So new Battlefield trailer, what do you think?
http://www.strawpoll.me/10137640
>>336604581
I don't even look at BF and CoD games anymore.
>plain olive coat
Looks like it's set in the past
What is with the Norman Bates looking Battlefield poster boy? The guy is creepy.
>>336604581
2143.
the teaser is actually the history of the battlefield license, going from 1942 to 2143.
How about you link the actual trailer you fuck
>>336605297
And we'll get a catchphrase like "war is changing" and shiet.
>>336604581
>Game engine footage
>>336605273
They went for an extra closeup to avoid showing anything, but yeah it looks weird.
>>336605113
I would tend to agree. His haircut too, but last time I checked they didn't have Titans during the WW
>>336604581
was just playing bf4
h y p e d
>tfw finally rank 136
>No colonial era
>>336605539
> finally rank 71
I don't play much
>>336605404
>op picture clearly showing where to see the trailer
>hurr where da trailer at?!
You may be retarded
>>336605603
>700 hours on record
i should play 300 more for 140 rank.
>>336605273
Dice is telling you they're JUSTing the franchise.
>>336604581
>dirty face
>fire and smoke
>looking at something big
>wearing an old style jacket
>emotional
>literal darkness is falling
looks like a world war to me
>>336605648
Read my post again, post link or kys
>>336605297
That makes sense, this is probably what this trailer is for
>>336604581
>not actual gameplay.
At least DICE are not fucking liers like CDPR.
If its a historical era I might like it. If its future its going to be another shooter filled to the brim with gimmicks and unnecessary customization that just bloats thae game
literally comfirmed its not in future, thank god
ITS MODERN
FUCKFUCKFUCK
https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/728313338174779393
>>336605539
currently downloading BF4 how far can i lvl before BF5, will it be enough time?
>>336605906
thats the 1942 logo
its probably a video going from 1942 to BF4.
the jet on the right looks like the su34 from bf3
the heli looks like the viper from bf4.
>>336604581
I would like if they did a game more like a platform. Instead of constantly changing games and forcing people to buy 60 bucks shit make it one game that is being upgraded with DLC.
20 bucks buys you Vietnam stuff (like BFBC2), 20 bucks future stuff, 20 bucks modern stuff, etc. Each contain some stuff inside, like 4 maps, unique weapons and skins, etc.
The time zones that prove popular would be upgraded, the others not.
>>336605906
Hold on.
They said that it was World War 1 with a twist. Could this be the twist?
>You will never assault the giant german zeppelin from your biplanes with Pierre and Simon during the mech battle of La Somme
>>336606046
if you're autistic you can probably make it to 130s~.
>>336605906
those look like pics of bf2/3
>>336605539
Do people still play BF4? This makes me wanna play Battlefield and I'm pretty sure 3 is dead now and I don't want to waste money on Hardline
>>336605906
You can see the Battlefield 1942 logo too. With the japanese planes and shit.
>>336605906
Are you stupid or what
That is a WWII uniform.
Unless DICE is rusing us here, this is definite confirmation it's WWII.
Still begs the question what the shadow is from though.
>>336604581
I'll be interested if they set it in the past, but I still don't trust Dice or EA after Battlefield Hardline and Battlefront. I'm still amazed at how badly they bungled Battlefront.
>>336606072
they never did
>>336606237
I would nuke a city full of puppies for BF2143. My copy of 2142 straight up refuses to work after all these years. Probably fucking punkbuster again.
>>336606237
4 is popular, 3 is meh, Hardline is about as popular as 3
If you just want a flavor-of-the-month thing, get EA access - BF4 + Premium + Hardline + Premium for about $5 monthly, and there's a couple more games with that too. It's a good way to play the older flavor-of-the-week crap you never got to try but don't want to invest $20 into something you will play for two hours and then stop.
>>336604581
Only watching to leave a dislike
>>336606072
It's most likely steampunk.
Just so it will be WWI with hand carried machine guns with extra gears.
>>336606452
gamespy died because noone used it anymore and so did hundreds of gamespy games 2 years ago.
old bf titles being some of them.
>>336606237
It's the most played Battlefield right now, even more than Battlefront (admittedly that's not saying much).
