How could they fuck up the graphics this badly?
It's a game for armchair generals and not 12 year old anime loving neets
is that a screenshot of civilization revolution?
>>337344373
It's the next gen CIV 6 game
Why are you posting mobile shit on v
Good resolution, fairly detailed.
The only thing that seems to be the complaint by you guys is the artstyle. Looks fine to me.
>great advancements in technology
>plenty of tools available
>make cartoony shit to pander to casual gamers
I blame reddit due to them having shit hardware.
This looks fucking worse than Black and WHite
>>337344126
OP it's just stylized
get over it
They're making shit that your granpa could run on his pc bro.
Of course its going to look dated.
I don't own a tablet, but I'm seriously considering picking one up when Civ 6 comes out, being able to play it anywhere will be really comfy.
>>337344996
thats the problem. Everyone can see it has "better" graphics. The art direction is shit.
>>337347715
Looks good to me.
About to upgrade my rig for civ 5. I want huge maps. dont even care about 6, looks shit and beyond earth was simplified shit.
even if it looked good it will take them a few years and a couple DLCs before it's worth a look
stick to Civ 5/4 kids
>>337344126
Looks very bright and plasticy.
"we want the overwatch audience"
>>337348876
>About to upgrade my rig for civ 5
Dude, i play Civ5 on my Chrombook with a pentium CPU
>>337344126
>armchair generals
yeah... but no. there's nothing deep or meaningful about having backstabbing allies that will be destroyed like insects once they declare war on you and you spam all your units to their place
>>337344126
>port XCOM to iPad
>when they released BE they talked about wanting to get an audience who wouldn't play civ normally
It's all about somebody up high wanting to tap into that mobile market in the most retarded way possible - making a PC game look like a mobile game.
>>337344126
What annoys me is how it looks like Mobile shit and you KNOW they have a big budget because it's fucking Civ, so essentially, you are paying for a downgrade in every possible way, especially since there will be maybe like a tenth of the civs that were in V
>>337344996
The artstyle is pretty shit and doesn't really suit the tone of the game. Comparing the visuals of VI to the promo art made for it is grating as fuck. The OST probably won't go well with the visuals either.
>Complaining about Civilization looking like Civilization
>>337352593
>civilization revolution was my first and only civ game
>>337352593
but it doesn't
>in b4 pretending this is the natural evolution of IV's visuals
>>337352719
>>337353314
A better question to ask is whether or not the AI has improved.
>>337353908
I don't know but no.
>>337350793
What, on Strategic View? I find that rather nice, actually. I turn on strategic view for large battles and ending my turn late-game.
>>337354323
this, they've been promising "better ai" since before civ 4
the ai will demand stuff from you, never give you anything for free, they will stab you in the back after 5000 years of alliance, Ect
![AsiaMoe[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/RNE27MA.jpg "AsiaMoe[1].jpg")
>>337344126
the game would be much better if it were based around little anime girls
first dawn of war 3 with a cartoony "down graded" artstyle. now civ 6.
could devs stop ruining my favorite franchises
>>337355123
But they gotta get that DOTA 2 audience in 3rd world countries that only play on toasters anon, how else can they have a game that has a competitive pvp player base that they can monetize for as little effort as possible?
Fucking DOTA 2 killed games
>>337355123
inspired by dota 2 and art direction copy and pasted from starcraft 2
its time to kill myself
>>337344126
It looks like civ 4. If only it played like it too then it would be amazing
>>337354493
No, not strategic view. The normal earth view or wtf it's called
Civilization games have been on a long downward decline ever since Civ 2. There have been cool features added in other installments. Strategic and luxury resources from 3 and 4 were good. But on average, the gameplay has gotten worse.
The name of the game is Civilization. The goal of the game should be to build cities, that's what civilization means. Thus, the game should reward you for building cities. More cities means more population, it means more troops, it means more GDP, more art, etc.
