![OpenGloriousKilldeer[1].webm](https://i.imgur.com/7zsdIOx.jpg "OpenGloriousKilldeer[1].webm")
DICE sure know how to spoil us.
>>336765584
They got chemical weapons in Star Wars Battlefront now?
>>336766569
Fucking Endor copy paste job
>>336765584
>He thinks that's Gameplay
wew lad
>>336766920
That's gameplay. Look at the destruction physics, shit clipping into the ground. Looks legit.
>>336765584
At least they showed the pancake machinegun
>>336766920
aside from those smoke effects that will be turned down for consoles that looks like gameplay
>>336766920
>wew lad
Piss off.
![2hohjj5[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/0qtT2VV.png "2hohjj5[1].png")
>>336767132
We have a problem.
>>336765584
Wow so you're telling me that this is real gameplay and this is not bullshots used in order to generate hype? You're telling me that the final game will have those destruction physics? WOAH, SIGN ME UP.
Fuck off shill.
>>336767508
Seems you play as a Russian African American
>>336765584
>reusing battlefront asset
the gameplay will be reused too
>>336767508
Wrong gun goober
>>336767629
>You're telling me that the final game will have those destruction physics? WOAH, SIGN ME UP.
Destruction looked better in BF3 you dirty console peasant.
>>336767508
Because that's a Lewis gun you colossal retard, which was put in service in 1914
>>336765584
Those structures don't look european or north african... india?
>>336767689
fuc
>>336767637
That's fine since no one played battlefront
>>336767731
I was shitting on the game you fucking mongoloid. The sarcasm in my post was palpable. Kill yourself.
>>336767508
>doesn't know Lewis MG
>tfw you were expecting huge improvements to destructionable environments
>>336767689
rekt
>>336767629
>Scripted animation of rubble falling onto the ground and disappearing
>High tech destruction physics
>>336767835
Get a better SSD m8
>>336767637
What is that?
>>336766920
Visually it looks like Battlefront
>>336767508
Aside from that being the entirely wrong gun, that's peanuts compared to the actual amount of 'artistic license' anyone who isn't shitting themselves already realizes this game is going to take.
>>336767403
what the fuck is wrong with you
>hip firing a fucking Lewis gun
>28lbs or 13kg
>firing rifle cartridges
Not for very long.
>>336767789
It looks like an old European church to me. Could be wrong though
>>336767879
On some maps we might get Bad Co destruction again, alot of small fortresses and buildings versus fighting in dense urban environments where they can't do those types of things yet
>>336767903
>what is sarcasm
>>336767924
Nah no point, it boots my OS just fine and I have enough room for 2 35 gig games. Gonna sell my 980ti when 1080ti comes out and cop one of those. Processor is fine since it's oc'd at 4.6ghz and is water cooled.
>>336767835
>a 980ti for 1080p gaming
based retard
>>336767958
Which jungles saw WW1 battles?
How are you going to repair horses?
>>336768080
Your implication through sarcasm was that this is not actual gameplay
ie
You're fucking retarded
>>336768115
you have to scoop the poop and put it back in
>>336768114
Africa m8.
>>336768080
Get a 1tb Samsung EVO 850 on sale around $300. Your Steam library will load fast as fuck.
>>336768015
Eh, I guess... archway and all, but somehow doesn't look it to me.
>>336765584
Why does the alien robotface pop up?
>>336768115
Feed them apples
>>336768181
WE WUZ
>>336768106
Nah I'm just watching movies on my 42 inch right now, I have a 1400p monitor next to it.
>>336768171
Gameplay can be faked as well, all early gameplay footage from DICE is almost always bullshots used in order to generate hype. You are fucking retarded, seriously. Guaranteed on release it won't even look close to that.
>>336768114
Africa
There was probably some conflict in China with Japan and Germany that technically counts in WW1
>>336768034
>can't do those types of things yet
Daily fucking reminder that RF: Guerilla came out 7 years ago.
>>336767508
are you fucking retarded
>>336768275
That gameplay is legit. Looks shit and has reused assets out the ass as expected from DICE.
>>336768237
Need a better look.
>>336768270
Please stop. Look up the East Africa Campaign.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_von_Lettow-Vorbeck
>>336768275
Yes that totally looks miles and miles above and beyond what Battlefront already looks like and is 100% fake
>>336768307
Its all small buildings with one visual design with almost nothing in them. BF4 was heavily urban based, in the middle of cities and shit where you just can't do that type of shit.
