Find a flaw
You literally can't
i literally can't
It can't do 4k 60fps on Ultra for modern games.
>>338482964
which single card can?
Green on black is ugly
Something will probably come out a year to 3 years from now that totally outclasses it and is somehow cheaper.
Too expensive
>>338482994
It's a flaw, init?
>>338483020
It's almost as if you can see into the future.
>>338482994
it's a new card, you're acting like it's a no brainer to not be able to do 4k 60fps.
the GTX 1080 is weird, it does well above 60fps on 1440p but it's well under 60fps for 4k. I'm waiting for the TI edition. Even then I'm probably going to wait for whatever comes out in 2018.
>>338483145
>>338483127
i'm waiting
>>338483160
waiting for what, your brain to process what I just said?
Who cares about the flagships other than rich peeps and people who misallocate money.
The vast majority care about the value cards or mid range like 1070, 1050 etc.
>>338483020
The problem there is that 3 years is 3 years away.
>>338482806
overpriced.
for technical flawes wait about 3 years.
>>338483145
I'm hoping it drops the price on a 980ti don't really care about VR until it's more of a "thing" than in the beta stage
>>338483020
source????
>>338482806
Why do i have the feeling that they are hiding some shit again it sounds to good to be true
Looks nice but overpriced as fuck. Say what you want about AMD, my 390 costs less than half and is maxing everything out no problem
>>338483203
waiting for a single graphics card that can do 4k better
go on lad
So I was looking at picking two of these up for SLI.
The question becomes, what do I do with the two 980s I have now? Is it possible to SLI secondary cards and dedicate them to PhysX?
>>338483424
Everywhere on the internet knows about the new architecture nvidia plans on revealing next year, fucking google it yourself
>>338482806
in 18 months it will perform worse than a new 60-tier card
>>338483048
get a job or save up enough welfare checks
>>338482806
Can it do Witcher 3 and Total Warhammer at Ultra?
>>338483486
>what do I do with the two 980s I have now?
Sell them or don't upgrade.
>>338483486
Why would you pick these up when yu already have 2 fucking 980s? Are you stupid?
>Find a flaw
It's an Nvidia card.
>>338482806
It's not the Ti.
Speaking of, what the fuck does Ti even stand for?
>>338483424
fuck you
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-pascal-gp104-gpu-gddr5x-leak/
>>338483486
Good goiym
>>338482806
Will probably have a terrible bang for buck in comparison to the 1070
>>338483661
Technical Improvement
>>338483661
Titanium.
>>338483573
At 1440p yes my friend
>>338483631
Yeah, basically. I like the shiny new thing with the big numbers.
>>338483287
It was the same two years ago
What the fuck
GP104
Less than 3K CUDA Cores
No HBM2
Overpriced
4K performance still sucks
>>338483661
Tits, innit
>>338483782
Well I'm still using a 1982*1080 monitor so I don't care about resolutions bigger then that.
But at 60FPS?
>>338483798
dang, that's a good aegument though
>>338483245
>poor people and NEETs care about the value cards or mid range like 1070, 1050 etc.
fixed
this thing has a 10fps perf difference in the most demanding games today, it's a joke.
>>338483245
>mid range like 1070
The 1070 is not mid range
>>338483486
>The question becomes, what do I do with the two 980s I have now?
sell them moron
What do you even need all that power for? The best looking games come out on console.
The smart move is to wait til this shit is out and buy a 980, right?
>>338482806
>Find a flaw
the gigabyte version's not out yet.
LOL?
>tfw 620 britbongs for FE edition.
Waiting for 1070 prices.
>>338483901
thing about 60fps is now 120fps is the new benchmark on 1440p, once you see it you will never want to go back
Asynchronous compute still practically nonexistent.
>>338484115
>amd
>>338484078
at a smoking 20 fps nice try NEET
Too expensive
>>338484030
Surely they could be utilised somehow to take the PhysX load off of the 1080s? Just wondered if I'd need one or two for that.
>>338483663
>wccftech
lol
>>338484115
did you make this yourself in ms paint?
>>338484078
uncharted 4 doesn't even look that good anymore on the final build, fuck off retard
>>338484131
I hate living in the past, but it's not like 120 FPS matters in games.