Civ 2 rewarded you for building cities. It was important that you build the cities in the right spot, and it was important that you develop the city properly, but if you do that right, it just rewarded you even further. Or, if you didn't want to rush settlers, you could conquer your enemies and after things stabilized that only made your own civilization all the more powerful. Painting the map was FUN.
Somewhere along the line they lost sight of that. Now the game effectively punishes you for building more cities. It fucks up your happiness, your economy, your research, your production.
I think that a common complaint from players in all Civ games is that people get tired of micromanagement in the late game. So the solution that devs came up with was to punish you for building too many cities. That means less micromanagement. I guess that was easier than coming up with better AI to automatically micromanage your cities.
>>337344126
>not 12 year old anime loving neets
Im 26 and anime loving, but I dont like this bullshit, phone-level graphics.
>>337356331
But it was V that punished people for going wide empires. IV was still about making as much cities as possible. Only that they made placement more important and prevented ICS from happening.
>>337356331
civ 2 was super easy to cheese with caravans
How is it honestly any different than past Civ games?
>>337344126
This is shit but I'm more interested in how the gameplay is going to be dumbed down compared to V and especially the previous games.
>>337356943
Do you even use your eyes?
>It's a Clash of Civilizations episode
How can they miss their target audience THIS bad? Tell me /v/, I just don't understand.
>>337354525
>Have only one war unit
>Start war with almost everyone
>Create a cold war
>Wait until they want to create a peace treaty
>Refuse until they give you one of their cities
>Repeat
>Wait until they have one last city and destroy them
>Profit
I fucking love CIV V
>>337352578
>doesn't really suit the tone of the game
Cartoony artstype doesn't suit the game where it takes 100 years for unit to cross the river?
>>337356331
According to dev interviews happiness will be local not global for civ 6, also apparently geography will affect research rate so being costal could speed up nautical tech research. What this means is wide could be viable again, not that it wasn't viable in V.
>>337358347
Yes.
I want to feel like guide to the nation, leading them across the history. That feeling is combined with classic board game approach, to make it even possible without forcing players to play for months.
Previous Civ games could give me that.
![Coliseum-Rome-2[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/IZfXGaN.jpg "Coliseum-Rome-2[1].jpg")
>its a /v/ gets mad about graphics episode
I am hyped, looks good. Day one pirate.
Who cares about the graphics? What I want to know is if the AI still behaves like a schizophrenic retard.
>>337358501
Source?
Stylized graphics are superior, hyper realism is too intense on the system and you can do more/better shit when you aren't trying to make sure the trees have realistic shadows and foliage.
>>337358795
Because graphics DO matter a lot in case of game atmosphere.
Do you think that, for example, Dark Souls would feel exactly the same if it had Team Fortress 2 graphics style?
>>337344126
the game doesnt come out for another 6 months.
is this really what the final product is going to look like, or is /v/ just losing its shit over nothing?
>>337359019
Did they changed the looks of Beyond Urf since they showed first screenshoots? Or Civ V?
There is a huge risk that this is really how it will look like in the end.
>>337357582
Are youvjust shitposting or does that really work?
>>337358347
The tone of the game is centred around the fact that it's about the entire span of human civilization. It features abstraction and boardgame mechanics but generally the aesthetics of the game have been in line with that. That's not to say that the game's were never light-hearted or didn't have any humour but there is very clear gulf in presentation compared to the promotional material, or the previous game. Imagine if SMAC had used these kind of visuals, it would feel completely off.
>>337359017
Now I want to see a souls game with Dark Spire style.
>>337359017
>opinion. for example, false equivalency.
Cool socks.
>>337349536
It's building upon the content already in Civ V after all DLC plus the new changes like unstacked cities, better terrain, stacking support units into regular military units, dyamic research, a coastal city will research fighing and shit fast than one in the middle of a continent as an example.
Game is gonna be great m8, already got it preordered.
