https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qzC5cUQcFk
>>338835615
It doesn't actually look that bad in motion.
>>338835615
i like that build up animation otherwise really the only thing i can knock it for is hexes (hurf)
oh well
>>338835735
It still looks like a mobile game though.
>>338835615
looks like a facebook game
>>338835615
>Teddy Roosevelt
Yeah boy.
Also I'm glad they kept the animated leaders. They kind of look like Kalypso-tier caricatures though, not that it's a bad thing.
I just wish the visuals overall were better.
>>338835615
TEDDY CONFIRMED
the new fog of war looks badass
The colors looks a bit darker there? Maybe they listened to the criticism?
>>338835615
Hope redeemed
I thought it looked like shit in the screenshots but actually that looks pretty cool. I love the way that the wonders seem to get built.
>>338835615
>fucking Teddy confirmed
No reason to ever not play America
>>338835831
>>338835884
I don't mind the art style. Running this at 120 fps will look and play great.
The buildings look nice, but the units look retarded.
CIVICS ARE BACK
>>338835615
Graphics still look shit but everything else seems pretty good.
I don't like quill18. He is too energetic and happy. Link me some cynical grumpy analytical pseudo intellectual instead.
>>338836537
Some bits look nice. The units look bad but I really like the fog of war for instance and cities/buildings are fine to good.
>>338836581
>Link me some cynical grumpy analytical pseudo intellectual instead.
Totalbiscuit?
>>338836229
>Running this at 120 fps will look and play great.
completely irrelevant if AI turns take minutes.
Looks so promising!! as a mod maker <3 and the whole game looks nifty
Is there a version out there without some faggot talking over it?
>>338835615
It looks exactly like a mobile game. Menus, UI and all.
Green grass and yellow grass? Is that supposed to be desertic or arid or something? The visuals are horrible. And i play this shit since the original, so don't come to me with that graphics are important bullshit, it's this damn artstyle which gives the looks of some budget title of some nobody studio.
>>338835615
was gonna watch it, then i was like meh, i'll just wait until the game is out to watch streamers
>>338836836
suck cock
>>338835615
Oh shit nigger is that Teddy roosevelt?
>Builders instead of workers that can make tiles instantly
Thank fucking god
>two sience trees
Fascinating
Seems like they have streamlined the game but added on the stuff the streamlined
The grafix still rumb me the wrong way tho
in some weird sense it feels like homm
i kinda like it
You guys know what I really miss in Civ.
In Civ 2 they had these mini wonder clips they would play once you've completed them.
Actually learned a lot from the game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHeyi3UbtX8
I also liked the advisors.
Felt super real (granted cheezy now) to me at the time.
Especially how advisors can give you the wrong advice at times, just like it was back them.
Was super immersive to me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlTIk80uBPg
Gameplay looks pretty good.
Graphics are OH MY GOD WHY THE FUCK bad.
Like even as stylised games go, this is dreadful. The terrain looks so dull and uninspired.
>>338837259
>feels like homm
No it fucking does not.
>>338835615
The unexplored areas having a map fabric look to them is cool.
>>338837270
These clips were also in Civ3 and Civ4, at least the complete games.
>>338837409
I like this as well
Just realised why it felt so weird.
The graphics style looks almost exactly the same as Warlocks MotA.
And thats not a compliment. Warlock's UI was trashy and felt out of place, so does Civ6 .
>>>338835735
this is literally one of only two things i care about in this newest installment. 1. faster AI. 2. better AI.
It won't be better, I know this. They can't make good AI. But at least make it fast.
>>338837435
Ah ok, Never had the complete versions of Civ3 and 4. Only the ripped ones via download.
Civ type games weren't sold in stores here at the time.
The graphics remind me of Age of Empires Online, which I kinda liked.
It has its charm.
The leader animations look really cool. Looking forward to discovering the new leaders.
>>338835735
>>338836148
oh REALLY !!
fuck the noobs who thought it would look bad in motion
fuck. you.
Ice cream? I love ice cream!