Also RF:G is single player only.
>>336768420
I take that back, RF:G did have an okay MP mode but it was a much smaller scale so it doesn't really count for much
>>336767508
>The DP machine gun
>Can only read that as Double penetration
The internet has soiled me.
>People saying this looks fake
>It looks like a slightly better version of Battlefront
It's 2016 people. These aren't bullshots anymore.
>>336768658
I'm willing to bet money this is "It's fake" stuff is coming from like mostly console players that don't know what decent graphics looks like.
According to them it's higher frame rate than what we can see anyway so it must be fake.
>>336765584
it's so dense
>>336768881
The graphics aren't in question, but the left of effects and destructible environments this game will no doubt shill will be watered down for the actual release. Just like with BF4
>>336769051
But theres nothing impressive about 2D smoke effects and rubble that disappears as it hits the ground
>>336768357
yeah
>>336765584
>>336767025
>rock chunks magically disappear
Even fucking FEAR did it right.
BATTLEFIELD 1 CONFIRMED FOR SHIT
Maybe it's just youtube compression, but I honestly think it looks worse than battlefront did
>tfw the best gun was delayed to a year after the war ended
>>336769831
Battlefront was a fucking knockout in the visual and sound departments, though.
The game only really failed because EA jewery.
>>336765584
Am I the only person in the world who thinks it's in bad taste to take an actual war that actual people died in, and make it into a fun game for children?
>>336769936
Hmmmm
yea
>>336766758
>>336767825
i cant seem to fint the battlefront clip for comparison sake. it was on the snow planet right?
>>336767934
A Greek/Roman decoration they dug up in Turkey recently. It says roughly "don't worry, be happy."
>>336769831
They had to tony it down a bit, Sw:Bf doesn't handle destruction unlike modern Battlefield.
>>336769932
Well that and the gameplay was complete garbage.
>>336767637
it was bf4 assets before it was battlecuck assets
I'll buy it if I can main mustard gas.
>>336767637
>memes were just a lost art
>>336769051
That destruction doesn't look very impressive to begin with and very simple. If it's in the game at all it'll be in single player campaign nobody will play and if you see it in multiplayer it'll be prescripted.
The gas isn't at all that impressive either and perfectly possible, to think otherwise is to be retarded.
>>336768034
What the point of making a WW1 game when it's known for its destructiveness if don't plan of having everything destructible?
>>336770218
I think they said in the announcement that the war zeppelins were going to be able to drop the gas.
And considering some faggot has a flamethrower, insane mustard gas shit isn't too far off
>>336769831
Battlefield maps are like, 2-3 times the size of Battlefront maps.
>>336765584
>this battlefront explosion on right
>this terrible smoke
>>336770638
Its running on an Xbone
What do you expect
>>336769936
Yeah, luckily nobody died in WW2 so we can make all the games we like about that war.
And that Battlefield Vietnam thing, no one died there. They really jumped the shark picking the ONE war where people actually died, those bastards.
>>336767825
Kek
>>336768115
Horses will be on pair with the at-at on battlefront.
Pick up a power up on the field and proceed to sit on a rail shooting for 60 seconds.
They were so elusive on answering the horse questions and that associated with the "we wanted to immerse the player and take away some gameplay elements at times" said it all.
Get ready for the worse and more dumbed down bf ever. They are going out of their way to give to the players everything that they actively say that they do not want.
>>336766920
You can even see the trees popping in
>>336768034
>On some maps we might get Bad Co destruction again
They said the exact same thing about BF4 and all we got was one little section of Golmun Railway that vaguely emulated the destruction that was in Bad Co.
They are full of shit until I see otherwise
>>336766920
literally just looks like battlefront
>>336768275
Not only are those the real graphics, but it runs at 60 frames across both consoles too.
Bet u real salty right now nigga.
>>336768521
Dinner Plate 28 is catchier.
![HLLxGD3[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/ZyzLFXQ.gif "HLLxGD3[1].gif")
>>336765584
>>336765584
>Gameplay
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N-CCb7ZHlA
>>336767689
FUCKING
T O L D
O
L
D
Is everyone ignoring the horribly inappropriate music they used?
