This guy played some Civ VI and has quite a bit of stuff to say about it (over prerecorded footage)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qzC5cUQcFk
Here's the footage without the commentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU8VM-jtXHM
Leaked in game model of Napoleon.
>>338859950
>that fucking resolution
He's a big guy.
>>338859950
Looks pretty bad
>>338860170
For you.
fuck off with this Civ 5 reskin
>V's leader scenes have been replaced with a guy standing in front of a picture
Jesus fuck, why?
Cautiously optimistic. Will probably pirate it and wait for it to be on sale unless it's fantastic and I want to play with friends asap.
>>338859950
It's never been so obvious that a game is going to be garbage
>>338860368
Laziness
Cute!
>>338860368
just like V then.
The changes sound interesting, but that artstyle is so fucking jarring.
>>338859950
>encouraging bureaucrats 8%
>>338859950
I hope that Teddy gets thyroid surgery before the game releases
>>338859950
The water looks gorgeous.
>>338860703
V's leaders had props surrounding them and their backgrounds were a bit more detailed than murky concept art paintings.
it's like they don't know how to make the core city building/management part of the game interesting so they just polish the shit out of the game and up in dumb minigames like managing fucking art galleries or other dumb shit instead of improving their games
>>338859950
they should give me VI free because i bought that festering piece of shit Beyond Earth at launch.
>>338860994
maybe because one of them is still in developpement.
>>338861018
Am I wrong if that is my favorite part of the game?
>>338860814
Compared to everything prior to V, not really.
If anything V was the one that departed from the somewhat stylized look of the previous entries. VI is dialing it back.
Also helps that Civics and lots of other shit are being redone completely.
I'm cautiously interested in this new district system, but my one concern is that it would make my favorite mapmode, Archipelago, unplayable due to the lack of open space on those maps
>>338859950
>Teddy finally getting some vidya
I might actually buy it despite the shitty art direction.
>>338861134
>it's still in development!
What will you say when the game comes out and the backgrounds still look like this? V's reveals tended to show concept art if they were still in development, they only showed the leaderscreens when they were done. If that's anything to go on then this is probably what it will look like.
>>338861306
Archipelago will be removed.
We will have
>BIG map
>MEDIUM map
>SMALL map
>ONE BIG ISLAND map
>>338861160
kek, IV and V look more similar than IV and VI. Just because IV was more cartoony than V doesn't mean this is the natural evolution of IV's style. Only the leaders are more in line with IV's style.
>>338861428
what about you?
They said the UI was placeholder too.
>>338861619
Either way, since when have graphics been a selling point in a Civ game?
>>338861712
>what about you?
What about you? Even the placement of Teddy Roosevelt on the screen indicates it'll be more of a Beyond Earth type deal than V, it certainly doesn't bode well. Just throwing out your concerns until it's too late because "in development" is a cop out.
>>338861842
Just because it's not the selling point doesn't mean there's a carte blanche to make them look shit wtf?
>>338860368
well eh at least it's not a fuckign still picture
>complaing about graphics
>in a Civ game
It's always been about if the mechanics are good. That's all that matters.
>>338861993
The lead for Civ VI did the expansions for Civ V, he didn't do Beyond Earth
>>338862109
That's implying the graphics look bad. Which they don't. Especially in motion.
>>338860170
fortub
>>338862147
it's just kind of an ugly aesthetic though
also a lot of people are complaining because it looks like they've made it ugly so it would run on mobile devices, if they're try to make it a mobile game then there's good reason to suspect the game itself will be less complex
>>338862214
That was Taft who got stuck in the tub
>>338860368
>people bitching about graphics
Fuck every single one of you niggers.
You should be talking about AI and gameplay changes, but no, you're acting like 3 year old console cucks.
Who in their right mind gives half a shit about a leader background?
>>338862363
>cartoon graphics for a strategy game mean mobile because of Clash of clan
>cartoon graphics for a fps game mean TF2
>>338862363
The guy in the video makes a point that the zoomed out version of VI looks better than V.