>>338837810
>noobs
2006 go home
>>338836581
Arumba
>MFW THAT LEADER SCREEN
HOLY FUCK IM SOF UCKH HYP ED
>>338838087
>implying this word is not vomited by all the players on every online games ever even today
>>338838274
>hyped
2006 go home
Sounds like it has more depth this time. I definitely would give Civ VI a try. Maybe pirate it and if it's a great game, I'll buy it.
>a warmonger who dislikes warmongers
So this guy is the new Alexander?
>>338838421
>like, that is SO 2006! lamerz
why is it that nobody at firaxis had the thought that, in a game where you lead a civilization through the millenniums of human history on a truly epic historical scale, making the game look like a p2w tablet game might not be a good idea?
>>338835615
>Get's b-roll.
>Doesn't cut out the black transition screens they add to make it easier for media to edit the footage.
>guy receives the privilege to talk about and show gameplay footage
>it only does praises
Yep, i'm certain this ain't biased at all. Remember people, every new release it's the best game in the series according to the marketing. Offcourse, that only last until the actual thing officially release.
I seem to be late to the party, but that looks absolutely fucking disgusting. What a cheap generic revolting art style.
Another good series down I guess.
>>338836229
It's going to look like ass and run like ass this is fucking Firaxis they will find a way to fuck it up somehow.
>>338836229
>120fps for a 4x game
fucking retarded
>>338837409
>>338837435
I'm sorta hoping that it goes from map fabric to a modern looking map around the Industrial era.
>>338835615
I had an IGN upload of the gameplay in my suggested videos and they made it private while I was watching lol
I've just realised that the UI and font used in the UI reminds me of the Warlock UI, and that wasn't the best looking UI it looked cheap.
>>338838462
Alexander doesnt like warmongers?
I know Alex is a dick regardless and will find reasons to get mad at you, but so far, me being Hitler wasn't one of those reasons
Usually: "You're near me", "City State BS" or "Im a fucking faggot"
>>338835983
Also the backgrounds are static.
Shame, aztec or indonesian intros looked great in CivV.
>>338839112
why the fuck not? you are retarded
>>338838884
>>it only does praises
no. sometimes he just describes stuff. sometimes he says he doesn't know what to expect.
what do you want? he obviously likes CIV V and he is hyped. why would you even watch this, if you don't already like the previous civ. nigga please
>>338835615
Looks too much like an iPad game or some shit, but everything else is good.
>>338839112
>I'm retarded: the post
two tech trees sounds like a great way to make science not as dominant as it was. it kind of hurts variety if you have to rush the science buildings as fast as possible every time with every civ.
>>338839136
I think that I read somewhere that the old-timey map effect for the fog of war remains irrespective of era.
>>338835615
>"Global happiness is no longer in Civilization VI."
Okay, I think I can live with these graphics, take my pre-order already
>>338839403
>why would you even watch this, if you don't already like the previous civ
Who says i don't? Liking previous games doesn't automatically makes me accept everything at face value. There was no critiscism in that video. I don't expect a review, but i certainly won't give credibility to someone who doesn't experience a single moment of "You know, this thing here feels a little off". Nothing is perfect in this world, this game won't be any different.
>>338835615
This looks like absolute trash. The worst thing about it is it looks so gay. I literally mean gay, with the brighty,disneyesq colours and playmobile looking terrain/cities. I mean look at the scout unit symbol. Its a happy chappy dog with a smile on his face. How the fuck are you meant to wage war looking like that.
>>338839403
he's obviously biased as fuck
>Gets picked by marketing to show their game
>Gets flown out to their HQ to get special treatment
>Get to play the game
>Comes back with marketing selected footage to show off
yeah he would totally criticizes the game he got flown out to play
yeah he would totally not be biased
yeah he would totally shit over this game he was flown out to play
>>338837270
i miss cleo
>>338836758
DABID!!!!!!!
>>338839716
>>338839746
so you will try to cherrypick what you feel off in a game 5-6 months from release instead of trying to enjoy yourself and be hyped?
okay. i understand the guy, i would be pretty happy and hyped if i had the chance to play a for a bit before everybody
why
>>338839740
>waging war with your scouts
???
Why is Gabe the leader of USA?
>>338840047
>>338840067
>>338840067
If he were, it would be a nicer place.
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS UI IT LOOK SO FUCKING SHIT?