>>337344126
It looks like a fucking mobile game for Christ sake. For whatever reason instead of adding more definition to the game they literally blur the lines and make a fucking cartoony stylized game.
You srs?
Anyone saying the artstyle is fine is the same kind of memelord who though Spooky's House of Jumpscares was genuinely terrifying.
The thing with Civ games is that casuals actually eat that stuff up. In fact, any sim genre tends to hit big with the casual market. The more they simplify the inputs and the more devices they get their game on, the bigger the market truly is.
I have in-laws that do nothing but play Simcity and Farmville but used to be straight up addicted to the older Civilization games. If they can get a full experience of Civ on their phones, they'll definitely be hooked into it. Revolution was a nice start, but it lacks a lot of depth and the games are actually too short.
>>337359429
>already got it preordered.
>tying up $60 in a pre-order for a game about which minimal details beyond "it has features" is known, and that won't be out for 5 months
>>337359551
that's because it is a mobile game anon.
>>337352578
Doesn't fit the game where a fucking huge man can defeat a battleship? lol
>>337359181
Shitposting
>>337359181
It does, and im not complaining about it, i enjoy literally doing nothing but create political despair until they gift me cities and resources just for a peace treaty of 10 turns.
>>337359292
GOTAY.
>>337359318
Because you say so?
Nobody is bothered just because it's stylized. What people are angry about is that it's stylized as a mobile game.
If someone removed the hex outlines and told you it's the newest Clash of Clans clone, would you honestly have reason to doubt it?
>>337359181
To some extent yes it works. The AI is extremely dumb about peace treaties and you can get cities or shit tons resources for no good reason. I once ended part of a three front war right as one of the AI's was all over one of my cities and got two luxuries out of it. Another gave me a white peace a few turns later even though I was still outnumbered and then the last was easy to deal with.
>>337359839
Because I say that I look forward to it? Yes. I do look forward to it because I say so.
>>337344126
I fixed it guys, see pic.
>>337359960
And what would prevent me for calling your opinion meaningless too?
>>337352578
>Statue doesn't fall under it's own weight
They should add in shaders as a visual option. So if you want, you can tone down the bright colors, or just keep them if you like them.
>>337360051
It still looks like a fucking mobile game
>>337360051
Nothing sweetfx can't fix
>>337360139
the globe is hollow you dolt
>>337359704
What's it like living off of minimum wage?
In Canada it's 80 Tru-Doh bux too, thankfully I'm not poor.
>>337360139
The big globe is made of styrofoam actually.
>>337352578
Yeah bruh Civ 1 was totally black and white from day one, rite?
>>337360051
Now add terrain details and more trees in forrests and it could pass. But V would still looks better.
>>337359019
6 months ain't enough time to completely redo the engine entirely
>>337344126
I like it. Gives me a really relaxing vibe.
>>337344996
Fairly detailed? The terrain's texture looks like something from fucking 15 years ago.
>>337345318
>I blame reddit due to them having shit hardware
What are you even talking about?
The average redditor is the retarded PC master race dickrider with the same i7-4790k/970 build that everyone has.
>>337360449
But it is not about redoing the engine, it is about making more detailed textures.
Buildings and cities are fine detailed so far. Terrain and everything else looks like lowest possible graphic settings.
They still have time to fix this, IF they would actually LISTEN to their audience. And they probably dont.
>>337360074
Call it what you want, just don't pretend that what you say is fact when you won't back it up.
>>337360342
They also reduced the number of soldiers per unit in those pictures why
>>337360610
>Average Redditor
>Uses best Graphics Card and CPU based on cost for performance.
Guess that means redditors are smart?
Way to fucking go anon.
You dumbass.
>>337359797
>I've never tried so better call him shitposter
>>337344126
I don't care as long as the game isn't as boring as Civ5
>>337360725
Yeah and if you were capable of reading, you would realize I said it in response to an anon saying that somehow reddit has shit hardware.
At least I hope they'll give us lightning fast turn times with that level of graphical fidelity.
