>get dark souls 3 for ps4
>30 fps
>looks like ps3 game
wow just wow
>>338051679
>get dark souls 3 for pc
>60 fps
>one second freezes every few minutes
>geometry pop in out the ass
>coop is broken, half the time you see statues or can't damage enemies
>pvp lag is immense
wow just wow
>>338051679
>>get dark souls 3 for ps4
you did the right thing.
my specs are i5 3400, 8 gbs ram, r9 380. and the micro stuttering when it goes from 60fps to 50 is fucking unbearable.
>>338052149
Myazaki does it again.
affordable PC gaming is just a meme. to have a SOLID 60 fps you have to bruteforce it with overkill hardware. simply going by recommended specs doesn't provide a solid fps and regardless of what they tell you a shaky 60 fps is FAR worse than a semi stable console 30 fps.
No it doesn't PCuck. There's a big difference between 720p and 1080p.
>>338051869
>one second freezes every few minutes
Thank god, I thought it was just me
>get dark souls 3 for pc
>framerate very unstable
>had to lock it 30 fps
>small freezes everytime you enter a different area
>online broken
>game looks worse than bloodborne despite being more recent
>>338051679
I don't know why you people keep posting this webm to try and shit on DS3. He very clearly dodges a half second too slowly. For fucks sake, the sword visibly reaches his head before he starts the roll animation. DS3 has tons of things that legitimately fucked about it, but this isn't one of them.
>>338051679
>get Dark Souls 3 for PC
>get banned
>>338052471
Lying much?
Aside from the intermminent freezes due to From's incompetence the game runs like an absolute charm.
I barely even break 60% GPU utilization at 1080p.
>>338052149
>m muh silky smooth!
>>338052597
It only started happening after the latest patch that has now been pulled.
Before it had some microstutter when saving, but nothing terribly noticeable.
>get dark souls on pc
>gtx 960 i5 4690k build
>both overclocked
>can't get stable 60 fps on ANY settings
>screen tearing everywhere
>have to lock it at 30
>looks like a ps3 game
Thanks, From
>>338051869
They rolled back the latest patch that caused the freezing every few minutes.
>>338052149
>buy economy card
>get economy performance
Lock the frame rate or tone down the graphics.
>>338052778
>Lying much?
end yourself. especially in a fast game like dark souls 3 those frame drops from 60 to 50 just fucking ruin it.
>>338052672
>>had to lock it 30 fps
how did you do that, radeon pro doesnt work.
>>338051869
worked fine for me :)
>>338053184
>those frame drops from 60 to 50 just fucking ruin it.
But I have none. Must be your shitty machine.
>>338052778
>core i5 4670K
>GTX 970
>affordable PC
>Dark Souls 3
>running like a charm
Do you own stock at Valve? Why are you fanboying so hard?
>>338053113
>>buy economy card
>>get economy performance
that's what I'm fucking saying. affordable PC gaming is just a meme. the framerate is too fucking inconsistent especially when you need it more. that lost pontif knight underneath the stares behind the two dragons; brah I had to use my fucking intuition because I couldn't see shit.
Why are these 970 faggots pretending their game has no drops?
You can't fool anyone, the tests are out there.
Unless you're too fucking stupid to realize it, I wouldn't be suprised.
>>338053113
>"build le master race PC for le $300 and totally BTFO consoles and play everything in 1080p/60fps!"
>turns out that PC experience is dogshit
>"Wow why didn't you get a GTX 980 like everyone else"
>>338053431
I have similar specs to him and Dark 3 does run beautifully on my machine.
I'll also be the first to admit that a decent PC rig costs more than a console. You get what you pay for. You could build a cheap PC that would cost almost as much, if not slightly more, than a PS4. The game would run just as bad on it as the console.
Bloodborne is painful to go back to after playing Dark 3 on PC. The frame rate is so goddamn bad and there is noticeable hitching from time to time.
>>338053726
I have an FPS counter running on my machine. Game never drops below 60 on a 970.
>>338053646
>>338053826
You guys are awful butthurt. I never tried to claim a good gaming PC was cheap. Read >>338053858
>>338051679
>Getting right up close to the AOE attack that clearly spreads out
>>338051679
>multiplat game
>get it for console instead of PC
>console version has worse performance and graphics than PC version
WOOOOOOOOOOOW HOW WAS I SUPPOSED TO KNOW THAT
>>338052471
>console
>stable 30
I'm laffin' mate.