I mean I know it's a mobile game but come the FUCK on?
>>338840043
literally not the same guy, but he's obviously biased, you can't deny that he's biased.
you should watch person that aren't biased
>>338840291
Quill18 says the UI icons are placeholder.
>>338840067
He looks like he has bees in his mouth
>>338840170
>If he were, it would be a nicer place.
no it wouldn't, valve doesn't give a fuck about you, they just want your money
>>338840406
The icons are obviously missing but the overall look is so fucking cheap and... Sims?
>>338840067
why is he so fat?
The road changes sound fucking retarded I don't want to leave it up to the AI to build roads for me, especially when I may have an opponent plot their city where the AI decided to build it.
>>338840134
>kids with disposable income, having a fun time
>security guard working in the weekends
>>338840369
well who's watching the video to know if it's good or not, i'm more curious about the details of the gameplay.
>>338840406
The whole UI better be a placeholder. It looks like shit.
>>338837435
>>338837270
Best were the Alpha Centauri secret projects.
>>338840469
>>338840645
"A lot of the user interface stuff isn't done yet"
>>338840470
dunno, he wasn't THAT fat
guess they wanted him to seem more realistic to modern day americans
>>338840470
he was never THAT fat
Honestly the game looks great. The graphics and the UI looks much better than in Civ V.
>>338840525
i guess it was a proud elderly man with disposable income in a restaurant having a good time
so much disposable income
>>338840678
I get that, but the style itself that they're going for looks bad. Hopefully it'll change significantly.
>>338840291
That is honestly Flash-tier on a technical and aesthetic level
>>338840823
THICC
>>338835615
As much as poeple complain about the graphic, it has more visual clarity there ever before. I can only hope it stay that way in late game clusterfucks
>>338840823
>>338840823
i suppose she's considered overweight on /v/
>>338840291
They did say they have 5 months but you probably have a good point anon. On the other hand it looks like it was edited to not show the actual icons and stuff.
They did edit the footage so it makes sense that they wouldn't show off all the game has to offer. Besides, it definitely looks like they altered those icons. Times New Roman also looks pretty shit on that UI. Also a little bland but hopefully that changes.
>>338840823
i had to reload the fucking page, that landplanet fucked up my browser
>>338835615
Holy shit, how awful it must be to have a voice that terrible.
>>338840823
I remember when I was a kid and our dogs were getting fat, we use to take them to the beach so they can run around and shed some weight.
I feel the need to take this thing to the beach.
>>338837270
I miss the palace/throne room.
And the advisors from Civ 2.
>>338841037
they copied the AOW3 old-map style
>>338838859
The b-roll doesnt have dark transitions though, he is just rewinding and you get that while his video loads.
>>338841250
And release it back into the sea where it belongs?
>china can complete wonders with a builder unit
this sounds busted
Who's the narrator this time?
>>338841538
It looks like wonders take up a tile now though, so you probably can't build all of them that easily.
>>338841538
Not sure wonder spam is a thing any more. It's more about picking and getting what couple you want.
>>338840823
I want to slap it with paddles
>>338841793
>implying it's not definite cityspam and wonderspam now
![warlock-master-of-the-arcane-1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/zyXj1rf.jpg "warlock-master-of-the-arcane-1[1].jpg")
>>338840448
Gaben is a libertarian, and anti-corporation, etc.
If you watch him give more free form lectures his political and ideological views really show, and he seems a good guy to have in charge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8QEOBgLBQU
>>338841037
>>338841258
>a good feature copied from another game
Nice. We need more of that. I really dislike when some good idea is only stuck in a single game, rather than spreading like cancer, as all good ideas should.
Still waiting on someone to copy Mount&Blade's combat and battle scale.
>>338841936
here this interview video is more recent
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdSKWKZFdrU
>>338841936
>libertarian
>anti-corporation
BAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.gameinformer.com/games/sid_meiers_civilization_vi/b/pc/archive/2016/05/25/making-all-the-right-moves.aspx
>After building up my army more, focusing on a settler to establish a new city, and starting research on foreign trade, I run into Egypt's Cleopatra. All the leaders speak in their correct native language, a nice touch as Cleopatra greets me in Coptic. She invites me to visit her city and I agree.
