New Battlefield teaser, what's it gonna be?
https://amp.twimg.com/v/eea6f366-700d-4bb1-8c77-32e9b556b63a
Another modern/sci-fi shooter. BF died after 2142. BC2 was good as a spin-off, but shit as a Battlefield game.
>>336582669
>Battlefield is shit now
I love this meme.
Anyways I'm hoping for a WW1 or 2 shooter like the rumours said a while ago
>>336582913
>I love this meme.
It's not shit, but it's not as great as it used to be. I even own every game except for Hardline. I might even buy this one if it looks fun.
>>336582613
>https://amp.twimg.com/v/eea6f366-700d-4bb1-8c77-32e9b556b63a
so apparently the man is looking at something massive.
could it posibly be a mech?
battlefield 2142 confirmed
>>336583008
Hardline was shit.
Played the beta and instantly turned off.
I had so much fucking fun on BF3 on Siene Crossing mainly. Camping B on Conquest and going up the building and ambushing noobs coming in.
Battlefield 4 was just as great. Especially some of the newer maps that are free.
If it's more future garbage it better be alternate history or something like that.
Great. CoD and BC going into space now.
>>336583071
What if it's WW2 and a Lancaster Bomber is flying over him.
>>336583341
dont think it would cast a shadow on the soldier who is on the ground
>>336583071
Could it be a man of massive statue flying over him?
Looks like a ww1 or ww2 soldier to me
>>336583443
You have no idea what you're talking about anon.
Especially on a clear summers day a Lancaster bomber going 500ft to bomb would cast a shadow
I know this is a battlefield thread, but is there a release date for Rising Storm 2 yet other than "2016?"
>>336583443
>implying real life matters in games
>>336583972
2017
Trailer is leaked
>>336584141
>implying this is it
Max kek
What's up with the autists on /v/ hating scifi/future all of a sudden
Is that because of titanfall or what
>>336584141
YYYYYESSSSSSSSSS
>>336584141
What is this actually from? That Cyberpunk 2077 game?
>>336582913
>shit now
The series has always been shit, senpai
>>336584108
you serious? fuck.
>vietnam setting
>it ain't me starts playing
>>336582669
BF4 is actually really great now after 2 years of patching it.
>>336582613
Is that josh from that ps4 movie?
>>336584338
Contrarians. There really hasn't been that much Sci-Fi FPS lately but there's still people acting like it'll never end. Shit the only real big name one I can think of is Call of Duty.
So, it doesn't have a WW1 or WW2 setting. Okay, dropped.
Its vietnam vest
>>336584416
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_v6RdAWXkw
>>336582613
A shitty, pointless singleplayer
>>336582613
A science fiction shooter set during the WW1 or WW2 era with low tecc sci fi titans and so on.
>Battlefield 5 trailer
>It's a mix of Star Wars Battlefront and Battlefield with battles in space
>theme starts playing
>This is ground control to major Tom
Reeeeee
>>336582613
BF 2142-2
>>336584378
>Shoving the whole magazine in
Glad they stopped that shit.
>>336584338
Its just that recently theres been a lot of futuristic games and going back to ww2 or even ww1 would be a bit refreshing. I dont hate futuristic games though
>>336584141
what game is this?
>>336584524
Call of duty does scifi now? Is it any good
>Dumb asses still buying EA games.
>>336584371
some guys unreal engine demo
hmmmmmmm
https://twitter.com/bravoINTEL/statu...60511221972993
>>336584338
Casuals can't git gud and learn the exo movements
>>336584817
>that link
you fucked up
>>336584724
>magazine
>>336584784
The campaigns are ok. The MP is similar to previous games just with more maneuverability
>>336582613
Maybe its ww2 dude looking at 2142 titan.
>>336584748
Battlefield V.
>>336584793
>Am I fitting in guys!!
>>336584784
Wouldn't know. Haven't touched a CoD since Black OPs 1. Last time I saw a little it looked like CoD and Titanfall had a baby. The wallrunning and jump packs made it lookfun
>>336584864
>>336584817
shit
https://twitter.com/bravoINTEL/status/728260511221972993
>>336584817
Got you senpai
https://twitter.com/bravoINTEL/status/728260511221972993
>>336584978
>>336584984
Who is this guy supposed to be
>>336584978
Hmmmmmmmmmm
>>336584978
>>336584984
>inb4 sci-fi setting with time travelling to WW1
>>336584978
>Those angry tweets at the bottom
It's going to be another Hardline blunder
>>336584978
>>336584984
WW1 with tech from the future
>>336584978
>diesielpunk BF
i like it
WW1 with magic.
