Hopes for battlefield 5 reveal this Friday ?
>current time setting
>realistic gore / exit and entry wounds
>fully destructible fucking everything
>more guns
>>336402337
I just want it to be futuristic or sci-fi.
>>336402337
It'll be sci-fi future, ala Infinite Warfare/Titanfall/2142, etc.
It won't have autistic levels of gore or any gore for that matter
It won't be fully destructible like BC1, it'll be like BF4
It'll have more guns
>current time setting
>for the 4th time in a row
fuck no
>>336402452
>>336402540
>>336402556
is there much chance of realistic gore ? its not really been there before and not sure if they would go that direction ...
no games do it now pretty much, fucking sucks because it adds to emersion, i satisfying and if done right, makes kills more unique each time
>Actual proper military uniforms. Not aftermarket equipment operator looking soldier.
>The M4A1, not the shitty M4
>More AK variants, AK-103, 105,107
>Less loose feeling trying to make the game realistic. No one asked for that shit. More BFBC2 feel
>Nerfed tanks. Can do more damage with larger blast radius but can be disabled a lot easier in separate ways, tracks and main gun.
>Proper starting camo. If I'm playing as a muhrine I want to start of with MARPAT, not Multicam. And I want the camo to take up the entire uniform, not have the shirt or helmet a separate camo.
>Nerfed spotting. Spotting locates only the location the enemy is seen in and doesn't follow the enemy as he relocates.
>Play as European countries like in the originals, Americans can get stale
That it is being developed primarily by dice LA
>>336402798
>is there much chance of realistic gore ? its not really been there before and not sure if they would go that direction ...
Probably not. Battlefield has never been a 'war is hell' type of game.
>>336402452
Fuck you.
>>336402337
WWII setting with advanced technology.
What did they mean by this?
>>336404304
Literally nothing.
>>336402337
I want realistic gore and %100 destructible environment as well but keep the destruction realistic. I don't want every match to turn into a flat wasteland
NERF SPOTTING
DELETE STINGERS/IGLAS
FUCK MINES
>>336404889
Are you crazy? If anything needs a nerf it's buzzards and havocs.
2143 HYPE!
>>336404304
hmm they are keeping their mouths zipped maybe?
>>336404889
>DELETE STINGERS/IGLAS
I never really felt Stingers were a problem. They're more of a detriment then anything.
Why take a Stinger or Igla to annoy a chopper when you can just take an RPG and knock it outta the sky in one shot.
>>336402798
If you want that, check out Red Orchestra.
>>336404647
Then you don't get 100% destructible environments. Its why they moved away from it immediately after BC1.
>>336402337
>current time setting
fuck off
>>336402337
Give me a sequel to 2142, otherwise I don't really give a shit about BF. Titan battles were the SHIT
Just play BF2 Revive.
If you expect an EA game to be good nowadays you're in for a disappointment
>>336405362
A man can dream...
Huge levels, non-modern day setting, mod support.
I'm maybe only going to get one of those.
>>336405362
Metal Gear?
>>336402337
I want it to not be shit like the last few.
>>336404647
If destruction is realistic then maps shouldn't be flat wastelands. It's really hard to actually level buildings.
100% Destructible environments isn't going to work well when so many people play Engineer with 6 rockets.
>>336402337
cold war please
>>336405362
2142 is by far my favorite but do you really want them to ruin it?
I would be happy with some sort of 2142 hd though
>>336406918
This or WWII
>2143
>All guns available from the start
>Physics put into the destruction
>fix the retarded perspective ADS or adjust iron sights to not be awful
>Multiplayer only
>More squad options
>>336407307
I don't know how they would ruin it but I REALLY want to see 2142 on the Frostbite engine.
>>336407609
how dont you know how modern ea and dice would ruin it?
>>336402337
Not modern
Not WWI
Not Napoleonic
Not Civil War
>>336402337
As long as I can brrrrrt people I'm fine with anything.
>>336407821
None of those themes works well with Battlefield.
>>336407786
DICE LA is doing 5 and they actually kind of give a shit about the quality of the game
They just have better map design philosophy, and want to mix up DLC and free maps/guns through updates rather than lock everything behind a paywall and listen to feedback
>>336407904
Air 2 Ground is so god damn underpowered in BF4..