>Civilization VI introduces leader agendas, and Cleopatra's is "Queen of the Nile," which states that she likes powerful militaries and will try to ally with them. Firaxis pulled this detail from her actual life; she aligned herself with powerful men like Julius Caesar and Mark Anthony, seducing them so Egypt wouldn't get attacked. She also has another randomly assigned hidden agenda that I'll need to discover through trade routes or by sending a delegation.
>Cleopatra likes me because I've been building up my army to take out that barbarian camp, but if you don't have a powerful military, she won't give you the time of day. Later, when my army loses forces facing the barbarian camp and I explore too close to her border, our relationship declines. She especially gets mad once I meet and stay on friendly terms with Teddy Roosevelt, whom she dislikes. Rumors and gossip show up about leaders throughout the game; this new system gives you more information to react to and plan your decisions around.
>>338842332
I like the part where you watched the video I linked and commented on it, instead of sperging out like a retard. I really enjoyed it.
>>338841421
Yes it does. Watch the video.
>>338842413
No, it doesnt, you imbecile.
The black screens are from the guy rewinding the video, not from the actual video.
You can quite literally hear him say stuff like "let me try to find X", then you see a black screen, and you are back to something he already showed before.
>>338835983
Agree but they don't look to bad. His model has a ton of detail and that animation is smooooooth.
Stalin back?
>>338842540
Why the fuck are you skipping the the first 3 minutes of the video with the super awkward black screens that aren't present on other sites B-roll because they fucking edited it out?
BIG STICK TEDDY
>>338842675
Other sites don't have the guy presenting rewind all the time. He is clicking through the duration bar and thats when the black screens appear.
>>338842675
B-rolls all have black empty spaces in between them, I think he changed the video file after the beginning as you can see the VLC pop-up display the filename.
>>338841936
>>338842402
Valvedronea everyone.
>>338842882
Watch the fucking video, you moron. Hear the guy talk about what he values rather than waving a dictionary like a sword.
>>338842882
it's so fucking apparent, he must be blind since he doesn't see it
>a Civ thread just turned into Valve debate
Just another day at the office.
It looks like shit, I really hate the aesthetic. It's not like Civ 5 was a demanding game in the first place, the only reason it gave systems trouble was because the ai inherently needed to burden one cpu core and couldn't be multithreaded. I doubt that's even something they can fix for civ 6.
>>338843619
>I doubt that's even something they can fix for civ 6.
yes they totally can, they were able to fix it with civ5 but instead fired most of the programmers
The graphics are bad but I like them, clean.CIV 5 was incomprehensible
>>338843619
It's a completely new engine, there is no excuse.
>>338843619
Yeah I like the water but the land just looks like fucking ass.
It looks pretty damn good.
>>338835615
fuck off, quill18
>>338835615
Looks pretty good, can't wait for it to be playable after the first expansion pack.
>>338840661
This.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY57ErBkFFE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGCaACqy1Ro
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh-ZcdO5fe8
>>338835615
>Civics are back
This is the one thing I asked for. I'm a bit more hopeful now
>>338835615
>gameplay
>it's actually just trailer b reel with an autist talking over it
okay
Looks pretty good.
>>338844198
>Civics
what is that?
>>338836112
>>338835615
I don't mind the new graphics but it should be said that the faggot who made the video desaturated it, probably to appeal to people who complained.
Here's the raw footage:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU8VM-jtXHM
>>338844673
go play civ 4
Just as I predicted after seeing the cartoony look of the game, the diplomacy screens are literally caricatures.
>>338844853
if you don't want to say that's fine, no need to be an asshole about it.
>>338835615
Most are decent improvements, but seeing that video just makes me wish they made the tweaks a mod for CIV5 so we can play it with decent graphics. This aesthetic style really isn't working for me at all. I hope they change it before release.
>>338844673
Civ 4's equivalent to 5's social policy system. It was much better
stalin better be back.
I hope they just don't add the same old fucking people again.
My favorite Civ is 2, and I played a bit of 4 and it was ok. Which Civ is the best? Does 6 look any good?
>>338844717
he made the video by... recoding the video player as it was playing...