I use a 980 @ 1080p with a 144hz monitor, would it be a waste to upgrade?
>>338483663
wccftech is fucking terrible, my dude. Not credible at all
>>338483643
saved, for when amd goes belly up
Worth the jump from 1080 to 1440?
Also, does IPS really look that much better than tn? I could get a 1440 tn with gsync for 500$ but the only IPS I see that are 1440 with gsync and low lag are $700
>>338484383
Please don't get a TN panel and yes the jump is noticable and you won't go back.
>>338483901
Reference benchmarks show the 1080 gets 80 to 100+ fps at 1080p with everything, even hairworks, on
And that's without overclocking, I don't think there's a single game that even dips below 60fps at 1080p
>>338484330
how come?
>>338482806
It's €789 for reference cooler models.
Thanks Germany.
>>338484308
a huge waste.
>>338484556
There's literally nothing wrong with modern TN monitors
>>338482806
Not a Radeon logo on it
>>338484383
Get a 4k IPS monitor, waaay better than sitting with a low res high refresh monitor.
>>338484572
Then a 1080 for me it is.
>>338484660
Enjoy your washed out color scheme. You may as well be buying plasma at that point. I mean if settling for shit is your thing, by all means go for it.
>>338484660
if you spend $600 on a gpu and then compliment it with a TN panel you should feel bad about it
>>338482806
>thermobaric incendiary device
I don't want to blow up my whole neighborhood
Can it run modern games on Ultra at a smooth 144fps at 1080p?
>>338482806
is this the new batmobile ?
>costs about as much as 3 PS4s
>you can't still play Bloodborne or Uncharted 4
>>338485015
yes
>>338484208
Use one for physx, you only need to pop it into the 3rd slot and not connect an SLI cable to that card, then config it in Nvidia config.
>>338485015
maybe
>>338485015
I don't know
>>338484617
yeah we get the same prices in holland, it's fucking ridiculous
>>338483485
The 1180 releasing next year.
>>338484115
who the fuck cares about ashes of singularity?
>>338484268
Only in competitive shooters. Just like how playing at a lower graphic setting is beneficial to competitive gaming.
For everything else, just stick to 60fps. Not to mention.... your card will last you much longer than someone who is a 120hz nerd.
>>338485217
CAN YOU REPEAT THE QUESTION
>>338485015
Doom@4k and 200fps apparently.
>>338484093
Why would you buy a 980 right before 1080 comes out?
I have a friend who did that last month and he is beyond asshurt now that benchmarks are out.
>>338485312
If we assume the same upgrade as the 1080 relative to the 980, it will still not do 4k60.
>>338485375
benchmarks came out and it can't even do 1440p at 200fps. What gives? Are they waiting to patch it to vulkan or something? Is it because drivers aren't really out for the 1080 yet?
>>338485337
what about 100hz?
i dont care about competitive shooters but about immersion and rpg
>>338482806
Looks cool tbqh
>>338485450
If it keeps up games will improve faster than what gpu can handle and everyone will remain oblivious because they're using 1080p instead of 4k, 8k, etc.
>>338485375
Que
>>338484660
Don't fucking tell me you still use TN? They're outdated since like 5 or so years.
anyone not waiting for gtx1080 aftermarket options is retarded, they will be overclocked to actually be good
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlSeHCPd75s
>>338485634
That's because there's no real reason to upgrade to 4k.
>>338485337
>Only in competitive shooters
I thought that in both competitive shooters and fighting games that it doesn't matter if you go past 60, below yes but not above.
>your card will last you much longer than someone who is a 120hz nerd.
But my monitor is 120hz
>>338484812
>>338485691
>falling for the ips meme
Enjoy your awful black levels, shitty response times and ips glow.
And don't pretend it doesn't exist anymore.
>2 months ago
>ask /v/ if I should just get a 980ti or wait for pascal
>most anons say wait
>benchmarks and reviews are out
>ask again
>most say wait for the ti version now
I feel like if I keep waiting like /v/ says, I'll never get a new GPU. Next it'll be "don't get the 1080ti wait for the 1180."
So I'm just saying fuck all and picking up the 1080 when the pre-orders go up.
