Civ 6 is a thing now
>>337238057
Looks cartoony
source: my sphincter
>>337238230
Yeah i thought that, i like it though, looks soft.
>check
>it's real
Alright then.
>they wasted all those resources on Beyond Earth instead of making more expansion packs for V
I'm still mad. Civ5 has constantly been in the top 10 of the most active games list on steam since its release back in 2010.
>>337238321
Literally just open Steam you faggot
I'll probably wait a year or two for the complete edition for 20 bucks instead of the Fuck Early Adapters Edition for 60.
>Next year all the 4X’s are going to come out. What I write below is not under some NDA. I know it because it’s my job to know it.
>Let me walk you through the schedule:
>1H2016: Stellaris, Master of Orion
>2H2016: Civilization VI, Endless Space 2
>I could be wrong on the dates. You could swap some of this around a bit but you get the idea.
-Brad Wardell, Stardock CEO and GalCiv creator.
http://forums.galciv3.com/474109
>>337238321
Go check steam you faggot
>>337238321
http://store.steampowered.com/app/289070/
The wonder occupying a separate tile makes me think of Endless Legend.
>>337238057
civ: madden
>>337238057
Are you guys gonna buy this game? I think i'll pirate the game until they release a complete pack.
>>337238057
>they reuse the sunshine theme
So will we have to wait 2 years for expansions to fix it?
I'd like to get excited about this, but I also know that it will 99% likely launch as badly as V did and it will require an expansion or two to become good. Meh.
Sean Bean?
OH FUCK
I hope my 5 years old work/ study laptop could still run it.
Why the fuck is it so cartoony?
>>337238517
Just noticed that, i wonder if wonders change tile output this time as well as doing their own thing
>>337238230
I hate it when they do it on purpose
>these screenshots
jesus christ, you cant fucking say "well its in alpha" this looks fucking ugly.
>>337238057
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeMkgoH2iHQ
9/11 hint in trailer
>>337238057
Looks like an iOS game. Has worse graphics than Civ 5 and will probably be even more dumbed down.
WE ARE THE EXPLORS AND SHIET
its gonna suck like beyond earth.
>>337238629
>le were're so creative!
>le it's fun!
>settlers II!!!
>Cartoon Style
Dropped
so they're going to strip out features and make you pay for them again as expansion packs.
>>337238610
Sounds like him.
>>337238767
Never did play BE, what was wrong with it?
>>337238708
Something about the civ trailers gets me teary eyed
Holy shit, it looks like fucking Clash of Clans
>>337238057
Oy vey! another case of the game being shit and limited at launch, then good in 3 expansions?
>>337238708
>Shitty stringed Adagio in D music
Kill me. This better not be the main theme/opening.
>>337238798
worked for the last 2 games
>>337238057
Good because BE was a joke from minute 2.
>>337238321
go to civilization.com. There's an announcement trailer right there on the official site.
>>337238057
Civ V had tons of civilizations, what is this gonna have that Civ V doesn't have? Better graphics?
>>337238820
Not that guy but i personally felt everything felt a bit too dense, they bumped up the ammount of non luxury non strategic resources and everything felt a bit crowded.
Also, how come there are no big announcement? I thought Civ5 is big enough to generate a lot of hype.
Holy shit I was just last night thinking about when Civ 6 was coming out and even went googling it to see if there was any news.
>tfw Songhai probably won't be in it
I don't like the exaggerated cartoony style and somehow feel it would look better if it had been about fantasy nations with bright and faggy elves versus dark and edgy undead, a bit like Heroes of Annihilated Empires.
>>337238939
There's some new stuff with unit mixing, you can put anti air guns with infantry on the same tile now i think
looks like it has the same art style as civ 4
>>337238057
Oh boy, I can't wait to see what features they've cut out for the obligatory expansion packs!
This seriously looks like some shitty game designed for mobile telephones and tablets.