>>336584984
battlefield game of SCP-186?
>>336585387
>>336585360
I'd take both of these.
It's something new instead of just getting more and more futuristic.
WW1 but with ninjas and wizards
>ww1
lol
>>336585536
WW1 but with ninjas, Wizards and dinosaurs.
>>336585489
>more and more futuristic.
cod and halo? what else?
you faggots seem to think the industry is overran with futuristic shooters
Dumbest teaser ever.
>>336584141
>there will never be a Blade Runner game in your life cycle
>>336582613
>spaceship sound
>chracter looks up
well it will take the worlds greatest detectives to figure this out but i'm sure we will find out
>>336582613
All I wanted was another Bad Company game...But probably gonna be a futuristic one.
I'm okay with both sci-fi and ww2.
But i'm not going to play alternate reality crap with sci-fi weapons set in ww1.
>>336585625
I don't mean Halo, Halo has always been set in the future.
I didn't even suggest games are getting more futuristic you fagtard. All I did was suggest the way COD was going.
>>336585487
>get *killed*
>instead of respawning your character just lays there missing half their head and screams horrifically until the match ends
>>336585738
I hope space will get popular again, i'm tired of cyber/steam/fantasy/mdoern/dystopia...
I don't mind dystopia in space though.
WW1 with Greek gods
>>336585717
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner_(1997_video_game)
>>336584742
>there's been a lot of futuristic games
like what? AW and BO3?
>going back to ww2 or even ww1 would be a bit refreshing
what is wrong with you?
I just want someone to make Planetside with an actual budget. Is that so wrong?
WW1 with Trump as commander
>>336586045
this
WW1 with Lovecraft's monsters
>>336586045
>mmo shit
yes its wrong
>>336585624
WW1 but with just the dinosaurs. Used as transport and infantry units. Velociraptor squadmates that talk. Velociromance blooms on the battlefeel when your dude discovers your velociraptor squadmate is female and in heat. Egg watching minigame with real time heat sensor.
>>336586267
lay off that weed, son
Why do people want WW1 again?
>stationary trench warfare that goes on for months
>shit guns
>shit planes
>shit prototype tanks
The only cool thing is chemical weapons other than that it's SHIT.
>>336586045
>muh 1000 player clusterfucks
>>336586419
>No scenarios for that levolution shit DICE loves so much
>>336584460
Do people still play? I've been sticking to bf3 but good servers are starting to die out.
WW2 + Dubstep
ugh
>>336586419
>stationary trench warfare that goes on for months
That's true only about the end, first year was fun.
>>336582613
Jesus christ making a teaser for a reveal trailer?
Stop doing that shit, it's ridiculous.
>>336584141
>more scifi
Fucking hell
>>336586517
>>336586581
They are doing a whole reveal event, like they do every time they announce a mainline game
They pussyfoot around a bit, show the trailer, commence more pussyfooting, and then show some gameplay
Battlefied1842
>>336586732
Arrogant as fuck if you ask me.
>>336586687
what do you mean? nobody made scifi games just a year ago
WW1 with power rangers
>>336586759
That would blow my fucking mind if they did that. Has there ever been a good Civil War game that wasn't a fucking strategy game?
>consciously giving EA money
>>336586759
Battlefield 1542
>>336586732
And they always show singleplayer first, like anyone actually gives a fuck about that in battlefield
WW1 with bunnies
>>336586045
I just want Planetside instead of Battlefield: The half assed MMO.
>>336587042
>Battlefield 1542
Already exists, it's called war of the roses
>>336587112
WW1with smug foxes > WW1 with bunnies
WW1 with snek
WW1 with the missing chpater 3 of MGSV
>mfw the new game will be simply called BATTLEFIELD
>and will be a remake of 1942 with DLC
WW1 with weed
Battlefield1142
>>336584141
POLICE CRUISER AT 8 SECONDS IN LOOKS LIKE A PAC TYPE4 DORAGON
BF2142 UNIVERSE CONFIRMED
Battlefield0042
>>336587747
>still falling for it
u r dum
This one.
>>336582669
this
>>336587331
It has no swag firearms.
>>336587869
It does actually
Battlefield4242HHGTTG game
>>336587931
Okay then.
Battlefield: Battlefront: Batman vs Superman Civil War Star Wars 2142 Bad Company Dota 2
So I'm gonna assume that it's diesel punk or something of that nature? If so than I'm okay with it.