>>338485641
>first amd card is 5 entries in
>>338485759
There's a huge difference that does make it worth using 4k though. The image clarity is great. Are you just saying this because others say it's not worth it? I have a 4k monitor, a 1080p 144hz monitor and I use my 4k one to game and do everything because it's simply better.
>>338485641
This is a load of shit, my 290 can't do fucking ultra 4k with 29fps.
>>338485842
I bought a 1440p 144Hz G-Sync IPS panel a couple months ago and you'reabsolutely right, the black levels are terrible.IPS glow I only notice when the screen is all black though so it's not a huge deal.
>>338485960
Must be AMD shitty drivers XD they can't compete with Nvidia ;)
>>338485881
Wait for the water cooled version, it'll be like a few hundred more.
>>338486102
>144hz ips
that's not a real ips, you fell for marketing gimmicks. Just because you're too dumb to know what ips is doesn't mean you're allowed to tell others not to get it.
>>338486102
which panel did you buy? i'm looking to buy one as well (asus pg348q, 100hz, 1440p, 34")
>>338485881
Three months after you buy your card you will have intense buyers remorse. This is a fact no matter how long you wait.
>>338485881
There are two kinds of people you should never listen to when asking for advice and that's people who talk about waiting or people that talk about future proofing.
Overpriced "Founders Edition"
Very shitty DX12 performance.
Loud ass fan.
Shitty cooling in general making the boost useless.
Supporting Nvida and gimpworks.
I could go on.
>>338485842
>Enjoy your awful black levels, shitty response times and ips glow.
You really are outdated as fuck. those things were true 5 years ago maybe, but things like e-ips exist that have response times sometimes even faster than your shitty TN.
and dont even mention anything about colors or brightness, because going just 1cm from center and it messes up the whole picture of a TN. it's literally shit.
>>338485881
>asking /v/ about anything
>>338484381
You might want to save this when your new 1080 burns your house down.
>>338486185
dont fall for the 1440p 144hz meme.
>>338484078
I've never even fucking heard of number 3.
>>338486138
But it actually was their shitty drivers this time. They patched it with a shitter driver that broke crossfire in a whole bunch of games.
There's a nugget of truth to every meme.
The real question is: Can it do Rocket League wastelands level on max settings 60fps?
>>338485881
It depends what you have currently. If you have something like a 660 ti then yeah get a GTX 1080 and wait to upgrade like 6 or 7 years from now.
>>338482806
>using obsolete gddr
gonna be alot of remorse threads with hbm2 rolling out and intels new chips.
>>338482806
bruteforced drivers and drivers that deliberately outdate older cards faster
>>338483536
>>338483663
I just want you to know that both of you guys are autistic as all hell.
>>338486179
I never told anyone not to get it, I'm quite happy with it.
Feel free to enlighten me though on what the 20 or so reviews I read prior to buying it failed to mention. I'm always looking to better myself.
>>338486185
Acer HB270HU
>>338486416
As if that is hard to achieve. Update your toaster poorfag.
>there are people in this thread who still use TN's
>>338485881
You can't win with GPUs because:
>Benchmarks don't always represent real world applications
>Each side will have pros ad cons
>There will always be new more powerful GPUs but...
>The release of those GPUs will lower the price of already really capable cards
The only thing I look at anymore is how much VRAM there is because devs are cunts and only make shitty vram dependent ports.
>>338486481
>HBmeme
>>338486470
what if my 7970 died a year ago and i've been using fucking retarded intel integraded graphics from my motherboard
>a superclocked die shrink maxwell
>still no async
>worse performance per clock compared to 980ti
>trade blow with overclocked 980ti
>'founder edition'
>GDDR55 is crippled by shitty bandwidth (barely more bandwidth than 980ti)
Its pretty shit senpai.
>>338486179
You're about 3 years in the past with that statement you dumb fuck.
>>338486596
i5 @ 4.2ghz, 8gb memory overclocked and 2x670 SLI. Cards a bit old, getting a 1080 but i ran motherfucking crysis 3 at max settings in 1080p just fine
>>338486719
Yes, Buy a GTX 1080 now, say fuck everyone and enjoy your games. Enjoy being able to play whatever you want for the next 6 to 8 years. As time goes by you'll eventually have to start lowering certain settings but it'll be manageable.
>>338486735
>trade blow with overclocked 980ti
If you mean "laughs at", sure.