If this is the case, I'm cool with that, because I rarely if ever zoom in.
>>338860994
Waste of resource really. Some of us have aging toasters
>>338862461
>Who in their right mind gives half a shit about a leader background?
do you have any idea where you are, cause we don't play video games
>>338862757
>do you have any idea where you are,
go back to /b/ then
>>338862170
That doesn't mean they won't take cues from Beyond Earth. Teddy's leaderscreen definitely has hints of BE's relatively static leaders (though they did evolve) than it does V's usage of a particular set for each leader. Granted some of V's leader were just them standing in a room.
>>338862629
Personally I would rather have them spending their company's time and money improving the shit AI, not pumping out garbage props that nobody notices
>>338862461
>Who in their right mind gives half a shit about a leader background?
I need proper leader screens for sexual release.
>>338859950
what are the odds they'll make other civs contacting you not yank you to a screen to tell you 'i heard you are friends with england now!'
>>338862871
>Teddy's leaderscreen definitely has hints of BE's relatively static leaders
Yeah you're right, this is just going to be Civilization 4 all over again
god, how will we ever survive
>>338862461
OK, get to it. Start talking about those things instead of complaining about what other people are talking about.
>>338862929
When will we get a separate screen for our captured leader harem?
>>338862929
youporn.com
redtube.com
SengokuRance.com
Get the fuck out of a civ thread and go there you pathetic loser. Christ.
>>338861112
Do they even care about BE anymore?
Just buy the complete edition a couple of years or so down the road.
>2016
>These graphics are considered acceptable
>People will defend this ass 'styleized'
>>338863019
V's leaderscreens was one of the aspects that it did better than IV. Why would you want a regression there, rather than say, getting rid of the shitty hex system that the AI can't used for shit?
>>338863059
I did in the last thread, dumbass.
>>338860368
>>338860994
>>338862629
>>338862904
Yeah, personally, I'd rather have less loading overhead by forcing an entire 3D scene into memory just so Cleopatra can whine that I built The Eiffel Tower as opposed to just a leader model.
Should be easier on modding and/or alternate civ leaders, too.
>>338863191
Because leader screens don't matter for shit.
The back-end diplomacy matters.
The grid matters.
Hell, even the fucking resources matter more.
People who are bitching about leader art need to pull their heads out of their asses and look at the full picture.
I'm not really surprised though considering there were Unchartedfags trying to shill their bullshit in the last thread (no joke). Some people really need to be hanged from trees.
>>338863269
>I have a computer from 2005
You know you can turn leaderscreens into static pics in the options, right?
>>338862629
this. spend all that time making epic cutscenes optimizing the damn game.also, wonder movies ala Civ 2 please
>>338863425
I have a computer from 2014 and it's still noticeable.
>>338863425
wait you can?
about 75% of my games end up crashing because a specific leader shows up, usually Boudicca or Monty
>>338863413
>bringing up Uncharted for no reason
No anon you are the cancer. Also of course people are kind to talk about the most visibly presented aspect of the game, we still don't have meaningful insight into the gameplay even with the hands on ("lol cant say" - Ed Beach)
Please make all the leaders speak english. hearing some brown shitskin wooble wobble in his native tongue did nothing for me.
>>338862929
Best girl
>>338863191
AI can use hexes as well as it can use squares. What it has more difficulty with is logistics under 1UPT. Civ V's AI would not have been smarter with squares.
>>338863540
maybe you should sort that out
Having each continent have it's own name is pretty cool, it's those llittle things that I'm excited for. Hopefully you'll be able to rename them yourself, though.
Is Geoff Knorr still composing the music? It was lovely in civ V.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEKRE2uamyg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFHNOJQimjY
>>338863706
Lol fag.
>>338863715
The 1.5UPT will change nothing in this regard.