TIME TRAVEL CONFIRMED.
It will be like Timesplitters, but battlefield.
>>336606237
Doesn't this new battlefield get out this year anyway?
>>336606436
>>336606557
It's a private video, doesn't make a difference to them
>>336605565
I can't even remember when we had a colonial game
>>336606627
i've wanted a new timetravel fps for like 15 years i would buy three copies on day 1
>>336605906
I honestly don't think it will be. Battlefield 3 and 4 were literally the same game. Surely they must have run out of idea/got bored with it
>>336606547
Oh I have 3 and 4, I loved the shit out of 3 even though it felt like a step backwards from Bad Comapny. 4 I didn't get into as much and I only bought the first DLC but if they're giving it out for free that's definitely something I wanna see. I always wanted to play the sea one but just never got around to it.
>yfw ww2
>>336606665
That's fine
>>336606072
>Battlefield Iron Storm
Fuck, I'd buy this.
>>336604581
My bettings are that it is EITHER 2143, or WW1. The teaser shows the fella looking up at something which is clear, either it could be a civilian looking at a Zeppelin for the first time, or someone witnessing the launch of a titan. What do we think folks?
>>336606775
At that point I just want to avoid anything related to mechs, or space.
>futurefags
>>336606665
>All those Battlefuck fanboys in the comments
So in case it's WWI with a twist:
What's the twist?
they wouldnt be dumb enough to make Battlefield 3.5.5
Please no more WW1 and 2. I had enough of those in the PS2 days. And no Vietnam either. Vietnam sucks.
>>336607021
Germany won.
PLZ BE WWII
If it's future shit I am fucking done.
>>336607089
faggot
>reveal trailer
>it ain't me starts playing
>>336607021
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jU3197aPyBQ
So the author of those cool dieselpunk WWI artworks denies his involvement.
>>336607021
da nazis boogeyman
something like wolfenstein.
>>336607089
fuck off
>>336606706
I'd love a game set in that time period. Might work okay with the current BF formula, though they'd need a deeper melee system. It'd have to be mostly skirmishes, because there's no way people online would be coordinated enough to do actual line infantry fights on open fields. Teams of irregulars, European mercenaries and natives going against each other on crappy terrain would be fun.
>>336607145
Done with what? There are barely any futuristic shooters on the market outside of halo and i guess call of duty.
>>336606904
Where are all these big battlefield type future shooters people like you talk about? People say they're sick of them but where the fuck are they all?
What's Rami Malek doing in Battlefield?
>>336607313
there are no other shooters period
>>336607089
fuck off comie
>>336607436
On console yeah but who the fuck plays fps on console.
>>336604581
>Being excited for Battlefield
>When the last three games were utter trash and one of them wasn't good until two years later
I will never understand the cretins that call themselves gamers. What a sad bunch.
>>336607386
Pacific confirmed
>>336607021
I'm betting it's either:
- Futuretech WWI
- Anachronism war - WWI fight alongside WWII, modern, Cold War, future, far future. Gives an excuse to include pretty much every gun ever made. DLC adds new stuff from different eras with main game focussing on 20th and 21st century tech. DLC maybe would add 19th century guns like revolvers, Gatling Gun, Maxim Gun. Medieval DLC add knight's sword and medieval crossbow. Future DLC maybe adds laser gun, railgun or guns from 2142.
- Germany is winning, the battle is being pushed to the Allies' countries and develop new advanced "Titan" zeppelin technology.
>>336607386
looking for Jap gold
>>336607526
Battlefield 3 was a good game.
guys what if
guys
what if its ww2
guys
but with jetpacks and shit
>>336607526
Kill yourself you sad fuck
>>336607089
that was almost 20 fucking years ago
>>336607481
>usa literally lost to barefooted, malnourished chink peasants
phahahaha
>>336607526
3 was good
4 is excellent now
Maybe you just hate video games like the jaded contrarian fuck you are
>>336606436
>PS3
>17,000
Wow
>>336607526
>calling yourself a gamer
Alternate history non-WWII>alternate history WWII>future>normal history>>>>>>>>>modern>WWII
WWII is more played-out than modern
WWI is a terrible setting
It's obviously set in the future
>Final Stand DLC
>disclaimer in the teaser
>biggest competitor FPS is futuristic
>WW2 being irrelevant in games for years, tons of other reasons why we're not getting a big WW2 FPS
>WW1 just lel, NEVER EVER
>EA risking its biggest franchise and letting DICE fuck around with time travel
my bet is 2142 prequel
>>336607526
here is your replay
>>336607729
What other games are they gonna play?