>>337344126
Is it a meme to hate this game's artstyle? I literally don't even see a problem with it.
>>337344126
the biggest problem is you can notice the steep different of each house cultural style, it makes the game weird
>>337352578
No anon, you have got it all wrong. It's supposed to be symbolic
>The ground: the hard work of coders who toil diligently on graphics programming, artificial intelligence, interface logic, and all that
>Atlas: the designers who spend all day crunching spreadsheets, documents, and generally struggling with the immense task of refreshing & reinventing an old standby PC series
>The earth: the incompetent publisher/advertiser, art director, and general artists who fuck it all up and are a burden on the company
>>337360278
Civ1's art doesn't suit the tone of the game, so what's your point?
>>337344126
>It's a game for armchair generals
>>337360752
>hexes
>1UPT not only for units, but now for city buildings and wonders
I've got some news for your anon, and you're not going to like it
>>337360991
/v/ like to complain and be cynical about video games, and so they're going to complain about the artstyle because there's nothing else to whine about
at least there isn't a black guy on the front cover
>>337361545
>boot up HoI/EU/Stellaris
>it's a game for snoring fast forwarders and map painters
>>337360991
>nothing wrong with eating shit stop being a hater xD
>>337359859
It doesn't look that different from Civ V in respect to scale or the design of your units/cities, they're just done up differently.
You're just paranoid about the mobile boogeyman.
>>337360219
I make a modest but decent salary, but if I spent that frivolously I'd be pretty poor yeah. Just because you can afford to pay for something doesn't mean it's worth the asking price.
>>337360991
are you a mobile "gamer" anon?
>>337358795
>Day one pirate.
but it needs two expansions to not suck
>>337362080
I played and liked Civ5 on release.
I played and liked Civ4 on release.
I'll be fine.
>>337357342
>Those shit graphics
Jesus fuck /v/
>>337361703
>You're just paranoid about the mobile boogeyman.
It's not a boogeyman when series go there to die.
Previously, that graveyard-ghetto was handheld (see Final Fantasy Tactics, Tactics Ogre, Shin Megami Tensei, Legend of Zelda, Megaman, the list goes on).
Hell, if I want to paint with broad strokes, you can even say entire genres went to handheld to die. Tactical RPGs, dungeon crawlers, and puzzle games are all genres that PC/console ignored and inevitably niche'd out to the handheld ghetto.
>>337362053
AoW was beyond its own time.
>>337361728
Doesn't sound very decent if you can't make regular game purchases with it on top of your typical living expenses.
Have you been suckered into starting a family or something, anon?
>>337361593
nobody complained about one being on the back cover
unless you're going to somehow argue that SMAC isn't beloved
>>337361703
Except he didn't say anything about the scale (though the trees still look fucking gigantic and don't even feel like a forest/jungle). What makes it look like a mobile game are the shitty-ass textures and lazily done terrain. If fireaxis had at last put some effort into the visuals I bet most people wouldn't mind the childish/cartoony art style so much. Only thing that looks remotely decent are the buildings.
>>337362320
Not really, it released alongside Heroes 4 and Disciples 2, both of which had gorgeous maps.
>>337352578
This. I also always feel Civ mainline series is more lean to table top games.
This artstyle more lean to mobile games.
Fuck I really want it to be good.
Any news on mod support?
SHIT NIGGER I had no idea this was Civ. I thought it looked pretty nifty at first BUT ITS CIV WHY have they chosen this style ?????? It fully looks like a baby game.
>base changes sound interesting
>art style doesn't fit the feel or style of the series at all
>m-maybe the mods will fix it?
I don't mind stylized but this looks so...cheap. I want to feel like a god-emperor, carefully guiding a people from the muck to the stars as commerce, religion, culture and science blossom from my careful tilling. These games don't always capture that but they should at least try if they want my money.
Ive seen this already but im still in disbelief that they chose this art style. I saw the trailer first on steam and it looked cool, so i look it up on google and OPs pic is what i see.