If you buy a PC of comparable price to a console you're going to get the console experience, with the option of lower settings for 60 fps.
>>338052710
I think he dodged fine, he was just too close so when he came out of the roll he got hit with the AoE that's bigger the close you are to him.
>>338053858
>I have similar specs to him and Dark 3 does run beautifully on my machine.
brah are you experiencing frame drops in real life ? you have a GPU what literally costs as much as the fucking PS4.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&Description=gtx+970&N=-1&isNodeId=1
Bloodborne on the PS4 feels a TON fucking better with its semi stable 30 fps compared to DS 3 on PC with recommended specs that goes from 60 to 50 all the time.
>>338054157
Sadly, that's not always true anymore in the current generation.
I had hoped with the new consoles being x86 the PC ports would be easier and quicker. Seems like they're shittier than even though.
Ps4 and pc version are literally identical graphics wise you dip.
>>338053858
Console performance isn't that bad in general it's Fromsoftware that can't optimize for shit. For fuck's sake have you already forgotten about Blight Town?
Also don't pretend the game doesn't have problems because it suffers microfreezes when loading areas and I also noticed severe pop in. Also the framerate jumps alot from 45+ to 60 I noticed regardless of graphical settings. At least it doesn't crash.
I don't know how is the PS4 version but I would assume it's more playable than that.
>>338054245
I'm well aware of how much my video card costs. I bought it. I'm also upgrading to one of the new cards coming out soon that's going to set me back another PS4's worth. Once again, you get what you pay for. Pay console price for a PC, you're going to get console performance.
And I'd agree that a stable 30 is preferable to a game bouncing back and forth between 50 and 60. Bloodborne is not stable though. That game's frame rate looks like it bounces between 20 and 30 (like the rest of the series on console) and there are noticeable hitches from time to time, especially in Old Yharnam.
>DaS 2 runs and looks magnificent on PC.
>You can run it on a toaster in 1080p.
>DaS 3 runs like a paralyzed retard on the same setup while managing to look slightly better.
>On better setup it still micro stutters and textures pop in everywhere.
QUALITY OPTIMIZATION.
>
>>338053184
>how did you do that, radeon pro doesnt work.
Nvidia utility brah.
>>338052149
going from 60 to 50 isn't micro stuttering. micro stuttering is then you have stable fps but bad/variable frame time.
>>338054214
>I'm laffin' mate.
console 30 fps just works. I don't know how, I don't care how but they make it work, the motion of the games just feels great. console versions (most of the time) are just better fucking products. the PC version especially with a FAST game like DS 3 makes those framedrops even more apparent, it's a shit product even with developer recommended specs.
>get game for PS4
>PC ultra settings at 1080p
>get to play bloodborne as well
Not bad for $300
>buying a release state from game
No one is to blame but you.
See you guys in a year.
>>338054813
Little too on the nose. 3/10
>make le epik console warz XD thread
>Guaranteed 300+ replies
Silky smooth 30fps
>>338051679
How can someone be so bad at a game that they don't even know about fat-rolling......
>>338054502
Hell no I haven't forgotten about the slide show that was parts of Blight Town. I know From isn't the best at optimizing.
I also never claimed the game doesn't have problems. The pop in is really bad in some areas. Textures sometimes fail to load entirely and you'll find yourself walking on invisible ground. Hell, I've fallen through the world once. I don't think these problems are exclusive to the PC version though. I've been watching playthroughs and the guys on console are running into similar issues. It's not game breaking by any means though.
As for the frame drops, I don't know what to tell you. My FPS counter has only ever dipped to 59 and I haven't noticed any issues with my specs.
test
>>338051869
Get used to it if you intend on playing any other Japanese ports.
>>338054643
>I'm well aware of how much my video card costs
>Pay console price for a PC, you're going to get console performance.
What on earth is wrong with you ? We are talking about dev recommended specs and you are spewing musturd race memes.
>>338054982
DELETE THIS
>>338055135
>werks for me:^)
>>338054982
>>338055458
A-am I fucking blind or retarded? This looks really good to me.
>>338055561
Looks ok for PS4 game.
>>338055375
It sucks but dev recommended specs aren't absolute guarantees of 1080p/60FPS or whatever level of performance you're going for. Especially from Japanese devs.
http://www.pcgamer.com/dark-souls-3-system-requirements-revealed/
Unless these were updated at some point these specs are ridiculous. A GTX 750/HD 7850 recommended? No way in hell are you going to get a good frame rate with that card.