>>336607526
>STOP LIKING THIS BECUASE IT DOESNT CATER TO ME
>>336607635
>>336607715
>>336607612
>Battlefield 3
>Good
The complete closed quarters design they want for the majority of it was complete shit. I don't know anyone who didn't hate Battlefield 3 in beta, let alone the faggot full release. Battlefield Hardline was shit. And meanwhile Battlefront came out which was also shit.
Kill yourselves, you're no better than the COD kiddies.
>>336607770
A prequel to 2142 would be awesome. According to the loading screen blurbs, there were a lot more Titans and resources near the start of the war, so we'll get much Titan mode goodness.
>>336607751
>WWI is a terrible setting
>not wanting based trench warfare
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXtsiqrhqsU
>>336607770
>>biggest competitor FPS is futuristic
You realize that these games take years to develop right, they don't just look at the latest cod trailer and say "looks like its all about the future now boys scrap that shit"
other points are valid
>>336607770
DELETE THIS!!
>>336607823
bloodbo-
oh wait
>>336607869
Oh so you never actually played the game outside of beta and your opinion is based around operation metro
Quality post
>>336607869
>I don't know anyone who didn't hate Battlefield 3 in beta, let alone the faggot full release
That would explain why it was impossible to log-in for 90% of the time back in the 2011 beta, due to FUCKING FULL SERVERS.
>>336607952
COD has been in the future/near-future for a while now though.
>>336607951
>wanting to be constantly respawning because you have to go over the top into machine guns and entrenched riflemen
There were other battles in the war that weren't just trench slaughters that would be infinitely more fun. Not saying that a good trench warfare game couldn't be fun, but its pretty much the antithesis of the BF formula.
calling it
its battlefield as a whole. different eras, diferent tech, etc etc
>>336608135
It's a shame, Blops had a great setting
>>336607089
There's so much shit that doesn't have light shed on it in WW1, WW2, and Vietnam. The settings aren't boring at all. Vietnam could potentially have a GOAT campaign by focusing on some of the heavy and scandalous shit that happened.
>THE MORALE, DISCIPLINE and battleworthiness of the U.S. Armed Forces are, with a few salient exceptions, lower and worse than at anytime in this century and possibly in the history of the United States.
>By every conceivable indicator, our army that now remains in Vietnam is in a state approaching collapse, with individual units avoiding or having _refused_ combat, murdering their officers and non commissioned officers, drug-ridden, and dispirited where not near mutinous.
https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/Vietnam/heinl.html
>>336604581
>it's a WW1, game, the shadow over the guy in the tease is actually a barrage of artillery so thick it covers the sun for a moment
>one of the missions is the christmas time where germans and allies played football and exchanged presents
>later you are forced to kill a german friend you made during christmas time, years later you message his family
>>336607952
>what is corporate espionage
>>336608146
It works for RO
What about his collar/shirt screams world war to you guys? It just looks like a jacket to me.
https://twitter.com/BFBulletin/status/728261366772051968
>>336608160
>autists can have their ww2, dudebros their modern warfare and people who like fun their future
Nice
>>336607770
This. People think it'll be ww2 shit just because that's what they want. Think how hard it would be to go back to develop for a setting like that. Battlefield would feel completely different and broken because of their shit dev cycles ea makes for them. Future is safer to develop for and gives more creative freedom when it comes to desgin and gameplay mechanics
>>336604581
I'd be content with any of the WW1, 1944 and 2143 all together. Just don't make it Modern, I'm done with Modern Battlefields for a while after 3, 4 and Hardline.
>>336604581
>No BC3 option
Fag.
>>336608230
I personally just wanted them to expand on the Cold War setting, take it into full-scale conventional warfare. I guess too many people wouldn't be able to distinguish it from MW though.