>da graphics in my casual board game aren't gud enuff ;(
>>338863706
already confirmed that they speak their native languages faggot
>>338859950
will you be able to have a mass migration victory? send a few million of your citizens to a rival civ and outbreed them?
>>338864156
Yea it's called a culture victory.
>tfw you'll never get your country into civ
They probably wouldn't even make the Seychelles into a city-state.
>>338862871
the civ 5 leaders were pretty emotive though, Harald Bluetooth just straight up walks off set when you take all his cities
>Cleopatra confirmed for Slut leader.
Oh boy.
>>338864349
Literally what mods are for.
>>338864349
R A R E
A
R
E
>>338864156
Memes aside, it would be neat if there was some kind of immigration/emigration mechanic
>>338864375
say goodbye to scenes like that then
I just want good AI, a good soundtrack and gameplay variety.Leonard Nimoy would be great too.
>Caring about graphics in a civ game.
>>338864413
>not Hatshepsut
fucking why? They had her in civ 4, and she was an actual fucking leader and not just some used pussy
>>338864413
Yeah, that really looks like an inbred Greek that never goes in the sun.
>>338864413
if they have to do cleo, they need to do her right. she was notoriously plain looking, so that should be reflected, or she should be wearing large amounts of make up
olive skin, dark hair. make a joke about being stuck inside a carpet
So it sounds like the governments work something like this - each time you unlock a new civic, you get to freely change stuff around, but if you do it on other turns, it costs something (probably just gold?)
And civics unlock through a bunch of techs, but government types are tied to specific techs that unlock multiple kinds at once.
>>338864559
anon, i hate to be the one to break it to you.Good AI isdead
>>338864559
>Leonard Nimoy would be great too
Anon...
>>338864607
Because Cleopatra is more well known. Everybody knows she was some chick in Egypt, meanwhile who the fuck is Hetshepidepp lol?
>>338859950
Damn that music is comfy. Looks pretty good on the whole, has the potential to be great if they don't fuck up.
>>338864635
>After building up my army more, focusing on a settler to establish a new city, and starting research on foreign trade, I run into Egypt's Cleopatra. All the leaders speak in their correct native language, a nice touch as Cleopatra greets me in Coptic. She invites me to visit her city and I agree.
>Civilization VI introduces leader agendas, and Cleopatra's is "Queen of the Nile," which states that she likes powerful militaries and will try to ally with them. Firaxis pulled this detail from her actual life; she aligned herself with powerful men like Julius Caesar and Mark Anthony, seducing them so Egypt wouldn't get attacked. She also has another randomly assigned hidden agenda that I'll need to discover through trade routes or by sending a delegation.
>Cleopatra likes me because I've been building up my army to take out that barbarian camp, but if you don't have a powerful military, she won't give you the time of day. Later, when my army loses forces facing the barbarian camp and I explore too close to her border, our relationship declines. She especially gets mad once I meet and stay on friendly terms with Teddy Roosevelt, whom she dislikes. Rumors and gossip show up about leaders throughout the game; this new system gives you more information to react to and plan your decisions around.
If you carry a big enough stick then she will suck your dick
>>338864635
>if they have to do cleo, they need to do her right. she was notoriously plain looking, so that should be reflected
No, she should be as sexy as possible and have a slut voice. Theodora for Civ VI.
>>338864772
Oh boy, sure do love these immortal god leaders who live for ten thousand years
>>338864735
Nigga they could chop up his civ IV narration and glue it together for civ VI and i'd still take it over any other narrator.
>>338864641
Is this image based on facts or is it speculation, because it looks really neat
>>338859950
>friend's only Civ game was BE
>won't try 5 even though it's infinitely better
>"there's no spaceships or aliens in it"
>he plays grim dawn and witcher 3 literally right after finishing BE
>>338864559
Anon...
>>338859950
Why the fuck teddy sound like a leprechaun?
We need a new leader for India. Pic related, an actual leader of India unlike meme-man Gandhi.