>>336408394
better than being op as hell like they were in 2
>anything else than current day setting, WWII, 2144, anything goes
>more destructible things on maps
>more distinct and differently focused classes so that everyone isn't playing as an engineer with 6 rockets and DMR
>actually good maps
If DICE somehow manages a release that isn't a buggy shitmess with tanking servers for the first three months, I will be impressed.
>>336406734
Engineers would need a huge nerf anyway, it's ridiculous how versatile they were in BF4.
>>336402337
I just pray to Jesus that they make it better than Battlefront.
All I want is a game as good as or better than BF4. Please god don't let EA cuck us.
>>336402337
BFBC3. Dem bantz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s28qM8M3Bxw
I want another modern one done properly.
Bloodier, more weapons, cooler maps, better customization, no gimicky bullshit like levelution or useless gadgets.
>>336408796
>>336408693
Dice LA is doing this one not the main Dice studio they are the ones who fixed BF4 so I give them way more credit then the main studio guys
>>336408185
>They just have better map design philosophy
Not by much. The only thing LA has going over Stockholm is that they are better with communicating and updates.
>>336409003
Great, so the only thing left is for EA not to stiff us on the content like they did with BF:Star Wars or whatever and it sounds like it will be bretty gud.
NO BATTLELOG !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>futuristic
>good maps, not shitty DICE lets cram everything in the middle clusterfuck maps
>no billion and one fucking weapons, stick with a handful of weapons for each class and make them significantly different so you don't have a billion and fucking one samey weapons that all perform practically the same
>make some guns up or some shit if you need too
>more variety of vehicles if possible
>no more fucking lock-on launchers unless you got some functionality like the dart from BC2, fucking BF4 is plagued with non-stop lock-on and smart launcher crap from a billion engineers
>bring back cookie cutter destructible buildings; i'd rather have a town of boring buildings that I can blow apart than one stupid designed building (whose layout makes no sense whatsoever) that you can't even do anything to
>no bullshit verticality (aka, no you can go to the floor and roof, that's it, oh and we'll make it only accessible via elevator so recon cockroaches can just camp the fucking elevator non-stop until you get a team of bug spray to remove the bed bugs fuckwits)
>no LELVOLUTION scripted crap. LITERALLY NO ONE WANTS THIS STUPID SHIT AND IT IS THE DUMBEST AND MOST BORING SHIT IN BF4.
>no SP, the SP in BF3 and BF4 was plain stupid and didn't need to be there, it's a MP game, stop shoehorning that shit in there
>no AA mine crap
>>336409003
I was about to go full rage mode but then I was reminded by you that LA ironed out all the glitches. It better be full budget because BF hardline felt kind of like a spin off but then again maybe it was the setting that limited it.
>>336409190
A bit of a stretch for that to be a reality.
>>336408796
>EA
You already know what's going to happen.
>>336402337
â–ºTEAM PLAY FUCKING PTFO
â–ºless weapons (bf4 has 100+ most of which were garbage because of the fucking huge number)
â–ºclasses to feel more classes non of this ALL KIT shit that makes every class as effective as the others removing the rock>paper>scissor gameplay
â–ºvehicles less OP (Active protection? get that shit outta here) BF2 styled vehicles with LIMITED ammo and BF1943 styled repairs that take them out of combat for a minute to allow people some fucking breathing room
â–ºNO METRO/LOCKER styled maps, infantry only is okay but tight ass maps with corridors barely fitting 2 people side by side and nade fest shit needs to go this is BF no CoD
â–ºmodern combat since they STILL haven't gotten it right, near future is fine but I feel that once you go full future (CoD infinite) you've fucked yourself and have no where left to go you've run out of ideas, although I wouldn't mind a 2143 if it were basically an "upgrade" to the original
of course all of what I could wish for an more probably won't make it in, which is why SQUAD and Arma exist, if DICE fucks this up their finished
can you guys actually think of an original setting for a bf game? and I mean actually original so no past wars.
I was thinking maybe a setting where humans are gone, either died or left, and the robots they left behind are fighting for control. could be on a mining asteroid or something.
>>336409003
>Dice LA is doing this one
citation needed
>>336409706
No...shut up...they will hear you...
>>336408735
I think Support and Recon need to not be so fucking useless
>Battlefield will never befunagain
>>336409074
Dragon Valley and Graveyard Shift showed they focused on gameplay encounters rather than realistic scenarios
>>336408889
i need to play this fucking game
is it worth it? the campaign is good?
