>you and your team work hard creating a modern masterpiece that is revered by everyone
>one review from some literally who hipster douchebag troll can knock your metacritic score down 2 points and cause you to lose your bonus
Why the FUCK is this allowed?
AS SEEN HERE BY THE OBJECTIVELY CORRECT SCORES, YOU FUCKS CAN'T EVEN GET OUT OF THE PARK BASEBALL 2016, A MASTERPIECE OF TODAY'S AGE.
NEVER
EVER
PSKEKS
It's actually not a badly written review.
I think dissenting views are important, especially if you're trying to create a conversation or greater idea of who a game might appeal to.
>>337733010
FORGOT PIC. I WAS TOO EXCITED TO RUB THIS IN.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA PS KEKS BTFO!!!!
Because they need the views? Who cares make your own conclusion instead of being buttblasted about some literal who not liking the game you do m
![latest[2].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/qflOrri.jpg "latest[2].jpg")
Hi.
>>337732698
Having dissenting opinions about some video game that will be forgotten in a couple of months? How dare they?
Are you actually one of the developers?
If not, it's just a Metacritic score of some game you played, so I have to ask: Does it really affect the quality of your life? Why do you care so much?
Why do you geeks care about metacritic so much?
>>337733456
iirc however many studios give the devs a bonus if it gets x metascore or something hence the butthurt
>>337733532
Well what else can I use to shitpost in a thread about a game I don't like?
Man fuck people with dissenting opinions
Why can't we all just be a hivemind?
>>337733593
Ok. Do you work for them? Did you not get a bonus?
i cannot believe that this SO-CALLED ethical journalistic news outlet is giving this game a score outside of the approved metacritic range for unchattered games............. LOOK AT THE SCORES......... UNCHARTED is an 8 or up game........ it is NOT a 4 game!!!!!
>>337733052
>It's actually not a badly written review
It's pretty bad. There are strong arguments to be made against the Uncharted series but he makes none of them, just some vague complaints about its storytelling and lack of interactivity with the environments followed by a very low score.
>>337732698
>revered by everyone
>it isn't actually revered by everyone as this review shows
WOAH
>>337734046
Funny enough he didn't even give a score in the review but he apparently gave it a 4/10 when he submitted to metacritic.
I'm not one to don the tinfoil hat, but this whole thing coming out with a poorly written, half assed review over a week after the embargo lifted and dropping the metacritic score 2 points does look extremely suspicious and is unethical as hell.
>>337734247
>suspicious
Your tinfoil hat is too tight.
okay so
op, u should try reading his review. it's really good and i agree with nearly everything it says. it's okay that not everyone likes your moviegame 2bh. in fact, many people see through the smoke and mirrors and are dulled by such games.
>>337732698
>30 fps
>revered
you console virgins are so used to settling for mediocre work
>>337734046
Those complaints didn't seem vague to me, but to each their own.
I like the review.
Is this the new 8.8?
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THEY THINK
seriously, who gives a heck?
>>337733731
no im a chef
i just remembered someone saying that about metacritic scores
>>337734663
>chef
At Wendy's making 115k a year?
Pretentious fuckwits at Sony
Bribe them better next time. You cucks
>>337732698
Nice bait thread but thank God for the few good reviewers with some integrity left
>someone calls out the game
>Devs lose their bonus
Based reviewer.
>>337732698
>modern masterpiece
Uncharted gameplay has always sucked
>>337733456
Looking at scores and sales is literally the only thing a PS4-owner can do.
>>337732698
We should do something about this /v/ros.
https://www.change.org/p/washington-post-remove-the-washington-post-review-from-uncharted-4-s-metascore
Holy shit, petition station fags indeed
>>337732698
>your metacritic score down 2 points and cause you to lose your bonus
>Why the FUCK is this allowed?
I also wonder why the fuck this is allowed, basing bonuses on metacritic scores is beyond retarded.
>>337734663
The only time I've heard this done was with Fallout: New Vegas, and that was only because Bethesda are absolute cunts who didn't care if Obsidian never worked with them again.
>>337736636
>>337735580
>>337734107
How dose it feel knowing this review is fake and WP's real review is a 4/4, which translates to a 10/10 on metacritic.
Stay salty you fucking PC clowns
>>337737905
If you read this guy's articles (the ones about Dark Souls and DaSII in particular), which are very dense and "literary", it's clear that he hates conventional videogames and only really likes those that make some statement about how games are a complete waste.
He's a bit pretentious but I get where he's coming from.
So, this article isn't fake, he definitely means it, but it may have been mistakenly submitted as WP's review.
>>337734863
My favourite game. If you like the tps genre, I can't understand not liking this.
>>337732698
>knock your metacritic score down 2 points
OHHH WOW. A WHOPPING 2 FUCKING POINTS.
WHO CARES?
>>337738181
well if he doesn't take video games seriously i dont think he should be reviewing them.
by thinking video games are a waste hes denying the artistic and technical achievements behind them in my opinion.
This is the same reviewer that praises every COD game and says the souls games are bad because he sucks at them.
metacritic should throw out the best score and the worst score, pretty simple.
>>337738442
He takes them very seriously and his opinions are considerably more nuanced than that. People are upset because those opinions are extremely contrary to the norm.
I disagree with him, for the most part, but I think his ideas are valuable precisely because they are so different.
>>337732698
The problem isn't the literally who.
The problem isn't the game.
The problem isn't metacritics.
The problem is the publisher who pays. They are the one that put the bonus on the line and dependent on the score.
>>337734370
He says the series shouldve ended after the first. How does that make any sense?
>>337732698
>>one review from some literally who hipster douchebag troll can knock your metacritic score down 2 points and cause you to lose your bonus
>lose your bonus
Man I hope that's true, Fuck Naughtydog.
>>337732698
>Tfw don't write for any publication
>Tfw the 7/10 score I would give for the game wouldn't affect its metacritic
So sad.
>MetaCritic
>>337737887
Bungie and Acti had the same deal with Destiny
>>337733731
It's called empathy, jesus christ.
>CONFORM
>>337737905
>making a really asspained post to accuse others of being mad
>>337732698
>masterpiece
>less interactive than any shitty NES era shovelware
The thing is....What is Metacritic doing? Washington post has two reviews. The real review (4/4) and the troll review (no score).
Why did they put only the troll review and with a score of 4/10? Are they pctards or something?Xcucks? Nintendrones?
Not even a fan of Uncharted, but man, this is bullshit.
> Washington Post
>same site gave quantum break a linear cinematic shooter with no mp and a shorter sp than uncharted a 7/10
I just dont get it
>>337732698
DELET IT
>>337740790
>real review
Kek
>>337734863
Well I'm triggered.
Max Payne was a great game
>>337732698
If people think a game is shit, they can think it's shit.
>>337732698
It's one point sony shill.
>>337740790
Maybe the people who use metacritic are just fucking stupid
can we finally kick out the sony ponies now?
>>337737887
It was Obsidian who proposed the deal btw
But feel free to keep felling victimized
>>337732698
It's not the reviewer's fault that the publisher puts bullshit restrictions on a bonus like aggregated scores.
>review by the only person not paid by NaughtyDog