>>337238897
And all 4X games nowadays (Endless legend, Stellaris, MoO reboot, etc)
After how the Space Civ turned out, only a fool would buy this on release
>>337238939
Don't even buy it. Wait until it goes on sale with some edition that includes the expacs then buy it. Guarantee it will be barebones and inferior to Civ 5 in every way at launch.
>>337239056
civ 4 had a more 'realistic' artstyle than civ 5
>>337239074
You know that's exactly the case.
Cap this, it's gonna be pushed hard on tablets and other mobile devices besides PC.
>>337238939
It doesn't even have better graphics, literally looks like a phone game
Hoping the online works in this one without having to reload every 10 turns or so like in V desu
Can't believe that shit wasn't fixed even in like 2014 when I played it.
>civ V is in top 10 in steam all the time
>wasn't anything special until two years after release thanks to expansions
>a gorillion mods for it on steam to make it whatever you want
>"let's release VI now!"
Am I the only one who thinks they should've waited longer?
Oh yeah, they've got coop in the multiplayer now, i wonder if you can make alliances with the ai for a bit of fun instead of civ 5's friendship system
>>337239105
This. I'll stick with Civ V (which was MASSIVELY improved with the expansion packs) and buy Civ VI when it gets some meat on it's bones.
>50 bong bucks
>>337238876
>shitty
wrong, overused but not shitty
Grim Dark neverever
>>337238820
It's just the typical civ withou xpack problems if they keep making expansions like they did civ 5 it could be good.
>>337238057
Why did they keep the sharp edged borders of beyond earth ? The borders of V were perfect and looked natural
>£50 for basic version
What the fuck man
I'm not normally a pirate but I think I might have to make an exception in this case
>>337238876
>so salty you even made a youtube comment
lol
>>337239174
i thought civ 5 and Xcom were already on tablets, plus i think they've got that civ revolution garbage for handheld stuff.
Is that Sean Bean doing the narration?
Why does the art look like mobile garbage shit?
>>337239174
Looking at the Screenshots you are probably right.
>tfw I started a marathon game with a friend in 2015 and we still haven't finished it because of exams and shit
>>337239243
Probably. There's nothing wrong with V and the graphics still hold up. But they keep selling it for like £5 for the complete collection so a new game means more money.
>>337239289
Yeah that's weird, we normally get it for 40.
>>337239381
Don't think 5 is on iOS or Android but it does have touch screen support on Windows 8/10
But yeah this one will most likely be on phones as well desu.
>>337239243
nah, the longer they wait the better the mods they'd have to compete with. paid codemonkeys can't compete with fanatic modders.
>>337238057
>Very distinct hexes
Bleh, I prefer the borders drawn more rounded and smoothly.
>>337239579
>tfw they won't follow rivers anymore
I don't even care about the art style, I'm just interested in the features and they look alright to me.
Literally out of nowhere, thought they'd save the announcement for E3 or something. Was a new Civ expected so soon?
>>337238830
Because in mundane times they compile huge points of human progress into a video and remind us that we actually are pretty fucking awesome as a species sometimes.
Considering we only discovered flight just over 100 years ago, we reached the moon only 60 years after that.
>>337238057
>non coastal cities having access to sea buildings and wonders
FINALLY
Is Beyond Earth really that bad?
If this is confirmed for being on phone or tablet, its a write-off from the get go.
It will be shit.
If not; we might get a decent civ game with an ugly art-style.
Time will tell.
>>337239289
So how many dollaridoos would that be then?
>>337239778
>implying
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvTQWXdz_P4
>>337239579
I agree. I'm not a fan either. Look how fucking hideous those borders are. Maybe there will be a way to change tile size or something, because that's god awful.
>>337239871
>Is Beyond Earth really that bad?
Yes. The real idiocy is that people don't realize how crap civ 5 is as well
>>337239871
Its alright.
Missing several systems and the lack of depth late-game is painful.
The expansion helped a ton, and with another it probably would be a good civ game.
Pity they shelved it.
Loved the affinity-mixes.
>>337239871
Soundtrack was nice at least.
