Post your specs and tell us how well Overwatch runs:
>i5-6600
>geforce 560
>50fps on medium to high
i7 4790k
gtx 980
200-300 fps on low
>playing an fps with high details
kill yourself
>>338310191
that's an ugly ass eye holy shit
>>338311107
>Buying an i7k and a x80 nvidia card to play on low details
>b-but I saw some pros doing it because that's too much information overload to your brain!
Yes, and you aren't pro, not earning money off this, nor are you playing an uber fast 1v1 arena shooter for you to need a sensory overload relief.
higher fps = smooth gameplay, even when going well beyond your refresh rate
learn how things work you monkey
>>338310191
i5-4690k
r9 380
60 FPS on max settings
http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyri/requirements/overwatch/12955
>>338310191
PS4
60fps
1080
>>338310191
Maxing on a 750ti and i5 3570k and 16gb ram
Ezpz
4790k and 980
No idea. Good enough for me not to check fps.
>>338310191
i5 4690
Gigabyte R9 290
60 fps @1080p with 125% downsampling
everything set to max except shadows, no AA
>>338310191
Hey /v/, I have a chance to buy a PC with a i5-6400 for very cheap, should I? To buy a PC with a i5-6500 I'd have to pay a lot more because its not on sale.
Rest of config:
GTX 970
8gb RAM
1TB HD
I'm a poorfag that has hoarded some money, please give advice, I'm not american so PCs are crazy expensive here. I just don't want to buy a PC that gets obsolete too quickly.
Is i5-6400 enough to run games for 3-4 years or should I save more and buy the i5-6500?
>>338310191
i5-5200U
Intel HD graphics 5500
>i5 2500k
>ATI HD 6950 1GB
>250-300 fps on low
>50 on high
i5 4690k
R9 280
8 gb
I don't know exact but 60+ all the time on max settings.
>>338312557
I have the same card. Buuuut I haven't cleaned it recently so it gets pretty hot. Other than that good performance.
>>338310191
fx6300
R9 285
60fps high
>recommended specs
>radeon hd 7950
>have hd 6950
>still plays at 60FPS on medium - 50 on high
kek.
kekekekekeke.
still don't need to upgrade even after 5 years.
>>338311389
>not turning off background textures
>But keeping model and particle details high
You sir do not use your details settings to your advantage. You probably play DayZ without adjusting the gamma slider.
>>338310191
>AMD Phenom II X4 970
>GT 630
>25fps on medium
in conclusion; like shit
>>338310191
6350 underclocked to 2.8ghz because I'm retarded and have the wrong mobo
970
Ran at mostly ultra with some high at 60-40 fps
>>338310191
>AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
>Radeon HD 5700
>40-50 FPS on Medium-High
>>338310191
Can run on ultra unless I'm streaming.
>>338310191
i5 6600k
r9 390
At least 60+ on Max settings. Aside from that, no real idea.
1080p
>>338312238
Can you not buy components individually? Processor is fine. 970 is probably going to get gimped really hard by nividia to get people to upgrade to the new card.
>>338310191
Judging by your op I have a 550ti 1gb, I guess I can have a stable experience with some tweaks. that's good at least. Boxed copy worth it or just buy it from blizzard digitally?
>AMD FX-6350
>AMD 280x
>8GB DDR3 RAM
Overwatch runs at a flawless 100+ FPS on Ultra at 1080p.
>i3 2100k
>R9 270
40-50 fps on medium with some minor stuff turned down.
DOOM and Dark Souls III are killing my computer though, I think it's time to build a new one.
>>338310191
i7 4790k
GTX 570
100-120 on low, medium textures, 1920x1080
>>338311389
what the fuck are you talking about? people play on low so they have a higher framerate, which gives better mouse responsiveness. It's especially important in overwatch which keeps a frame in buffer. I'm not the guy that told OP to kill himself for playing on high btw. I don't have a problem with what other people choose to do.
>>338310191
i5-6500 @4.2 BusOC
R9 380
like 80fps Highest but my monitor is old so I couldn't set it to 1080p or whatever.
>>338315115
This is where I get confused, since I'm still very new to the PC scene, I have a 550ti and an i5 2500 stock, With 8 GB of RAM. My question to you is how will my experience differ from yours?
