>Battlefield 1 not just muskets and trench warfare, says DICE
>muskets
>MUSKETS
You can't make this up
>>337345807
It gets worse. It's a game about WW1 and France isn't even considered a main combatant. Italy and America are for some reason.
>>337345807
>muskets
fucking
>>337345807
The developer is saying that there's a misconception that WW1 is nothing but 'muskets and trenches'.
Seriously anon, do you even read?
Most people are fucking retarded when it comes to even basic history, what else is new.
What's wrong with that doe?
People are still going to use a Springfield 1903 or some shit with a tryhard scope so they can sit back in a trench and ping off people just like they do in fucking every other battlefield game that includes sniper rifles
I seriously don't get why servers limit sniper/recon spots to maybe 4 per side or some shit.
They don't even do anything either than try and pick you off, sometimes they succeed, most o the times they don't.
Then you just hop in a tank and blast their face off.
It's retarded. Snipers shouldn't even exist in a game like battlefield.
I mean, these are highly paid professionals and they can't y'know, fucking read at least one book or hire a advisor on the subject
>>337345807
>air combat
In WW1, if you were in the air, you were pretty much dead since the planes were BARELY built to land again.
>using Origin
>>337347706
>France isn't even considered a main combatant.
This can't be true. It makes so little sense it's unreal.
>>337348034
yeah, i don't get the point of snipers in these arcade-y, deathmatch games. there is never ever a suppression mechanic and there is never ever an incapacitate function and people are damage sponges so that renders machine guns useless, a machine gun in these games is nothing more than a very big clip and a long reload.
so that leaves snipers with no targets of opportunity, they just arbitrarily and slowly boost their own score.
shit, even in the old days, snipers could at least snipe through gun breaches on tanks. in video games they don't do shit.
>>337348517
It is true, it really is.
http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield_1
I just saw it on /int/ myself and it's unreal.
>No France
>No Russia either
>There's probably nothing about the Eastern Front, even though this game prides itself on diverse fronts and environments
>>337348624
>eastern front
>diverse
>all white people fighting
DAS RAYCIS
>>337348107
>being this thick in the head
That's exactly what they are doing for this game.
Learn to fucking read, they say there's a misconception that WWI had muskets and shit, not that the game will have muskets.
>>337348752
>they say there's a misconception that WWI had muskets and shit
Where are they getting this misconception from? Fucking youtube comments?
>>337348034
please no sniper rifles.
>>337348624
worry not anon, I am sure DICE willput them as DLC, like 5 of them,
Battlefield Niggers
sweden does it again
fucking cucks keep digging their own grave and redditards eat this shit up
>>337348624
France doesn't even get a mention?
bien baise
>Guys lets make a Battlefield where we can make the cover character black
>There were some HARLEM HELLFIGHTERZ in WW1
>Okay lets go with that how many of them were there?
>Eight
>THAT'S FINE
WHERE'S MY BATTLEFIELD SOMALIA
>>337350663
If they really insisted on having black troops, they could also have used Senegalese tirailleurs. Bot those fought for France, and France ISN'T EVEN A FUCKING PLAYABLE FACTION.
>>337349554
Fucking shit, I can actually see this happening.
Do people on /v/ not know how to read?
>>337348624
This is a fan wiki where they added those based on what they saw/confirmed from the video personally. As usual /v/ freaks out over nothing.