What the actual fuck?
It looks worse than civ5 and nearly as bad as age of empires online.
I dont even care about civ but that kinda pisses me off and makes me feel bad for fans.
>>337362751
Engine has been designed with ease of modding the game in mind.
>>337361472
nigger what? Yes it did. It legitimately looked like your first serious experience playing board games. The squared off units and cities make them look distinct from the map, as if they were individual pieces. Civ1's art style is at worst, fine, and at best, great.
>>337362375
If my bar was as low as yours (which is clearly pretty low) for putting down full price on a game then I'd almost be buying every game in existence. And of course I have a family, what are you a filthy hedonistic bachelor?
>>337344126
It has a similiar art direction to civ 4 but not the quality and detail of a game that you'd expect them to have made. What a fuckin blunder on their part. I don't mind the style but those models better be more detailed than these screenshots or I'm pirating or not even playing this shit.
>>337362053
Left looks really good. Why can't Civilization be more like that?
>>337360991
>Is it a meme
Stop it.
People who dont like this artstyle provided a lot of arguments against that. Trying to turn this into strawmen argument by using this retarded "meme" and "hate" terms is worst you can do.
>>337363492
I've bought like like 5 games this year full price anon.
And yes, I'm not even 30 yet, why would I ruin my youth on some woman who I'm growing to grow bored with in 6 months?
The real kicker is that Civ V sold over 8 million and this cheap shit is what they came up with afterwards.
>>337363736
>Stop it.
>blank line
>actual post
Eat shit.
Looks fine to me, the gameplay is already highly abstracted so I don't mind the visual style being simplified in some areas if it makes it easier to acquire information. Good UI design makes a much bigger difference than how noisy the texture of a grassland is. Perhaps if the visual style of the previous games was tied closer to the gameplay I would be bothered about the change but it never felt like it was, particularly so with V.
The important things about the game are how much/little it improves upon V and whether it compromises on depth in order to get an eventual mobile port out of it.
Still going to pirate it, wouldn't want to waste my money if it turns out to be a turd like Beyond Earth.
This must mean that the game doesn't take as long to start/load up as V and the maps are going to be bigger.
Warlock MotA > Civilization
Prove me 'rong.
>>337363850
>"I cant find any counter-argument, better stick to something meaningless".
You had one job.
left is terrible beyond belief and the UI artist need medical care for his shit taste.
>>337364079
I'm not that guy.
>>337363905
Doubtful
>>337364531
HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEvHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
>>337364062
>>337364531
Honestly Clash of the Clans with better graphics and interface would be a 9/10 game.
>>337364605
Except that all the gameplay info so far is pretty hype.Mainly because Firaxis is copying Endless Legend.
>>337363941
why do asians have to make everything into girls?
>>337364062
Warlock is shallow beyond belief. Play the game for 5-6 hours and you've seen everything.
>>337364605
>Civ 2 above Civ 4
shaking my head to be honest
>>337344126
If it plays like Civ 5, but better who the literal fuck cares? Can always play in strategic anyways.
>>337364915
Underage?
>>337344126
Why do kids think that the hardcore graphics make the game hardcore? 100% the same edgelords that were meme/metal shirt, because its brutal
>>337365203
>hardcore graphics
>tumblr
>>337365203
>hardcore graphics
Right, it's really damn hardcore to not look like android shovelware.
Do you guys even remember how fucking muddied and cluttered Civ V looks?
NEW LEAKED PICTURE
>>337364605
>Civ 4 that high
Shame tastes have fallen that low in our time.
>>337359429
>Civ 4 was kind of shit without BTS
>Civ V was borderline unplayable without G&K
>Nobody even remembers enough about Beyond Earth to remember if it was good or not
>Still pre-ordering the next civ game
>armchair generals
>absolutely shitty conquest policies that completely ruin warmongering and make waging war a terribly slow cluster fuck of uninteresting numbers
Kek
It's a board game
>>337344126
I'm fine with the graphics, it's just that everything looks so BRIGHT. Civ V had a good colour deal going on. Hopefully, there'll either be options for this stuff or early mods.