Phenom II 1100t running at 3.9 ghz
6870
60 to 80 fps on low-medium
>>338310191
3570k
ref780
Had a few hiccups but I'm pretty sure it was just a process that was fucking me up that I already found how to kill.
The game doesn't run at 21:9 resolutions which pisses me off greatly.
660ti
i5-3570k
I didn't check the fps but I didn't notice any major drops. I ran it on med/high though because my CPU has been overheating and crashing my display drivers recently making me restart.
>>338310191
Epic (Maxed settings) @ Smooth 60 FPS
Shills pls go
>>338311682
whew, glad 750ti is sufficient, my GPU is the weakest part of my rig so I'm always worried
>>338310191
lmao that's worse than xbox, you should set to low for 60 fps
GTX 770
3570k OC 3.9 GHz
8GB Ram
Had like 180 fps on epic if I remember correctly.
>>338310191
i7 4770k
GTX 780
ASUS VG248 monitor (@144hz)
I get 80-90 FPS with everything on HIGH but I get sub 60 when everything is maxed out during big engagements. Might need to dust out my tower, haven't done that in years.
i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz
R9 390
90-130fps on mostly ultra
>>338311107
Only autists ruin the experience by playing on purposefully low settings for an imaginary visibility benefit.
I dunno, I just turned everything to max/ultra and it just werks.
I do need a new monitor though
>>338311107
>not playing with 360 FOV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQOJ3yCK8pI
These faggots man
>6600k
>390x
>100+ fps on 1440p with a few pointless settings not on ultra
FX 6300
HD 7850
1080p, 60fps on high.
>>338317430
holy shit.
>>338310191
>1.6Ghz Jaguar CPU
>AMD Radeon
>8gb GDDR5
>60fps
>>338311107
the only time this was ever relevant was quake 3 on a CRT you stupid millennial redditor
and it was only because you needed those fractions of second to hit with rails
it's completely meaningless in modern games with RNG sprays and 20 tick hitboxes
>>338317430
god damn this is like some HP Lovecraft shit. we weren't ever supposed to experience that.
feel like i'd throw up if i tried playing that in VR
i5 2500k @ 4.6 GHz
Two GTX 670
Game never goes below 100fps with everything maxed out. I was expecting worse.
>>338310191
R9 290 XFX
Intel Pentium G3258 3.0 ghz
8 GB 1866 mhz ram
1080P
Maximum settings -60 FPS constant
>i5 3460k OC @ 4.00GHz
>3Gb 280x
60 FPS maxed, the game runs fine faggots
>Not playing at 1440p in the year of our lord 2016
Disgusting
>>338314431
What does GHz influence on processor performance? Isn't 2.7 GHz a bit low?
Also, if your performance is low, just turn dynamic reflections down to medium.
It's pretty much the only setting that has a real, noticeable effect on performance.
i5 6500 3.2 ghz
r9 390
how will it run?
I promise to upgrade the shit CPU and add more RAM eventually. I may even move on up to a 1080p monitor.
wait, this is out on PC now? I thought it was the 24th.
i5 4690k
980ti
ran it at max with 1440p @ 144hz monitor
>>338320305
>soundcard
xex
>>338310191
i7 4790k
750 Ti Twin Frozr ultra memelord edition dragonfire deluxe totally not a poorfag card
about 80fps on low but I can literally not tell the difference between high medium and low aside from up close textures
i5-6402P CPU @ 2.80GHz
GTX 960
8GB Ram
Shit runs flawlessly on Ultra
>>338310191
AMD FX-8370
GTX 970
90-100 on Ultra settings
i7 4770
r9 290
8gb ram
85-90fps on preset epic.
>>338310191
i5 6600
GTX 760
I get like 90fps on whatever the default settings are, which I think is medium. Game looked good enough to not bother with changing.
>>338322607
>GTX 960
Nice cucklord card
FX 8350
980 ti
16 gigs of wam
Running it on all the things though i have a habit of turning off things like motion blur just cuz i usually prefer that off, it can be too swishy in many games
>>338310191
>i5-4460
>r9 380 4gb
>60 fps on epic
>6600k
>980ti
Around 90 on the highest settings
>ps4
>25 fps
Can a kind anon recommend a power supply and graphics card that are compatible with my processor?
I have an Intel core 2 quad CPU q8200 @ 2.33
I would like to play Overwatch at 60 fps. It doesn't have to be high settings.