Like christ have some fucking self control.
> Guys I'm putting together the BF1 trailer
> I'm cutting it like I would any modern FPS trailer
> Also I'm using a shitty seven nation army dub step cover
> ... Sounds good
How the fuck did this get the go ahead and how the fuck does that person have a job?
>>336771147
This on the other hand is very unlikely to be actual gameplay
>>336767689
DELETE THIS
>>336769872
I know sucks we wont see it, also sucks we wont see the BAR America had it in their disposal but didn't deploy them because they didn't want it to fall into enemy hands
>>336771253
Ironic considering they criticized the CoD trailer.
>>336771168
>CoDfags being this ironic
>>336770938
why did they ditch all the destruction from BC2? that was the best part of the game.
>>336771253
Probably the same guy who green lit the song for the trailer was also the one who came up with this oh so clever name Battlefield 1
>>336771448
Because it was the worst part of the game and completely destroyed any semblance of map design.
>>336769936
God forbid they make a game about a war that killed about 60 million people. Oh wait.
>>336765584
Wow, only needed 1.6 seconds of gameplay to know how badly their going to miss the mark with the setting.
WWI is not the setting for massive explosions and gas and crumbling buildings everywhere.
Not sure what that giant ball of fire explosion is supposed to be from.
You know they're gonna make Battlefield 2 and 3 after this one.
>>336771448
Muh map balance & muh "extreme graphic fidelity" tradeoff
>>336771253
What should have they used instead, the original theme?
Even though it is amazing it would still get criticized and being called lazy.
>>336771253
I flet the same way
>>336771557
Blitzkrieg of a fortress and artillery
WHERE ARE THE BOLT ACTION RIFLES FOR THE INFANTRYMEN
I don't want no akimbo 1911
>>336767835
boi
>>336771682
some popular music from the WW1 era wouldve been neat.
>>336771693
Artillery does not make giant balls of fire.
Just throws debris all over the place.
>>336771682
> What should have they used instead
Anything else but FUCK DUB STEP! THEY SET WWI! TO DUB STEP!
Just think about that for a moment.
>>336771682
Maybe something that acknowledges the gravity of the history that they're essentially fucking parodying.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS1dO0JC2EE
World War One was the most tragic war.
>>336770927
Fuck me I seriously hope there aren't power ups in bf1, it's fucking annoying.
80 bucks, D1 DLC.
>>336771806
Air burst artillery does.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8eLH3VbJOQ
>>336771557
Battlefield has never been a super serious franchise or at lease the last couple of game hasn't been if you want a serious ww1 shooter go buy verdun on sale for like 15 bucks on steam sale
>>336771832
>World War One was the most tragic war.
found the brit
>>336770469
Are you saying they didn't use flamethrowers in WW1?
>>336771858
Count on that, forgot to mention that the flamethrower guy question was also so elusive that it should work like the heroes in battlefront
>>336771981
Aussie
>>336771806
>>336771906
also
Profit = Flashy hollywood spectacle > realism
Dice could have brought someone like Ian from forgotten weapons to sperg out about every little detail of how weapons actually work but that costs money and directors/developers usually ignore a lot of what they say anyways.
>>336771802
>>336771824
>>336771832
How else they would get hype for the cool kids on the consoles? Because that is wherre all the money is.
I'm not defending it, but it is the future we allowed.
>>336772127
Well in the othe hand do you want fun game play or realism
>there's a gallipoli landing map
>World War 1
>Your average British soldier having one
I guess it depends on when this battle takes place but every military in Europe laughed at Machine Guns
except Germany because they were still stuck on old war fantasies of Defense being for fags
Verdun Is actually a great game but it's, to a degree, niche.
I can only predict that they'll completely ignore any historical accuracy. I can only imagine what the average BF player would say playing
> WHAT'S THIS! A BOLT ACTION RIFLE?
> THAT'S NOT A SNIPER?
> WTF I DON'T WANT TO SHOOT SLOW!
> SWEET A MACHINE GUN
> WHAT! I CAN'T RUN AROUND WITH IT!
>>336772214
This.
Keep in mind DICE has to make a game where the entire duration of the war was "sit in a trench until you died"
>>336771981
Nah, WW1 was probably the worst combat soldiers have ever seen. Not necessarily the most deaths, but mentally it completely destroyed soldiers. Especially the guys on the western front.