>>337360051
>>337360342
Neo /v/ is real, you guys are truly an antithesis to what we used to be. It's actuall kind of funny.
>>337360449
do you even now what an engine is?
>>337365659
No it's a simulation that I'm in control of, it's my world and my world is not a baby cartoon
>>337361579
Hexes are alright, the real problem is 1UPT. You can't have 1UPT without completely swinging the combat in favour of the player and making late game a fucking chore, so basically the game is guaranteed to be boring from the off.
>>337344126
JUST FUCK MY SHIT UP
>>337362375
Don't criticise others for being wasteful with their money, you're the one throwing away 80 communismbux on what is at the moment literally nothing.
>>337344126
Literal ripoff of Age of Empires Online
>>337365783
>simulation
Kekaroony
>>337364605
(you)
>>337344996
>fairly detailed
What?
>>337363941
I-I...
I w-would play it, if I could be such a qt leader like that red-hair one on the left.
>>337364605
>tfw everyone always forgets about Call to Power
I mean, it was retarded in terms of balance, but insanely fun.
>>337365967
Nope, that's more detailed.
Their last game was Space Pirates or whatever? It was an iOS game.
Sid Meier has decided Firaxis' true audience is apparently the Clash of Clans audience. They literally gave away their 4x throne, but that's fine because fresh blood devs are fighting to lay claim to it.
>>337365735
Please explain, what exactly you consider wrong in this approach. That we provide ideas, how this current theme could be fixed or what?
Why do you people care about the graphics in a game like that? No Civ game has ever looked good, nobody has ever cared.
>>337365659
It sure looks more like one now.
>>337344126
I like the art direction, graphics from Civ 5 was pretty shit even for when it was released.
At the very least their art direction can kind of hide their shitty textures.
>>337344126
in Civ 5 the trees look more like bushes so the trees in 6 are an I mprovement
>>337344126
Face it OP, Chad and Stacy playing on their new ipads are the new market now, get with the times gramps
>>337360649
It's probably because it's a special unit for what appears to be the Japanese, not the usual infantry.
>>337366578
Because the current style makes people associate the game with mobile shit. That's not exactly a flattering thing for a 4X.
>>337344126
It looks good. You're just a faggot, OP.
>Caring about graphics in a Civ game
I'm holding off on judgement until we see some landscape variety.
I have a feeling that snow/tundra will look really comfy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXX5B33Dp9g
>>337344126
Why do you care about the graphics so much?
>>337366398
Yeah right, all you fucking children do is complain. No constructive criticism whatsoever.
>>337366398
It looks fucking awful and it goes against the art direction. Desaturating everything is exactly what we used to make fun about since it was the industry trend as they tried to target kids who wanted to play grown up games for grown ups such as themselves.
>>337367024
>the inevitable contrarians who say something that looks shit looks good
lol
>game announced merely days ago
>/v/ shitting it down to the core with only 3 screenshots of evidence, of who knows if it's taken from a pre-alpha stage
>not even that, but people caring about graphics in a CIVILIZATION game
>>337366903
chad and stacy don't play civilization though
>>337363941
Honestly I would hate the game if it were like this. Am I a homo?
>>337344126
>It's a game for armchair generals and not 12 year old anime loving neets
No. Grand strategy are games for armchair generals, Civ is for playing some sort of party family videogame. The art style is fitting and fine.
>>337366873
They're supposed to look more like bushes
>>337367178
The art invokes fears of civ being dumbed down mobile shit, no one wants a watered down civ game made for the drooling retard mobile market.
>>337364804
because asian girls are worth being idolized
>>337367234
>>337366246
Google CIV Online
>>337367178
You don't need many screenshots to see they're going in a bad direction with the art. We're bashing what we don't like, no one is complaining about the new mechanics.