>>338864754
hatshepsut is a level in serious sam, no?
>>338864968
It's speculation and mockup on my part, but I just did it as a visualization from what he was talking about in the video here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUr5nf3ALCg&t=8m58s
>>338864990
Tell him to go play Alpha Centauri if he wants to bitch about it not being sci-fi.
>>338864968
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUr5nf3ALCg&t=9m15s
9:15
>>338865107
because Teddy had a bitch voice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhlzdjPGxrs
btw how is Beyond Earth? did that game ever get interesting? just seemed literally like civ v in space
>>338865239
or I'll just kill him with a pistel
>>338865452
>just seemed literally like civ v in space
You're 100% correct
>>338865457
I mean, that works too but you have the opportunity to make a greater improvement on the world should he take to Alpha Centauri.
>>338865571
he should've liked every single thing I liked if he didn't want to be shot with a gun until dead
>>338865651
anon your pills
>>338865452
>just seemed literally like civ v in space
you're 100% incorrect
the game is still crap. Extension is ok but doesn't change the core issue that the fucking tech progression is boring.
>do you want to research the tech for the building that gives +2 science +1 health, or rather +2 health +1 science
>or maybe a +3 science building
>or the other +3 science building
everything feels so empty in that game, it's depresing
>>338865696
I got two pills chambered you wanna chase the dragon?
>>338865819
Sounds like Civ V :^)
>>338862461
The gameplay changes are for the worse.
Barbarians never did invasion forces. Why make them smarter than they already were? In civ5 without the CBP barbarians never even attacked your cities, just walked around your territory pillaging everything. And they didn't even pillage roads. Just were a nuisance, really.
Buildings being tile improvements is pretty much worse as well. You get a sense of expansion, sure. But if that was the case, the map has to be expanded as well. I really shouldn't be building my wonders on the same border that I share with teddy over there who started 7 tiles away from me bajillion years ago.
After much complaining unit stacking is probably back. PROBABLY. Not that we know much about how it works, but in reality it will be about finding the best combo and rolling it.
Research bonuses are probably an improvement and your current state doing more impact on your research rather than "research X if you're military, research Y if you're pacifisht by turn [integer]". Then again, you wouldn't research sailing if you were in the middle of continent, unless, of course, the fucking tree didn't have it prior to fertilizer.
Same goes for "civics" or what ever they call culture policies now. Seems that instead of choosing them yourself, you get them by either depending on your current situation or what ever you're doing right now.
Global happiness being gone is actually an improvement. I suppose. No more stacking circus, coliseums and such to artificially improve your empire's happiness. Then again, not that happiness level gave you any bonuses in non CBP civ5, besides preventing you from losing production and/or growth.
What interested me was first impression dialogues. Then again, I actually hope that out of the box diplomacy will actually do anything besides "hurr i denounce u, other civs wont want to do anything with u durr, i denounce someone else no war pls" to an eventual embargo. Jokes on you, you didn't embargo city states.
>>338860342
(you)
>>338866370
Uh, what's wrong with invading barbarians? Have you never heard of what happened to Rome?
>>338866370
none of those things are negatives
>>338864641
>wild cards offer strange and bizarre but powerful boosts that dont necessarily fit into a specific playstyle
>MFW late game government: Anarchy
>8 wild card slots. ONLY Wild Cards.
>>338859950
>wonders actually take up space now
>workers don't last forever
>districts
Neat.
Also, it looks a lot better in motion than I thought it would. Its very clean, I like it.
>>338866903
I want to have an adventure with a 13 years old girl!