>>336772030
fuck
>>336771253
They should've had a kickass snare drum version of the original BF theme.
>>336772275
Yeah totaly you got to find the balnce of realism and fun game play that i think battlefield i known for
>>336772320
>>336772272
> Be WWI fag enthusiast
> BF1 gets announced
> Inaccuracy's and half truths everywhere
Fuck me.
>>336772275
Exactly. Everyone's going to run around hip firing laser HMGs. Anything fun or interesting like tanks, special weapons, or planes will be bullshit power ups that spawn on the map.
Get ready for Battlefront: WW1.
>>336772461
So people could mock them with shit like "skabba dee bop"?
Do you forget what happened with the remix for bf3?
Brrrzzzz bzzzzzt
>>336772275
How are they going to balance the bolt actions in a game like Battlefield?
>>336772475
>expecting realism in a Battlefield game
Not even 1942 was realistic with their shit. DICE has to make their game somewhat stupid and action-y.
Seriously, I hope they embrace it and add stupid fucking gun designs.
>>336772563
>>336770105
And it was CoD dlc before then, what's your point?
>>336772214
Depends entirely on your definition of fun.
I think you could have plenty of fun in a great war shooter without turning it into call of battlefield dubstep explosionspam 57
There are all sorts of oddball military evolutions and callbacks to older wars that came out in the world war 1 era that I think would be neat to play with and teach people something about history at the same time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqrw9KVzQzc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNVfe5Et9-I
>>336772601
I meant something more like this.
https://youtu.be/rX-3b1DK-4s
>>336772414
>>336772729
>Target audience
>Caring about original BF theme
>>336772652
>Russians will get Fedorov avtomat as an unlock
How horrifying.
>>336765584
If memory serves me right, there was text in the trailer to the tune of "gameplay engine footage," or something like that.
I wouldn't confidently say that those are 1.6 seconds of actual gameplay footage.
>>336770780
I wasn't just talking about this one game.
>>336772707
Yeah bro i watch his videos too,im just saying battlefield has never been one to take itself seriously
>>336765584
And just a few days ago DICE employees were shitting on the new CoD trailer for not having gameplay.
Bra-vo.
>>336772810
That's why its sad.
>>336772702
Deny all you want bitchboy. Even if they don't do Battlefront style power ups it's going to be a shit game.
>>336771253
I wouldn't say it's inappropriate at all.
At the end of the day, this is the latest mainline game in the Battlefield series. They are targeting the same audience as they did with the previous Battlefield games.
>>336772414
I'm sure soldiers during WW2 that were caught in an encirclement and had to eat tree bark to survive were a lot more psychologically healthy.
>>336772927
>hasnt playd the game
>>336772414
But why doe? What was so bad about it compared to every other war where people crawled in the dirt to murder and blow each other up?
>>336773027
>Neither has anyone else
>It's made by DICE
>>336772907
Really? Last time I read those tweets they were gawking at the graphic fidelity and directing of the trailers and did not mention gameplay
:o)-S-C
>>336773029
It's the one that seriously affected britbongs, and as we all know they are the only people whose opinion matters.
Call of duty still looks more fun then this pre-renderd piece of shit
>>336773029
If you got called to fight in a war today, you'd have a good feeling of what to expect, right?
Imagine being called to war in 1916. What the hell do you expect?
>>336769998
no, the forest one, endor.
foliage and ground are is using the same assets.
>>336772987
Eating treebark is a lot better off than watching your foot melt off into your sock.
>>336773220
sleep tight, suzuki.
>>336773220
SLEEP TIGHT SUZUKI
>>336773029
WW1 was just a lot more prolonged than it needed to be. For the first time you had 20th century firepower like HMGs, long range and fairly accurate artillery, and chemical weapons.
But everyone kept fighting like it was the 1800s. So you had a huge increase in killing power but most of the tactics acted like everyone was still using cannons and inaccurate rifles.
>>336773220
Okay. Sleep tight, Suzuki.
>>336773220
sleep tight, rice rocket
>>336773029
The technology wasn't good enough to keep anything sanitary or remotely safe but WAS good enough to develop all sorts of bat-shit and brutal weapons with no regulations on any of it.
