[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Are you going to see the first great video game adaption?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 2
File: Warcraft.png (183 KB, 666x448) Image search: [Google]
Warcraft.png
183 KB, 666x448
Are you going to see the first great video game adaption?
>>
I'll just catch it on the syfy channel in a few months.
>>
>>339432062
There is no way it scored that high, the shills are out in full force.
>>
>>339432062
I'll watch mortal kombat this weekend sometime
>>
File: oh hi durotan.jpg (69 KB, 860x276) Image search: [Google]
oh hi durotan.jpg
69 KB, 860x276
>>
>>339432062
why would i spend two hours of my life watching a movie that is guaranteed to be shit?
>>
>>339432062
>8.1
>this is the power of Blizzdrones
>>
>>339432439
There was literally a RT review that said there was 'too much fantasy' in it.

Like what the fuck. Did people complain about there being too much Sci-Fi in the new Star Trek?
>>
watched in few days ago
solid 7.5/10
only played warcraft 3 for a bit years ago, never played wow
>>
>>339434032
Theres a reason why autists are ill- there is such a thing as too much fantasy.

Perhaps RT reviewers lacked the vocabulary to express themselves in a correct and straightforward manner. But their point likely was : Warcraft has shit fantasy and fails to consistently suspend the viewers disbelief.

Google suspension of disbelief for further info
>>
>>339432062
They seriously fucked up by making the transmogs available to anyone that logs in. I was going to drive to the theater just to get the code.
>>
>>339432193
Yeah, right.
>>
>>339434032
>Did people complain about there being too much Sci-Fi in the new Star Trek?

Why would they? There was practically zero scifi in Abrams' Star Trek.
Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 2

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.