TERRAAA NOVUM ET CAEEELUM
>>337238387
How's working at Taco Bell going?
>>337239975
muh stacks
>50 fucking pounds
Go fuck yourself firaxis.
>$105 CAD
Into the trash it goes
>>337240109
stacks are a small price to pay to avoid the late game clusterfuck that is civ 5
>>337239938
That would be a little over $70.
>>337240128
>>337240161
what's the matter pcfats, you spent $1000 on your computer, surely it isn't hard to cough up another $60
>>337238708
I am really curious about this. Are they going to play it out where you can build the twin towers? Will 9/11 be a random encounter in the Modern Era?
>>337238057
The artstyle looks like SHIT.
>>337239956
Boy i remember this, i had almost tears when i first saw it.
Jesus fucking christ, Russians know how to move a white man's soul.
>>337239956
WE WUZ GREEKS
>1upt stays
Day 1 ignore
I really don't like the cartoon style. Looks like the camera angle is more angled too instead of being top-down. It's definitely gonna have a different feel/look to it I think judging from what we're seeing.
I really, really hope they bring back Diplomatic Screens or whatever they're called in Civ V, where you talk to leaders in their castles/in some sort of pretty environment. BE just had a gay-ass overlay.
>>337240242
>I CAN PUT thousads of troops into onelittle piece of land plus my tanks horseman and more infantry
>I cannot literally into warfare where terrain is vital
After all you are a /v/ermin and it is implied you are retarded so yeah keep loving ur stacks :)
I'll just play Vicky 2 thanks
>>337240271
Britfags like mtself pay 40£ as standard, is it 60$ in amerioca or 70$?
>>337239956
this is beautiful
What comes in the digital deluxe edition?
>>337240284
>we want the mobile audience
>>337240128
Don't worry it'll be on cdkeys for like £20 before release
>>337240271
>>337240432
Exactly.
50 quid is 100 CAD bucks.
And lol no. I'm not paying more than 40 quid.
Especially for a civ game. Those are usually fucked at launch.
They're trying to up the price because consolecucks are used to paying fucking outrageous fees in this country. Most PS4 games are 50 quid new.
>>337240271
Not when I just had to give my yearly installment of dosh to Activision-Blizzard™ for their newest hit smash Overwatch™
>>337240665
Don't you mean played the beta and realised it was steaming garbage?
Pay us again for a game with less features! Don't worry though, two expansions are on the way!
>>337238685
Its probably intended to cater for cross platforms like mobile and tablet.
There is regular cartoony and there is "mobile shit" cartoony. This is getting dangerously close to the latter.
Never figured Civ 6 was going to be a mobile game
>>337240769
This.
I'm going to ignore this till it comes out. Only buy it full price if by some miracle it turns out to be literally Civ5+BothExps and more on launch. Even then I can refund.
>>337240659
50 Quid? Fucking hell, i used to get my shit from cex and i didn't get anything over 20, what the fuck.
>>337241130
I only got Civ V when it was free on the Joystig thing
>>337241172
Publishers have been upping physical prices.
PC publishers are trying to follow suit.
I saw InFamous SS the other day for 50 fucking quid still in Sainsburys.
Its fucking ridiculous.
>>337240769
Did they do this with Beyond Earth too? Didn't really look at that game twice.
>>337238057
So what are the actual new features? The only new thing I notice is ''sprawling cities'', which seems meh.
At least the jump from Civ 4 to 5 was pretty big, but this just looks utterly terrible. And so soon after BE? Fuck.
>>337241130
This
Reminder to wait two years once they add all the features and mods are out.
God I hope this isn't a mobile game.
>>337241410
BE only got 1 expansion
>>337238057
Please god, no one unit per tile.
>>337241031
Correct.
It looks worse than Beyond Earth.
And it looks low-spec enough for tablets.
I thought these retards had realised that it won't be profitable on mobile platforms? Normal people don't have the time nor patience for something they'll play for about 5 minutes on the train.
