>this kills the franchise
>>337595691
Can't wait to try it on my tablet!
>game looks like a mobile port
>will still have fps issues
Can't wait for it to happen.
It looks fine.
>>337595691
I don't get it, what's the matter?
>>337597090
I agree actually, graphics look fine, and you can see more detail within the city instead of just the blob of buildings it was before. Id on't see the issue.
>>337597172
He doesn't like the bright colors.
>>337595691
Literally the only problem is that certain tiles retain the same architectural styles regardless of who built there.
>>337595691
I think it looks comfy as fuck.
Also you're autistic.
>>337597090
It looks fine for a game released in 2006
>>337595691
>people think this is comfy
I'll stick to Banished thanks.
>>337595691
>clean, bright, comfy
I don't see the problem
>>337595691
Isn't there some crappy mobile game or browser Civ game that looks just like this?
>>337595691
I don't play civ. What's the problem? Is it just that it looks a little cartoony?
>>337595691
It's for Android and IOS?
>games aren't supposed to have artstyles!
>I hate any change!
>mobile game!
>>337595691
This game is suffering some heavy windwaker syndrome
Looks okay to me.
>>337595691
>graphics 2016
Is this the famous next gen that I keep hearing about?
>>337597614
Civ Revolution.
>>337595691
I'm more interested in gameplay than graphics / art design.
But the way it looks still bothers me. It's an immersion thing. Now it looks like 'fun', a mobile game you play for 20 mins. It's kind of disconnecting you with what impact you have gameplay wise. If it was slightly more realistic but still cartoony I would be fine with it, this is a bit too much.
It almost looks like a facebook game, and I feel like I'd just be better off playing V or IV, I don't want to trade aesthetics for minor gameplay elements. It's not like the franchise shifts dramatically anyway.
It's not really enticing me to get it.
![Civ4bts3[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/gW8QwI2.jpg "Civ4bts3[1].jpg")
>the people who complain about the art style are those who prefer Civ V to Civ IV
>>337597784
>games have different artstyles
Wow u sure showed us.
Also the left is pre-rendered, which always affects the artstyle.
>>337595691
uhhhgg /v/ and the stupid overreactions
shut up OP, this looks good, damnit i'm mad now
>>337597847
Civ VI is now ENHANCED.
>>337597892
>Empire Earth graphics
pfft
>>337597729
>games aren't supposed to have artstyles!
Every game has an artstyle. This one is shitty for the expected quality of a Civilization game
>I hate any change!
I hate shitty changes
>mobile game!
Clash of Clans look pretty similar
>>337595691
>you can already feel the consolization
>>337597892
Civ IV had better gameplay but worse artstyle.
Fuck, Alpha Centauri was the last good Civ. Why I am even bothering with the series.
>>337597975
W-WOAH....
If you are looking for an autistic level of realism in your game, then play some paradox stuff. Civ has been a meme since 4.
>>337597923
The one on the left looks better. If 3D graphics can't beat pre-render, then why would not change to pre-render?
![A1AlM8h-SbL._SL1500_[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/s8WvBCk.jpg "A1AlM8h-SbL._SL1500_[1].jpg")
ÝEAH FIRAXIS
GIVE ME SHITTY LOOKING UNITS AND A MUDDY LOOKING MAP
MAKE MY PC CRASH AND MY TURNS LAST FOREVER
IF I CAN TELL WHAT SOMETHING IS WITHOUT ICONS YOU MESSED UP
>>337598238
this
>just bought Civ V Bundle for 10 bucks on impulse
>Never played a Civ game before, nor have a real clue what it even is
What am i in for?
>>337598334
>What am i in for?
just one more turn
>>337598214
Because people wouldn't accept pre-rendered graphics in 2016.
>I can't rotate the camera? I can't zoom in? This game is shit!
You know, shit like that. Also in this day and age they wouldn't put nearly as much effort into it as they used to. This artstyle is simply derived from a want to appeal to as many people as possible.
Turn Based Stategy is a fairly niche genre in the first place, so I imagine poor sales is always a worry.
>>337597923
Just because something has a better artstyle doesn't mean it's better, civ 6's cartoony artstyle doesn't fit with the game.