>>336409845
Is that how Nintendo makes Miis?
>>336409979
Vietnam was so good. The base game was also fantastic.
>>336409979
BC/BC2 was a mistake
>>336409979
you accidently posted BC2 instead of BF2
>>336409746
Sweden is stuck to BattlEAfront and LA is the only studio that isn't working on a project
>>336410037
Campaign is fun as hell. MP has limited weapons attachments compared to BF3 and 4 but much better building destruction. It's a solid 9/10 game.
>>336410180
>dolphin diving
no he's right, you're the one that is mistaken
>>336410180
you accidentally typed BF2 instead of 2142
>>336410227
im pirating it
>more weapons
what's the fucking point, bf4 has WAY too many of them
>>336409728
I wish they would make something that's not even on Earth. Something similar like what Ace Combat-series is doing with Strangereal, a completely different world but with same kind of technology and also super weapons and that kind of stuff.
But I'm pretty sure that's never going to happen.
>>336408889
Holy shit you could tell this was written before 2012.
>>336410180
>grenade spam and dolphin diving: the game
>fun
pick one
>>336409601
>hardline felt kind of like a spin off
That's because it was a spinoff. DICE wasn't even the one that developed it.
>WWII
>Gore
>Super destructible
>Maps like France with tons of buildings you can enter
>Dog fighting
>D-Day map and gamemode
>>336402337
Future setting so airsofters can be BTFO
Also I know it's a complete pipe dream, but I want DICE to stop being faggots and allow mods again(Thought it'll never happen since it gets in the way or their season pass.)
More down to earth hopes are a reworked UI that doesn't cover your screen in doritos and icons and other clutter that makes it fucking impossible to see what you're doing, or at least an option to toggle elements of UI off.
Also would like to see them finally knocking off all the lens flare and BRIGHTER THAN A THOUSAND SUNS lighting.
But who are we kidding. Realistically, it'll probably be anotehr copy-pasted modern setting unlock progression treadmill to be an alternative to CoD so the Oxide teenagers can stop pissing themselves over a brief divergence from their yearly supply of 293914 WW2 and Cold War games.
I honestly just follow this shit out of habit. They stopped making Battlefield for Battlefield fans when 2142 came out and started all 'streamlining'
>tfw I finally am about to get a desktop good enough to run bf4 and now 5 is gonna come out soon
Anyways, it being not locked the hell down and allowing fully private servers and mod support would be great but >implying
>>336406918
So Korea and Vietnam?
>>336410382
Why desu?
>>336407307
2142 ruined BF with all of it's cancerous 'reinvigoration' changes to the core mechanics of the game, so it's only fair that nostalgia fags that only put in 20 hours into the game a decade ago get shit on.
>>336410632
There's no reason to believe you won't be able to play 5 at whatever setting you can play 4 at. We're still in 8th gen.
>Having any faith in EA whatsoever
>In the current year
It's going to be another watered down shitfest made for the lowest common denominator, as per the usual.
>>336402337
tl;dr
is hardline worth the $10?
>>336410192
Thats hardly compelling evidence
>>336410918
It's not even worth the bandwidth.
i want bad company 2 level of destructable environments, none of this leveloution crap that barely has an impact. I want to take down all the walls in a building.
>>336410804
I know but I want to play 4 specifically; I already own it and the expansions.
.
>>336403950
tfw barely any dieselpunk games
>>336410518
In terms of the UI it got completely redone in BF4 with multiple options,
including turning icons on/off (including popups for when you level up/unlock something),
resizing the mini-map, transparency etc, being able to see a timer above someone that can be revived,
being able to see the ranks of people within your squad/vehicle, size of reticle and color it is
Complete medic overhaul.
>You get 50 Points for dragging a soldier into safe cover after being shot.
>Every time you heal someone it takes 10 seconds to actually heal them, instead of just throw down a medpack and forget about it, you have to actually play a 10 second animation depending on the wounds.
I know it won't happen, but here's to dreaming.
>>336407367
>All guns available from the start
We can dream, but 2142 is the game that started the treadmill in ernest, anon. It exists to incentivize season passes and battlepacks, so there's no way they'll go back to the old school level playing field style of multiplayer without the korean grindfests.
Besides, casuals don't play for fun anyway, they play for the 'gratification' of unlocks. Without the unlocks they feel like they are 'playing for nothing'. Which says a lot about the replayability of games these days.
