>>338353314
Nice try shill, nobody gives a shit about this abortion of a game.

>>338353401
>S-S-S-Somebody likes a game! They must be a shill!
Not even him but fuck off.

>>338353314
>I'd like to see the old zombiemen, shotgun guys and chaingunners

hitscan would fucking suck in this game, you've got too much other shit to worry about.

>>338353643
If Brutal Doom can turn their ballistics into actual projectiles and not hitscan, I'm certain id can do the same. I'm certain the chaingun in neo-DOOM wasn't hitscan.

>>338354164
It isn't, only shotguns are hitscan afaik

Anyway I think thegame is ok, haven't finished it yet. Gameplay could stand to feel more frantic, there just aren't enough enemies and they up the difficulty by increasing their dmg and that's it. Pay $40 for it no more

I want an expansion that adds proper fucking map tools, or a co-op hoarde mode

Idk I think the game is pretty fucking sweet

Is the multiplayer good?

>>338354520
A lot of people don't like it but in my opinion and those I play with it's fucking great, it's pretty much super fast paced gory halo with demons

Less unskippable scripted events, more monsters at once

I just want to go fast quite honestly.

I'd like them to ease away from arenas into more Doom 1 esque enemy layouts. I still thought the campaign was really good in spite of that, but I think that's one definite area that could improve the game overall. Don't even have to do away with them entirely.

STORY CO-OP.

Also it would be nice if you entered another dimension of hell where the monsters look more like their Doom 1 counterparts. Could be just for one level, would be nice fanservice.

>>338354407
aww, the gameplay I saw looked potantiall fun as hell but I thought it needed a lot more enemies because everything seemed so empty and I assumed they would spawn more on higher difficulties, you're saying they don't?

>>338356793
DOOM 1 has co-op, how did they not include it here?

>>338356928
Not him but later levels you can easily get swamped in enemies