>>337598032
civ 4 was fantastic you mongrel
>>337597808
>wind waker graphics are bad meme
>>337598440
You have 30 seconds to name a 4x strategy on ps4.
>>337598334
Late nights.
>>337595691
What's the problem?
>>337597784
What's the game on the left? Looks dope.
Also, what are some good games that have similiar graphics to those? I have a huge boner for that kind of artsyle.
>>337598546
mediocre
>>337598592
Nobunaga's Ambition?
>>337598537
*different artstyle
Alpha graphics, they already said they're working on this shit
I doubt it will become much less cartoony, but part of the reason was that the tiles have to be extremely readable, which Civ 5's tiles weren't
>>337598589
Wind Waker itself is the meme here, my lad
>>337598656
Ok, I found out it's Age of Wonders. Sorry for being lazy.
The other question still stands though.
At first I thought it looked gross, but I actually kind of like it now
>>337598537
Never said Civ 6 had a better artstyle, but there's nothing inherently wrong with it.
can't pass judgement just yet, but I'm not too hopeful about the gameplay either
>>337598720
>falling for the Alpha meme
This shit is Beta.
>>337595691
As long as the characters don't look like CivRev, it's fine. I wish there were some more shadows on the map but oh well.
>>337598529
HD pre-rendered graphics would allow to zoom. And you don't need to turn around in Civilization games. Also, people accepted 2D fighting games, a pre-rendered Civ gae would be welcome if it looks good.
>>337597892
Civ V is objectively better though
>>337598663
What didn't you like about it?
>>337597892
I love Civ IV and shit on VI artstyle. What you gonna do about it punk?
Also IV was the jump into 3D while also being a decade old game.
>>337597808
Good point, wind waker was an awful divergence that only manchildren like. Even when my 11 year old self saw the previews of WW in 2001 I knew it was retarded trash.
>>337598967
I'd doubt they'd put the effort in, though. Nowadays, making HD sprites are more expensive than 3D models.
The most obvious examples would be King of Fighters switching to 3D, or Guilty Gear doing the same.
What if it's good and looks like whatever and it will still be goodI swear this fucking place sometime
>>337598971
how is it objectively better just because you say so?
>>337599004
I don't remember.
>2006
>oh graphics don't matter it's all about gameplay
>2016
>MUH GRAPHICS BLEHBLEHBLUHBUHUBUHBLHUBHUB
there's literally nothing wrong with civ VI's graphics you cuckolds.
>>337599073
>People who call themselves adults STILL hate wind waker only because of the cartoony artstyle
Grow up, god damn.
I guess someone is salty
>>337599283
Fuck off manchild. Go play your fischer price games on your dead console.
>>337599197
I swear if /v/ didn't collectively shit itself over minor bullshit on a daily basis at least half of these motherfuckers would die of a brain tumor.
I think it looks worse than Civ V but I never played Civ for the grafix so I don't really give a fuck.
>>337599278
t. Firaxis iOS Department
>>337599393
gamecube is a dead console? damn
>>337599393
Wow
>>337598001
Don't you dare to shit on Empire Earth you underaged little shit.
>>337599274
>>337597472
hence the title
>>337598238
/thread
just get the fucking turns to be faster
>>337599362
Did you just take a photo of your computer screen?
>>337599257
I objectively say so
>>337599446
We don't have an iOS department. We dump that crap on 2K China.
>>337597090
This, I am really getting to old for this site when it's so obviously filled with 15-year olds who grew up with Gears of War and other games with brown and slightly grayer brown in em, to the fact they act confused and angry when there's a game with colour.
Especial since there's only one fucking thing that matters and it's the game mechanics.
>>337599498
Lol. Wii u, dumbass.
>All of these shills
Disgusting. Also, what kills the franchise is forcing people to buy 2 expansions because vanilla is extremely lacking. I mean who is going to be dumb enough to buy VI on release when they know theres going to be no content?
>>337599362
heh, a literal screencap
>>337595691
The more I look at it, the better it looks honestly. The Great Lighthouse is placed tiles away in the water, there's a little harbor/dock, the tiles are still distinct and more detailed than ever.
