>6.3
>6.3
>6.3
>6.3
>SIX POINT THREE
>V
S
I
X
P
O
I
N
T
T
H
R
E
E
NICE EXCLUSIVES PCFAGS
delete this!
it was supposed to be the Uncharted killer!
>IGN
>>337014353
>Mid-game slog
What the fuck does this even mean? It's a grand strategy?
Does it mean the reviewer is a fucking retard, didn't do anything for a long time and then went HURRRR HUGE SLOG
What a fucking babby.
>>337014353
what is this non-overwatch or ds3 thread?
>its a stellaris shill thread
oh okay, proceed
>>337014353
>IGN
>>337014353
>IGN
I dont even give a shit about this game.
But you're a total fucking moron for thinking IGN is relevant.
Clearly a complete retard who knows shit about this genre or just games in general.
How can mid game be a slog if that's one of major parts of the game.
Stellaris has so much things going for it, I can't see this game being less than 8 atm. Probably 9 in few months with fixes and mods, and then like a 10 in few years with expansions and even more mods.
Anyone got a pastebin?
>>337014458
>>337014682
>shillaris posters
>GSG/4x game
>IGN review
wew
>>337014768
He admits in the review he didnt even play much of the mid game, he gave up
tldr; IGN are morons, this review is worthless
>>337014353
Never heard of it.
Get your shitty indie crap out of here.
>>337014748
sure you dont, thats why posted in this thread
>>337014748
>IGN doesn't give a shit about this game
nobody does
>>337014353
>post yfw you're pirating this shit in like 5 hours
>Weak Diplomacy
Haha. Get fucked strategy fags.
>>337014891
>gaming 'journalists'
>relevant
>to anything ever
Im just laying down the truth mate
>>337014793
This. They don't know enough about games to review mario, let alone a grand strategy game.
I don't even like stellaris, but I do indeed hate IGN.
>>337014353
>IGN
>reviewing grand strategy/4x games
>reviewing anything
Yeaaaah certainly a review I'm gonna trust blindly here.
>>337014772
http://pastebin.com/iGtfdYYg
>2016
>still giving a fuck about "professional" reviews
How does it feel being unable to form an opinion of your own?
>>337014928
Same here, pal. I hope for a nice CODEX release.
Will probably buy it if it's good, but only console kids buy a game without trying it first.
His review basically just boiled down to being bored because there wasn't enough action.
>it's not CK2
>>337014353
Did you just go on IGN and find the first shit review for a PC game? I r8 your b8 8/80 for making me reply
>>337014989
>The problem is that alliances are built for war, and the diplomatic conception of war in Stellaris doesn’t work well at all. Essentially, the issue is that the goals you set before a war are too big: things like capturing or freeing an enemy colony or vassalizing an enemy empire. There are no options for something smaller-scale, like shifting a border star system into your sphere of influence in order to get that tundra planet for colonization. It all feels all-or-nothing. But resources are balanced by planet, so you don’t really need massive expansion except for its own sake. I found myself declaring war out of boredom rather than for any strategic benefit – never a good sign in any grand strategy game.
>HURRRRRR WHY CANT I JUST TAKE THIS PLACE WITHOUT A CASSUS BELLI
>I HAVE NEVER PLAYED GRAND STRATEGY THIS IS GAY
what a fucking retard.
https://www.patreon.com/rowankaiser
>expecting mainstream reviewers to understand 4X or anything genre more complex than a linear FPS
I mean Christ I'm not even a 4X fan but it's quite obvious most reviewers aren't fans of the genre or even capable of comprehending the nuances of it without crying about how dense it is or how it's not simple enough
>>337014989
>wooooow I didn't even do anything mid game and nothing happened woooow
>the diplomacy is simple guyz, trust me I have a second degree in politics
I swear every single GSS or 4X game, there always someone who'll say the diplomacy is simple. I mean what do they expect really to make it not simple?
>>337015116
And that he didn't even understand basic concepts. He couldn't even get trade going because it was too complicated for him.
Something that is literally 'you give me X I give you Y' was too complicated for IGN.
>>337014353
MODS WILL FIX IT!!!
>IGN
>>337015291
>t'll help me write articles that might be difficult to place elsewhere. Like most writers, I have dozens of good article ideas, but don't always have a place to pitch them. This will give me a chance to publish these, and continue making a living.