The 1070 " trades blows" with the 980ti.
>>338485842
What monitor should I get if I want good black levels?
>>338486084
They're probably using a 7600k
>>338484078
>every one riddled with jaggies, blur filters, depth of field, low fov
Looks great mate, mostly just in a tiny square in the middle of the screen though
>>338485064
Literally the only argument that consolefags have
>>338482806
mid range part being sold for £620
>>338483643
need a pic like this that says nvidia with the hat on fire
>>338486347
the updated 1440p/144hz monitors are fine. yes you're gambling with the possibility of terrible black light bleed but you can returns panels if they're really bad.
if you bought the xb270hu though you got completely memed, not only do you get AHVA quality panels but it only covers 80% of the sRGB gamut which is just criminal for an IPS (like) monitor.
the pg279q and xb271hu are fine.
>>338486234
I've found that out now. I like to be futureproof as much as the next anon, but waiting and waiting isn't going to do anything. Eventually you just have to pick up what's new and stick with it for a while.
>>338486470
I have a regular 660. Which is why I want to upgrade so bad. I have to set most newer games on medium, or low to play.
>>338483382
>nvidia
>price drops
lmao desu senpai
>>338486839
Nigger, people were saying the same thing about the 900s. You don't know where the industry is going to go, 8 years is a ridiculous overestimate.
>>338485842
Response times are fast enough these days.
Backlight bleeding is only an issue when the screen is black.
Blacks arent' great, but okay.
>>338483573
970/390 and higher is enough for those at 1080p
>>338483020
Yeah and then something else will do the same 3 years after that. Well done on figuring out how technology works, genius.
>>338486853
Nah
>>338487058
Hey idiot, something is better than nothing (he's using intel graphics for christ sake). If you think it's fine to drop $599 on a card and turn around to buy another one two years later you're fucking retarded.
>>338486936
VA panels but they have their own drawbacks.
Why won't someone make fucking oled monitors already.
You can't exchange it for sex.
>>338486598
What's the best way to describe IPS? Don't see the appeal of viewing angle since no reason for me not to be viewing it dead on. Been fairly content with my tn with the only other screen I own being oled vita which is really nice and vibrant.
The room is badly lit.
>>338487161
so... beats it every time, and you thought this supports your point?
>>338484267
Confirmed for not actually playing it yourself
Seriously, I own a 970 and generally it outperforms anything on console but the GAME ITSELF of Uncharted 4 looks utterly fantastic.
>>338486658
>every major manufacturer adopting hbm2
>samsung cant produce it fast enough
>>338487198
That's debatable.
Nvidia meme card owner here..
Go AMD for Q4 2016 and onwards for the foreseeable future, Nvidias architecture cannot do Asynchronous Compute, GDDR5x is no match for HBM2 and the real kicker is that AMD hardware is in the consoles so developers WILL be coding with AMD in mind, if they have any business sense. Nvidias shekels are nothing compared to MS/Sony shekels so expect very few developers to adopt Nvidia gameworks which will mean shit performance for Nvidia cards in future DX12/Vulkan titles.
AMDs next cards will small, cool and very power efficient thanks to 16nm finFET and while they will be weaker in terms of raw graphical processing compared to Nvidias option, they will be much cheaper and thanks to next gen GFX APIs you can buy a second GPU and it will be 100% utilised, unlike SLI/Xfire seen today.
AMDs masterplan has almost come to fruition and i wouldn't be suprised if they kick Nvidia out of the gaming market intirely by 2019, and considering nvidia is try to branch out into the render card and more importantly, driverless car market, nvidia is likely looking for an exit strategy to the gaming hardware market.
>>338486853
Have you watched literally no reviews of this card or do you actually work for Nvidia?
>>338487198
A hooker who won't exchange a new one for sex is either overpriced or stupid.
>>338487282
You do realize that the chart show 980ti oc beat stock 1080 most of the time right?
The 'Max' 1080 is 1080 with maximum fan running for it to achieve boost clock for most of the time to avoid throttling.
Well on my radeon 290, it appears to run 22-28 FPS.
I had no idea I got some good frames but DEAR GOD FUCK 30 FPS.
I just can't deal with this shit, I'm gonna get 2 watercooled 1080's or 1080 ti's when they come out, depends when they do though.