What are people actually upset about? The academy/university tiles? They're probably just great person improvements.
Nobody is going to play it that zoomed in anyways.
No idea why people even compare it to a 'mobile port' mobiles don't have a fraction of that definition.
>>337595691
nice city you got there
>>337599670
who the fuck knows wind waker from wii u?
>>337599801
that game has terrible combat
>>337599862
only if you never figured out the initiative orders and ctrl/alt-clicking for queue/force move commands
>>337599705
>who is going to be dumb enough to buy [game] on release
Anon...
>>337599839
Jesus christ you're impressively stupid. If he's a shitwaker fanboy then he's probably your standard nintentoddler, has a wii u and eats up childrens games on it.
>>337599862
how could it? isn't it just like civ's combat?
>>337599257
>falling for this
newfag or just plain retarded
>>337599362
>photo of the screen
What the hell are you doing Anon
>>337599862
It's not as bad as civs combat though.
>>337599997
Making a lot of assumptions there, boyo
>>337595691
Looks good.
>>337600012
youve obviously never played it
>>337599997
damn man, you have a lot of angry dumb assumptions over someone who probably played Wind Waker in 2003
>>337600390
And yet, I'm completely correct.
>>337599073
>11 year old in 2001
>is 26 now
>still gets mad about "kiddy" graphics
give yourself a break my man
>>337600634
>give myself a break from being a patrician
Nope.
>>337595691
The only problem is the mountains. They look waaay too pointy. Must look better not zoomed in.
>>337598537
It doesn't fit the fucking trailer, and plastic mobile-tier graphics just scream lack of polish. It's no coincidence indie clones on app stores look remarkably similar. It's easy to shit up real fast.
>>337600762
You seem insecure.
Should I play Crusader Kings 2?
Last strat game i played was Civ 4, but I got fed up with the inane management of workers and city improvements. CK2 looks interesting though, since it seems like you can do a lot of political manipulation and backstabbing.
>>337595691
am i the only one who thinks it looks kinda comfy?
>>337597519
>Washed out sterile DF superlite
No thanks
>>337600971
Do you play with toys like pic related? No? Wow, you're insecure. :^)
>>337597472
This, I know these money-grubbing cunts are marketing to a gayming audience that keeps getting younger and younger, but this feels like SimCity all over again
>>337599801
wat game is this and is it fun
>>337599362
>3.77 MB, 3264x2448 low quality photo
>for a 3 post screenshot
>>337600992
>Crusader Kings 2
completely different genre than civ
>got fed up with the inane management of workers and city improvements
Then you're going to hate CK2.
>>337595691
The art is the least of my concerns, look at the fucking hexes
The AI in Civ 5 was completely incapable of handling hexes and I doubt there'll be any improvements in that regard
All the improvements that Civ 5's DLC made are likely to be stripped out and sold again later as DLC for Civ 6
But people will buy the game anyways despite seeing what a disaster Beyond Earth was
>>337595691
>those soldiers in the middle, top picture
Holy fuck I hate these graphics
>>337601347
>AI
>he plays singleplayer 4x
for what purpose
>>337601187
>comparing Banished to DF
Am i being trolled?
>>337598238
These graphics literally look more aestethically pleasing
>>337601347
>The AI in Civ 5 was completely incapable of handling hexes
what?
>>337595691
Is this a fucking phone game?
>>337597090
I think so too. I'd probably love it if I could see if it's well-animated.
>>337601451
I didn't play singleplayer Civ 5 because it's completely fucking broken
The ability to play a singleplayer 4x is nice because I don't like waiting hours for for 11 other people to play their turns and sometimes I just want a quick game
>>337595691
i like how it looks
>>337595691
At least now i don't have to use the shitty markers to distinguish resources from the other tiles.
>>337601738
>ability to play a singleplayer 4x is nice
Maybe for practice.
>waiting hours for for 11 other people to play their turns
It's called a turn timer, dingus.
>quick game
There's options for that.
>>337601239
If there was an adult sized version I would be curious, yes.
>>337601821
No you don't, fucking contrarian.