Hell the XCOM2 devs fucking understood that and made it PC only since the sales were so low on console.
>>337238057
Civ developers realize that the previous incarnation will be revered over their latest release, so they tailor-made VI for handhelds. They expect new players to come from mobile demographics, while hardcore fanatics will stick with V. Why compete with yourself when you can simply bring in new audiences while simultaneously reminding your core demographic how good you CAN be (after two expansions)?
They know full well that V junkies will come around a year or two later and drop maybe twenty bucks a pop for the new incarnation plus DLC, while normie fucktards hoped for the next fallout shelter on their iDrones.
Sad shit, but nothing will ever match that friend who showed you Civ II back in the day, and maybe it's time to recognize that this franchise simply cannot meet your expectations for what could be.
Why is the generic mobile art style infecting everything?
I swear, if you removed the hex lines and told me it's the newest successor of Clash of Clans, I'd have no reason to doubt you.
>>337241325
Jesus christ, they fucking go down to like 35 a day after releease anyway, publishers are fucking fooling themselves
>>337241564
XCOM devs = civ devs
>>337241604
It'll crash and burn.
Mobile players don't want a civ game.
The dedicated fan-base is on PC.
They're trying to expand into markets that don't want them.
Look at Sid Meiers Starships.
A fucking failure.
Civ Revolution 2 also was released btw.
It was also a fucking failure.
Why does this company just keep trying to fail repeatedly.
>>337239289
Fuck that, i will just pirate it instead. Civ games have been getting worse for a while and i sure as hell are not going to pay to find out what this one is like.
Wonder how long it'll be until a graphics overhaul mod is made.
What the fuck are bong bucks?
>>337241725
They aren't.
They're part of the same company. Not the same dev-team.
It wouldn't make sense to put two titles that are wildly different in the hands of one dev-team.
Both are specialised in Civ and XCOM.
![latest[2].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/stzDvEh.jpg "latest[2].jpg")
>>337239018
oh you mean stacking?
>post yfw Civ has virtually become the yearly rehash of turn-based strategy, following in the footsteps of Fifa, CoD, AC, etc.
Am I the only one who doesn't give a fuck about the DEEPER MYSTERIOUS AGENDA behind the artstyle and just wants to know more about the gameplay
>>337242071
The last civ game came out in 2013.
The last main-line game came out in 2010.
You're a fucking moron.
This game looks awful from three screenshots but you're still even worse than it.
>>337242163
Fucking this
>>337242163
Its the same as Civ 5 but they've taken Endless Legends city-territory mechanics.
And they've made stackable units a thing, but in a balanced way, like AA guns in a batallion of soldiers.
Plus some shit about "Corps".
So are they getting off that tall tree they climbed and changing back from 1UPT? They already admitted it was a mistake
>>337242163
Because the art style clearly reflects a mobile art style, which, if they utilized this same way-of-thinking for the entire game, would deeply affect the gameplay fuckass
>>337242196
really it seems like it came out just yesterday
too bad they dont do anything like add game options like stacks/no stacks or hexes/no hexes so that everyone that liked previous civs will be more into the new changes
>>337242397
>>337242397
>/v/ logic
>>337242196
>Beyond Earth
>2013
You're just plain lying.
Also, I said "virtually". What's more important is the fact that the games are eternally rehashing themselves at this point.
>>337242397
Do you really think they'll get away with mobile style IAP's in Civ? They'll get eviscerated by the fanbase. And they can't fall back on the mobile market if this happens, because they already play garbage like those clash games.
>>337238057
>no baba yetu
dropped
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJiHDmyhE1A&
>>337238629
Because it's supposed to appeal to the mobile game players.
>>337242641
>no civ 4 narrator
>>337242612
what fanbase HA
>>337242681
why the fuck would mobile pick this up? civs takes hours to play one game properly
>>337242397
You underestimate how autistic the fanbase is
They fucking censored liberty leading the people.
