When did the "muh 60fps" fetish take root? Crysis didn't run at 60fps in 2007, and it still can't run at 60fps on consumer hardware. What happened? Nowdays a PC game is "shit" if it can't hold 60fps on the highest settings.
Shit, I played Crysis at sub 30 FPS at 900p in 2008 and loved it.
I'm really only picky about my FPS in games where it matters. I don't mind a better looking game at a lower frame rate as long as it's not LOCKING me to that when I can do better (PC) or hindering the gameplay in any way.
>>339341921
>and it still can't run at 60fps on consumer hardware.
bait
>>339342307
It can't. Crysis has severe bottlenecking issues that cause the game to drop down to around 30fps on an i7.
>>339342307
I'm sure with a 290X or better you can get 60fps but on the max settings at 1080p, but it's still far from one of the easiest games to run
I had an overclocked 8800GTX above 8800 Ultra speeds when Crysis launched and the game pissed me off with how bad it ran.
>>339342419
>>339342974
i7-2600k here with 570 GTX and I can run it no problem on 60 maxed out at 1080p, stop shitposting AMDniggers.
>>339343469
>he's a Nvidia cuck
>>339343469
nice, a graphics card that launched a full 3 fucking years after the game did
and you're full of shit and playing without AA like the blind retard you are
>>339343540
Yeah thanks for confirming this AMDnigger thread.
When 1080p 60hz monitors became the dominant format.
>>339343469
>i7-2600k here with 570 GTX and I can run it no problem on 60 maxed out at 1080p
Have you played the entire game, measuring framerate the entire time? The game runs fine at 60fps on the first mission with a shit PC. The problem is the later missions.
It's like claiming your PC can run Watch_Dogs real good becuase you get 300fps in the stadium car park.
>>339343592
Thanks for being a easy to trick cuck
>>339343469
>stop shitposting AMDniggers.
You're confused you're talking to sonycucks
>>339343469
u just tested the first area