>Some potential subjects include: "How Game Of Thrones Trolls Its Audience," "Video Games' Representation Wars," and "Mid-2000s Marvel Fights The Patriarchy."
I don't have to read it to know it's lies because Paradox can do no wrong!
Gonna have to agree with the posts on this thread, OP.
The reviewer doesn't look like someone who even plays 4X, nevermind Grand Strategy
I am yet to download it though.
For me, Paradox's games are like The Sims series: buy the main game if you're into it to support the series but pirate all DLC to not support that shitty practice.
>>337015291
What an insufferable faggot.
I don't even know what game.
9/10 from Destructoid
4/5 on PCWorld
OP is a faggot.
>>337014858
Which is why the number itself is usually meaningless in the end. Review has to be read and reviewer taken into consideration.
>Rowan Kaiser
https://soundcloud.com/totalbiscuit/enough
>>337014353
Constant v threads fueled my interest.
is it something like Alpha Centauri?
Wasnt it IGN where some faggot reviewer got caught on his steam playing 20min of a game before he reviewed it, and was playing the games on easy mode too?
>>337015759
Its a 4X and grand strat game. So its more like CK2, but in space.
>>337015825
thanks, sold
>>337014353
>grand strategy or 4X review
>by a mainstream site
About as useful as me reviewing the latest Madden game. These people are not the target audience.
>>337015675
AYYY FUCKING LMAO
>>337014989
>played 80 hours
>gave up in midgame
PC Exclusives are shit, more news at 11
>>337015291
jesus christ
>>337015818
I would not doubt it
>>337016005
to be fair, every single reviewer gets a copy of the game and only a few of them review it
>>337015996
Look >>337015291 stupid.
Best part is, they gave this steaming pile of shit BEFORE Art of War a fucking nine out of ten.
Stellaris must be Beyond Earth levels of doo-doo.
>>337014972
Probably played in that big streamer/journo multilayer game and got eaten by northernlion.
/v/ flavor of the month gets a bad review on any review site
>baaaawwww who the fuck cares about that site they're irrelevant and dumb
/v/ hate of the month gets a bad score
> lol look at the score they gave it, I always knew they were reliable
This place holy shit
>inb4 /v/ is not one person
No but might as well be considering you all faggots act the same way.
>I WANTED GAME OF THRONES IN SPESS
>>337014353
People still buy these kinds of shitty games when we have GTA and Battlefields?
>>337015291
>doesnt need content
>create good content
Well, what is it, do I miss something here?
>>337016080
>Every reviewer working at a website gets a copy of every game
[citation needed]
>>337015291
>one of the most piss easy fights ever
Okay.
>>337016239
>defending IGN
>defending a SJW faggot known to not play a game before reviewing it
>being a candyass in general
end yourself my man
>>337016302
They're called steam review accounts, you get free access to every game on the marketplace
Crack when?
>>337016239
>Newfag's 1st week on /v/
Where do you niggers keep coming from?
>I need someone else to tell me what to think
I actually can't believe people still read reviews when you can literally watch hours of gameplay before deciding to get it.
There's people that still care about reviews?
I wish reviewers would tell us their previous experience with similar games, does he like other 4X space games? I don't know, so I have no idea if this review is relevant or not. It doesn't seem hard for the website to just have a little blurb about the reviewer.
>>337016392
That totally sounds real and not something you just made up.
>>337016570
Only shitposters anon.
Dön't listen to them, börkbörk you knöw önly the good gämes cöme fröm sweden, the land öf eurovisiön
>>337016570
No, there are just people who want to try to stir shit up.
>>337016570
How come when a PC game gets a shit review, you don't care, but when a Nintendo or a Sony game gets an 8/10 everyone goes apeshit?
Why the double standards?
>>337016392
Didn't Steam take those away? I thought I remember a bunch of journalists crying over losing their unlimited free games a few years ago.
>>337014353
Destructoid 9/10
PCWorld 4/5
Explorminate.net (Dedicated to 4x Games) Exemplary (Highest Rating)
Gameswatcher 9/10
Pcgamesn 9/10
IGN Italy = 9.3 (Just LOL!)
Eurogamer - Recommended
PCGAmer 7/10
IGN 6.3*
I want to make a note here about the IGN Review.... First and foremost the guy who reviewed this reviews strategy games... He does not give reviews of 4X games and that comes across very well if you read his review. You can tell he got really frustrated with a number of things for all the wrong reasons and even had the courage to state that Paradox/Stellaris has Weak Diplomacy..... It's also funny that moderator's in the chat keep saying he does know what he is talking about because he has reviewed Crusader Kings....... Which is not a 4x game.... So there is that.