>>337242641
Yeah their reveal trailer really was crap. I think it's the music choice, it just droned and hurt my ears. Made it look like a cheap discovery channel intro.Why is all creativity in the AAA industry, both films and games, gone?
>censoring a historical painting
>>337242579
So just purchase a slightly more polished rehash for 30 bucks every 5 years. It's like buying the new DnD edition every now and then. A better optimized game, without retarded unit clogging and inflation, maybe some 'interactive' features with satellites and shit. Improving the AI, etc.
>>337242774
can't show a tiddy because that'd be unamerican
Here's an article so that we can focus on the gameplay and not the art style for a minute.
http://www.digitaltrends.com/gaming/civilization-vi-first-details/
>>337238708
>>337238057
if they actually are wanting to get the mobile market you can expect micro-transactions and for it to be more shallow than Civ V.
>>337242579
>2014.
I stand corrected.
Regardless. Its been six years since the last mainline game.
And 2 since the last spin-off.
And a difference of 4 years between civ 5 and beyond earth.
So stop being such an autismal cuck.
>>337242641
>trailer supposed to convey the wonder of human achievement
>hire a fucking Yorkshireman VA and censor a painting
>consider a one-note cacophony a good way to end the music
>>337238057
>we want the tablet audience
>>337242910
those wonder tile reqs could be interesting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVq2yMuAMVQ
>>337243003
Which painting was censored? I didn't notice
>>337242719
why didn't they record a full sample of his voice for future generations? rip
>>337242815
>censoring a historical painting
A H E A D O F I T S T I M E
H
E
A
D
O
F
I
T
S
T
I
M
E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY57ErBkFFE
>>337243003
Unsurprisingly, muting the civ vi trailer and playing baba over it works wonders.
>>337238708
Good god what pompous shit.
Why is human progress regarded as something so fucking groundbreaking? We're literally the only sapient species on earth.
>>337241725
is this cracka serious?
>>337238057
>XCom2 and CIV6 in the same year
>>337242910
>In previous iterations of the series, certain systems were left out of the initial release, which were then added in through subsequent expansions. Beach told us, however, that all of the major systems — including espionage, religion, tourism, archaeology, and trade routes — will be in place at launch. He admits that some will be more fleshed out than others, still leaving room for later additions, but the basics will be there. Beach cited his team’s experience on Civ V’s expansions as ideal preparation for tackling the core game’s entirety.
It sounds like they might not be as fleshed out as they are in Civ 5 currently, but its cool that stuff like espionage and religion aren't being cut out for a future expansion.
>>337243245
Because we learned to fly only 100 years ago.
And we visited the moon only 60 years later.
Stop being an anti-human spastic.
>>337243178
The strong and independent french woman showing off her titties is little blurred I think, hard to notice from the trailer.
>>337243245
Stop memeing, just because the trailer was shit at conveying it doesn't mean we aren't a fucking remarkable species.
>>337238057
Looks like a mobile game
>>337243245
>We're literally the only species on earth to evolve socially and industrially through use of tools, language, and sheer force of will
>>337241957
youre right, my bad
>>337242163
there are a few features mentioned on the website, like unit combination, so you can have infantry and anti-tank on the same tile, or settlers and warriors.
Wow holy shit those screenshots lookfunandkinda cute
>>337243331
Everyone forgot about Xcom2 less than a month after release, so that's hardly reassuring.
>>337238057
>http://www.civilization.com/
It looks just like Civ 5
CIV AND LEADER YOU WANT?
WHAT VICTORY CONDITION AND STRATEGY YOU DO NIGGER?Tall diplomatic with an eye to trade.
>>337243245
what the fuck is wrong with you
>>337239778
>billions and billions of people lived and died since the start of humanity
>only a handful actually helped advance humanity
>we are awesome
haha yea no, we are pretty shitty and some of us gets lucky sometimes, most people just eat, shit, fuck and consume until they die, including you and me and probally everyone you know.
>>337243575
Fortunately Civ 6 looks like it can run on a tablet, so we don't have to worry about performance.
It's going to be shit.