I wish they could go full on anachrotech from WW1 to future warfare with armies from different periods facing off and stuff because someone set up the time bomb - actual Infinite Warfare, that could be continually updated with new time periods as DLC instead of sequels
But that's fresh and creative
It's just gonna be Battlefield 2144 because EA only does what's safe, and ironically that puts it right among a bunch of other future shooters coming out right now and what is it going to have to stand out
>>336607386
JUST A PRANK BRO
>>336608160
The BF devs would make a clusterfuck mishmash of shit.
>>336608385
>wanting another console game with half the features missing
Fag
>>336604581
If everyone wants WW2 games so bad, why not just play red orchestra? They're coming out with a new vietnam game too
>>336607770
>my bet is 2142 prequel
so WW1
>>336608454
We haven't had a futuristic battlefield since 2142, and even then people bitches and moaned about it even though it turned out to be awesome
>>336608587
because just like arena shooter fags, they think they want it but when they actually get it they dont like it
>>336608587
all of them are absolute dogshit, like everything tripwire made after killing floor 1
>>336608587
Red Orchestra has shitty graphics.
>>336608160
this is the company that made Star Wars battlefront
we should be glad if we get one period
>>336608160
this could be true
like what they did with need for speed
i will literally kill myself if its future
>>336608513
this. Why is there so much nostaglia towards BC2 on the internet? If anything its when battlefield took a huge leap back compared to 2142
>>336608587
If you want future shit why don't you just play Call of Duty?
What do you mean the gameplay is completely different?
>>336608728
>this is the company that made Star Wars battlefront
Different Dice studio
>>336608502
hahaha dank memes friend I love h3h3 XD
It's WWI. The coat and he's wearing one of these hats. Also, he's watching a zeppelin explode.
>>336608714
>>336608707
I still haven't seen a compelling argument against it
>>336608551
You mean like BF3, 4 and Hardline.
Double Fag.
>>336608394
I mentioned that in the previous threads, but Cold War, despite not being a war, had seen hundreds of localised conflicts (post-colonial Africa, Soviets in Afghanistan, etc) which were not Vietnam.
Apparently it's...
Battlefield 1?
>>336608587
But i do, is my most played game, is just that i want others theaters
>>336607021
WWI never ended
>>336608728
battlefront was made to WOW normies with trailers before and after they watch the movie.
>>336608865
4 is great.
It's been confirmed its 19XX, but it'll have some futeristic twist
>>336608872
Battlefield: Primal confirmed!
>>336605539
I have played this game so much
>>336608685
Holy shit this so much.
>>336608872
I dont read rammstein
>It's been confirmed its 19XX
citation needed
and no some literal who on twitter is not a citation
>best case
future or historical, anything but modern
>meh
modern
>worst case
they're rebooting the franchise as 'Battlefield'and it's still modern
>>336608587
>6
red orchestra is boring and tiring
i want a more friendly experience that doesnt require autism and 500 to learn how to shoot, something like 1942.
>>336608828
robin hood wasn't in WW1
wait a minute, is this the twist?
>>336608685
>because just like arena shooter fags, they think they want it but when they actually get it they dont like it
Spot the faggot who's not played RO2. It's completely different to Battlefield in almost every aspect. Also, the people who want arena shooters are the type not to be excited by a watered down soft reboot.
>>336607021The Animus
>>336609058
Scroll up in the thread, faggot
>>336609058
meant for >>336608940
>>336609037
are you that M4 autism?
ww1 never ended, world has been at war for a century
>history of battlefield
Sign me the fuck up nigga, hype is through the roof
>yfw it's another modern military shooter where you play as an American.
>>336609208
Who?
It's pretty much confirmed to be a futuristic bullshit shooter.
1. He's being overshadowed by a giant mech
2. it even says in the trailer on the bottom 'no weapon,vehicle, or gear manufacture is affiliated with this game'
This means no ww2 guns, theyre all gonna be bullshit 'XU38894' lazer guns with no real brands
debate me fags
>>336609265
People are getting tired of it apparently
>>336609078
>rebooting a multiplayer franchise that has new games coming out almost every year
nigga what
>>336608932
I don´t like it.