TIME TO KILL THE PC FAGS!
*BANG BANG BANG*
TIME TO FUCK THE PC KEKS!
THEY'VE BEEN IN DENIAL TOO LONG
THEIR LOVE FOR INDIE GAMES IS TOO STRONG
WE NEED TO DRAG THOSE FAT FUCKS OUT INTO THE STREETS
AND CHOP THEIR FAT FUCKING MANTITS INTO MEAT
IT'S TIME TO KILL THE PC KEKS!
>>337016570
Nobody gives a shit about reviews. Just the score apparently.
>>337016123
>Beyond Earth
HEY, FUCK YOU.
I had almost forgotten that thing existed.
>release "expansion" for your game
>lol no, we just stole some guys mod and included it in
How fucking shit can they get with it.
>>337016709
>How come when a PC game gets a shit review, you don't care, but when a Nintendo or a Sony game gets an 8/10 everyone goes apeshit?
You must be mistaking me with someone else. I don't care about any reviews period.
>PC Gamer
>STELLARIS REVIEW By Phil Savage
>70
>7
>0
S A V A G E
>>337016621
I can't find any sources, but I remember fags whining on youtube that Steam revoked their review status a few years back
I've seen it mentioned on /v/ too
>>337016721
9.2 ayy lmao
http://multiplayer.it/recensioni/167905-stellaris-vita-intergalattica.html
>>337016731Posted from pc
>>337016709
Because /v/ isn't one person you fucking mong
>>337016709
this is the internet. 4chan literally the place where people come to shit post. Are you seriously here to disscuss games? Some oldfags started to "hate" sometihng and now all the new guys think its the thing to do to fit in.
i mean its not that hard to understand. anonymous imageboard that should answer you question.
>>337016831
if only there was a way to view post history, most people in here would be outed
not saying you're one of them, but most of them would be
Seems unfair to have a game designed for autistics to be reviewed by a normie.
first Paradox failure? steam reviews are looking pretty brutal
>>337014989
>http://pastebin.com/iGtfdYYg
sounds like he went in expecting a civ 5 scale 4x game (5 colonized world is a "fairly large empire" ????), but got a paradox grandstrategy game instead. worthless review.
>>337016387
I am not defending IGN you idiot. How to reading comprehension?
/v/ says IGN is shit, and I agree, but whenever there is a bad score IGN suddenly becomes "the good site".
>>337016901
>Because /v/ isn't one person you fucking mong
yes it is, you fucking moron
Yes, IGN. The pinnacle of reviewing content.
IGN and Gamespot would be the last websites I'd go to for a Paradox game review. They lack the concentrated autism these games demand
>>337014928
Who the hell keeps buying Paradox tripe
>>337016709
What double standard? Is the OP not apeshit about the score? Are there no "idgaf" posts in Nintendo/Sony review threads?
Are you new or just retarded?
>>337017068
This is silly, they use freelancers for stuff like this, these people are pretty autistic since their job is literally to review weird games nobody else wants to review.
>>337016921
Nah you're just assuming baseless shit
>>337016716
They still get given keys and review copies by publishers/developers
>>337017067
Is it this time again?
I still don't know what the game is about
>>337017265
Mafia 2 deserves less to be entirely honest
>>337017265
Its probably time
>>337014858
All that needs be said here but shitposters will still shitpost because it's a PC game and all that
>>337017198
That's precisely the point.
They get money per-review.
They stand to gain more by half-assing 30 reviews in a day than to actually play a game and make a review each week.
Here, I'll freelance myself to IGN too.
>GTA
You shoot cops and hookers. Some folks to drugs. 7/10
>Runescape
Low-res WoW. Has more skills. 6/10
>Pokemon
Ripoff of Digimon. Cute art. 3/10
See, it's that easy.
It has a 77 on Metacritic, so not everyone seems to LOVE it. I'm gonna try it out though, maybe buy it but I'm scared.
>>337016832
>phil savage
http://www.pcgamer.com/hatred-reinstated-on-steam-greenlight/
>>337017265
>>337017340
I didn't know Ali rapp was reviewing for IGN before she worked at Nintendo.
>>337015297
I think it would be kind of nice to have to actually negotiate with the AI in a kind of RPG style conversation system, choosing the correct things to say but not just feeding them what they want to hear.