>Teddy
America is saved
>>338844961
unfortunately, this is not what they went for
>>338844193
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY57ErBkFFE
How could they predict the future so well? I mean, they themselves censored Liberty Leading the People. How the fuck was old Firaxis so good?
>>338844984
Thank you, atleast you're not an asshole.
daily reminder that this game will suck as long as it has one unit per tile or something similar to it
Pretty fancy
>>338845067
Are you a retard?
F
>>338845058
What we know so far
America is Teddy
Egypt is Cleopatra
China is Qin Shi Huang
>>338845256
I like and prefer 1UPT.
>>338845256
Yeah because stacks of 20 units running around sure were fun.
Now that Teddy is confirmed, post your hopeful leaders
>Stalin
>Churchill
>Sun Tsu
Why the fuck have they just glossed over WWII and Cold War figures? Too recent?
>>338845378
This
>>338842373
>Cleopatra is Egypt's leader
Bullshit. If they wanted a historically relevant female leader for Egypt they could have used Hatshepsut. They literally had her in Civ 4. Instead they went with the woman whose greatest accomplishment was fucking two dumb Romans
Do you think they'll have hitler this time
or is everyone still scared of featuring one of the most notable world leaders in history
>>338845346
if you watch the video, he stops the player with his mouse
>>338844961
At least they actually speak in their languages unlike Civ Rev's foreign sounding gibberish. Still, it all looks to be a step down from what V had. Maybe that means we might get multiple leaders in expansions.
>>338845460
>>Sun Tsu
Nope, it's Qin Shi Huang I believe, see
>>338845373
Who else would it be?
>>338845319
rome was build in a day!
>>338845319
It will be cool for the first time but after that you are just going to skip that shit.
>DLC adds new leaders for each civ
>Largely the same, but small differences in bonus and mainly for aesthetics
>No more arguing over what leaders should have made it in for a specific civ, can just choose whoever you want
Would you buy it? Or is the idea shit?
>>338845571
Kingdom mod when?
>>338845515
Everyone can see that, retard. How does that have ANYTHING to do with what I said? Holy shit you are dumb.
>>338845465
the game is called Civ
Hitler never led a civilization
just a bunch of fedoras in costumes that illegally took over a country
>>338845596
Caesar, you´re drunk. Go home.
>>338841936
these grfx are awful
>>338845695
And Teddy led a nation made out of immigrants from all over the world, your point is?
>>338845630
>Largely the same, but small differences in bonus and mainly for aesthetics
Shit idea. If I just want small changes I'll download a mod, not give lazy devs my shekels.
>>338845695
if your country can get taken over by a bunch of fedoras in costumes then maybe it's time for a change of leadership anyways
>>338845256
there was a mod for civ5 that allowed stacking, it was pretty neat
>>338845421
unless each unit has significantly more impact on the game, you're just going to have 20 individual units instead
>>338839707
>"Global happiness is no longer in Civilization VI."
Thank fucking god. I'm tired of Civ having such strict limits to how I can expand.
Any word on how they castrate your expansions in this game?
>clicking and sitting and waiting for hours on end counts as "gameplay"
>Uncharted gets slated on /v/ for having no gameplay even though it has tonnes
kek, never change /v/
>>338845847
The main point is supposed to be the leader, not the small bonus changes
>>338845851
Well the Weimar republic was unstable as fuck anyway.
>>338845890
Uncharted players, everyone
>>338845421
Better than having to play a sliding block puzzle every time you need to move more than one unit somewhere.
>>338845881
cities need amenities to be happy and housing to expand past a certain point.
>>338845460
>Why the fuck have they just glossed over WWII and Cold War figures? Too recent?
Yes. They're polarizing
>>338845690
recording from the screen like that can have impact on the quality of the end video
but i guess you just want to shit on other people, you must have a really sad life
are there gonna be those short info scenes where its a drawing and a quote like in Civ 5
when you build a wonder?
>>338846037
CIV players everyone
>>338845460
because those leaders are all shit or memes.
Not thrilled with TR as the American leader choice. I just thought there are better choices like Lincoln or even Nixon if they want to go the modern, cynical route.