BC2 was the last time I had fun with the series.
I know BF campaigns suck, but BC2 at least had personality. BF3 and 4 had great sections but the story was overall bland, I mean BC2 being a bare-bones experience managed to be more memorable.
I wish BF4 was a little easier on the eyes, too much on screen and I did not like the feel of it.
>>336609265
Why would you want to play as anybody else? America has never lost a war and never will.
>>336608867
But they covered some conflicts in the Blops games, what they were missing?
>>336607770
It's a 2142 timeline game. However a section of the campaign will be set in the past, possibly during WW1 (like the WW2 section of Bad Company 2).
>>336604581
>BF4
>now it's BF 1944
>6th of June, to be precise
>Massive Omaha beach map as the highlight.
>Trailer will be the guy, 1000 yard staring
>puts his helmet on as it zooms out
>He's in a landing craft.
>Pans out over the other landing craft approaching the beach.
>Deep dialogue over the top.
>Goes to black, Battlefield 1944
>Classic: DU-DUN DU-DUN DUN DUN.
>Release 2017
>>336604581
His face reminds me of Mr. Robot
>>336609381
>campaign
Are you braindead? Nobody plays Battlefield for the story, it's a multiplayer game.
Jesus fuck the shit I have to read sometimes.
>>336609392
Just like North Korea hasn't lost any wars
>>336609392
Its easy when you're surrounded by 2 oceans
>>336604581
is that rami malek? looks like him
>>336609381
>playing battlefield for the campaign
so this is what being triggered feels like
>>336609392
(you)
>>336609092
m8, that's a WWI US Army hat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bydGoAdvmZo
it's happening
>>336606547
EA Access doesn't give you Premium, just the base games. Unless it changed in the last month.
>>336609339
>2. it even says in the trailer on the bottom 'no weapon,vehicle, or gear manufacture is affiliated with this game'
Like the BF4 or BF: Hardline trailer you mean?
>civil war comes out tomo
>this trailer releases
guys
>>336609492
>Jesus fuck the shit I have to read sometimes.
Like your own posts? BC2 had a good, enjoyable campaign. The rest are trash.
>its not Bad Company 3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s28qM8M3Bxw
>>336609432
https://youtu.be/vg0Tmydj29M
>>336609392
>We will never get a game where you play as a teenage girl in the Vietnam war tricking the Chinese and Americans into fooling around with you then dicing them up into little pieces
>>336609427
Those that I mentioned, for example. They never touched upon the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (which Phantom Pain did, recently), or the dog-of-war/soldier-of-fortune style mercenary combat of 60s/70s Africa (like Belgian paratroopers fighting warlords).
>>336609594
>mfw hardline had a decent theme
>game was shit outside of the car chasing mode
>>336609594
2142 is the best theme.
>>336609705
>Playing Battlefield for the campaign
Do I need to say more?
>>336609707
Good. Bad Company was cancer that almost managed to kill the series.
Consoletrash spinoff garbage.
>>336609594
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk4wEAO07hM
It's happening
>>336608683
The problem with going sci-fi is these mainstream fucks always make it the most generic boring kind of it. Destiny broke the mold a slight bit but all that meant was adding fantasy elements and a larger sense of scope.
I don't want yet another reheat of Starship Troopers
The question is what caused the shadow
we could see 2143 style mothership
>or
its a zeppelin flying over a WW1 trench
>>336608920
Hmhmhm
>>336609432
It's this.
>>336609492
>It is okay to pay $60 USD for a game with just MP maps
You are asking ME if I am braindead? Seriously what kind of shitty reply is that.
If it is a MP only game price it as such, $20 or bust, if you pay more you are clinically retarded.
Oh and it is not like they cannot get better at it, I honestly do enjoy them, I just liked BC2 better, which is again my point, idiot.
Really I am gonna tell your parents you go online to post crap like that.
>>336609824
>>336609813
Muh Negers
You can say what you want. But having a full-crewed Tank in those big field maps on Battlefield is fun as fuck.
>>336609775
But they did those in Black Ops 2
>>336604581
GAME ENGINE FOOTAGE
*NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF END PRODUCT
Anyone that works for this company should kill themselves.