>>337016921
Even though this statement is true, reviews are still something that people shouldn't care about because not everyone is suited to review all games, objectivity is sometimes non-existant, reviewers might (and probably are) shitters, the list goes on and on about why reviews are stupid as fuck.
>>337017364
Yep, it shows they suck at reading. Someone should send them back to school.
>>337017380
There really isn't that much work for them, and nobody would hire you if you keep delivering half-assed reviews.
>>337016239
>/v/ flavor of the month gets a bad review
>sonyggers instantly creating shitpostthreads
>/v/ finds reviews written by non-pleb reviewers
>those reviews praise the game
>sonyggers continue to ignore these and proceed to make fools out of themselves
kek
Reviews only count if they confirm my bias.
>>337016967
>steam reviews are looking pretty brutal
Yeah 0 reviews because the game isn't officially out is very brutal
has anyone here played it and has real criticism? only played eu4 from their games, looked forward to stella. on hold for now
>>337014353
>Paradox making a shit game
Wow, just like CK2, HoI3, and EUIV! Who would have guessed?
>>337014353
>ign
end yourself
They gave Beyond Earth an 8 or something pretty close, while even the biggest Civ5 fans realized it was pretty bad after only a couple of games.
>>337017585
>on hold because of IGN review
Oh boy, you're really insecure aren't you?
>>337014353
>IGN
>6.3
So Paradox didn't pay them.
>>337017535
>nobody would hire you if you keep delivering half-assed reviews
I'll believe that when I stop seeing reviewers writing crap after playing it for 20 minutes.
What's the point of a review if you're not getting a good description of a game's strong points and short-comings?
Half-assed reviews always share the same trait:
They're extremist in view.
It's either complete shit, 2/10 or it's the second coming of Christ, 9.8/10
10 years ago, I didn't need to pirate shit to find out. There was marketing, allright, but not to this degree.
>>337017686
>IT'S NOT OKAY WHEN IT'S A GAME I LIKE!!!!
>>337016694
You missed a couple of å's, ä's and ö's there friendo :^)
>>337017550
DELETE THIS
>Stellaris for PS4 WHEN?
>>337017849
If IGN gave it a 10 I still wouldn't give a shit. They only are relevant for AA games. AAA games are always overhyped and inflated, niche games are reviewed by people outside of that niche.
>>337017585
>has anyone here played it
Doubt it. Go watch the hours and hours of live-streamed gameplay footage and make up your mind.
>>337017585
Nigger just watch some videos on youtube and decide yourself.
>>337017959
I don't care what you have to say
you can't prove that you're not a shitposter
>>337017831
>I'll believe that when I stop seeing reviewers writing crap after playing it for 20 minutes
Thankfully that never actually happens.
Also I'm pretty sure you were like 6 years old 10 years ago.
>>337014353
DELETE THIS
>Uncharted 4 is a 10/10
>This PCuck game nobody has heard of is a 6.3
LMAO
>>337015291
>this is my cat please give me money so I can get her to a vet
How about you eat less for a week and get your cat to a vet anyway
>>337017849
Your strawman already failed before you posted that. Read the fucking thread next time faggot.
>>337018038
>you can't prove that you're not a shitposter
Neither can you. What's your point?
>>337017865
DON'T DELETE THIS
>>337018096
Uncharted is a nice movie.
Watching a full walkthrough right now and apart from a couple of moments where I get mad at the player for being a retard, I feel absolutely no need to actually play it myself because nothing will be different.
>>337018070
see >>337016721
>>337014353
IGN can't play PC strategy games for shit unless it has excessive hand holding. Those negatives basically make the point that its perfectly fine, minus diplomacy.
I was going to pirate it anyway. R-Really!
>>337017067
>nice visuals
>>337018164
There is no point to /v/ at all.
>>337017459
that would be so fucking cool, Pardox is going to pump out the DLC for this anyway so maybe one day
>mainstream game journalists reviewing grand strategy games
it's like going to IGN for a review of Dwarf Fortress. these games are for high IQ spergs such as myself, they are not for simple game journalist folk and their audience of console kids
>>337018450
>I'm a self diagnosed autist
So your a dumb retard who has no clue what autism really is?
>>337018450
>IT'S NOT OKAY WHEN IT'S A GAME I LIKE
>>337018450
Should apply for IGN if your so smart
>>337018450
*tips fedora*
>>337018450
Yeah, this only demonstrates that the gulf between Xtreme fast-twitch console babbies and true PC gaming continues to widen.