>>336773029
Oh gee, I don't know, maybe chemical warfare? The massive advances in artillery? The death charges into machine gun nests? The months upon months of being holed up in a trench half frozen, shit food, & with medicine still being shit? Seeing your buddies skin melt off due to gas attacks, or seizuring so bad they coughed their innards out?
WW1 was so bad that for practically the first time in history, all of humanity came together and said, "Shit son, this was too brutal. Let's get some rules up in here so this doesn't happen again". Rules to govern warfare.
>>336768521
Dubs poacher 28 for me Im afraid, i hate dubs poachers
>>336773183
It also completely cucked the French
>>336773345
>their feet were warm enough to melt
Fucking casuals
>>336772853
Then stfu
>>336773443
There were conventions on what weapons were allowed and what advances be made before ww1
>>336773029
Trench warfare in the first world war had a debilitating effect on people, for a number of reasons.
Being stuck in a singular location, for long periods of time, where death awaits you in ways you can't even predict. A few feet to a just a few inches over you head you are liable to be shot, artillery fire is frequent and devastating. But you can't run, you are ordered to maintain the line, and must subject yourself to the gun fire, the artillery, and more. You risk your feet atrophying from you via trench foot. Rodents make their home in your trenches, and carry with them diseases and grow to large sizes.
Throughout this you need to find time to sleep, and you are certainly not safe during that time. The enemy might pull a night raid, and you might not be prepared, sleeping leaves you vulnerable. The artillery keeps happening, and it's deafening and has killed off people you know.
Your commander has ordered your platoon to cross no man's land in a vain attempt at military bravado. The advance fails, and you retreat back to your trench, many men fewer, many you knew. It's guaranteed your commander will order another trip into no man's land.
Some death's might be beyond your control completely. The enemy could have dug a line underneath your trench and packed it with explosives. They could be using mustard gas, etc. etc.
This can break a lot of people, and it did.
>>336768262
The player is putting on a gas mask, you knob. That green cloud over there is chlorine which is, you know, poisonous.
>>336773776
Which were promptly thrown out the window.
>>336773220
sleep tight suzuki
>>336773220
sleep tight suzuki
>>336773029
It's impossible to describe here in a way that you will believe, but WW1 destroyed the West. The more reading you do on it the more you realise how incomprehensibly massive its impact was on the culture of Western European nations.
Prior to WW1 there was incredible optimism about the future. The benefits of the industrial revolution had finally begun to materialise, and technology was allowing for new and marvellous feats every day. People saw a world that was getting better every year. The early 1900s has been called the age of wonder. It was the time of Titanics - of Barnstorming - of the very first skyscrapers - of opening up the Dark Continent. People were still very morality-driven and religious back then, and they connected the technological and quality of life advancements with their spirituality in a way that is totally alien to us today. There was a genuine belief in the "Concert of Europe" and the convergence of rationalism and religion into a perfect order. It lacked the cynicism and "witty" barbs that politics today has.
All of that was destroyed by WW1, and the Great Depression and WW2 served to grind it further into dust. This all sounds very romantic, but it's all true. The more you read from that time period the more you see how people connected the improvements they were seeing in their lives with a perpetual grand march of progress and great men like Dr Livingstone who were lighting the way.
You can view it like a child who can see a marvellous light, and he reaches out to touch it, only to get burned on the globe by its heat. He's learned a valuable lesson, sure, but he'll never look at lightbulbs the same way again. World War One destroyed an entire way of seeing the world. It turned us by half into bitter cynics, and what followed did the rest.
The political apathy and cynicism you see today in mainstream culture, where being able to cut someone down with a smart tongue lashing is so prized, all flows from WW1.
Believe it or not
FUCK ALL OF YOU. I preordered it.
It looks hella frickin' sick and you can't deny it. Dumb shitposter contrarians. Back to call of duty you peasants. EA always wins baby.
>>336773220
sleep tight, suzuki
>>336767508
Hahaha, you fucking scrub get rekt.
>>336767689
Also, didn't they say it was an alternative story.
>2017
>still playing fps games
>>336774320
trying too hard.
>>336767835
It's not nice to make fun of people with aspergers. It's not their fault they can't detect sarcasm.
>>336773608
Bacteria eating away at your living flesh would result in some heat being produced I suppose. Not like you could feel anything but pain.