>>336609817
>being this retarded
No one played BC2 solely for the campaign though, but the fact that it's campaign wasn't just playable, it was enjoyable, makes the game stand out.
>>336605532
>last time I checked they didn't have Titans during the WW
Where are you seeing a Titan?
>>336609705
>The rest are trash.
Yeah, maybe because Battlefield used to be exclusively multiplayer and the SP part got forced in by Bad Company shitters.
Bad Company was a mistake.
>>336609594
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb8PQXPOkCc
>trailer is 1942 intro but with modern gameplay
>>336609965
Kill yourself retard.
Sage.
>>336604581GIVE ME WOLFENSTEIN
Goddamn, I have to work tomorrow during the announcement.
>>336609824
>2006
fuck senpai I miss this game
>post yfw when the bf 2143 theme starts playing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnlA2rCHJHY
i thought we had a man on the inside
where is he when we need him
>>336609885
Win win either way, no?
I wanted BC3
>>336609965
You value tacked-on campaigns more than the actual meat of the game?
Pretty sure the guy was right about the brain dead part
>>336610074
>sage is a downvote
>>336604581
>let's all release our games trailer before e3
what are companies thinking these days? am insane or are they all mentally retarded.
no millienials will watch e3 for their gameplay. so why not leave a trailer for the actual gaming people who watch e3, play the trailer there with gameplay segment, then release that trailer on YouTube after its aired..
Also..
>game engine footage
yeah no one falls for that anymore
>it's 1944
>You play as a Nazi soldier
>As you progress through the game your character starts to change his mind on the Nazis seeing how crazy Hitler was
>The character falls into a deep despair after murdering innocent people
>taking drugs
>losing his friends
>His family is killed
>He finally ends up at a Russian prisoner camp, pleading for them to end his life
>>336610021
Well the game is like 6 months from release, of course you have to put a disclaimer like that up.
It'll look like shit on consoles.
>>336605273
Looks more like that gay Amazon hacker show I can't remember the name of.
>>336609707
play cod
>>336610045
This. It was all just added in to compete with CoD and it's singleplayer element.
Battlefield has always been a multiplayer only series, and should have stayed as such.
>>336610029
Too bad the part that matters, the multiplayer, was poorly balanced and really shitty.
It's obvious BC was made to appeal to the console crowd, and /v/ being underage as it was loved BC and BC2. As those underages grew up they started getting vocal about MUH FUN MUH BC2.
Go fuck yourself, you fucking series hijackers.
>>336610045
Fuck you. Bad Company 2 was a great game.
>>336610101
>>336610045
>Yeah, maybe because Battlefield used to be exclusively multiplayer and the SP part got forced in by Bad Company shitters.
>blaming fans for a studio's incompetence in trying to follow past title's various successes
Seriously, you're a colossal retard.
WHO THE FUCK /bfg/ IN HERE!
SMASH DAT MF LIKE BUTTON IF U /bfg/ AND U HERE SENPAI
>>336610228
>Implying the Nazis did anything wrong.
>>336610116
You can order that shit online
>>336610116
you get those from gamestop you nigger.
>>336610017
Shit, I never played Blops 2, I thought you meant the first one.
>>336609627
It changed.
No BF3 premium though oddly
Sims 2 UE would be a cool addition seeing as you can't get it legit from Origin any more.
>>336610074
>/pol/ school of debate
Dear Mrs Anon's Mom.
I regretfully inform you that your son has been a little shit all day, please make sure that he is taking his medication for he has behaved like a naughty little snot, and I, as well as other users, won't deal with his bullshit.
Please restrict the internet usage of your manchild to just social media, sonic passion and mlp.
Signed, a very concerned anonymous person.
P.S Get him some skittles, and some malt liquor, that ought to shut him up.
Just want to make people aware of this so they can shut the fuck up saying everything is modern day.
>>336609270
>tfw the theme will be WUBBZZZWUNUBUBWZWZZZBBBBZZZZZ
>>336610045
>He thinks Bad Company was the first to have a story compaign
What a retard lmao.
>>336604581
The red light behind him kind of makes me think it's not set in WWII or before.