>>337018564
prove him wrong
>>337018564
>I take buzzwords like sperg and autism literally
Come the fuck on anon
>>337018564
>>337018601
>>337018720
>>337018764
consolebro infestation
some games were never meant for you
>>337014353
JUST FUCK MY SHIT UP
t. Johan
>>337018817
Sure if you can get me the number of the people who work at IGN I'm pretty sure I can prove him wrong.
>>337018601
>strawman because you didn't bother to read the thread.
Keep making yourself look retarded though, it's enjoyable to the spectators.
>>337016921
NeoGAF is that way fag.
>>337018865
i know a perfect game just for you
another 4x failure? maybe time to end this badly made autistic genre? never even heard of paradox, what have they released for xbox1?
>>337019190
what has anyone released for xbox1?
>>337019140
Still has more frames than Uncharted Sonypony :^)
>>337019140
I already play Aurora, thanks.
>>337019140
DLETE THIS!!!!1
>>337018450
get a life. hot grills play COD and black ops, not this cringeworthy crap for freaks.
>>337019140
Yes, because anything that has complexity or requires brainpower is "totes boring amirite lmfao"
>>337019140
>he doesn't classify his dorfs in endless excel tables
Step your shit up anon
>>337017340
>3.0
>Gets on the top 100 PS2 games list
>>337019190
>>337019476
that's IGN for you
>>337019140
Why did you show yourself as low intelligence shitskin?
>>337016396
>that file name
/k/ autism triggered, that's a Zumwalt class destroyer
>>337019731
>/pol/ vs /k/ autism
>>337019423
I don't know if you were intending this or not but you absolutely nailed 13 year old edgelord.
LGTSS
>Blunderis
>>337016396
>merchant vessel
i see what you did there anon
>>337019825
/k/ is autism, the good 4chan kind one
/pol/ is just dumb
>>337014353
>IGN
also
>scores only matter when I say so
Does this game finally have readable text on resolutions higher than 1080p?
>>337019624
whats wrong with enjoying games with beautiful graphics instead of primitive text games for creeps?
>>337020086
t. /k/ommando
>>337016396
filename made me giggle
>>337014353
>rowan kaiser
>>337016721
>IGN Italy = 9.3 (Just LOL!)
Oh fuck this is real.
>>337016832
The man gave Superhot an 84. Opinion disregarded
>>337015236
>Medieval Cassus Belli
>Game about space aliens.
Haven't taken game critics' opinions seriously for the last 10 years, I don't know why I should start now.
>>337021472
true. why would you need any reason to DOW on filthy xenos
>>337017459
na na na. You cant generate sentences and language properly yet.
It will just get repetitive after a few hours of diplomacy cause there will be a set amount of text lines in the game.
>>337021298
What should it get?
>>337016721
>Explorminate.net
Wow, that's a pretty great site. Didn't expect their reviews to be this long and even state stuff that might turn off people.
Paradox forgot their check?
>>337016005
most reviewers play games in offline mode tbf and achievments always fuck up in that
Also not all achievements are live before launch
There's some recent game I've spent like 200 hours in and I don't have the achievement for beating the prologue (think it's dragon's dogma)
>Part of this is the fault of the overly passive AI. If they’re stronger than you, they might declare war. If they’re not, they don’t do anything. It took me 50 hours and three games, progressively raising the difficulty and giving a computer empire a huge buff before they declared war on me for the first time.
I don't get his complaint. He wants the AI to be dumb and start pointless wars that it can't win?
>>337021869
Bro, bro, but where's the action? Where's the ACTION, bro?
>>337021130
wtf that webm
>mfw im going to enjoy a game whether /v/ says im allowed to or not
>>337022084
WHEN YOU PRESS A BUTTON SOMETHING AWSOME HAPPENS
welp, looks like I'm waiting for Endless Space 2`
>>337022558
WHAT?? OH SHIT BRO! 11/10 INSTANT CLASSIC - IGN
IGN and Sonyggers humiliating themselves once more while I got a great new game.
All in all this has been a very good day.
>>337023081
Do you want to skype
>
i get the userscores are sometimes shitposting but fucks sake
>>337023640
>weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
why did I laugh?
