Tic-Tac-Toe
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
How many ties does it take you to reach 10 wins? Beat my score.
playtictactoe.org
>>337748024
How about fuck off shill, not gonna give you ADS-dosh.
Done, and i think i migth get lower
>>337750262
damn
EZPZ.
wow
>>337751436
Let me guess.
>Upper left
>Lower right
>Upper right
Best strategy, legit unbeatable.You have to go for 10 wins, though, not just 1.
>>337751630
How is a computer losing a solved game? What the fuck? The player should never win. It should always be a tie game.
10-17
The trick is to lose the first round to lull them into a false sense of security.
comp beat me first, such is life
>>337751630
If you put circle on the bottom right, then top middle and then middle left you can only tie. The game is unwinnable if both players play smart
Beat that, niggers.
>>337753972
That computer has to be retarded.
>>337751958
The player that goes first can almost always win, the player that goes second can generally force a tie.
If you are not first you will lose.
Lame game
>>337754296
>If you are not first you will lose.
I hope you mean tie.
>>337754342
Tie = Lose fuccboi
>>337754296
no, there is always a way to tie
>>337753972
He really was. The majority of the games turned out like the one you see there. Deliberately ignored that I had top and bottom left, put an O in middle right, and then I won.
I don't get it either.
>>337754404
But that's wrong, because that implies there is a winner. There is no winner in a tie game
Itt: people who haven't seen War Games and don't realize the computer is literally letting them win.
>>337754519
>that implies there is a winner.
Nope, you both lose. If you're not first, you're last.
>>337754693
But if you're both last then neither is ahead of the other. So you're the same rank, which is first.
![oTtbX[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/dNNiiX1.png "oTtbX[1].png")
Its impossible to lose tic tac toe.
Its also impossible to win if the adversary has perfect knowledge.
>>337754902
>which is first
And also last.
>>337754296
I just did
>>337754945
Those two statements contradict each other. The best the first player can do it tie if the person going second isn't dumb. The second person can only ever tie if the first player isn't stupid
>>337754204
Do you not understand what a 'solved game' means? If both players know how to play optimized, the second player will force a tie every single time
>>337755184
And seeing as a tie is neither a win or a lose, the two statements make perfect sense.
>>337755184
You cant win, you cant lose, that means only ties.
>>337748024
Am I retarded?
>>337755301
>>337755332
You are indeed correct. My mistake
Check'm
>>337748024
Easy
autism
>>337755530
>person on /v/ is fine admiting he made a slight mistake on a trivial issue
is this bizzaro-/v/?
eh
Shitty artificial difficulty RNG meme game
>>337756095
>deliberately decide to not block
>blames the game and its RNG
The essence of /v/
>>337755920
What, you want me to call you a faggot? I don't mind admitting fault, especially when it quite clearly was me just misreading somethingfaggum
>>337756245
>make a joke about /v/ never wanting to admit its wrong
>get called a faggot
okay good im still on normal /v/
>>337756245
guys pls dont fight, it scares me ;_;
Pure pro.
>>337756560
>the fucking eyes on the robot
Smugness is an emotion, kill it.
>>337756560
>those shifty eyes
Everytime
>>337754902
Nope, two people can be last but only one can be first. Remember, if you're not first you're last. In a race with 10 people one guy comes in first and 9 people come in last.
>>337755504
stop randomly clicking on the screen
Was it designed to lose every time?
>>337756896
Bullshit, you just faked that.
>>337756896
Impressive.
>>337756896
No, it was designed to (at times) use the optimal 2nd player strategy, which forces a tie.
So your pic is shopped
>>337756853
There is a difference between losing and being last. The person in second is 1st place loser, but he's still better than the schmuck who got 10th
>>337756861
I always click to block and it blocks me back or I miss a really obvious win.
>>337748024
ai is retarded and the key is to make it so it's ABOUT to win so it gets greedy and doesn't block you from winning.
>>337757256
wrong
>>337756853
Easy there, Ricky Bobby.
>>337748024
10
12
1
Not bad I think.
>>337756207
It is actually RNG. Go middle in the first match and it picks a different spot every time.
I think their AI is set to have a moderately large chance to randomize its move. That or their Min-Max tree is fucked up.
>>337758575
You're implying that they even have one. Good chance that they've attempted to bake the tree into a lookup table of sorts and it's completely fucked.
>Literally plays to prevent you from winning, even if it doesn't win itself
That's just spiteful
Tic-tac-toe
The game where you can't lose if you go first.
>>337754296
You can win if you start second but your opponent must make a mistake.
>>337759247
That's how everyone plays when they realize how easy it is to solve the game because there are only 3 starting positions and 3 counter plays all of which result in a win or draw for the first player.
The third move either guarantees a win or it is just win blocking until all the spaces are taken.
>>337759690
But that's wrong!
I can probably trim it down to 0 ties pretty easily, but not autistic enough to keep playing tictactoe.
>>337748024
Kill yourself