>>337238057
>you will see Civ X in your lifetime
>>337243721
fuck off Nietzsche
>>337243721
Edgy
>>337243723
>tablet
You mean phone
>>337243762
So a new Civ comes out every 5-6 years, a Civ X would be out sometime in the 2030's?
>>337243721
Cry more nihilist baby.
Why don't you kill yourself if you're such a fucking failure as a human being?
>>337243723
Good because CIV 5 was unreasonably heavy to run compared to BE. Maybe it was the interface I don't know.
>>337238057
I'm actually kind of excited, it looks exactly the same as 5 so they'll have to actually include some new content and features to set it apart, right? Right?
>>337244057
It looks the same except 2 times sunnier.
>>337238057
Looks okay, I suppose.
I'll wait for the PS4/Xbone version though.
>>337243641
>VC
transcendence as an alternative to alpha centauri. basically just fluff
>civ and leader
the civ 4 roster with civ 5 style traits instead of the combination of two traits
>>337238708
i love how everything modern was USA based
>implying USA is civilized
>>337243003
>isnt human beings great
>we're great
>we always aspire for the good
>except the time europe got invaded
>and 911
lel
>>337243941
>>337243832
>>337243808
lmao triggered the normals that think they matter or contributed anything to humanity
unless you invented something that changes our way of living for the better you are a fucking failure :^)
It's times like these I'm actually glad Firaxis doesn't own the Alpha Centauri license. At least we know EA won't bother trying to ruin it... knock on wood.
>>337244350
why don't you kill yourself if you hate humanity and life so much
>>337238057
Why are the graphics from 2006?
>>337244351
Don't joke about that, remember when we thought Dungeon Keeper was dead and buried and EA decided to desecrate its corpse with that mobile game?
>>337244453
You keep it simple, stupid.
>>337243245
>We're literally the only sapient species on earth.
crows, cuttlefish, whales, apes.
>>337243406
>remarkable species
Compared to fucking what? Other terrestrial species? We're only remarkable because our knowledge of other living species is limited to the sol system.
>>337243509
>we're literally the only species on earth to evolve socially and industrially through the use of tools, language, and sheer force of will
>sheer force of will
kek, it's a pure matter of natural selection, we simply outbred or outright killed off other species of hominids, and pretty much most of them were capable of using tools. Why do you fucks make it sound all so fucking lofty?
>>337243641
Israel/Judea/Kingdom of
King Solomon (religious, economic) & Ben Gurion (settlement, industrial)
Maccabi unique swordsman. Can be free to build but costs a pop. Can't build from cities with pop lower than X. Cities conquered with Maccabis spread your main religion to it with. Or a UAV as an upgraded helicopter. It's actually a ground unit operation that sends an aircraft, kinda like a long long range archer. Operator gathers experience so even if the drone is shot down the unit survives. Just suffers from critical health and must rest as a penalty. Unique Mossad Safehouse to replace embassy. Gets a bonus to spying on that empire and an extra spy. The more safehouses the faster xp spies get.
Canada.
Harper (militarist, industrious)/Harper (Militarist economic)
Harper bear to replace main battle tank
Seal Clubbing unique, free national luxury. Basically free happiness.
r8
>>337238362
Yep and late game was shit and needed to be fixed..The whole culture crap and looking for artifacts was garbage...
They should have added some internal strife and civil wars and other stuff to keep you busy..
or add more advanced diplomacy with intrigues and playing others against one another etc..
>>337244335
>humans are great
>except when europe got invaded
I think that's a matter of perspective m8
>>337244592
get me at them titties
>>337244351
>giving EA the benefit of the doubt
Not even once.
Civ2 is best Civ
>>337244546
where are the crow, cuttlefish, whale and ape civilizations then?