>>336410918
What platform? I heard it's kind of dead on PC.
Can I get Origin games to work with Steam Controller?
>>336408536
At least it actually took some level of skill. But yeah, 1942 did vehicle combat the best, for the most part.
>>336411035
You've got plenty of time to put hundreds of hours in. Plus since 1) People are afraid of DICE games at launch and 2) it's gonna be scifi, plenty of niggers will keep playing 4 indefinitely
Make BC3 and have the DLC be Vietnam again
>>336408394
The fuck are you talking about? It's not hard to Brrrt a tank, switch to J-dams on the ark up and get a kill.
>>336411129
PC, both consoles, doesn't matter
>>336402337
2143 or bust
With BF4 climate change, snow blizzard and shit.
>>336411095
>>>/squad/
>>336410768
I had like 200 hours just in the demo alone before I even bought the game
WW2 or fuck this shit im not buying it.
I'm surprised you guys want some futuristic stuff.
>>336411528
Close future like Cod =/= 2142
>>336411614
Haven't heard about 2142, i'm so out of the loop. Only battlefield game I played was bad company. Was fun man.
>>336402452
Literally kill yourself
>>336403950
You I like the way you think
I'd be happy with either futuristic or back to roots ww2. I'm expecting something futuristic if only because it would be easier to have lots of unlocks and shit. I would much rather have a slower paced ww2 theme but I ain't holding onto any hope for it.
More than one gun option to start out would be nice too. Fuck playing for 30+ hours before you get half the weapons, and thats if you're actually good and get lodes of points all the time.
>>336411359
In that case, PS4 would be the most active.
>>336411708
>Haven't heard about 2142
Well there you go.
All the people complaining most likely never played 2142.
>>336411812
better be fucking laser guns
im sick of some 50-70 years in the future and we STILL have bullets. the fucking guns in BO3 i have no idea which is which, they all look the fucking SAME
How about I can look through a scope and not see the lines in buildings and trees where they are supposed to break?
Or better yet, how about giving me an executable game and a main menu instead of this battlenet garbage?
oh andno 870 no buy
>>336410331
But my gunfu
No unlocks
No lens flare
No desaturated colour filter
No map packs splitting the community
No wasted development on shitty gimmick modes nobody is ever going to play
No jets
No demize99
No 3D spotting
>>336402337
>War is hell
>more reliance on teamates
>Destructable everything, but harder to destroy
Some of that and I am in
![Battlefield-Dev-Call-Of-Duty-Tweet-3[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/mG1Gf08.jpg "Battlefield-Dev-Call-Of-Duty-Tweet-3[1].jpg")
CoD B T F O
![Battlefield-Dev-Call-Of-Duty-Tweet-1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/XNpG8wC.jpg "Battlefield-Dev-Call-Of-Duty-Tweet-1[1].jpg")
>>336412565
Oops, meant to post this one instead
>>336412565
plz no bully. cod boys have been very vocal on /v/ about how everyone is out to get them, especially battlefield fans.
>>336412565
>rolliethepollie
Can't wait for another heavily choreographed "gameplay" vid that doesn't actually resemble real gameplay.
>>336412565
HL3 isn't announced on Friday though.
>>336412721
I hope you aren't trying to insult rollethepollie anon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk4wEAO07hM
>>336412968
I can and will insult everyone at DICE.
Daily reminder that someone at DICE thought this was a good idea
How about bad company 3?
>>336413385
I would be totally okay with this.
>>336413309
What makes it a bad idea anon
>>336412640
based
>>336410380
mexican drug war? literally the only thing i can think of.
>>336402337
it will be a copy paste of 4, which was a copy paste of 3, which was a dumbed down copy paste of 2 with modern graphics
DICE just can't make new games these days
>>336410380
>Spain
>Greenland literally unchanged
An affordable game with content that doesnt try to fuck me with multiple premium editions.
>>336413309
a sandstorm? in a desert?
nah, thats nature bruv
>>336417140
VIDEO
GAME
>>336412683
It weird how BFfags are constantly going after CoD when other games does PTFO better than BF itself. As if trying to compensate for something.
>>336402337
It'd be nice if the jets didn't fly at the speed of a brisk walking pace with a 500 ft flight ceiling, or if the maps were fucking small with "OMG URE GONNA DIE GET BAK 2 THA FIGHT CONSOLES CANT HANDLE A MAP THAT BIG SOLDIER!"