>>337601930
Lol, nintentoddlers everyone. Unironically interested in toys for 5 year olds.
>>337598663
Civ IV with both expansions was easily the greatest experience in the series.
The people that are freaking out about these graphics should do the world a favor and leave it. Civ has never been concerned with graphical fidelity, and it shouldn't start now. As long as it capably renders the progression of a civilization, that is all that matters. And given that they are clearly returning to Civ II's method of having different architecture, I'm pretty happy.
>>337599362
Why would you do this
>>337597729
>Here is your coffee sir, would you like me to put some poop in it
>No
>Yeah stop being afraid of change, I'm going to put lots of poop in it
>All the improvements that Civ 5's DLC made are likely to be stripped out and sold again later as DLC for Civ 6
Religion, Trade Routes, Archaeology and all that junk has been confirmed to be in the base game
>>337599362
10/10
is the annoying builder unit gibberish mumbles and the camera auto-pulling to each unit still around?
Threadly reminder that people saying it "looks fine" are paid shills.
I refuse to believe there are people retarded enough to thinks its okay to release a civilization game with clash of clans-tier graphics.
>>337600762
Patrician is a term invented by insecure white boys to convince themselves they have good taster
>>337602290
Fuck off, it looks fine, gameplay is the only thing that matters.
Fucking shitty niggers suck my dick because they are shit i fucking hate niggers, women and faggots, they will all burn in hell because they are not part of the master race, trannies need to go kill themselves.
Any company that would pay somebody to say this would be fucking retarded.
>>337595691
but it died long ago, anon
when civ V went out
>>337602343
white boys is a term used by insecure niggers/tumblrinas to convice themselves of their superiority
>>337599362
>>337602343
You're pretty stupid, anon. I wish you best of luck in life.
>>337595691
>b-but muh realism
fuck off the graphics don't matter the gameplay does
>>337598917
Someone with sense for once
>>337597284
when you live in a cave your whole life bright anything hurts the eyes.. or if you're a drunkard like me
>>337602573
>the graphics don't matter
I want this reddit meme to die.
saying that what you're going to be staring at for possibly hundreds of hours doesn't matter is just retarded.
>>337601327
endless legend, yes it is fun
>>337602720
Everything that saves me seconds of staring at the turn order screen is far more important.
A 2D mode that isn't complete and utter convoluted shit, for example.
>>337601327
Endless Legend. It is easily the best fantasy-themed 4X ever made. It is innovative for its creative diplomacy system. In addition, players expand their cities manually, by choosing hexes to build districts on.
Civilization VI's trailer has suggested, to me, that it will be more or less lifting both of these systems from that game and putting it in theirs. I definitely think you should pirate it, or buy it when it goes on a good sale. The combat system is a bit confusing, and it's certainly a bit slower, but it's one of the better 4X games released in quite awhile.
>>337595691
stfu u stupid n00b go play cod lol
>>337602995
>It is easily the best fantasy-themed 4X ever made.
Not when Age of Wonders exists.
>>337602115
I don't get it can you make it a food analogy
>>337595691
I'd love if they would copy this new age of wonders style and make it a little more realistic but with the same feeling of a big living world. The new Civ just looks like plastic.
>>337602951
Its not our fault you're poor and can't afford a decent computer.
Fucking AoE I looks better than this.
>>337595691
It looks exactly the same as V
>>337595691
Will we finally get a mainline Civ game for mobile? I have been waiting for this
>>337602995
> players expand their cities manually, by choosing hexes to build districts on.
They're stealing this from Civ VI.
>>337603262
Okay, best fantasy-themed 4X for its era. There are times when newcomers just won't be able to hop into a game, no matter how intriguing its mechanics are. Same reason I can't recommend Dominions to friends, despite how great it is.
>>337603393
I will fuck your eye sockets.
>>337603332
Coffee can be a food sometimes.
>Civ games are supposed to be dark, gritty, and serious!
>>337603424
Yes, I said that in my post.