>>337238057
>Civilization VI offers new ways to engage with your world: cities now physically expand across the map
>cities now physically expand across the map
AHAHAHA YES ONE CITY SPANNING THE CONTINENT
>canadians have to pay over 100 dollars for this
kek
KEK
>>337244350
Senpai I'm depressed and pessimistic as hell, doesn't mean I don't understand how fuckin dope the human race is. You literally sound like the edgy teenager who browses r/imgoingtohellforthis
>>337244525
So shit is simple, got it. Thanks for letting us know you have no tastes.
>>337244795
Seems they learned from Endless Legend
>>337244676
>No civ will ever have that epic wwii scenario
>>337238057
>Large grasslands and fields
>Suddenly a fucking desert RIGHT WHERE THE PYRAMIDS ARE BUILD
Holy shit, quality control your shit before releasing it. And if it's intentional. Then there's literally NO HOPE that this game will be good
>>337244795
seems familiar
>>337244690
they have language and they can use tools. they also recognize themselves in mirrors. they are sapient.
>>337244335
Europe can get fucked in the ass.
>>337244590
>we're not that impressive! It's only natural selection! We just so happened to completely dominate literally every other species on earth due to our supremely superior intellect and ability to use tools, then expand on our ideas to the point where we visit another celestial body!
DUDE WHAT A RUSH
WHAT
A
RUSH
>>337245026
I SERVE MY QUEEN
>>337245163
That's the spirit
Polygon did an interview with the devs
http://archive.is/l9lnV
>>337244590
post tits
>tfw no more Leonard Nimoy to voice Civ
>>337244926
The japan and the new world scenario was way better. Especially the roman fall/rise scenario. Felt like entire expanionpacks by themselves
>Optimised for windows tablet, Apple iPad Xbox One and Ps4
>>337239956
>>337240321
>>337240457
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stEuQamTLXw
>>337245163
They are getting fucked in the ass, and the leaders of their countries are begging for it.
This is what happens when you give up rational thought in favor of feelings. I hope they enjoy their Caliphates.
So the voice in the trailer is probably gonna be the narrator in the game, right?
What do yall think?
Not as good as Civ V's but 1000x better than shitty Indian woman from BE
>>337243245
yes good goyim
humans are bad!
hate yourself!
>>337245442
>>337243245
Fuck off, reptile shitter, your end is coming soon.
>and access to four post-launch DLC packs* that will add new maps, scenarios, civilizations and leaders for a bundled discount.
>civilizations and leaders
Since they listed them seperate does that mean we can have different leaders for each civilization again?
>>337245628
oh no how dare a company want to make money
>when Civ 6 comes out I'll be teaching a history class and have no time for vidya
>Muh cartoon
>Muh mobile art
Implying CiV has looked like anything but a fucking cartoon from the beginning, maybe you should go back to Civ V and look at it again because that was cartoony as shit back when it was released.
>>337244841
>how fuckin dope the human race is
That's because you literally don't have anything to compare it to. You also seem to take into consideration only the technological advancements ignoring the fact all the vicious shit humans did and do.
It's like applauding fucking cockroaches for their resiliency and ability to to breed in large numbers.
>>337242749
Not anymore it does. heuehueheuh. Mobile fucking garbage.
>>337245869
CIV IV looked cartoony.
CIV V was slightly less cartoony.
Older CIVs weren't really cartoony. And Alpha Centauri is not cartoony at all.
Um, you guys know that Baba Yetu is african right? You shouldn't like it if you're a proud man. They might as well have used rap
>>337245767
If they have well made animations like in Civ 5 I'm guessing no. Too much effort
>>337245893
Fuck you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=035cpHEowS4
>We will never get intros like this back
>>337246074
>And Alpha Centauri is not cartoony at all.
Not in graphics, but the plot was like some stupid childish shit you'd see on Cartoon Network.
>>337245685
>hate yourself
I care for myself, my family and friends, and a good way down the totem pole of how much I give a fuck are my countrymen. I couldn't care less about other members of the human race, and I just find this "hurr humanity fuck yeah" where you feel some kind of personal pride for the steady and predictable progress of the human race reddit as fuck.
>>337246089
Yes but since it's gospel it's not degenerate like rap.
