explain yourselves
this game sucks. its like playin a mobile game ir sumthink senpai idk lol.
They better not defend it because that's literally censorship and you people are supposed to be against it.
>>338009467
anyone that defends that is a retard, plain and simple. but some of /v/ will just to be contrarian.
5
>>338009467
explain your image
i guess washington post gave it a bad score and people are pissy, is that it?
>>338009947
Nice try
7
>>338010081
p1ebs
>>338010027
It's a rant posted under 'comic riffs' and he doesn't even give a score, metacritic pulled the 4 out of nowhere.
It's funny to see the butthurt though.
Speaking of 4, check it
I have a PS4 and can assure you I do not give a single fuck about the uncharted seriesCheck this 9 baka
>>338009467
its out of place. thats neogafs role.
>>338010081
>>338010148
>>338009947
check this 8, m8s
>>338010081
oh shit i think you left your 7 here
>>338009467
>waaah someone said something I didn't like, lets silence them!
That's like stupid baby logic.
The petition is retarded but so is the circumstances surrounding the review.
This guy never gave a score in his review and was most likelymade up on the spot when metacritic asked him for one. He is a known ultra contrarian who used to write at IGN's contrarian collum. He hated dark souls for essentially having ''too much gameplay'' and his favourite games are telltale games.
He obviously doesn't enjoy or take video games seriously as a genre, yet insist on reviewing them and channeling his negativity toward the medium of entertainment through reviews. He simply shouldn't be reviewing games in the first place.
That being said, here's what his ''''review'''' essentially amounted to : ''The visuals are shown to the viewer rather than communicated to them''. Only the most desperate console warring and most likely PC clown /v/tard would defend such a meaningless and pretentious reviewer just for the sake and the off chance you might anger somebody who likes the game and perhaps his PS4.
>>338010210
This is what sonyfags actually believe.
>>338010027
Uh, yeah actually. You hit the nail on the head.
>>338010227
That's not how you check, mate.
Why should I, or anyone else, care about some review? Just form your own opinions on games from watch some gameplay footage.
>>338009467
Sonyggers are so firmly in denial that they will seriously argue that a review should be REMOVED?
Holy hell, and we call the PCucks the petition-race.
>>338010476
off by 1
>>338010380
>''The visuals are shown to the viewer rather than communicated to them''.
Shit man that is some good ass bait for grafix threads.
>>338010409
I guess the intern just saw the FOUR in the title and slapped that on there.
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2016/05/12/uncharted-4-a-thiefs-end-review-this-four-part-series-should-have-ended-after-part-one/
>>338010575
>have to sign in to read article
is this real life?
>>338010476
but this is
>>338010575
Metacritic said in their twitter that WP gives them their scores separately exactly for the purpose of score aggregation. They requested score for the game and received 4/10. Give it a rest, the game is utter shit.
>>338010519
Don't get me wrong i'm 100% in favor of freedom of speech, but when it's nonsensical speech who doesn't respects a game as excellent as Uncharted 4 and gives it the score it deserves, that speech ought to be removed
>>338010496
>le epin "form your own opinions" maymay
They are PROFESSIONAL reviewers for a reason, idiot. You seriously think some disgusting neckbeards have the same insight as a journalist?
I didn't play the game, I say that as a PC user who has jusst seen a lot of footage of the game and has been impressed, all I will say that it just isn't a 4/10 or a below average game through any reasonable judgement, it just isn't. I'm not saying it';s the 10/10's the game has gotten but it ain't a 4, that actually implies that cash grab games like Quantum Break are actually good and it encourages this practice.
>>338010656
It's free here, try deleting cookies or using archive.is or the google cache
Criticism should be censored, What a world Sony Fags live in.
>>338010723
You're better than this Anon. I know you are.
Sony hasn't rotten your mind to this extent yet.
>>338010727
Fuck you faggot, she's a 10. I'm gonna make a petition to shut you down.
>>338010727
what a baka
>>338009467
reviewer is not exactly wrong, U4 definitely feels really bloated and boring, we've already seen all the series has to offer in terms of mechanics and gameplay, all the setpieces begin to feel the same especially the ones where you jump onto something and it breaks, they look nice and all but I felt no tension because it's just another cutscene that plays out.
Jesus fucking, it's a real tweet. Why even bother? Is this like Fallout: New Vegas' metacritic score being one off for the Obsidian team to get a bonus?
>there are people on /v/ that weren't here for 8.8
I don't even want to think about what percentage,
>>338011239
>>there are people on /v/ that weren't here for 8.8
again you're missing the point why people are angry, it wasn't because of the score, we already knew ign was going to give it a 9 something out of 10, it was because they decided to issue a ''review in progress'' instead of just giving it a finalized score.
>>338010693
>game is universally acclaimed by critics and gamers
>oh apart from that one clcikbait reviewer and half of /v/
Well I guess you are right and the millions of people loving the game are just having fake fun
>>338011582
Check
>>338011386
>universal acclaim, if you ignore the people who disliked it
>>338010210
>metacritic pulled the 4 out of nowhere.
netacirtic ask TWP for the score even when said score is not listed on the review paper.
keep on denial fagget
We need a board for /twitter/ screenshots
Actually you all should just fuck off to twitter
He's not saying remove it for being negative, he's saying remove it because the system switched out the original 4/4 for a 4/10 score, drastically changing the number
If i get a 4 then the score is legit and this thread is sacrificed for my dream.
