>we want the mobile audience
its ok texture mods will fix it i dont get the big deal you guys are overreacting civ 6 is gonna be just as good as the previous ones
>>338289105
there's literally nothing wrong with those graphics
stop being autistic
>>338289105
why wouldn't they? that's where all the money is at
>>338289272
>>338289262
This has to be a joke. The game literally looks like B&W2, and significantly worse than Civ5.
>Cartoony looks means mobile
When will this meme end?
>>338290241
>literally
No, not literally.
Also,>muh graphicsEnd yourself.
>>338291152
When completely everyone finally has low standards.
Nobody has ever played Civ for the graphics.
Is this the new standard civ shitpost?
>>338291273
Look, that's not even the graphics, the style looks fucking retarded.
>make a thread about the graphics
commence 200 replies
>make a thread about the mechanics
0 replies
o-okay>>338290689
>>338291541
Good job, you killed both threads with this post. Dummy.
>>338291541
/v/ is like a primitive fungus that only responds to basic stimuli
>pc fats shitpost endlessly about how graphix are important and how pc has the best graphix
>now that one of their exclusives looks like shit graphix don't matter
>>338289105
>>338290241
so its less taxing graphically, so you can have fuck loads more going on in one map and not have turns take centuries
>>338292549
needs a chick with tits
>>338292518
Its almost as if thats not the same people posting.
>>338289105
As far as I'm concerned Caveman2Cosmos is what every Civ game should be living up to.
If any of you faggots want to play a final Civ game, get that mod for Civ4
>>338289272
I tell you, the one thing I don't like is the trees. In the old games they look like actual forests, but in this one they're just a handful of trees scattered around.
>>338293512
>As far as I'm concerned Caveman2Cosmos is what every Civ game should be living up to.
Yeah, you are absolutely correct. 200 hour long games, impossible multiplayer, building Alpha Male and Alpha Female from your capital when you settle it.
Such a fun, non-autistic, and not in any way autistic game.
>PC games don't get downgraded guiz
>>338292702
and fake third person envrioment ads
>>338292569
I hope it will, I have everything on lowest settings on civ V and have around 20 fps en end game around 10. I really hope I can play Civ VI when it comes outATI Radeon HD 4250
>>338294232
>right is an unfinished version of left
woo
>>338296536
>its just alpha guiz ;.;
>>338296635
It isn't even alpha, its just unfinished assets.
>>338289105
>pc 2016 cutting-edge graphics not held back by consoles.
![civilization4bytheswordss_1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/myauuZs.jpg "civilization4bytheswordss_1[1].jpg")
Civ V babbies can't name one thing wrong with how Civ VI looks. All they can use is buzzwords.
>>338294071
>playing with all the features on
200 hour long games are your own fault. Don't try and make others look dumb when you can't even use your brain.
>>338297707
>2005 graphics is excuse for 2016 graphics
Okay.
people be complaining about civ 6's graphics looking cartoonish but then they praise the first ever pokemon game for it's revolutionary graphics that are easily understandable and playable even in 2039
>>338291541
It's Endless Legend.
Remember when Beyond Earth came out? City states had been turned into single tile buildings called outposts where you get quests from? The whole questing thing in the first place? And everyone is wow this is just like what Endless Legend was doing and I'm sure there some other game out there that did it before that too but it was the other game currently on the market.
Now we're going to give city tiles buildings and call them expansions and they're gonna get bonuses for certain ones being adjacent. And you know how that's been like Endless Legend from the start?
So there is no original gameplay and you know what? I'd be okay with that if there was some nice new graphics on Civ4 or Civ5. If those were just updated to look nicer and run better. You ask any Civ5 player what they want and it's just one thing, better netcode. Please your fanbase then add in a new feature or two and you have people going nuts over your game. Fucking EA knows this. Blizzard/Activision know this.
Instead they are fucking this shit all up. They know they are fucking it up and they are pushing out this retard fetus anyway to be dead on arrival. Why? Just call this shit what it is. "Guys we decided you're gonna have to wait a few more years for Civ6, we're releasing a CivMobile game in the meantime" and people who play mobile games would probably go nuts to have a civ on their mobile device.
It's just idiotic. You can tell anytime the devs do a podcast too, they don't give a shit about feedback. People playing their games awkwardly try to point out the flaws hoping these people, their guests, will get the hint. But they never do.
Civ is dead.
>>338298147
>2005 graphics
It looks better than Civ V.
Look at the trees. Look at the water. Look at the buildings. All of them are higher quality in comparison to Civ V. Unless you are allergic to bright colors, that is.