>>336584141
that was a tech demo awhile back senpai
>Dice thought Far Cry Primal was going to usher a new era of cave man games
>everyone hated that game so they bet wrong
Tomorrows reveal will be Battle Field OOGA BOOGA
>>336582613
2143 or no buy.
All the dirt on the face makes me think it's not something futuristic. Looks like Vietnam or WW1/2
>>336588329
if anyone thought cave men would be the hottest new shit those games won't pop up until 2018 or later. Triple A games take a long time to develop
>There's a giant hulking mech in the game
>WW1 setting
>it's just gonna be a reskin of Battlefront 3
>German Imperial Walkers
>>336587425
WW1 with burbs
Just like Killzone 1 was WW2 in space, BF5 will be WW1 in the future.
>>336588546
Fuuuuuck. Fuck. Fuck fuck fuck. This makes too much sense. You are almost definitely correct.
>>336583071
2143 confirmed
>>336584724
It's wrong but not for the reason you think.
>>336582669
Welcome to /v/, a board filled to the brim with underage so far attached from their peers that they spend most of their free time false flagging and baiting about console wars so they can get just a tiny taste of that attention they were so starved for as a child. The hottest "joke" right now is to pretend to be an obnoxious dick riding corporate dog (for sony, before anyone else), insult all other brands that directly compete with them, and discard all other posts just to get that point across. Enjoy your stay!
>this new battlefield
>Battlefront still be popular
>BF 4 being still popular
>BF Hardline being somewhat popular
>Titanfall 2 being a thing
Is this the year EA finally stretches too far?
>>336588546
>Implying its not Walker from 2142
desu It looks like Titan from 2142
>>336582613
>New Battlefield teaser, what's it gonna be?
if not Battlefield 1942 remake- shit.
>>336582613
Looks like a WWI/WWII soldier looking up at a titan.
Animus or time travel, calling it now.
>WW1 with a twist
so kinda like how resistance did WW2?
It's a futuristic game assholes
>Dice just made a Star Wars game
>they will reskin that into a futuristic BF game
You think they are just going to dump the new assets lol
>>336588879
That's a screenshot from the latest cod trailer. We're talking about battlefield.
>>336584724
With a garand it's correct to say "clip." And you actually do push the entire clip in with them. That *ping* noise the gun makes after firing all rounds is that clip being ejected out.
no one noticed this? definitely something futuristic
>>336582613
Sci-fi/futuristic confirmed, he is looking up at something flying over him and shocked by what he sees. Obviously a spaceship or futuristic aircraft not seen before.
>>336583071
What if its ww1 and its a tank rolling over his trench?
>>336588868
>deadline
>popular
It can barely manage 10k players at peak across all platforms dude, are you joking?
>>336588868
BF4 is popular because it's the best bf game out at the moment. The rest of those are dead in comparison
>>336589034
Why?
Could just as well apply to a modern day setting.
>>336587042
>Try plunging attack!
I'm calling it now.
>game will be called BATTLEFIELD
>remake of 1942
>generic as fuck campaign about D-Day and boring as fuck french farmland with dead cows everywhere to serve as cover
>singleplayer will be glitchy and unplayable just like BF4 and added as an afterthought, plus terrible performance
>Multiplayer will have 10 maps, set on western front only with no variety whatsoever
>DLC and season pass
>one DLC will have Wake Island remake with germans instead of japs
>last DLC pack will have some kind of wunderwaffe, like me262 and some kind of laser guns and only this DLC will have winter maps
>>336589034
You know you can just rename the guns to avoid endorsements and shit, right? Also you don't need any of that for WW1/2 weapons.
WW1 with alternate cyberpunk reality
>>336589104
He's looking at titan firing, even colors/mood matches with this of 2142
>see pic
>>336589205
i forgot to add
>rubberbanding
>dying behind corners
>20 tickrate
>glitchy physics in multiplayer
Battlefield 08th team
>>336589237
Except BF always uses licensed weapons and names.
>>336589205
i'm calling it now
you're retarded
>>336586419
Not on the east front.
Germans ownd russia. Very mobile warfare.
Bad Company 3.
Prequel set in WW1.
Screencap this.
when was the reveal going to take place?
>>336589120
could be
however it seems like the object is emitting some light and is being reflected on the soldiers eyes. so probably not a tank
>>336589382
>always
not in bf3 they didn't, the last battlefield i played
>>336589468
>>336589146
and why the fuck would they put a disclaimer like this when they use real names?