Custom water cooled my 290, I get max 75 degrees so I'm gonna smash out the overclocking later.
>>338485881
Well you can buy now but you will be getting shafted hard on the price. The 1080 should be £200 cheaper.
Im not upgrading till a year or two since I have a 980 only at 1080p, but if I wanted to upgrade now I would wait until at least september for polaris/vega/1080ti/titan etc which will drop the price of the 1080/1070 hard.
>>338487203
You get IPS mostly for the good colors and black levels. OLED would be good if it was cheap and didn't have burn in issues.
>>338487282
~6-10 frames a second is not exactly "laughs at" anon, especially when the 1080 isn't even reaching 60fps
1080 dips below 30 frames in 4k too.
>>338487524
Did you update your drivers?
>>338487465
You're acting as if you can't overclock the 1080 :^)
>Tfw my boss came up yesterday and asked me if i was interested in a supervising position in the future
>Tfw would be making 23 bucks an hour to start
>Could finally waste money on retardedly expensive graphics cards like >>338482806
Its happening bros, I'm finally moving up in the world
>>338487659
Why do people always ask this? If he did custom water cooling on his cards, don't you think that "updating your drivers" would be a no-brainer?
>>338487392
yeah try to pay a hooker with a graphics card and see what happens
>>338485337
I hate this meme.
Why would you not want smoother gameplay in every game you play?
>>338487731
You'd be surprised. I've seen worse.
I'm gonna miss you guys, RIP me and my house ;_;.
>>338482806
The neon light is an unnecessary waste of electricty
>>338486839
thanks wil do ill wait for the aftermarket stuff
>>338487731
You shouldn't actually update your drivers, unless a brand new game has specific settings included in the update.
>>338487685
>what is thermal throttling
Every review has said the 1080's clocks won't boost over 1700Mhz because of heat.
>inb4 "whaddabout custom loop anon-kun <@:^)
Goalposts nigger
Overpriced
GDDR5 yet again
Awful temps
I'm waiting for HBM2 cards, fuck buying the top line for something that'll be outdated in 2 years.
>>338487685
Reading comprehension bro
>"The 'Max' 1080 is 1080 with maximum fan running for it to achieve boost clock for most of the time to avoid throttling"
Yeah good luck overclocking something that cant stay at its stock boost speed ;)
>>338487805
>1080 is designed to run at 80C
No joke
>>338487685
The gap between OC vs OC is actually smaller than the gap between stock vs stock.
GTX 1080 have shit overclocking due to its reliance on single 8-pin connector and the GPU temperature.
Have a chart where OC 980ti actually beat OC GTX 1080.
>>338485641
show me intel family graphics
>>338486561
finally someone gets it...
can't believe those retards actually looked up sources to back up the claim that 3 fucking years from now a better videocard will be out
>>338487869
In 6 months when 1080 ti and polaris/vega is out the normal 1080 will be $400 too and come with multiple free games
No point buying now, getting fucked by the hype
>>338487863
>>338487879
>bitching about moving goalposts
No, fuck you.
Are the overclocked benchmarks being shown from reference coolers for the 980 ti? If not then your whole side is fucking pointless since aftermarket coolers on the 1080 would solve this issue.
>>338487659
I did, but this is a botchy windows install, I'm overclocking her now fellas.
>>338487805
>that fan speed
The card is set to run around 80c with a minimize fan noise.
Tweak the profile and find your own sweetspot.
>>338486316
>>338488072
top kek
I bet your one of those guys that bitch about AMD housefires with the r9 290 but when it happens to nvidia its a non issue ;)
No new nintendo games.
>>338487392
There's not enough spaghetti in the world for the event in which you try to pay a hooker upfront with a GPU.
>>338487805
AMD confirmed to do worse when you overclock.
Got it at:
Core: 1115
Memory: 1500
I think this after burner has done fuck all honestly, is there some setting I'm missing?
>>338482806
>Slower on paper than a 390x or FuryX
>overclocked maxwell 980 on speed
>16nm but runs as hot as a 28nm+
>Gets its ass handed to it by a 980ti oc
NOPE its garbage, white hot blazing fast garbage
>>338484024
1070/1080 are mid range parts being sold with high end prices
1080ti/Titan are the high end parts which used to be sold for £450-500, but nvidia has effectively bumped up the price of each segment
Unless the 1070 actually has issues like the 970, I don't care if it's been gimped as long as it's powerful enough. Seems like a bargain compared to how much you'd get out of a 980 or a Titan, and it's high time I upgraded anyway.