Unless you actually meant "from" and not "for." In which case what
>>337603349
>the 'you need an i7 for turn times to be manageable' meme
Not everyone is an Intel cuck
>>337603424
They're stealing everything from EL and I love it
>>337603462
I've had Endless Legend for awhile but just don't have the time to dive in and learn all the shit I need to do decent.
>>337599801
How the fuck do I play as the creepy doll dudes with 1 city?
When I convert minors in neutral regions - they get killed off by AI factions and I have to reconvert them again. Also how the fuck do I gain resources quicker than 0.2 per turn per minor faction settlement?
>>337603683
That is how I feel for many 4X games I have. I bought Distant Worlds months ago, after hearing it was the most ambitious space 4X ever, but I could never bring myself to read through the manuals and tutorials to get a hold on how to play the game.
>>337597090
I agree, colorful and lacking absurd bloom is rarer than it should be
>>337603462
>same reason I can't recommend Dominions to friends
the fuck nigga, i recommend that shit to everybody and play that shit bimonthly
Dominions is hardly an advanced game, and Age of Wonders really only gets advanced in it's tactical combat which you can ignore completely.
>>337603262
>>337603262
> battle of brooke lost.
YOU HAD ONE JOB.
>>337603575
>Civ games are suppose to look like mobile games!
>>337603971
there's a reason i'm about to hit load game senpai
>>337603974
Well all the old Civ games look like mobile games, so I guess so.
Don't worry, I'll buy multiple copies to spite you retards.
>>337603963
Dominions is definitely an advanced game that requires a lot of thought and micromanagement. Very few people are willing to take the time necessary to learn the system and mechanics, and the graphics are very plain and not endearing in the slightest. It's a great game, but it is definitely not for everyone.
>>337595691
Mobile is the future. Deal with it nerds.
>>337602995
>t is easily the best fantasy-themed 4X ever made.
Only if you are a retarded shitter who doesn't play 4x or strategy games in general. The concept and systems are amazing but the AI is some of the worst of all time. Plus the fact that it is extremely easy to cheese and the combat is absolutely terrible makes it merely "okay".
>>337603974
yeah they all do
I honestly don't want them to change the graphics maybe fix the hills, its kind of ugly, and give a bit more variation to the buildings (the egyptian market district is a bit too european)
>>337604073
> savescumming in age of wonders.
Jesus christ kohai, what are you doing?
>>337603683
Endless Legend is extremely intuitive and quite easy to learn. There isn't much to learn if you have played any 4x games before.
It's not that it's cartoony, it's that it looks like Clash of Clans
>muh artstyle
Fucking Warcraft 3 has a better artstyle than this shit. Not an argument.
>>337604182
the future for ur mums anus so it can stuff more dicks daily lol
>>337603332
it's like going to taco bell and ordering a pizza but getting a burger instead
>>337604550
yeah exactly, the artstyle they picked is shit you idiot
if it was more detailed it would be 10/10
I never played a 4X game in my life.
I dont even know what 4X means.
So as a total 4X newfag should i get Stellaris or Civ V?
>turn 642 in a marathon civ 5 game
>86 minutes per turn
just kill me now
>>337604793
you should start with civ 2 newfag
>>337604178
>Dominions is definitely an advanced game that requires a lot of thought and micromanagement.
It really has hardly any micromanagement and is entirely focused on the macro.
I suppose some factions would require thought in "how do i make this pile of shit viable against this skeleton spamming fuck", but most factions you can do reasonably well by doing simple magic research and spamming your bread and butter units
Nothing in the game is really that advanced, and the only hurdle to playing the game is the UI which really isn't that bad. The game even allows you to make new players a disciple to learn the game without suffering large consequences from their mistakes.
>>337603343
Wow, that looks absurdly better than OP's pic of civ 5.
>>337603309
Need more brown and grainy textures
>>337599362
>It's not just any screencap
>It's a literal picture of anons screen
>And said anon still uses cathode ray tube screen
>>337604967
err, civ 6, you know what i mean niggers
>>337604793
>as a total 4X newfag should i get Stellaris or Civ V?
Civ V, the complete edition. Don't listen do the Civ4 nerds.
>>337604793
Civ 5 is the most polished game in the genre and is really easy to learn for newer players, so I'd definitely recommend that.