>>337023640
wuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuzzzzzzzzz
>>337023745
KAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANGZ
>>337023745
Kongs
>>337023916
>it's a GG force their e-drama into a video game thread episode
>>337023916
kek, I knew this nigger was full of shit.
>>337024018
But GG literally raped him, this is important stuff, Anon.
I know you understand.
>>337014353
what a stellar blunder
>>337024018
How is this forced? The guy has a conflict of interest when it comes to the creators of the game. He was upset with the devs of the game that he was tasked to review.
This is relevant information.
>>337016385
Holy shit what the fuck this wasn't even remotely memorable
>>337024220
it's not a conflict of interest at all
he doesn't like totalbiscuit and this game has nothing to do with totalbiscuit
>>337024115
Oh, Shitlaris was made by Totalfaggot then?
>>337023916
>Tot*l Biscuit
>>337024376
go away
>>337023916
>GG is evil and only about harassing women not about journalists being shitty people that can't seperate private matters from work and promote people they know
>lets rate this game bad because the people they made it have a different opinion than me
Why are people like that not gassed?
>>337024481
What has stellaris to do with gg in any way?
>>337024449
fuck your shitty shilled game bitch
>>337024348
>When I was at ParadoxCon
Paradox likes TB, he doesn't like TB.
>>337024731
but he was at their convention, meaning he likes the company
DELETE THIS
E
L
E
T
E
T
H
I
S
It's out now for DL, by the way.
>>337024848
He LIKED the company, but then he found out Paradox endorses literal rapists so he didn't anymore.
>1.6 gb
No. I'm putting my fucking foot down, they can NOT keep getting away with this.
>>337024481
>>lets rate this game bad because the people they made it have a different opinion than me
literally nothing implies that happened
>>337024885
once again, that's entirely your headcanon and there's nothing to support that
>>337024889
Away with... what?
Small game sizes?
I have literally never heard nor seen anything about this game.
>>337024642
>>337024956
to quote >>337024731
"Paradox likes TB, he doesn't like TB"
>>337025043
People started making threads a while ago
It's mostly the same people (devs) in those threads though
>>337024889
>underage baby has been only playing games since companies stop bothering to compress that he is LITERALLY cucked by compression.
>>337024956
>no evidence to support the claim
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
Critically Sane 5/5
Destructoid 9/10
eXplorminate rates it "eXemplary"
GameWatcher 9.0/10
IGN 6.3/10
PCGamesN 9/10
PC Invasion 8/10
PC World 4/5.
TICGN 10/10
Gamespew: 9/10
IGN Italy: 9.3/10
Eurogamer - Recommended
Aint sayin, just sayin
>>337025207
show the evidence
hardmode: no social media
>>337025220
Paid reviewers. And I have proof - 100% of Paradox games and expansions have game-breaking crippling bugs upon release. Thus it is impossible for reviewers to rate it high based on merits, let alone play it all the way through.
wew
>>337024642
Read the tweets on the image he's replying to. It's not really GG related, but the reviewer of this game expressed distaste for Paradox based on their advice that TotalBiscuit can help sell your game. He disliked this because TB is supposedly a "serial harasser"
>>337025457
LIES
CANT
FIND
>>337024665
stop posting anytime
>>337025570
IPTorrents
does this game even have region lock?
>>337016716
Doesn't happen like that anymore.My game is getting added on steam is just under 3 weeks. I've had journalists emailing me for free keys to review it.
>>337025823
>IPTorrents
Nigga I ain't paying for torrents. Gib me magnet.
>>337026124
literally just search Stellaris-CODEX
dling as we speak
>>337020256
Beautiful graphics mean fuck all if it's not backed up with good gameplay, see battlefront.
>>337018450
>anime
>high IQ
So basically this game is EU3 for furfags, right?
The biggest selling point is your leader can be an anthro fox.
>>337027294
For you
>>337014458
>>337014682
>>337014748
>IGN gives Uncharted 88
>HAHAHA SONYGGERS BTFO
>IGN gives a shitty PC exclusive a 6.3
>w-w-who cares about IGN a-anyway
IGN hates aliens
>>337021602
exactly. The could brute force it by writing a shit ton of lines but at that point, I rather they use their resources on other stuffs
>>337016570
I need something to talk about while I'm torrenting
>>337014458
>i-i-it's not true when i don't like it!
>>337016005
that's obviously not a particularly useful bit of evidence anon.
>>337015675
I kinda miss being OK with Totalbiscuit's arrogance.