>>338055717
You won't, as you can see by this thread.
I have a 770, playing on the lowest settings i still can't get stable 60 in a lot of areas.
It's a mess of a port.
>>338055717
>Unless these were updated
yes they have been fucking updated, the recommended amd is an r9 series. exactly what I said at the top of the fucking thread>>338052149
jesus you mustard insecurity fucks are slow.
>>338054954
>Little too on the nose. 3/10
and it's the absolute truth. console 30 fps just works, it's a BETTER PRODUCT.
>finished 3 playthroughs with zero technical issues on 60 S I L K Y smooth fps
Best of both worlds, baby.
>>338055990
http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyri/requirements/dark-souls-iii/13089
Nevermind that earlier post. They were updated. Recommended 970. Which I have and get a good frame rate.
But fuck, no way a PS4 port should need that much power. Especially looking back at Dark 2. The durability problem was annoying but the game ran great otherwise without such high requirements.
After all these years Japanese devs are still trying to figure out how the PC works.
PC players cheated so much. poor From had to remove this
KEK
>>338056239
wew lad PCfats
>>338056203
>>finished 3 playthroughs with zero technical issues on 60 S I L K Y smooth fps
noone fucking said this was another batman. but you have to overkill the specs to get a stable 60fps and since we are talking about a very fast game it's more apparent than most other games.
stable 60 fps is a meme unless you go for an expensive PC. something mustards usually call bullshit.
>>338056239
I don't think you understand what the issue was. The patch was pulled due to From's incompetence because all it did was create new technical issues.
>>338051679
>complain about DS 3
>post webm with DS 2 boss
wow just wow
>>338056103
The asspain is your post is palpable. I love it.
But it is strange their specs just list the R9 series. That includes a wide range of cards, most of which won't come close to the performance needed.
The 380 isn't equivalent to a 970. You simply won't get the same level of performance.
>>338051679
>THATS WHAT YOU GET FOR BUYING A CONSOLE
>>338056606
>Reasoning with shitposters
They don't care, they're literally just here to get people to reply to them.
>>338056606
>From's incompetence
another meme. I don't care about the benchmarks, when you get to play the games on PS3/4 both DaS and BB felt satisfyingly responsive. yes those shaky 30 framerates actually play well on the console.
nothing like recommended specs DS 3 on PC.
>>338051679
>boss charges up sword with glowing lights and shit
>walking anywhere near the hit radius
what the fuck
>>338056478
>stable frame rate is a meme
>mustard race
You sound like a fucking idiot. I hope you know that.
Also, I'm a PC guy and I've never heard anyone seriously claim that. You just can't get the power for that low price point.
>>338056876
>fell for the recommended specs meme
>>338056876
Are you implying Dark 1, which was locked at 30 FPS on PC (without the use of the frame rate hack which could break the engine), was not responsive?
>>338051679
That move is fucked, got killed by it twice when I shouldn't have. Can't think of anything else like that though.
>>338056772
>The 380 isn't equivalent to a 970.
brah are you high ? it was you who mentioned the 970 out of the blue in the first place.
>The asspain is your post is palpable.
it happens when I talk with retards who post off topic nonsense and pretend everything is fine as long as we don't get another batman.
>>338056876
>>338057340
The game runs at smooth 60 on recommended specs, aside from the intermminent freeze issue that was introduced and later pulled with the recent patch.
Pic related are the officially listed min/recommended requirements, i7 is once again unnecessary, a decent i5 is more than enough.
>>338057340
http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyri/requirements/dark-souls-iii/13089
>Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 / ATI Radeon R9 series
They specify one card for Nvidia, and then a whole range of cards for AMD. That's where that came from. Again, no idea why they would have done that.
I'd also be very curious to see a rig that is having frame rate issues with a 970. I have one and the game works fine. It might be a problem with a different manufacturer, or a driver issue, or a bottleneck somewhere else in the rig. So many problems can crop up in a gaming PC it can difficult to diagnose sometimes.
It's specs are far too high but the game is fine as long as your computer is beefy enough for it. Except for the online. Much easier for cheaters/hackers to fuck with the game and From, a Japanese developer, is still having difficulty working out how to fix it.
>>338057165
>>fell for the recommended specs meme
yep.