WHAT CAUSED THE SHADOW
>>336610161
>/v/ on E3 trailers
>BULLSHOTS EVERYWHERE
>WHERE'S THE GAMEPLAY
>your post right now
Fuck off. I'd take gameplay footage at E3 over some trailer any day.
>>336610152
>Value more
When did I say that? moron.
But you are right one thing, it is value, and I appreciate that value. If there is not a campaign then price it as any other MP game.
Take for example Battlefront.
>>336610710
Titan
>>336610710
u're mum lol
>>336610710
It's a bird
>>336610710
the jews
>>336610459
I really only liked the cold War part, didn't care for the futurist part, so never finished it
>>336610710
my dick
>>336610710
Paul The Edgehog
>>336610161
EA quit E3
>more muh graphics
how cute they are going this route instead of delivering a solid game with entertaining gameplay
>>336610747
>When did I say that?
>If it is a MP only game price it as such, $20 or bust
You really are brain damaged
No one gives a shit about campaigns in multiplayer games, retards such as yourself just think it adds value so companies do it because the autists will screech at them for charging too much for mp-only
>>336610747
I'd much rather Battlefield games have no campaign and cost 60€ than have a shitty campaign that wastes dev time that could be spent on more content for the mp component.
I'll play the campaign once, maybe twice if it has different unlocks for the mp.
That will amount to maybe 5 hours tops.
I will play the MP for thousands of hours.
I wonder what I want, more maps, weapons and balance for the MP I'll spend thousands of horus on, or a shitty ass campaign that I'll play against my will to get all the MP content. HMMMM I WONDER WHICH ONE I WANT
>>336607021
It never ended.
If it's 2143 I will literally shit my pants with joy.
its set in the past but with aliens or timetravellers or something. meh
>>336610774
AYY
>>336604581
>Generic modern setting
It's shit
>>336610286
>Too bad the part that matters, the multiplayer, was poorly balanced and really shitty.
For the most part balance was good with a few exceptions.
>It's obvious BC was made to appeal to the console crowd, and /v/ being underage as it was loved BC and BC2.
I'm fucking 22 and I've played all BF games, I loved 1942 in particular. BC2 having a campaign, and a good one at that, was novel considering the past games singleplayer were just skirmishes or "campaigns" that were historically ordered skirmishes.
Games tend to get simpler as they attract wider audiences but this doesn't stop the game from being enjoyable. If you dislike it so much, there is literally nothing stopping you from not playing it seeing as BF will never go back to how it was, in the same way the vast majority of game series will never live up to the original title.
If people having fun with something you dislike triggers you so badly, you need to hang yourself.
>>336611024
Yeah I feel like the Battlefield guys just wanna make multiplayer games anyway.
>>336611056
I hope not. That game was ass.
>>336611024
^this
>>336610652
>reading comprehension
You're the retard here.
>>336611056
2142 was garbage, worst game in the series. Also, thankfully, this isn't that. Very clearly set in the past.
>>336604581
>another white guy
Ugh, tired of this white supremacy bullshit..
>>336611427
>2142 was garbage, worst game in the series.
elaborate
>>336611427
>>336611291
Utter trash taste.
>Hitler assassinated
>Barbarossa called off
>Peace is signed with Britain,
>Less immigration of german scientists to America slows down the nuclear programm, which makes the war with Japan going longer, Roosevelt dies before pushing for US involvement in Europe
>fast forward early 60s, Cold War between USSR, Nazi occupied Europe and USA has been going on for 10+ years.
>As URSS finally launch the offensive on Germany, several terrorists attacks strike the US in the midst of the Civil Right movement, apparently by american nazis backed by Germany
>US government declares war on Germany
Solo game can be about the war and uncovering that the terrorists attacks were like false flag attacks from the French resistance to force the US to get into the war or something.
You could also get DLCs in Asia, with a US-occupied Japan, Manchuria and Indochine.
There, alt-history, WW2 with more modern tech.
>>336610892
>EA quit E3
Quit is a strong word.
They just do their own show(EA Plays) next to the conference.
>>336611562
engineer was underpowered
no splash damage on rocket launchers was gay