They already emphasized exploration and adventure as a thematic idea driving the game's presentation, so Teddy fits the bill. But I just think TR is one of the most overrated presidents by the internet.
>>338845695
i'm not denying that hitler was a shit leader in the end, but WW2-era germany was a powerhouse.
>>338845319
better
>>338846158
>churchill was a great leader but will never be included because he was RACISS WAAHH
just shoot me family
>>338845890
please be bait
>>338845890
>people talking about a game
>bring up something completely irrelevant other people were talking about in a different thread to stir shit
kek, never change /v/
>>338846249
churchill was a fucking shit leader
>>338846198
i think they went for him because he might have been more military focussed
>>338846158
>Stalin
>shit/meme leader
I've heard some stupid shit in my time, but this reaches new levels.
>>338846380
His "agenda" is actually that he likes peaceful Civs and fucking hates warmonger Civs.
>>338846363
this better be fucking bait
>>338846225
an unsustainable powerhouse
if they added hitler, the game would be banned in germoney
>>338846459
>warmonger
hope they removed that penalty
>>338845460
Jesus
Éamon de Valera
Shakala
Can we not have a civ thread devolve into /his/ shitposting for once, please?
>>338846557
There will be a more justified system, so you will receive less penalty for attacking a leader who denounced you
>>338846380
http://franchise.civilization.com/en/news/2016-05-theodore-roosevelt-leads-the-americans-in-civilization-vi/
>It should come as no surprise that America is represented in Sid Meier’s Civilization VI. The Americans have been a fixture in the Civilization series since its inception 25 years ago, and in Civilization VI they are being led by the nation’s 26th president, Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt.
>Roosevelt took office following the assassination of President McKinley in 1901 and, at the age of 42, became the youngest United States President in history – a record he still holds today. Roosevelt championed his “Square Deal” domestic policy, comprised of three basic ideals: the conservation of natural resources, greater control over corporate plutocracy, and consumer protection.
>His efforts to regulate corporate “trust” monopolies earned him the nickname “trust buster.” He established the United States Forestry Service in 1905 and fought for the conservation of millions of acres of federal land, which are still protected to this day. Roosevelt also coined the iconic phrase "speak softly, and carry a big stick," describing his form of foreign policy of negotiating peacefully while simultaneously threatening with the "big stick." Roosevelt described this policy as “the exercise of intelligent forethought and of decisive action sufficiently far in advance of any likely crisis.”
>>338846757
>Unique unit: P-51 Mustang
>The P-51 “Mustang,” an aircraft created by America during World War II, was designed as a long-range, high-altitude fighter to serve in dogfights, escort bombers and even enact bombing missions on its own. The P-51 Mustang was able to outmaneuver the best German Luftwaffe fighters above 15,000 feet and even outlast the efficient Japanese fighters, and by 1943 the P-51 Mustang was in service on every American front.
>>338846757
>you will never rub teddy's big stick while speaking softly into his ear
>>338846425
he was a strong leader who kept his country together
by that logic tito and yugoslavia would also be in civ
>>338846860
So are we back to just one unique unit per civ?
>>338846860
>Unique unit: Rough Rider
>The 1st United States Volunteer Cavalry, better known by its colloquial moniker the “Rough Riders,” was a regiment recruited and raised by Theodore Roosevelt in 1898 AD to fight in the Spanish-American War. This volunteer regiment included 1,060 ranchers, cowboys, college athletes, miners and other rugged outdoorsmen hailing from New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma and Arizona.
>>338845460
stalin was in civ a lot till civ 5?
still its bullshit.
>>338846860
That's what grass looks from a satellite image, they are doing it wrong.
>>338846757
>speak softly, and carry a big stickP-PLEASE DO
>>338846956
It's high noon.
>>338846956
>Unique Building: Film Studio
>Thomas Edison, the much vaunted American inventor and businessman, created the first film studio in West Orange, New Jersey back in 1893. His film studio was used to capture the amusing larks of vaudeville and theater actors, to display within penny arcades, fairground tents and unused theaters. By 1920, there were a dozen film studios in operation around Hollywood, California, each feeding what would become an American and global obsession with film
>>338846951
Not exactly, see
>>338846956
>China can insta build wonders
Waiting for filthyrobots tier list, shud b gud
>>338835735
This.