>>336774320
Stick to the bating you're good at.
>>336765584
that smoke looks terrible
>>336771168
I don't understand the point of this video. I'm not a big fan of CoD of BF, but it seems that the trailer is insisting that everything is in engine, but the animations, facial expressions, set pieces etc. were embellished for trailer's sake, which is quite honest and nice of them to specify. The only fishy practice here is the alleged "Xbox One footage". Haha okay. It is likely PC in engine footage though. DICE knows how to be on the cutting edge when it comes to visuals. Come October I wouldn't be surprised if the game looks pretty close to the reveal trailer on PC with max settings similar to Battlefront.
>>336774815
that's what smoke looked like back in WWI days tho
I showed this trailer to my great grandfather and he is stoked. says it looks epic and very close to what it was like
>>336774808
Where is the game?
>>336775194
Give him his glasses back.
>>336773719
Again, no mention of gameplay, "shows the game" implies they'd like to see stuff in the CoD engine, which the BF1 trailer has.
>>336775194
That's pretty impressive considering there's no more living ww1 veterans.
any chance this will be a XboX One exclusive? I'll preorder if that's the case.
>>336771147
has any game ever done the whole shockwave part or heat? You know how this guy should have been reduced to molten dust?
>>336767508
my No. 1 problem with the game is that 90% will be a fuckfest of everyone running around with MGs hip firing and running around with their heads cut off... when well over 90% of the issued guns were bolt action rifles
>>336769872
>iktfb
>>336775627
>this guy should have been reduced to molten dust
quite the stretch there champ. a charred corpse at best.
>>336765584
>literally looks identical to Star Wars Battlefront
What a fucking surprise.
>>336773443
One more reason why Hitler is a disgusting human being is that even after having experienced it himself he was still ok to subject the world to the horror of the war.
I doubt BF1 will depict it right.
>>336775040
The issue is we've been burned by ads with pre-rendered game footage before... so show us the actual fucking gameplay in its current or final form....
>>336773220
sleep tight, suzuki
>>336775860
BF4 had Recker
what will BF1 main dude be called?
were there portable radioes and earphones back in WW1? how will our mane character be given orders!?
>>336773220
sleep tight, suzuki
>>336772830
>be sucka
>tip my Fedorov at the incoming enemy
M'kraut
>>336773220
sleep tight suzuki
pls, im desperate
>>336773220
Sleep tight, Suzuki
looking forward to using this sexy beast desu
>>336775921
>Hitler invented war
>>336766758
yeah maybe its because they're both forests and thats what forests look like you tard
and yet the game will still make over a billion dollars from you bitching dudebros, as usual.
>>336776291
The only reason why anyone uses that piece of shit is because its always steady. Too bad half your screen/peripherals is gone because of the butt fucking retarded mag placement.
>>336776051
Radio and portable radio became a real technology race near the middle-end of the war because wires were ass backwards tier in trenches
>>336776471
>oh no i might need to move my head around and see what im shooting at
>nah, fuck that shit, id rather die
>>336767934
It's a Turkish mosaic depicting a skeleton in the typical position of someone who's attending a symposium. These were basically house parties between well settled buds and mundane occasions despite the skeleton being an image of death. The letters read "euphrosynos" meaning happy and light-hearted.
It's an invitation to enjoy life despite all its problems.
>>336776939
Yeah, cause you can't do that with a gun that isn't retarded. It's a lazy easy to manufacture cost effective design, you can't argue its not dumb.
Just stop.
>seven nation army AND dubstep
weeeeeeeew
>>336773220
SLEEP TIGHT, SUZUKI
>>336775970
No main protag.
Multiple POV , like CoD.
>>336774214
You're wasting your knowledge here my man, it might be time to find another board as home.
>Battlefield 1
>World War 2 themed Battlefield 2 will undoubtedly come after this
>people will slowly start to forget the real BF2
>existence is pain
>>336765584
It's the exact same lewis from hardline without the scope and laser sight.
haha i love how battlefield 1 is single handedly blowing the FUCK out of everyone who doesn't know shit about history before WW2.
>"LMAO MACHINE GUN THEY DIDNT HAVE THAT!"