Alas, it's going to be cross-platform of course so it'll probably still have that bullshit.
>>336412968
>9 years and the video title is still wrong
It's Battlefield Primal guys
>>336417951
I wouldn't even be mad
>>336413385
>no prone
>no commander
>4 man squad
>tinier maps
>wanting hipfiring battlefield again
>>336402337
I'm hoping they bring back a meaningful level of destruction, I miss being able to blow craters into a map like you could in BF3 beta or alpha or whatever that test was
>>336410632
IF you can run SW:Battlefront well, you'll have no prob for BF5
>>336418201
Except BF5 will have Destruction physics, whereas SW:B had none?
reminder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bydGoAdvmZo
>>336405231
If they balanced it like bc2 it would be okay.
Just place some anti air weapons around the map, and give each side like 1 anti air tank.
So that way when I jump into a heli or anything flying for that matter I don't constantly hear BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP and then die after flaring and hiding behind a mountain/building.
>>336410750
It's not cringy "hip" bullshit
>>336410890
BF4 ended up being a really good game after like 4 months. Not acceptable obviously with that amount of time, but still a really good product in the end.
>>336418082
>No prone
>Bad
Spotted the useless sniper.
>>336419601
It was okay in the brief period between the visual recoil fix patch and the "make every attachment shit for no reason" patch. It still suffers from having a grand total of two maps worth playing, one of which is dlc so it never gets played and a cancerous community where 99% of servers are either instant vehicle retardation or 24/7 lockers/metro trash.
I want them to make better use of a dynamic cover system it had in BF4.
Make it similar to red orchestra instead of automatic
i hope to god it's 2143 just so i can watch the butthurt from the same people saying "hurr durr le cod is le star wars now rip"
>>336402337
My hopes are not too far off from yours OP.
Current setting
More destructible buildings and environment
More guns, although the customization could be streamlined.
Realistic gore and blood would be nice.
More focus on team play to take out vehicles.
Maps that are very vehicle focused, the way Metro and Locker are infantry focused.
Vehicle ammo works like BF3 again.
Guns are reworked to be somewhat more realistic.
But the biggest thing is that they take all the lessons and shit they learned to fix BF4 and implement it before release so that the game has a good launch with none of the crashes and netcode issues that BF4 did.
>>336420238
>gets under heavy fire
>crater nearby
>can't prone and take cover
>dies
I just want my G3 back.
Fuck it, make it a 80's era cold war gone hot setting. I'd play the shit outta that.
>>336409979
I had a shit ton of fun with BF3 and BF4, BC2 is overrated.
>>336421191
G3 is best gun
>>336420782
Same. I get a lot of pleasure at laughing to those people.
>>336421056
Well too bad for you then. Return fire.
>>336402337
Bad Company 3
>>336421230
Same. Bad Company was fun and hella ep*c! when I was a console kiddie. Naturally BF4 is better in every way.
>>336402337
I just want it to go back to the Bad Company roots
>smaller maps with lot's of detail
>no giant empty maps with no options for infantry combat
>full destructibility instead of, well, no actual destructibility like in 3 and 4
>all weapons feel great and have a nice punch
>no more 5 billion attachments for 100 billion weapons while only 3 attachments and 4 weapons are actually good
>some kind of sniper nerf
>>336402337
Fix fucking Rush
>>336411928
To be fair, they missed nothing. It was easily the worst BF game ever released, it just had a really cool setting, vehicles, and a fun game mode.
What people never remember when they have their nostalgia goggles on is how shit the netcode was, the almost total lack of mods, the streamlining of kits into the current dogshit 4 kit one man army system that destroyed any remote semblance of teamwork and diversity, the utterly god awful balance(Pocket rockets. Pocket rockets fucking everywhere), the cluttered UI, the buggy as shit titans that weren't fun to fight on because of all the glitchyness and poor interior design that made it a floating checkpoint-fest, the worst maps in the franchise by far, and the korean mmo grindfest of unlock cancer that now has the franchise in a death grip and goes out of it's way to make it as impossible to have fun as it can.
Which is a real shame, because I enjoyed the fuck out of the APCs and Walkers.
>>336421624
>Bad company roots
>A console spin off series.
>Battlefield's roots.