Stellaris is less of a 4x game and more of a grand strategy game.
>>337599362
What OS are you running.
My money is on W98
>>337603879
>after hearing it was the most ambitious space 4X ever
>could never bring myself to read through the manuals and tutorials
Why the fuck did you buy a game based on it's ambition and then ditch it instantly for it's ambition?
>>337597729
Suck a dick.
Your logic and reasoning deserves a equally retarded response.
>>337604967
And that's not even the main focus of the game. It's mostly about the tactical hex-battles. Still got the over world great.
>>337605471
Because I overestimated the amount of free time I would have to learn to play a videogame that seemed interesting. Because it was on sale I bought it with the intention of learning it at a later date.
I think the artstyle is a bit.... 'cucky'
>>337605548
of course.
and playing alone with a gazillion of units on the map will be ass and laggy as shit
of course
>>337605771
shut the fuck up
>>337605741
>Because I overestimated the amount of free time I would have to learn to play a videogame that seemed interesting.
It really doesn't take more than a few hours to get a basic understanding of the game, especially considering you can automate a fuckton in Distant Worlds.
Maybe if you spent less time shitposting about how you don't have enough time to read a manual you'd be able to read a fucking manual, or at least listen to a youtube tutorial in the background if you're really that desperate.
>>337595691
Everything they said about the graphics justifies the look. We will be able to dress up our units and they wanted them to be easily identifiable from any zoom.
The art style just looks to clean and plastic, almost soulless in a way
But thats the 2010s for you, maybe we'll look back at this trend with the same camp of the 80's
>>337605805
You seem salty this "age of wonder" game is btfoing civ 6 in terms of graphics.
>>337605548
>It's mostly about the tactical hex-battles
Not really, it's perfectly viable to just automate and skip all of them.
It changes how you approach units sure, but the game's bread and butter is in it's world map.
>>337600992
It's a very different game, but I'd recommend it. Pick it up vanilla, see if you like it, then think about the expansions. Unlike certain Civilizations, the base game is pretty decent and you'll get a good feel of whether you like it.
>>337605805
Actually it's pretty well optimized. Turns in Hex-Battles are slow when everyone is moving units but you can speed that up.
Gameplay-wise it's not as good as the older games but the art-style and graphics are lovely.
I heard it's still gonna be Civ5 under the hood?
Civ5 had a pretty shitty engine, and would play like dogshit the closer to Modern Era you got. Plus it never got any badass mods like Civ4--I don't count Steam Workshop mods like "Gamindustri Civilization" which gives you a Nep to look at as your civ's leader. I'm talking about mods like Fall From Heaven.
>>337605902
I don't have a few hours to learn how to play the game. I rarely have a few hours of free time at all. If it were convenient for me, I'd have already done it.
Calm down autist.
>>337606003
nah. i'm just saying they are other caracteristics to keep in mind.
see>>337604813
you are just going to make the game feel laggy when
players want smoothness
>>337606305
They have talked quite a bit and there are going to be quite a few different things. Yeah, engine looks a lot better. I personally prefer this graphics to those of V (though they are not amazing either)
>>337603509
Civ 5 is a simplified babby tier 4x
>>337606027
It doesn't have that much stuff to do in the over world. You can tech up and fully upgrade cities pretty fast. Civ has much more content in that context.
>>337606273
well in term of units of the map. how is it?
civ can become really cluttered
>>337606482
>you must use a shitty art style or else the game will run like shit
Lol, no.
>>337606334
>I don't have a few hours to learn how to play the game.
Yet you have thirty minutes to shitpost on 4chan lmao
>>337606590
Lot's of clutter. Map is gonna be spammed by units, armies, scout groups, heroes and neutral mobs, events, buildings.
It has a lot of stuff to do but managing every army on multiple fronts while exploring the map with your hero can consume some time.
>>337606618
maybe not when the game starts
but later in the game things can get laggy.
not everybody can afford a 3000 dollarou pc
i see no prob with this artstyle. you people are just spergin out
>>337606618
Eh, the higher fidelity the graphics the worse it will run as the game scales.