>>338866976
>wonders take up a tile
but how will i build 20+ wonders in one city now?and how do i know that the AI probably will be able to
does anyone else really hate city states
>pollute the map meaning less places to expand to
>constant notification spam that's hard to keep up with
>seemingly always build defense buildings meaning they're a chore to deal with in wars
>rewards are absurdly overpowered, you can basically throw a bunch of money at them (or get lucky and finish quests) and double your culture or faith output
>because of the way 1upt works, spreading religion to them is infuriatingly time consuming because they keep all their units within their borders and it can be impossible to get near the city and spread religion
>they move their units every turn even when there's no need to and take up a lot of time in between turns as a result
>since other civs don't play by the same rules as you, they can constantly just throw money they don't have at city states to ally up with them
>they get annoyed when you walk through their territory even when you just use scouts/non military units
>interaction is extremely limited, they can't even trade resources
they're a symbol of what's going wrong with these games desu, instead of making the diplomacy with other civs more interesting or making the game more lively in general they add a completely unnecessary distraction that introduces more problems than it solves
>>338867346
are there still city states in 6? I only watched the first part of this vid
>>338866370
Your entire post reeks of "they actually changed something or made it different, that automatically makes it bad!"
Honestly, all of the changes sound like they are increasing the focus and importance of having a military. In Civ 5, you could get by with a minimalist military on most difficulties with the right playstyle. That does not seem to be the case this time.
Barbs increase need for military early game.
Wonders and certain buildings being made into tile improvements means that spamming and creating every building and wonder you possibly can is no longer viable. Instead of being good at everything, you have to decide on a strategy and be selective with what you are going to build in what cities- space is limited. You can't build everything now. This increases military by making invasions and taking enemy cities more important- to get the wonders and space for wonders you could not get yourself. It also gives you a lot of free turns to produce great people or units with instead of simply producing buildings non stop.
The best combo will change throughout the tech eras, and if they do it well, will change depending on the opponents forces.
Culture policies are no more. Culture is now its own tree, that works just like the tech tree, but with different bonuses and unlocks.
>>338867610
Not the guy you're replying to but yea, but diplomacy with them is gonna a bit different. Keep watching.
>>338867707
i don't wanna im lazy but the first part was goo
>>338867346
>they get annoyed when you walk through their territory even when you just use scouts/non military units
I don't remember it happening with non-military units like workers, missionaries and so on. You could build a road or spread your religion without taking a relations penalty.
>>338867346
City states, like many parts of civ 5, were a neat idea that was poorly implemented. I'm cautiously hoping that they are improved for 6
>>338867610
La venta is shown at 17:05 in the fog.
>>338867757
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUr5nf3ALCg&t=16m48s
16:48
>>338861306
might have more ocean resources. Plus apparently just building a city near water give you bonus on discovering ocean travel tech.
>>338863810
Maybe companies should work to fit the standard need of many instead of some few sperghlord that spent $800 on a new nvdia graphic card when their old one catch fire in 2 years
>>338866573
The way its done in civ6 seems to have a method to prevent the invasion without clearing the encampment.
Again, they just were a nuisance without CBP.
>>338866635
How so? They never did anything with happiness.
They never did anything to properly utilize diplomacy besides have AI jew you every trade.
Research bonuses seem to be an improvement, but in reality will probably be a nuisance.
>>338867346
I feel you.
>>338867629
What makes you think they will pull it off? What makes you think that over all that glorified "different playstyles each game" won't be dissolved to "try to get yourself into better tree even if the game actively prevents you from getting to it"?
Civ5 was a disaster already. And got barely fixed with expansions. Now that they're targeting the mobile audience makes me lose faith even more.
City States are in but they work very differently in 6 with a delegate system.
>>338868368
And Alexander will still crowd you out of all of them.
>>338863674
>for no reason
Read the previous thread retard
>>338868462
>that fog of war
>>338859950
Alright guys, time to rev up those reel leeks.
>>338868675
needs more blur
>>338868357
>What makes you think they will pull it off? What makes you think that over all that glorified "different playstyles each game" won't be dissolved to "try to get yourself into better tree even if the game actively prevents you from getting to it"?
Civ5 was a disaster already. And got barely fixed with expansions.
