>futuristic setting
>everybody still uses swords
It kind of makes sense though, doesn't it?
Everyone is wearing armor to protect them against guns so they'd never expect a sword.
nice beetle
>>339351581
>realism in videogames
why would you do that? have you forgot how to have fun with games?
it's safer to stab someone in a spaceship than try to fire a gun
>>339351581
if you have good enough reflexes swords will always win
>not knowing swords will be useful again when bullets are made useless by shields
>laser blades because proper weapons are too gritty
>whether they actually slice anything or just do miscellaneous knockout damage depends on the scene
>>339351581
>futuristic setting
>fights are just everyone sitting in their bunkers throwing nukes at each others
>>339351581
It's because it looks cool you retard
>Futuristic setting
>It's set in our universe
>Some retarded "new technological advancement" like extreme vibrations is the reason everyone fights with swords now
>>339353435
why not make a gun that shoots slow projectiles?
>2016
>still no game where guns shoot swords
>>339354351
Why have the gun? You could just throw the projectile slowly.
>>339354404
Because you could get more range by shooting it
>>339354495
You need to clarify when you're talking about an alternate reality where gravity isn't a concept.
>>339354567
a gun that shoots stabilized, pointy rockets at 30 ft/s
>>339354620
So it's a rocket, which is propelling itself after leaving the chamber.
Once again the gun isn't necessary.
>>339354705
Technically you could set a bullet off by smacking the back with a piece of metal. the gun is just a handy tool to carry the bullets around in and point in the right direction.
>>339354798
No, you're full of shit. The only reason the explosion propels the bullet at all is because of the enclosed space inside the gun. If you set off a bullet outside a gun it wouldn't go anywhere you mong.
>>339354798
Confirmed retarded.
>>339354930
you're a stupid. stupid.
>>339355015
Confirmed anal devastated.
>>339351581
>Futuristic setting in America
>Normies haven't all uploaded to the cloud scarfing cyber junkfood
>futuristic setting
>guns have compensators on them to make them "futuristic"
>>339354705
I don't think you want to be holding that rocket in front of you when that back blast goes, m8. if you want to split hairs, then lets called it a recoilless rifle then
>futuristic setting
>war isnt obsolete
>>339355204
You don't have to, that's why RPG launchers exist.
inb4 >dats a gun doe dey do da sam ting
>>339351581
>RPG fantasy setting
>they use swords and guns
I liked FFXII but this was one thing that really bugged me. Why not equip footsoldiers with both? It's weird to have a melee battle on the ground while fighters shoot each other in the air.
>>339355204
>Check out this future gun
>It still shoots bullets and performs the same function
>But it has neon lights on the side! Wow!
>>339351581
>futuristic setting
>everybody is white and speaks english
>>339351581
>Futuristic setting
>War never changes
>Futuristic setting
>War has changed
>Battles in space vessels
>Use guns that penetrate machinery, wires and armor from inside out
Yeah good idea
At closes ranges nothing beats a knife or a club
A fist maybe if you don't wanna go lethal
>Futuristic setting
>Strongest guy is still just someone with the power to punch really fucking hard
>>339355871
But I thought that war never changed?
>>339358385
They were wrong