>>338052471
Zozzle
>>338051679
PLIZ STOP THE #ps4shaming
>>338051679
post a pic of your ps4 with the game
>>338051869
none of these things happen. stop whining you faggot
>>338052778
Nice dude, I've got a similar rig, was thinking of purchasing dark souls 3. Good to know it'll run fine on my 970
i5-4690k
GTX770 2gb
Everything maxed, 60fps constantly with very rare drops
I don't see the issue here.
>>338057902
>none of these things happen
Are you blind and willfully ignorant or just shitposting?
>>338057691
>The game runs at smooth 60 on recommended specs
that's a blatant lie.
>>338058134
It's not though.
>>338051679
>those shitty tells that still end with the enemy rotating in your direction
no other company than from would hire such incompetent designers.
>>338058134
How come? It runs fine on my >>338052778 machine, which is even a little below that. Other people in this thread also attested that the game runs fine on their rigs.
>>338056478
stable 60fps is easily attainable if you don't care about putting your graphics to the highest settings
for me, framerate will always take massive priority over dumb ass shit like textures or shadows in a game like Dark Souls, so something like medium settings at 60fps is infinitely superior to whatever the console equivelant is at 30fps
>>338053113
>>>338052149
>>buy economy card
>>get economy performance
>
>Lock the frame rate or tone down the graphics.
>dude, why buy consoles when you can 4k 120fps for 300$?
this is what mustards have been preaching the whole time.
also
>tone down graphics
sure, too bad ds3 is a shit port and scales like shit, ultra to medium gives you no visual variation and only 3-4 more fps.
now, considering 90% of games are shit ports, you're left with mostly indie games for mid-range pcs
>>338051679
>People shit on DaS2 for every enemy pivoting during their attack where the player moves
>No one even mentions it on DaS3 despite it being almost as common across the board.
Now i think DaS2 is shit overall well DaS3 is a solid game overall but why do people ignore this like its not shit design?
>>338058658
>dude, why buy consoles when you can 4k 120fps for 300$?
No one who plays PC is foolish enough to suggest this.
>>338058825
It's still there but not as blatantly noticeable as it was in 2, I think.
What bothers me more is the Bloodborne enemy design you can see in Dark 3. Too many enemies flail and swing about wildly in huge 180-270 degree arcs.
>>338058832
maybe a bit exaggerated, but many were claiming to 1080p, 60fps on i3+750.
which was somewhat true, until next-gen only titles were released.
>have recommended specs
>never have issues
wow
>>338051679
You're just shitposting, otherwise you'd post your own screenshot/webm to showcase your point.
>>338054214
funny
atkeast use some new memes
you cucks are getting old
>>338059361
http://www.darksouls.jp/win_spec.html
>have recommended specs but 16gb ram and ssd install
>drops to 50 in many areas
>microstuttering since 1.03.1
works on my machine :^)
>>338057902
why the fuck are you posting with my name you piece of shit
>>338051679
DON'T WORRY ANON
BUY TRADING IN YOUR PS4 AND FIFTY GAMES YOU CAN UPGRADE TO A PS4.5 NEO VERY SOON.
THIS WILL RUN YOUR GAMES AT A FRAMERATE THAT "MEETS OR EXCEEDS" CURRENT PS4 PERFORMANCE WHILE UPSCALING YOUR HIGHLY ALIASED JAGGY TEXTURES TO 4K RESOLUTION!
SONY DOES IT AGAIN!!!! #4thePLAYERS
>>338051679
>>looks like ps3 game
So PC version must look like PS3 game too.
>>338058528
>stable 60s is easily attainable
No it isn't, you need some amount of money.
>>338051679
Welcome to Fromsoft optimization
>>338060552
it looks like a ps5 game actually
>>338056227
they never wanted too in the first place
>>338051679
then wait for the PS4.5 version
>>338053036
I have a 4690k without overclock and an old ass 7870XT and get basically 60FPS everywhere on 1080p.
You can turn everything off in the settings and the difference in visual quality is fucking minimal as long as you have Texture on Max. You just gotta let go of that AA man.
>>338061926
ebin shitpost
>>338052149
>playing with a toaster
>surprised the performance sucks
lol
>>338051679
>>looks like ps3 game
they look identical.
>get dark souls 3 for ps4
You don't have a ps4
>>338059082
They were being faggots. If you don't have a minimum of $1200 to put into it than don't bother.
