Is it safe to say Crash 4 is coming?
>>337593307
Yes, my dad works at Nintendo
>>337593307
Well Activision isn't in the credits and they probably would have been sued to shit otherwise.
It's coming. Next week.. In games magazines.
>>337594198
Activision still owns Crash you fucking idiot. Even the mouth breathing retards on Facebook know that.
>>337594269
You need to settle down, buster brown.
>>337594269
>He doesn't know
Look who just made a fool out of himself
>>337593307
No. Do you REALLY want a modern Crash game? Let his legacy end in a relatively positive light.
>>337594269
>Activision still owns Crash you fucking idiot.
You're saying it like that means something. There's nothing mandating new Crash game has to be made by Naught Dog and this whole thing could've been a head-start in marketing agreed to by Activision.
>>337594514
The new R&C was good though
But I don't think NG should be the one who should make a new crash.
>>337594269
>>337594514
Handled by the right devs it would be fantastic. I've been aching for a decent platformer for years and Yooka Laylee is all that's keeping me going.
>>337593307
I'd rather have a Crash 1-3 remaster like the new Ratchet & Clank game
>>337594269
You need to learn to read in-between the lines: a statement like "Activision still owns the rights to the Crash franchise" could easily mean "The contract is still valid but in a couple of months it will expire and will pass to Sony" or something.