What makes me think I will like it? Maybe because Civ 5 is my favorite PC exclusive game that I have hundreds of hours in split between multiplayer and singleplayer. I enjoyed each and every one of its expansions and Brave New World in particular I feel improved the game significantly.
These are the same guys behind those expansions, and every change sounds like something I will enjoy.
>>338868675
>Gran Colombian
lol, sudacas thinking they're relevant
>>338868675
>Bolivar
Do fucking want.
>>338868675
thats not a real leak. real leaks are at more of an angle, and are much blurrier
>Teddy Roosevelt, as depicted in Civ VI’s full-body animated diplomatic encounters, is a smiling bear of a man. He makes reference to the toys that go by his name in one line of dialogue, which is one of those weird reminders (as if the immortal presence of a single leader weren’t enough) that Civilization’s awareness of any particular historical moment is flexible in the extreme. The leaders, as ever, represent the entire span of their civilization’s existence, lending one aspect of their personality or historical rule as a fixed agenda – a second agenda is selected randomly from a pool of possibilities at the beginning of each new game.
>What that means, in practice, is that you’ll learn to expect certain kinds of behaviour from each leader, but that base personality type will be modified by the second, hidden agenda. In Roosevelt’s case, his fixed agenda causes him to behave aggressively toward any civ involved in a war on his own continent – that’s to say, he’ll look unkindly on violence close to home, while tending to turn a blind eye to military action overseas. I believe, though can’t be sure, that he is much more inclined to take issue with the aggressor in a home-continent war, and that was certainly the case in my playthrough, when Cleopatra entered the fray.
>Unique unit: P-51 Mustang
>The P-51 “Mustang,” an aircraft created by America during World War II, was designed as a long-range, high-altitude fighter to serve in dogfights, escort bombers and even enact bombing missions on its own. The P-51 Mustang was able to outmaneuver the best German Luftwaffe fighters above 15,000 feet and even outlast the efficient Japanese fighters, and by 1943 the P-51 Mustang was in service on every American front.
Ilike these graphics
>>338869569
>Unique unit: Rough Rider
>The 1st United States Volunteer Cavalry, better known by its colloquial moniker the “Rough Riders,” was a regiment recruited and raised by Theodore Roosevelt in 1898 AD to fight in the Spanish-American War. This volunteer regiment included 1,060 ranchers, cowboys, college athletes, miners and other rugged outdoorsmen hailing from New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma and Arizona.
>instead of going to war Teddy challenges you to a boxing match
>>338869682
>Unique Building: Film Studio
>Thomas Edison, the much vaunted American inventor and businessman, created the first film studio in West Orange, New Jersey back in 1893. His film studio was used to capture the amusing larks of vaudeville and theater actors, to display within penny arcades, fairground tents and unused theaters. By 1920, there were a dozen film studios in operation around Hollywood, California, each feeding what would become an American and global obsession with film.
>>338868675
Glad it's nor real, why I had to pay extra for the Inca and the Spanish last time?
Sid Meier should squeeze extra shekels from the rich countries, not from us.
>>338868675
I like the Gran Colombia thing because they've said they wanted more African/South American/North American civs
>>338869569
>that fucking toy plane
>>338864559
>Leonard Nimoy would be great too.
>>338868675
>Denmark
>Ragnar
lol
>>338869943
Thinking of firing up Civ 4 again after all this time. What mods are worth grabbing for it?
>>338868675
>Poland is DLC
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
WE WUZ MEDIEVAL SUPERPOWER
>>338868462
>implying i'm not just going to steal them with great people as Sweden
Love the caroleans as well, Sweden really grew on me after playing it.
>>338868675
>Arabian - Saladin
>Danish - Ragnar
>German - Frederick
>Spain - DLC
I don't think so.
>>338870287
Fuck off Szczyrzyc
>>338870310
Wasn't Spain DLC for Civ 5
How much did Rising Tide actually improve Beyond Earth? I'm aware the game is basically a glorified Civ V mod, but i'm still interested (And don't feel like dealing with getting SMAC running)
>>338869779
What the fuck is this supposed to be?
