Will it be good?
Is it worth the money?
h-hype?
>>337357646
It's Ubisoft padding game #1723 with setting so ridiculous it's impossible to take seriously.
>>337357646
Was the first one good? No.
This one will not be any good either. In fact, it will probably be more generic and shit than the first because it's a sequel, and the dev team has no guidance to work off of beyond "Take this failed game and turn it into a viable series."
>>337358067
First one was decent actually, just too short.
>>337358223
>That horrible nerf gun gameplay
>Story with absolutely ridiculous premise that actually takes itself seriously
>Decent
>>337358653
okay, at least that intro was decent
Why did they get rid of China as the invading country?
>>337358872
What? China never invaded usa in the first one.
>>337358872
Why did they remove Tibet from Doctor Strange movie?
>>337358872
what the fuck are you talking about
>>337358993
>>337359015
>>337359152
Wasn't the original homefront supposed to have china instead of north korea invading the us.
>>337358993
>>337359152
The story was originally supposed to feature China as the big bad.
>>337357646
Played the beta, it was hella fun i was so fucking suprised cuz the first one was ass. So yeah i lre ordered it if its bad its bad watevr if its good ill be so happy, seriously had a blast with the beta
>comes out Tuesday
>no new gameplay
>no reviews
>no presence or hype at all
It's semi-decent at the very best. Probably bad. Sorry OP.
>>337357646
pick it up cheap in a year or 2 when you are bored.
wiki about the game and it got sold mid development, I would expect a buggy mess
>the people who made Timesplitters are forced to work on this
It's sincerely crazy how everything I love dies and everything I hate lives on. Some days I earnestly wonder if I'm in some sort of Jacob's Ladder situation where I actually died and went to Purgatory sometime around 2007 and I'm just not fully aware of it yet.
It isn't the worst, sort of like a bad Deus Ex: HR. If you liked that, buy this on sale, if you didn't, give it a miss.
>>337357646
>literally who: the game
>"hype"
do I smell a shill?
>>337359257
>>337359278
They pussied out because "they would be banned from ever going to china" those communist loving motherfuckers.
>North Korea
>Advanced Military
>America turning into some high-tech society due North Korea
What's even the fucking point by calling the enemy faction North Korea, why suspension of disbelief is being tested here heavily.
>>337360341
I really hate o say it but DE: HR is way, way more complex. It's more like Far Cry.
>>337360657
It's an alternate universe where North Korea became a superpower in the 90s and the US military got assfucked by nukes in the middle east, or some shit.
>>337360657
>he doesn't know that north korea has pulled the moon close to earth in 2015 so everyone can travel to it on planes
Don't know why anyone would be hyped for this. I got the first game in a bundle. It was like a kinda neat premise but the lamest calladooty clone gameplay. I mean it wasn't a terrible game, but it was definetly below average. And I'm sure this one will basically play like a reskin of far cry 3. Another dull open world collectathon with a bunch of empty space peppered with outposts. There'll be enemy patrols who wander an expanse of barren world geometry. You'll have some some kinda building you can go to for a map of a region. And you'll probably have a flare or a radio to call some resistance buddies who show up in seconds like they were hiding in a nearby shrub. Oh can't forget some pile of neato guns you gotta collect from special Koreans or some shit. I dunno.
Let me guess
Only like 4 missions long and the online mode will be filled with wall shooters and people spamming tanks
>>337361649
It's open world and (I think) co op only.
The marketing has been mediocre but the game looks fun. We didn't really get a good open world shooter this year so this has the chance to really shine if it's half decent.