>>338846459
Shouldn't Teddy's agenda be to have a big military to threaten other civ to become peaceful?
>>338846889
that's a fat dog sadface.com
>>338847021
Fucking faggot
>>338847045
So every civ has two UUs and a unique building?
>>338835884
I want the children to leave.
It looks like a civilization game -- something which pre-dates facebook a decade or so.
>>338847021
>>338846889
Stop being such sluts, anons. Jeez.
>>338847126
America does.
It might be completely different for others.
>>338845847
Civ games are made up of small bonuses that can snowball the game, I think you're forgetting that.
>>338846425
>mismanaged his country so badly that 5+ million people starved to death
>good leader
>>338845890
>Hey guys, remember this game? Please pay attention!
>>338847163
Or maybe one of the UUs is tied to the leader (like Rough Riders are obviously tied to Teddy Roosevelt) allowing for multiple leaders?
This is just my speculation
>>338846757
>Roosevelt championed his “Square Deal” domestic policy, comprised of three basic ideals: the conservation of natural resources, greater control over corporate plutocracy, and consumer protection.
American need this desperately right now...
>>338847180
Speaking of snowball, has anything been mentioned yet that prevents this? Late-game snowball in MP was the most boring shit.
>>338846468
He was a great wartime leader, he was a mediocre peacetime leader.
>>338846921
>by that logic tito and yugoslavia would also be in civ
Except yugoslavia wasn't even close to being as influential or developed as a civilization as the Soviet Union/Russia. I'm not sure how you jumped from the subject of Stalin's leadership to including Yugoslavia.
>>338847142
make us
>>338847268
Well the one of the goals of Civ 6 is that they don't want you to use the same strategy over and over
Different playthroughs will be a lot more distinct
>>338847268
They're bringig back stacked units so I guess the focus isn't solely on having a more advanced unit, science dominators probably won't be as strong as say a production dominator that can pump out more units even if they are weaker.
>>338847354
the soviet union wasn't very influential.
all they did was bully neighbouring countries into being communist and failed at invading others
they left russia in a terrible state
>>338835735
>game doesn't look that bad with motion blur
>>338846425
i remember the original civ 4 encylopedia mentioned stalin somewhere as a horrible leader who killed millions of his own people, and who's only real achievement was driving out the germans in WW2. then they added him in the expansion pack anyway.
>>338847427
>science whores like korea can't turtle up and shit out a space victory in under an hour
thank god
>>338847427
>They're bringig back stacked units
Uhh not exactly, the system is still largely 1UPT, just with more sense like having some support AA guns embedded with your infantry.
>>338847201
>""misamanaged""
>transformed agrarian backwater shithole in modern industrialized superpower that rivaled the whole of the Western World, including the US, a country that was bearly touched by war, despite having been unimaginably shafted during the war and after-war deals compared to the West
>The most commanding figure in diplomatic gatherings, by the West's own admission
>"Bad" leader
This must be one of the worst memes around here.
>>338847045
I sure hope this isn't what cities will typically look like in industrial times. Like a bunch of parks separated by narrow paths.
>>338847237
Well, this time, only the leader is modeled, so maybe they'll feel more inclined to multiple leaders this time instead of Civ V's leader scenes that were heavily modeled.
>>338847268
at the very least, science isn't going to be as strong since the tech tree has been split into a science tech tree, and a cultural tech tree.
>>338847537
>Leaving any victory condition besides domination
Anon you're not playing the game right.
>>338847427
It's semi-stack.
Two unit combines with each other. Not sure if it two attack unit (2 warriors) to become a superunit thought.
It sound more like 1 attack and one support (1 warrior + 1 battery ram). Where the warrior now have a bonus taking down walls
>>338847489
>the soviet union wasn't very influential.
I hope you're joking.
>Leonard Nimoy wont be doing the voiceovers for intros/techs anymore.
I know it was super minor but was still neat for the old Star Trek nerd in me.
>>338847624
Infantry, vehicle, air units all stack, of course the same with workers, or builders as they're called now.
>>338845319
>>338846229
they just need to make the grass look better.