>"LMAO BLACK PEOPLE?"
and it's also the first world war 1 game that could only be done well by based battlefield devs
my body is ready lads for a return to the early 2000's when we actually had the original call of duty games become the landmark series of allowing you to just be a soldier in a boots-on-the-ground action experience. no more medal of honor "RAMIREZ DO FUCKING EVERYTHING" shit.
>>336773220
SLEEP TIGHT, SUZUKI
>>336781508
>original call of duty games become the landmark series of allowing you to just be a soldier in a boots-on-the-ground action experience. no more medal of honor "RAMIREZ DO FUCKING EVERYTHING" shit
Okay, so now I know you never played the original Call of Duty games.
>>336777286
>its retarded you might have to look around your gun based on its design
>meanwhile i complain how i cant see through the bullet to shoot the bullet 100% accurately
its nice and all..but how will the historical period affect the number of weapons and the customization compared to bf4?
>>336771682
Anything orchestral from like medal of honor would have been fine.
>>336781508
I know you are
>baiting for (You)s
>creating a strawman through black/white fallacy
Please stop being so obvious and up your troll game for everyone's pleasure.
You are only a tad above obvious falseflagging.
>>336771682
First minutes of this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U22lCxUrx5Y
>>336771253
i agree the music WAS FUCKING SHITE
>120v120 multiplayer trench warfare
you know you want this,
>>336781508
>retard that doesn't know 99% of the original team is gone
>retard think it's going to be anything like the early BF games
>>336781508
Except you do realize that the vast majority of the playerbase will be fighting over the SMG and LMG classes, right?
If the game doesn't restrict those weapons to a certain few people, the entire game will consist of SMGs and LMGs with standard run & gun gameplay. It does not look like DICE is interested in emulating Verdun's gameplay, so this is what will happen.
It's going to be real funny if Activision pulls a serviceable clone of the Titan mode out of their ass and shoves it into COD.
>>336770101
gameplay improved with the 3rd person but it should've definitely been more arcady
>>336782771
It's still 64 players.
Why the fuck are we stuck at 64?
It's been like that for a decade.
>>336775970
>implying anyone gives half a shit about singleplayer in BF
>>336773608
>what is a teaser trailer
Boy you must really hate movie teaser trailers
>>336766920
It's 100% gameplay, it doesn't look any worse than Star Wars
>>336782996
120v120 would be fucking shit, half of you would be getting spawn camped by tanks/mortar fire, the spawn time would have to be in minutes for balance issues and the maps would be impossible to traverse on foot to make it so you aren't facing 10 people every time you turn a corner
>>336772830
That comes with the 120 dollar platinum edition dlc super extra booster kit premium edition
>>336782996
Play Planetside 2 if you want that much of a clusterfuck. The only way you can have hundreds of players per fight with a large-enough map is to make it a persistent world where there is always sufficient players and no wait time.
>>336783543
>the maps would be impossible to traverse on foot to make it so you aren't facing 10 people every time you turn a corner
>going lone wolf in WW1
how about playing as a team?
People always complain about "LEL NO TEMPLAY" on battlefield, when the game doesn't force you to beyond throwing medpacks.
>>336771168
>CoD is quaint! QUAINT!
>>336783706
50vs50 sounds reasonable.
>>336783730
>wanting the gameplay to turn into halo 3 tier of kill trading
how about you fuck off to planetside, there's nothing tactical about having a stupid amount of players
>>336784087
Yeah, WW1 battles were fought 64 soldiers at a time.
I feel this game is only going to be "WW1" in name and actually have nothing to do with how WW1 actually played out
![a4304d0679087971825760681b482c09-650-80[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/F20E3xn.jpg "a4304d0679087971825760681b482c09-650-80[1].jpg")
>>336784471
I am very afraid so.
I dont believe todays EA controlled DICE stands a chance in doing the source material any sort of justice.
If anything, maybe Tripwire could make a nice WW1 game.
Seeing as they have made a quite believable and seemingly accurate recreation of the battle of Stalingrad.
>>336784471
I anticipate a reskinned SW Battlefront with some BF4 mechanics thrown in
>>336785329
Seeing DICEs recent trend of removing features and mechanics for every game they put outNo, the commander system in BF4 does not fucking count
I am very certain this is what we are getting. Maybe there will be a squad system, but flamethrower guys and MGs will totally be Battlefront-style power-ups
>Hipfiring a lewis gun
