes it did very well
>>339487691
Snyder pls. You made a bad movie. Just own up to it and improve next time. No need to shitpost on /v/ and /tv/.
>>339487697
>Not one of those reviews is from a critic
Im quite sure people working for the Irish Times, Daily Star, Variety, and GQ Magazine are critics
>>339487983
journalists =/= critics
>>339488083
>thank you blizzard defense force 1$ has been deposited into your account
>>339485759
blizzard fags BTFO
>bowie died before he witnessed this failure
>>339488340
> bowie offed himself to keep from seeing this failure
Overwatch miniseries or full series when? You know that\'s coming, and that's where the money will be.
It's sitting at 8.1 on imdb with over 15k reviews as opposed 22. I think the movie will be fine.
>>339488442
all blizzard fanturd user reviews
>>339488340
What does Bowie have to do with this?
>>339488574
His son directed the movie
>>339488574
Xe was very involved early in during the films preproduction, xe was a really big fan of WoW
>>339488442
i'm pretty sure there's more blizzcucks than 15k
>>339488243
:^)
Original guy here I legit thought they were displaying user reviews I was wrong
>>339487507
>muh deep drama
They don't get deep shit, the only thing they knows is pretentious shit that they think it's so deep and realistic...meh.
Btw, this movie is shit, Jones really give up on the story telling and went full fan wank.
> No undead
> No Arthas' story
Good, let it burn.
get ready for butthurt when it breaks 800m$ thanks to China
It's pretty funny, I haven't enjoyed Warcraft since 3 but the reviewers for it cemented by view of movie critics as just as bad as game ones.
They complain about some of the best bits (i.e. glitzy CG, non-celeb actors, fast-paced action) and enjoy the absolute worst bits like the required Hollywood "romance" and baby bullshit while complaining that it should have been LONGER when it should have cut 15 minutes of pathos bullshit and called it a day.
A honest score would be a 6.5 or thereabouts but I guess a "professional movie critic" can't give a "dumb action flick" more than 2 if they don't want to be ostracized by their fellow retards.
It's been reported that in most countries it is released to have so far netted top box office openings so far.
It looks to be another case where the viewer opinions will say one things whilst the money says another.
>>339487868
>Adam Sandler is a terrible actor that makes terribly unfunny movies
>still rakes in a quadrillion dollars every time he decides to take a dump onto a script and turn it into a movie
how does he do it
>>339490937
so Transformers then
so blame Blizzardfags?
>>339490975
see also Uwe Boll
>>339487142
Its not based on wow you fuck.
Inb4 l8 response :^)
>>339487592
>Excessive amounts of fantasy jibber jabber
Hardly a valid critique.
>>339490975
>Adam Sandler
>unfunny
>people actually think the film is good
seen it, it's essentially the shit I hate with what they did to Warcraft upon going WoW - pointless lore and an attempt to make themselves look like "Tolkein" but turns out flat and uninspired
>>339487592
>imagine a film where all the antagonists wear buckets on their head
Sooooo star wars?
>>339491284
sandler hasn't been funny since the early 2000s.
>>339486887
the first warcraft game isn't problematic
>>339490975
>Browses a board that discusses video games.
>Questions why something that is rehashed a thousand times continues to sell.
You already know the answer anon.
>>339491284
If you think he's done anything remotely funny since Waterboy, you're retarded.
>>339488243
No, thank you!
Also guys buy Overwatch ;^)
>>339485759
Movies aren't vidya