Several different separate towns?
One town with additional buildings added to it ?
If yes then why is the church or whatever far away from the town, same with the little cluster of houses
>You have to manually build the great wall.
>>338869682
>>338868675
>cleopatra
>elizabeth taylor cleopatra
or
>WE WUZ KINGS cleopatra
>>338868675
>Arabian - Saladin
lol what
>>338869790
>Sid Meier should squeeze extra shekels from the rich countries, not from us.
Israel has never had a civilization
>>338868675
Can anyone confirm this?
>>338870598
I doubt they will make her black
>>338870579
> Builders can only be used a limited amount of time
why
>>338870809
Are you retarded?
>>338870837
Because improving tiles is instant now. So rather than waiting for tiles to be build you now have to wait for new builders to use up again.
>>338870598
How fucking hard is it to make her look like a greek woman. For fuck sake, she even had the most prominent historical example of the greek nose.
>>338870947
makes sense. it can take up to 400 years to build a mine in the early game
>>338870837
because you are now building your empire on the broken backs and blood of your people
>>338870809
It's just shitposting
But here's all we know so far
>India - Ghandi (from various interviews)
>America - Teddy Roosevelt
>Egypt - Cleopatra (from stories about the gameplay)
>China - Qin Shi Huang (from pic related)
>>338870809
Yes, it's all true.
t. Ed Beach
>>338871159
Qin Shi Huang looks like a toad.
>>338870480
There's the core city tile with the capitol building, monument, granary and such.
Then there's district tiles which house part of what used to all be contained in a City proper - the Holy Site has the temple, cathedral, etc., the Campus has the library, university, public school, etc., then there's farms and mines and towns which are tile improvements, then there's the Film Studio which does whatever it does (probably Happiness/Tourism related), and I guess that's a Wonder in there, too?
"Cities" now sprawl across their whole territory.
I hope they bring back being able to name rivers and mountain groups
>>338870651
If they really wanted jew gold they would add the Kingdom of Israel with Solomon as leader
>>338871231
What did you expect?
>>338870650
He was in Civ IV and the Civ Rev games. Don't act like it won't happen, Cleopatra is back as an Egyptian. :^)
>>338864635
>>338864772
>>338864865
People you are all forgetting one important thing
Before everything else they have to get the nose right.
>>338871275
I'm wondering why they aren't, why they haven't.
>>338859950
babayetetetbababatetetettee
>>338871591
Because Israel itself was never important
>>338871790
Poland never even existed yet they are in the game.
>>338871935
>Poland never even existed
>>338872036
Prove it did.
You can't.
>>338872036
It's a fake country
>>338872138
How can /pol/ be real if Poland isn't real?
I want climate change caused by your factories in the modern age and other nations getting pissed at your for your refusal to research renewal resources
>>338871159
We also know that Japan is in because of the samurai from the first round of teaser pics, though not who leads them.
>>338859950
AAAAAA
That's an over exaggeration of his chubbiness!
>>338872036
Can you point Poland on this map?
I want to play with the Papal States
>>338872604
>>338864772
What a slut, I'll have much fun dominating her
>>338872796
Sorry, I'm not seeing it.
>>338872604
/his/tory Anons why is russia so big? Why Didn't other countries gangbang russia then tell it to fuck off?
>>338872796
>/pol/tards trying to rewrite history again
Why am I not surprised?
>>338872976
there was that french feller and that german man, i forgot their names..
>>338871159
>But here's all we know so far
We don't know that there's only 1 leader per faction, so even your information might be wrong.
>>338872976
Because it's a shitpile with a terrible climate that's not worth conquering and it's big because they bred like niggers and spread in all directions.