The alternative is to try to go realistic with low quality assets, which ends up with the game looking as shitty and muddy as Civ V did. Worst of both worlds, looks like shit if you zoom it and you can't tell shit apart without icons if you zoom out.
>>337598827
One of the best civ series ever.
>>337597090I never played CIV for its graphics. So I don't really care.
>>337606669
It only takes a couple of seconds for me to reply to you. I work at home.
Though tbf I would rather spend thirty minutes shitposting on a Dutch basketweaving imageboard than three hours learning a random videogame I won't have much time to play anyways.
>>337606890
>>337606842
Shitty plastic graphics and HARDCORE REALISM OVER 9 MILLION TRIANGLES are not the only options.
>>337603575
i thought the girl was michael jackson's Bad in the thumbnail
>>337601593
AI couldnt manage troops properly
>>337607135
>Shitty plastic graphics
nice opinion you got there
but i'll wait for ingame graphics to forge mine
The more important question is wither Leaders will look different depending on your tech age.
Tribal Abe Lincoln is my fondest memory of Civ
>>337607394
>i-it's just screenshots
Anon pls, stop being so retarded.
>>337607064
>he has less than three hours of free time in a day
must be hard senpai
>>337595691
Whoa, nice graphics you have there.
>>337607720
i prefer to forge my opinions on good materials
an ingame video for instance. the see the aliveness of it all, you know.
sperg
>>337595691
Wow, those Egyptians sure are black...
>>337607919
Whoa, nice naval combat you have there.
>>337595691
Is that settlers 3 HD edition?
>>337607336
has nothing to do with hexes
>>337597472
You seem to have forgotten what games from 2006 looked like, friend. Don't worry though, it's a pretty common problem, with a pretty common solution! Here, this is what a game from 2006 looked like. Notice the quantifiable and undeniable difference in quality between CivVI screenshots and this.
No need to thank me, friend, I'm just doing my part to educate friendly reddit immigrants like you. Sayonara, as they say in the land of the rising sun.
>>337607865
I tend to have more than that in a day. I just choose to spend it in other ways, usually.
>>337608240
Yes it does.
It could into any form of naval warfare, nor defend Peninsulas or narrow strips of land because the hex system made the rules of movement to intricate for the AI to properly grasp.
Mods will fix it
>>337608717
No, what fucked up the AI was the lack of stacking. It's a lot more complicated when you can't just pass units through each other and move them as one. The AI now has to consider each unit's position in relationship to the others, it's far more complex. There's no reason hexes would be any more difficult than squares.
>>337609160
still looks like gay playdough
>>337609160
that's fucking disgusting
>>337609160
This looks good to me. A bit too dark, but otherwise great.
>>337609160
It's like someone smeared diarrhea over my eyes, but I'm also still looking at the same shit art.
>>337609249
Well that contributed to it, but hexes also make it hard to properly perform defensive maneuvers and organize troops to take advantage of things like ranged cover and stuff.
>>337599362
USE PRINT SCREEN
GG
>>337609160
You can paint shit in gold but it will still be shit.
>>337609569
How?
>>337595691
The only reason it looks this way is because they want to release a mobile port for tablets.
>>337609160
This looks even worse.
>>337609679
Squares are easier to program for AI than hexes since it's easier to conceptualize the optimal defensive strategy in squares then hexes, especially since the previous ais had been built on the 8 axis freedom
>>337595691
> civ has finally the proper mobile graphic to the casualised gameplay.
i see nothing wrongness here.
>play Civ5
>game keeps locking up during barbarian turns
>can't even use task manager or alt-F4 to close the game, have to sign out of Windows to close the game
>have to not allow barbarians in my game if I don't want this gamebreaking bug
What does the game mean by this?
>>337601584
for fags maybe
>>337610508
Strange that bug should have been fixed for years now. I got it a few years back and I'm sure they even hot fixed it. Are you running any mods? What are your system specs? What map/player amount are you playing with?
If you can't open the task manager it's usually a bad sign. Something's wrong on the system level. The task manager should always open or at least you should be able to strg+alt+entf into the option screen as long as the OS is running stable and the hardware isn't failing.