Well shit.
This is doing fucking NOTHING!
How am I fucking this up so badly?
>$600
>cant play 4k at ultra
Why do we make fun of consoles again?
>>338488419
Yeah honestly with the die shrink I was expecting 100% performance increases at all price points.
Instead we get a 980 replacement being sold at +50% the price
>>338482806
you can run any modern game on high settings at 1080/60fps on a card that costs less than 1/3 as much
>>338488558
hey autist, what does that have to do with the 1080? Go away.
>>338488587
Because they can't play 1080p at medium with a stable 30 fps.
>>338488658
Has to do with performance, and how to get more performance than a 1080!
>>338487018
I had the 660 sc and just picked up a meme 970. I'm only rocking an fx6600 @4.4ghz so anything else would be a waste. I couldn't wait any longer. It was night and day though. Max out witcher3 without hairworks, shadows and distance scaling on high and get 60fps @1080p.
>>338487524
>On 4670k + GTX 780 setup.
>Mostly get 60 on high but get some pretty nasty drops.
>Other people on identical setups get a steady 60 on Ultra with a handful of options turned down.
This is just being the unfortunate 5%, in a game that's well optimized you're gonna have 85%* who will run it perfectly, a 10%* who will run it fine or otherwise fine after some tweaking and an unfortunate 5%* who won't be able to run it well due to some fucking obscure API / runtime / driver / firmware cross compatibility shit that's fucking something up in your PC and you'll never know what.
It's a shame because I'm otherwise enjoying the new Doom quite a bit.*pulling all these numbers out of my ass but you get the idea
>>338488558
>pushing the clocks to maximum
>leaving the power at +20
>temps going through the roof
people like this should stay in consoles
Honestly dont see the point, what are you going to use this hardware for, console ports?
No games make use of PC hardware anymore.
>>338488587
Well consoles are still running at 900p at 30FPS on medium settings.
>>338488648
Yeah you're so sure about that that you don't provide a single example, can you be more retarded?
>>338483020
HOLY FUCK GUYS TECHNOLOGY IS IMPROVING OVER TIME HOLD THE PRESSES STOP THE COPS CALL THE PHONE
>>338488897
Sorry but I'm not going to play games like Doom on a console.
>>338488879
>Doesn't know 95c is normal for a radeon 290.
You're bad and you should feel bad.
>>338489006
You dont need a 1080 to max out doom.
>>338482806
>single fan
>heatsink is covered by plastic
I'm only doing this because you told me to, OP.
>>338489101
max out at what resolution for what targeted refresh rate are the questions that remain...
>>338488156
It's nice how nvidia lies about shit all the time right?
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/917161/fermi-support-/?offset=37
https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2015/01/21/windows-10-nvidia-dx12/
>Mike Ybarra of Microsoft was asked if gamers would need new graphics cards to take advantage of DirectX 12, and he replied “To get the full benefits of DX12, the answer is yes".
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/207598-demystifying-directx-12-support-what-amd-intel-and-nvidia-do-and-dont-deliver
Nice lying shitvidia, faggot lying homos
>>338489064
>buying reference cards
Is now the time for 4k gaming?
>>338482806
They're literally selling a reference model as a "Founder's Edition" and charging an extra $100 because they can.
>>338488771
Exactly why I want to upgrade now. I haven't maxed a game in a long time.
I do have a pretty good CPU though. I play emulators more then I play regular PC games, so I spent more for a CPU then GPU. I have a i7-4790k at the moment.
>>338489292
Nothing can run maxed out 4k 60hz, still.