>>337367178
I know you know this but people don't actually care. /v/ doesn't play videogames and it certainly doesn't play Civ. Wait a few weeks and you'll see the Third Strike effect happen with people claiming to want Civ to be more like Civ IV again despite having never played it for more than a couple hours if at all.
You and I have been here for too long.
>>337367274
So this proves that the screenshots are mere bullshots.
It's obvious they fucked the graphics so they can port it to tablets easier
>>337367178
>game is 4 months from release
>DLC plan is already announced
>pre-alpha
>>337365949
You sound pretty flustered there anon.
Something wrong? Have you never paid for tickets to a concert or anything in advance? Preordering a game is essentially the same thing.
>>337367380
I don't want to see that again. Trigger is the only proper word I've found.
>>337367273
This 2bh
>>337367274
What the fuck, they were supposed to be merged ? Why am I such a tard ?
>>337367149
>the inevitable sheep who use flavour of the month words like "contrarian"
>>337367483
>>337367518
Concert:
>Limited tickets, may lose the opportunity to purchase
>Ordering early guarantees being able to see it
>If you don't buy a ticket, you won't see the concert
>If you buy a ticket 6 months after the concert, you are fucking retarded
Vidya:
>Unlimited copies, you'll always be able to purchase the game with a couple of clicks
>Ordering early gives you no bonuses whatsoever
>If you don't pre-order, you can look at reviews before buying
>If you buy the game 6 months after release, you get the same game but for less money and with fewer bugs
"Essentially" the same thing.
>>337367518
>thinking the consistency between shows of a band to consistency between games of a series is anywhere near comparable
Stop breathing, my man.
>>337367721
But the Steam Controller was pretty much made specifically for games with KB+M controls.
It's pretty expensive for an expansion pack that downgrades the graphics.
Let's hope they reveal something new about it at E3 since these minor tweaks are something you would see in an expansion for V and do not justify a full price.
looks like a Facebook game hahahah
>>337367491
>DLC plan is already announced
Really? Where?
I mean, I know it will get at least 2 expansions like V did, but I must missed that part.
>>337367858
>Ordering early gives you no bonuses whatsoever
Have you been living under a rock on the dark side of the moon for the last couple of years?
>>337367956
>40 Euros
wat. It's 60 here.
>>337368028
>Expand your empire further with the Civilization VI Digital Deluxe which includes the full base game, the 25th Anniversary Digital Soundtrack, and access to four post-launch DLC packs* that will add new maps, scenarios, civilizations and leaders for a bundled discount.
>*Save vs buying DLC packs a la carte. Individual DLC may be sold separately. If you purchase the Digital Deluxe, do not also purchase these standalone packs, as you will be charged for them.
>>337368064
It's 60 at Steam and Humble Store but 40 at G2A.
>>337367858
>wasting your precious time defusing this trainwreck of a comparison
Leave him be or he will come back with more marginally relevant stuff to try and maybe counter one of your points or switch the discussion's focus. A fool and his money are soon parted, it's just the way it is.
>>337367603
They're not.
>>337368054
so its pre-order-2-advantage now?
>>337365203
Civ V didn't have hardcore graphics but fit appropriately to the game's general tone.
>>337367603
They weren't, they don't actually match up. It just gives a better idea of the zoom level of actual gameplay.
>>337364708
>Autism Simulator
Interested in this now. Pls go into detail.
>>337368234
Maybe, Chaos could very well be one of the worst factions in the game.
>>337368146
Oh, thats justs the same shit that V did - few scenarios nobody played and few overpowered leaders.
Looks great to me. Looks much more readable, much less tiring than the pseudo-realistic crap in civ 5.
>>337367635
>flavour of the month
Did you just learn the word this month?
>>337368158
>G2A
Buying from that site providing stolen and such keys?
So whats the minimum requirements?