>>336589237
bf always used real names
they put it there because vehicles and weapons will definitely bear some resemblance to modern day weapons
I can't wait for WW1 & 2 fags to get BTFO tomorrow and all the buttblasted shitposting about it being modern/futuristic.
>>336589494
Magnify that shit then.
Maybe you can see somthing.
Or reflections somwhere else.
>>336589308
>20 tickrate
You know what's sad? This would actually be an improvement over Battlefield 4.
>>336589542
What? Every gun in BF3 is a real gun using it's real name.
It will be 2142 prequel
just listen to the fucking soundtrack
thats not ww2 or ww1
its cyber shit
Battlefield vs Battlefront
the Empire against Earth (Empire has no access to death star or those huge space ships. how would our modern military fare against them
hey guys
you guys
srsly
you guys
what if they made alternate history world war one with super nazi science?
>>336588918
Shit, this could make sense
Back in BF3 there was this EU drone flying as a easter egg on DLC map
It's like EU can travel back in time
>>336589667
>and why the fuck would they put a disclaimer like this when they use real names?
...they wouldn't and that's why they put the disclaimer in there? They'd just use similar logos/names.
>>336589782
Battlefield 4 supports up to 144 tickrate now though
>>336589802
For reference
http://uk.ign.com/wikis/battlefield-3/Weapons_%26_Gadgets
>>336589884
>world war 1
>nazis
>>336589782
it's the current year, stop living in 2013
It's the WW1 of the 2142 setting.
>>336589973
Time travelling nazis of course.
>>336589952
Wow really? And how many servers actually utilize the higher tickrates?
>>336590132
Most of them are 30, 40, or 60.
>>336582613
>Trusting in DICE after their last 3 games...
No, thanks.
>>336582613
>battlefield
>1 of 40 players
>nothing you do will ever matter
>team with least noobs wins every time
>>336584978
YES finally, the jacket in the teaser even looks like something you'd see during that period
There's no way DICE would do WW1 without some way of having a variety of interesting automatic weapons so I really hope they did something besides ALIENS
>>336589942
are you brain damaged? be honest
>bf always used real names
>they put it there because vehicles and weapons will definitely bear some resemblance to modern day weapons
>>336590198
this bf is made by the studio that fixed bf4 and made it into one of the best bf games to date
>>336582913
>WW1
It could be WW1, here's why: imagine poor, patriotic, Eastern European boys, whose idea of a war is an over-romanticized image of XIXth c. conflicts. Now imagine those boys encountering their first tanks, shellings, mustard gas attacks. Makes sense, doesn't it?
It's fucking aliens
>>336590292
>>bf always used real names
They also used to deliver quality games.
Shit changes, son.
>>336584141
is this real
hello
>>336590345
Link to that? Because I thought Sweden has been on this one since LA took up fixing the mess that was 4.
Battlefield/Titanfall crossover?
>battlefield mystic
>we van helsing now
>vampires, werewolves, monsters, dragons, etc
>swords and crossbows
>maps with day/night cycles for balancing
>ride horse carriage and dragons
>maps with ancient castles and ruins
>>336582613
I'd love it if they did something crazy like wizards in world war 3 or something.
>>336589879
that would be cool
BF4 had final stand had alot of 2142 themes to it
all those prototypes
>>336589237
>Also you don't need any of that for WW1/2 weapons.
sure, because every manufacturer from WW1/2 is no longer with us, right?
>>336590529
No it's not. It's some Unreal engine demo I think.
>>336588684
>will be WW1 in the future
Battlefront is a thing y'know...
>>336590424
>xcom-ish battlefield with humans vs aliens, each with wildly differing weaponry
I could actually dig that.
>>336590546
Sweden made battlefront they couldn't have had time to make this.
>>336590546
DICE Sweden are the primary developers but I believe that LA is helping.
Look at the left eye frame by frame, it looks like some EEUU WW2 ship like pic related.
It's clearly going to be a fantasy battlefield.
He's looking up at a dragon.
>>336590683
I'm a retard. I totally ignored Battlefront. If LA ends up making 2143 I'll be pretty optimistic. I think most of the people complaining about sci-fi never played 2142.
>>336590925
I'd be pretty content if we got an alternate ww1 by Dice and a 2143 later on by DiceLA
>>336590925
I played. Clusterfuck with walkers and shit. Even BC1 better.
>>336587498
I doubt it, they already tried that with BF 1943 and it flopped.
It's WWI with space jam
what's up with all these obsession with world war 1?