>>338009467
And I used to think Troy Baker was coolalso check this six
>>338012556
Wizard
>>338009467
>literally DELETE THIS
you can't make this shit up. life imitates memes
>it's another review score thread
Cancer.
>>338012387
>if you ignore the people who disliked it
Yeah let's listen to those people
>>338012556
Good guess, get fucked Baker Boy.
Two.
>>338012767
And now show us what the 10s gave other PS, Nintendo and Microsoft games.
>>338012767
Wow, a cherry pick and ad hominem at once. Sony defense force sure is multi-tasking one.
>>338012767
>he's actually angry that people are calling out shit practices in a review of the game housing them
When did /v/ get subverted so hard that they actually like microtransactions in $60 games?
So its literally impossible to dislike Uncharted 4 now?
>>338012767
>10 on star fox
>10 on pokken
>10 on quatum break
LOL WHAT THE FUCK
>>338010380
This, it's fucking pathetic to watch people defend this pretentious autofellatio bullshit and pretend it has any right to be taken seriously
>B-B-BUT YOU JUST WANT TO CENSOR OPINIONS YOU DON'T LIKE
Dunkey's 3/5 was a great score for the game because it was a good review, I have no problem with being critical, I just hate the idea of taking retards seriously because you just want to shit on a game
>>338012767
>pairing the russian review with the spanish one as coming from the same person
This is fun bait, i like it
Would pat the head of the original creator
>>338010380
How the fuck do you communicate visuals?
Honestly though, I've been watching a playthrough because this is more of a movie than anything and doesn't seem to be worth the money because of said reason. HOWEVER this is the prettiest game I've ever seen. Visuals are fucking outstanding and that alone, discounting the actual playability as I assumed there'd be little anyway, grants it a 9/10 from me.
Story seems to be pretty good too, so points for that, but minus points for the sjw pull with the strong female black lady who literally kicks the shit out of Drake.
>>338013697
Agreed, I didn't agree with dunkeys review but I'll be dammed if it wasn't fair, completely valid and worthy of being taken seriously.
>>338010380
>''The visuals are shown to the viewer rather than communicated to them''
He actually said that? Jesus Christ. How does one "communicate" visuals? Did he confuse it for a fucking book? Does he mean telling instead of showing? If so he's a fucking moron and a prime example of everything wrong with game journalism (and journalism in general)
>>338010380
According the forbes article he did have his score given along with the review when it was submitted to the The Washington Post. Why it didn't show up on The Washington Post website is the site own policy and out of his control. Metacritic receive the score that the reviewer gave from The Washington Post so that's why it's show up on Metacritic as 4/10 since that what he gave the game.
>Sonyggers
>>338013908
Actually, I'll correct myself. The guy I'm watching hasn't finished it yet, so I can't really give much of a grade for the story. What the story lacks however is that it jumps from place to place without any real standing. Yes they're looking for treasure, but there's all this hype bullshit and letdown one after another with the same excuse of, "oh treasure isn't here," which is fine but good god come up with some new story points because it gets stale after the third time theyre directed somewhere else.Also, how believable is it that Avery set up map points all over the world in his lifetime as well as expected others to take this journey themselves within their own lifetime? Considering he couldn't fathom technology, he wouldve had to have built it around his contemporary technology--i.e. large wooden boats, maps, and astronomy. But it doesn't fit, considering the trek alone would cost most of one's life if they were left with just that. So I call bullshit
>>338012767
>any of those games being above a 3
3
>>338014490
Well, neither is any Uncharted.
>>338012767
Oh who would have thought, it happens both ways. I am shocked.
6
>>338013697
This is hilarious because it's one of the few times that a story driven game is reviewed by it's story. It's not unfair, it's just not normally done.
>>338015385
People rate stuff 10 or 0 all the time without trying to actually score it. It's not even necessarily fanboyism.
10 is "I like thing" 0 is "I didn't like thing"
>>338015968
You should tell that to the person I was quoting, not me.
Also despite the fact that I agree with you, there's still the odd coincidence that the person I screencapped just happened to only review two PS4 exclusives and one Microsoft exclusive. I don't think that many people would own both systems, buy three games exactly and review them like that.
>>338009467
It is sad Nintendo had to pay Washington Post to give Uncharted 4 a bad review. Nintendo needs to realize their console is dead and Sony won.
>>338015385
Who here remembers the days "we" busted EA using bots and we even broke them down
>>338009467
>/v/ is one person
Really don't care either way but Troy Baker is a grade A tool. Sonyggers are just booty blasted there game lost one or two points on metacritic.
>>338009947
>>338010081
>>338010148
>>338010271
>>338010352
>>338010476
>>338010505
>>338010669
>More xcuck false flagging
This is a sony only board. You will DELETE THIS and your life Rscottyg