>>338873120
Some people who've got their hands on the game confirmed there's only one leader
>>338872976
The Empire of Russia aggressively sent settlers east to claim salt and iron
They wouldn't've'd lived there if salt wasn't basically the medieval gold.inb4 shitposts, you can't handle me styling on you
>>338873003
You mean /pol/and. POland has always been a pathetic little wannabe "Empire". They even started World War II over it.
>>338873206
>Some people who've got their hands on the game
...yes, the media copies. No one has access to the real game.
>>338873351
Don't forget about the death camps.
>>338873283
>They wouldn't've'd lived there if salt wasn't basically the medieval gold.
What perfect timing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_3wRicL-QI
>>338873492
Fug, I didn't know he did a video about it, much less use the same gold analogy.
At least he's right.this time
>>338873405
Are you talking about how footage of Poland atrocities on German citizens were passed off as German atrocities on Jews? I wonder what group of people were responsible for that deception hmmmmm...
>There are people who believe England and Americas enemies are all moustache tweedling baby-eating satanic demon super villains and that England and America are always the righteous champions of pure justice.
>>338859950
Roosevelt wasnt that fat what the fuck
>>338859950
Roosevelt looks like Taft after he ate something he's allergic to.
I'm so hyped for Civics and Governments
>>338873714
His cheekbones are distorted (probably for the animation) but otherwise it looks fine
>>338873830
Is that a fucking vampire behind them
>>338873830
>>338873919
>>338874038
Could Roosevelt still be alive and chilling with Mozart?
>>338874305
Don't be ridiculous, there's no way those people are still alive
>>338869569
>>338869682
>>338869779
>Each Civ will have three unique things to build instead of two
Neat
>>338860368
>game is not coming out for 5 months
Don't base your descision to purchase the game off of the footage.
>>338874305
Yeah, just like Oda and Vlad the Impaler
>>338869569
They are replacing the glorious B17 with that crap?
>>338868675
>Saladin
YES
>Arabia
WUT
>>338874412
whatever you say wolfy
>>338868675
SALADIN WAS THE SULTAN OF EGYPT REEEEEEEE
>>338874705
>>338874796
It's not real you dumb niggers
>>338874839
No no, it's real.
t. Leonard Nimoy
>>338875148
That's not black you dumb /pol/poster
>>338861018
It's actually better this time around, because you will have designated cities, instead of every city being universal.
>>338860368
do you not remember vanilla V?
>>338875090
hey wait a minute
>>338860994
but the leaders themselves were paintings as well back in the ye old days
>>338861306
It would still be possible as long as there are a few big ass islands on the map. It would even be an incentive for an early expanse.
>>338862461
Right lets suddenly turn the next dark souls into something that looks like a chibi mobile game. Now don't complain about it at all ok aesthetics don't matter ami right?
>>338870310
>>338870650
>>338874705
>>338874796
>>338866370
>Barbarians never did invasion forces.
this is so fucking blatantly historically wrong
>>338874705
>>338874796
>thinking that matters to firaxis
Saladin appears as the leader of Arabia in 3 games already family.
>>338862363
It looks OK. It's not something impressive, but at least the tiles look more "clean" (and are more recognisable) than Civ V.
>>338868675
Checked it again under a legitimacy checker. Dammit it's fucking real.
>>338875902
Watch the videos, it looks nothing like a chibi mobile game from the typical zoom distance while playing.
Firaxis (or more appropriately, 2K) was retarded for announcing the game with 3 screenshots zoomed in far beyond what you're usually playing as. It's like 2K doesn't understand strategy gamers at all. We want to see the UI and how the game typically flows.
>>338874796
and part of the Zengids
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zengid_dynasty
wow it's almost like that's on the Arabian Peninsula
>>338876806
now thats a leak
>>338862929
Where to find naked version of her?
>>338877179
redtube.com
>>338877179
Nothing found, unfortunately.
>>338862130
>well eh at least it's not a fuckign still picture
Anon did you not know V's leaders were animated? Did you never toggle the leader quality setting in the video options?
>>338877179
rule 34 exists