>>338489292
not even close
year 2020 maybe
>>338489256
Exactly, you can max out crysis on pretty much anything but it might run at 5fps, yet retards on the internet will be like 'lol you can max out crysis on a gtx 9800'
![1463914774281[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/bQTw8zX.png "1463914774281[1].png")
I
>>338489292
Sli 1080s? You'd probably be good for 4k at 60fps with a few tweaked settings
>>338482806
Reviews of 1080 and 1070 when
>>338487575
lel you think a new card is coming in 3 months?
wew
![1463914855487[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/R45c8Tn.jpg "1463914855487[1].jpg")
CANT
>>338483020
if I'm correct about how processing works then there's probably one or two iterations left before graphics cards top out their maximum power/size
I can't see how they make a card that does much better than the 1080 without increasing its size.
4k 60 fps will most likely not happen in processing in a modern 3d game without a breakthrough the likes of the steam engine or electricity
so I'd say the 1080 is pretty safe if it has not built-in limiters
>>338484812
>plasma
>shit
Get the fuck out. Better than the horseshit lcd technology that'll keep us eating shit for the next god damn century.
Oh but oled is even better? Enjoy your dead panel in 2 years of buying it- or not being able to see blue anyhow.
![1463914984727[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/iQOofHU.jpg "1463914984727[1].jpg")
FIND
>>338489530
vega is out in 5 months and going to dump all over the 1080s performance.
>>338489530
You dont think polaris is coming within 3 months? Sure, AMD will just sit here and let the 1070 sell like hot cakes.
Polaris reveal within a month is my guess, then availability a month later.
>>338488280
>amd
just throw it out the window man
![1463915155535[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/8jAsQIq.jpg "1463915155535[1].jpg")
A
>>338489256
1080 at 60 or 120/144.
4k is still a meme, 1440p is starting to pick up but a 970 can run that at 60/1440p.
>>338489334
Well, if you have the dosh....
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00NH5T1MS/?tag=pcpapi-20
This is the one I have. It's great. Even more quiet than the 660 kek.
![1463915298203[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/Jw6v4Bc.png "1463915298203[1].png")
FLAW
>>338487176
>If you think it's fine to drop $599 on a card and turn around to buy another one two years later you're fucking retarded.
Isn't this what console gamers do?
>>338486271
>implying g2g is anywhere near tn panels
ips structure prevents any fast changing, no matter how "developed" the tech becomes, it's always going to be a problem, and yes there will still be ips glow and washed out blacks. Show me a monitor that does not have any of the typical ips characteristics.
>true 5 years ago
That's why http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/asus_rog_swift_pg348q.htm shows on a modern panel right?
Also it's VA panels that are more common in the 144hz non-tn panels. Don't confuse the two, va and ips are different developed tech.
>>338489710
Lol wot a die shrink and still the same performance roughly?
This has to be the most disappointing die shrink ever in GPUs
1080 should be the 1070, 1070 the 1060, 1080 ti the 1080 etc. But as long as people pay whatever prices nvidia sets they will sell the mid range for $700 and keep the high end for $1500 titans
>>338488648
>60fps
go back to bed grandpa
>>338489762
well of course it is going to run smoothly at 1080p, that's an old outdated resolution. 1440p is phasing out for 4k now. Problem is the GTX1080 is for something inbetween 1440p and 4k.
>>338489762
>1080p
sure feels 1997 here
>>338489976
Who said that was acceptable? I know that isn't, but consoles are different in that they get exclusive games, so you pretty much have to get them for certain games. This isn't the same as graphics cards where you can hold onto one for a very long time playing whatever is available on pc.
>>338489976
No, they wait 4 years.
Housefires.
>>338486256
I swear this nigger is a Nvidia shill.
Post your fucking rig right now you faggot or get the fuck out. I better not see any Nvidia hardware or I'm slap your bitch ass. Make sure to have my post showing in the picture fuck boy.
>>338489292
give it like 4 years more
I play in 1920x1200. What GPU would suffice for me for the next couple years? Is an i5 2500k still enough for most games?
>>338490035
>GTX1080 is for something inbetween 1440p and 4k.
No its not. Its a 1080p card.
>>338490340
1070 or a 980/ti when the price drops
2500k will bottleneck a little especially in CPU intensive games, but it should be fine for the most part as long as its at 4.2+ghz and with decent speed memory. Definately not worth the money to upgrade the CPU.
Im replacing my 5 years old 2500k with Zen if its good hopefully.
It's not the 1080ti in SLI.
>mfw upgrading my 980ti SLI
The future of VR is here!
>>338485064
you really don't know about optimizations, did you ?