Samsung Galaxy S7?
>>337345318
Civ is always made for people with old PCs in the back of their mind. As long as we can get actually huge maps this time, there should be no complaints. If the maps are as small as V then I will understand the bitching
>>337368290
400 hours later and 7 restarts and I have not finished the campaign. Fuck that Slav bullshit.
>>337352578
Imagine if they had teased the game with this art a few weeks earlier, and then came out with those screenshots.
That would have been hilarious.
looks kind of like black and white 2
>>337368417
Don't let the Valvedrones brainwash you.
>>337367178
Look at Civ5's announcement screenshots.
It's pretty much the same as launch.
Do you really think Firaxis is going to change much in 3 months when they have to coordinate all the useless shit like boxing distribution, bugfixing, and certification?
>>337368398
It's just a phrase you autist.
Civilization has been shit since 4 anyway
>>337356331
It's the "the only good gundam is 0079" guy. Thanks for that exhausting post.
>>337368321
>and few overpowered leaders
>Denmark, Spain and Inca
>Overpowered
>>337368146
Welp, looks like I'm confirmed for Civilization VI: Day 1 Pirate edition
>go on civfanatics
>people there pretending the graphics look good
oh lawd
>>337367452
>no one is complaining about the new mechanics.
I fucking am. Hexes and 1UPT are cancer.
"Unrolling the city" is just as bad as Civ5's "unrolling the military," to use Ed Beach's own words. It requires an excellent tactical AI.
Given how Jewish Firaxis has become with DLC, I have absolutely no faith that they're going to spend time to make an AI good enough for this game. They'll cut corners just like they have since 5.
>>337368726
Wasn't Babylon a DLC civ? They're overpowered
>>337368789
I don't know about that. The districts will be grouped, so the AI will put science buildings in the Science District
>>337368290
Campaign is made of playing somewhat typical game over shard (think of floating part of world) to add it to your own. Each of such game takes few hours since you cant transfer too much between maps (actually, once per few battles you can get enough mana to re-use hero you had before or start with extra building or something). Shards unlock new buildings and units to add.
There are tons of shards and mutliple endings tied to your actions during the play, so clearing the campaign is basically cost of 200+ hours of total gameplay time. That is, unless you wont have to restart, because you screwed something over.
>>337359292
Uh, Wizardry?
>>337368679
You're implying the word hasn't been used regularly for ages. You simply must not have noticed it, it's a perfectly cromulent word.
>>337368780
Everything looks better than V except the trees
>>337368872
Yes they were, and they were the only one who was overpowered.
>>337367858
>>337367863
limited special/collector's editions and such like this anon pointed out.
I admit Civ VI was a poor example due to it not having any bonus.
I just preorder games I know I'm going to get hours out of. Anything else I grab on sale or grab keys for cheap through 3rd parties.
You both seem mad about someone buying things you don't. Seems like a case of autism.
>le civ v is bad
retards
So, does anyone have any indication that the gameplay is dumbed down? Everything I've heard sounds great
>>337368789
>Hexes and 1UPT are cancer
How can one man be so wrong? Hexes are a lot better then what squares will ever be.
>>337368887
I'm talking about military and how the military views those tiles. Specifically, pillaging. Or, if certain tiles can be obstacles (like walls)
Civ5's AI never understood pillaging (as a strategy), much less how to move units, formations, or splitting up its army into objective and sub-objective. "Unrolling the city" is only going to make that worse because suddenly the AI must now consider lots of tiny sub-objectives in its plans, not just
>conquer city, win
>>337356331
I actually liked Civ 2, I tried to play civ 3 for a whole night but just got bored of it.
I played civ 5 for less than an hour and uninstalled it.
i'll never play a civ game again
>>337359318
The comparison perfectly made his point. This whole thread is about opinion you faggot.
>>337344126
fucking disgusting
>>337368606
Dont believe that keys can really be get for much lower price than at any other shop, in some magical way.
