Why is DOOM 4 running like shit on amd cards?
>>337635671
get in here bros
>>337635671
amd doesn't make gaming cards
>>337635879
why not
>>337635671
>He fell for the AMD meme
The answer is that most devs don't give a shit about AMD cards so they don't even bother testing on those, often due to incentives from Nvidia to make it that way.
Fuck off, shill
>>337636127
No you
>>337636127
is everything a shill to you losers
>>337635671
DELETE THIS
>>337635671
So I did a thing.
>>337636636
grats
>>337636636
How many hours did it take you?
>>337636449
Original Shitpost.
Do not steal.
>>337636449
>>337636837
41 hours.
I DID kinda Task Manager it and kill the process at the start of each level, which keeps the save, and so I could have a break.
Also, I won't lie, I had a macro set up so that every time my health was at 5%, it would auto kill the game, and I would reset at the start.
>>337637114pleb
Turn off GameWorks
The game uses the Vulkan API, and AMD Vulkan support is shit. Just like AMD support in general is shit.
This is why you don't buy AMD. Only time you buy AMD is when you want your PC to also be a heater.
>>337635671
>Why is DOOM 4 running like shit on amd cards?
Because they're AMD cards, and this is a new game. New games always run like shit on AMD cards.
>>337635671
because nvidia pays to get the chance to optimize the game for their cards first; then the benchmarks happen; then AMD optimizes and catches up
Benchmarks are shills
>>337637950
>New games always run like shit on AMD cards until a few weeks when Nvidia gimps their hardware to run worse
Fixed
>>337635671
>tfw when i fell for the 970 meme
>>337637795
There is no gameworks for this, moron
>>337635671
>Game has compute shaders
>Heavily favors AMD in early benchmarks
"HAHA YEAH TAKE THAT NVIDIOTS
>Game is actually released
>Runs significantly better on nvidia
"T-They are just shitty devs who don't care about AMD muh gameworks muh gameworks"
>>337638106
this. you're stupid to take these reviews at face. I can get my 7870 running just as well as my 970 on older games. Its only the new ones which amd hasn't had a chance to optimize for that nvidia wins out on
>>337638968
haha yeah fuck those 2 out of 10 anons who went with AMD. nvidia better get that monopoly rolling i want to pay them more money.
>Why do AMD cards run like shit?
Every single game ever. You were told to buy Nvidia if you wanted performance. You made your bad choice, live with the consequences. AMD isn't going to magically get better some day. They're going to keep being shit forever.
>>337639341
Then AMD better stop dicking around and make competitive hardware. I'm not going to spend money on inferior hardware just because muh monopoly.
>>337639341
You have to be 18 or older to post, newfag
>>337639341
I'm sure it wasn't some collusion.
"Yes, together, AMD, we'll fuck aaaall of your customers ballsacks, one after another, MUAHAHAHAHAHA!"
>>337636221
>>337639341
AMD needs to step up their game then, you think Nvidia is just going to fucking wait for them? This is business you idiots, stop blaming Nvidia and intel for AMD sucking shit with graphics cards and processors. It would maybe be suspicious if they were just doing badly in processors but made a killing with graphics cards. But since both segments of their corporation fucking suckm the logical assumption to make is "Wow this company sucks at making good products"
>>337639341
If AMD wants to compete with market share, they can release a better product instead of constantly trying to lean on the "support the poor underdog" card.
>>337639626
AMDs hardware IS competitive
it's their software and shilling that isnt
>>337639617
>AMD isn't going to magically get better some day.
But it does, every single fucking time.
Witcher 3 is the best example of such thing.
Ran like shit on launch and a couple of days later it ran like magic.
>>337637831
Or when you do a bit of research and realize AMD is vastly superior for mid-tier cards.
>implying AMD doesn't have the better product
You nvidiots sure love those card killing drivers, huh? lmao retards
>>337639997
>Mid tier
If I wanted a joke PC, I'd buy a console.
>FPS (Higher is better)
What fucking shitlords actually believe this haha
The lower the FPS, the more cinematic the experience. I wouldnt expect the mindless sheep who spend money on Call of Duty to realise that.
>>337640235
Mid is not low. I'm talking 1080p ultra at 60 fps. If you wanna go full retard with 4k gaming, NVidia is indeed better.
>>337635671
>why does everything run like shit on my budget card
>it's not fair
>>337640379
>>337639997
But that's wrong. Nvidia is best for 1080p highest settings and for mid tier. AMD's only good point is that it renders at high resolutions like 4K or multi-monitor the best. AMD is good for nothing else.
>>337635671
game is shit that's why
>>337636221
UUUUUNNNGH THICKEEERRRi'm just kidding please don't
>Closed Alpha
>AMD card dominate the benchmark
>Open Beta
>AMD card falls a bit, but still within its expected performance
>Release
>It ran like shit
What in the actual fuck is going on?
>>337640242
My heart melts to those that seriously reply to this.
>>337640583
The R9 390 and even the 290 put the GTX970 to shame, so there you have it.
Going with anything but the 980 if you have the big bucks to spend is just silly.
>>337640707
AMD continuing to fail in the driver department.
It's funny that this game also runs worse on stuff like the 950 and 370 compared to consoles. All around, it doesn't seem very well optimized for PC.
What can you do in snap map? There's co-op and stuff, right? It's like a more advanced Forge from Halo 3? Might be fun.
>>337641091
It's really robust. You can script complex events, things like puzzles and challenges, custom games, etc. There's also co-op, yes. I can't wait for people to build really in-depth complex levels with it.
>>337640859
No, that is not what happen.
What happen is that somehow, this game is running on older version of openGL for AMD, while Nvidia enjoy a newer version of it.
During beta, both card get to run on newer version of OpenGL.
How the fuck did that happen? Who know.
>>337641091
you snap map pieces together, squish them and stretch them, lighting, ai, etc its more like timesplitters than forge
>>337641091
>snap map
This brings out the old /v/ rage in me
Back in 1998 they handed you the complete dev tools kit for making in-game things (without C++ code) and said have fun.
Today, we get this garbage. I'm also pissed about blueprints in UE4 so it's not isolated to this game. Blueprints replaced unrealscript, and in the C++ code itself it's funnily enough actually using what used to be unrealscript as blueprints.
I mad /v/, I mad
Great game 10/10.
Where the fuck is the Vulkan patch?
>>337641413
Is there a way to remove the glory kill system? When they get stunned can they regenerate their health?
No clue what's going on. Runs worse for me on lower settings than the beta.