>>336591091
>watched 5 minutes of gameplay
ftfy
>>336591203
as always /v/ has no fucking idea what they actually want and what people in general actually want
>>336591198
WELCOME TO THE JAM
>>336591091
Bad Company 1's multiplayer felt really bare bones if I remember it correctly.
WW1 with pump-a-rum
Final Stand was the biggest clue yet everyone ignores it
>mfw ww1 faggots
>>336591259
>>336591203
Did you guys not see the fucking tweet or is this some hardcore metatrolling?
![1462463057225[1].webm](https://i.imgur.com/AN7YeIL.jpg "1462463057225[1].webm")
>>336584724
This is you
It's going to be future+WW1 campaign to appease the autists that just recently began playing videogames and aren't dead tired of two decades of rehashes.
Plus a DLC WW2 pack and weapons from the era.
I'm ready for Canadian to finally have a prominent role
>future shit
>>336591091
Bc1 didn't even have prone, i love bad company but to say that console trash is better is pretty funny
>>336591486
>tweet from some literal who "leaker"
wow it's fucking nothing
>>336591604
>past shit
>>336591623
Neither did BC2, they removed it after the beta proved that recons with ghillie suits were almost impossible to spot/kill.
>They give Visceral a second chance
>Battlefield: Dead Space
>EarthGov and Unitologists
>All sorts of neat ass future guns and space mining tools
>Zero gravity infantry combat
>Necromorphs as a third AI faction to mix it up and co-op game mode enemy
Fingers crossed.
>>336591486
Should I trust some bumfuck no-name tweet or considerable hints at 2143 in games since BF3 and DLC that literally features 2142 content. Plus you know EA wants to shove their own future shit against Call of Duty.
>>336591737
visceral are working on some star wars game
>>336591838
Fuck Star Wars, give me blue lasers.
>>336591404
>>336591623
But it's really better than 2142. I don't understand why all liked that game. Like they never played and loved it's only because it's futuristic and sci-fi.
>>336591738
You do know that these games are in development for 2-3 years?
DICE didn't just decide to make a future style BF because CoD just showed their trailer. They decided on making it what it is years ago.
Alternate history WW1. These games will die on their ass if they dont have customization options now, every shooter needs to have dildos to unlock that you can hang of your gun or its just fails it seems.
>>336589565
funny
>vintage looking coat
>looking at something massive just above him
H-he's looking at a weaponized zeppelin, right? P-please
>>336592080
With the current generation of snowflakes it's strange there are no gender options in mainstream shooters.
>>336591690
>present shit
>EA announces that they have decided to revive the Time Splitters IP
>The only catch is that the only way it will live it that it has to be crossed over into another IP
>Decide to smoosh it in with Battlefield
The singleplayer will take place over many wars (WW1, WW2, Vietnam/Cold War proxy stuff, modern and 2143) AND the multiplayer will replicate that experience with an era spanning Titan mode
screencap this
>>336592205
WW2/1 fags are literal newfags. Fuck off. Take your regurgitated trash somewhere else.
>>336591972
I really wonder how it's possible that new trends always pop up at the same time when you know its been years since the project was even started
>>336591950
Titan mode
I just want to play titan mode populated again with some of the modern BF improvements like no hit scan and better controls
>>336591690
>not wanting WW3 in the 80s
>>336592207
But they are?
Cod for sure has them
>>336592347
>It's been done 10 years ago, you can't have it now!
No, you fuck off
>>336582613
is that brendan?
Would someone welcome ground to space battles? Space battles only mode and the like?
Or is that too futuristic?
>>336592521
The point is it has been done and we shouldn't go back to it just because you are too young to have played any of the old games.
>>336592447
I meant the whole "spectrum".
>>336592549
>Battlefield: Just War
>>336592253
>alternate universe shit.
>>336592347
What else is there? Future shit? Modern shit?
>>336592652
I did play them and enjoyed them. I want to enjoy them more, with current day technology.
So eat shit.
>>336582613
its gonna be aliens
screencap this
>>336592423
If there's something that normies hate more than future shit is alternate history shit.
>>336589382
>>336589667
>>336589802
they stopped doing that for a few guns in BF4 and Hardline
they just add a random letter in usually (e.g. ACR to ACWR)
>>336592839
>general audience
>hating future or alternative history
Holy fucking shit son you are retarded
>>336583596
Bane?
>>336592775
Cold War shit, Modern Shit, Future Shit, Straight up Sci-fi Fantasy Shit and Alternate History Shit. Pick your shit.
>>336592839
Most normies will happily eat up alt-history or future as long as its marketed properly. Its internet autists who want their super realistic ww2 games who get triggered