What was wrong BC? Even if it was a console spinoff the controls were really good compared to BF3, 4's sluggish controls on consoles. I know cause I've tried all of them myself. Wanting better graphics when you're focusing on a fps is stupid as fuck.
BF3/4's better but BC was fun as hell as well. Or are PCfarts just mad cause they had a shitty port from BC?
>>336417274
JUST
BLUE
MY
SHIT
UP
>>336413309
I'd be okay with bringing back fog of war, but that's just silly.
>>336423986
this guy gets it
Bad Company isn't the best game, but it was fun. it has heart.
>>336419601
Four months??? The CTE wasn't premiered until July 2014, and even then it took months of trial and error before the netcode reached an acceptable level.
In four months they've only started that shitty "Player Appreciation Month," where DICE hands out Gold Battlepacks like candy while they randomly fix one thing that breaks another. After the month was over, they then shrug their shoulders and the game stewed in shit for the next four months until DICE LA was brought in.
I can't wait to find the wonderful bugs like "knife a fence to destroy a building" and "smoke launcher turns into railgun".
>>336423986
The more I play BC2 the more I ponder, what the fuck happened?
>>336411708
>Only battlefield game I played was bad company
>>336412640
Does that mean they've going to make a good Battlefield game for a change or is he just a dick?
>>336421295
Patrician taste anon
Why are modern FPS studios so bad at sci-fi?
>>336410931
How is that not compelling evidence?
Visceral is reported to be working on a Star Wars single player game. DICE Stockholm was working on Battlefront. DICE LA and some members of Stockholm that moved on after Battlefront's release are working on the next BF game.
>>336427643
Deus Ex is fine.
But I guess you only know of Dice and infinity ward.
>>336427643Halo 5 is good
>>336427764
>Deus Ex
>FPS
It's an RPG Shooter, sure, but you know (or should have known) what he meant.
>>336427764
You're showing signs of autism, bud
Maps that aren't fucking ass
Please let it be 2143
>>336402798
>no games do it now pretty much,
Verdun does.
Also check out 'gore reviews' on youtube, good shit.
I bet it will be USA vs Russians or Chinese again
>>336402337
>same maps as battlefield 4
>minor graphic tweaks
>$60 first day dlc that adds new textures to the guns
>no destruction
>tfw I am right
>>336417628
Battlefield and CoD have had a weird rivalry since Battlefield 3 was launched as a primarily-console game. The neo-Battlefield console kids think themselves more sophisticated than CoD console kids, despite the fact that Battlefield is trying as hard as possible to become more CoDlike.
Let's just hope it will be better than Battlefront alright?
>>336427860
>It's an RPG Shooter
In what perspective?
Yeah 1st person.
a First Person Shooter.
>>336429014
You mean since BC2 which had specific anti-MW2 marketing.
>>336429312
>but you know (or should have known) what he meant
Do I need to spell this out for you or are you just being obtuse on purpose?
>>336429358
Snow mobiles are for sissies.
>>336429358
>BC2 came out after the CoD craze
Huh, slipped my mind. Yeah, I guess I meant to say BC2.
>Dice can't figure out what made BC2 popular.
That's what separates them from CoD devs. They know what makes their games popular.
>>336429358
>>336429575
>>336429887
>CoD only does it own thing and minding it's own business
>Battlefield comes crashing down and shit on them
wew DICE is a bully
>>336405897
You KNEW?>>336405897
>>336423986
>32 player cap when 1942 had 64 players a decade before
>Less vehicles, less options
>Funneled small maps focused on infantry
It's the call of duty of the battlefield series.
>Nobody here asking for the 1943 PC port that should have been made
The true injustice. I know its unlikely, but I really want a 1943 PC port a battlefield 1944
>>336402337
WWII please.
>>336430807
I'm super confident they will have another WW2 spin-off (probably by shitty DICE, not LA). They must know the audiences are dying for it. Why have an event just to reveal one game?
It's going to be modern. How else are they going to include tons of guns and dlc content? Futuristic games are being beaten to death with every call of duty release. If Battlefield 5 isn't futuristic, I think it will finally beat CoD for once
So if it's the future, how futuristic do you want it? 2142/3? Full out Halo level (though humanity in halo is pretty on par with 2142 thinking about it)? even further?
I think ancient ayy lmao level could be neat, with weapons so advanced and esoteric that they don't even resemble guns.Sorry to mention halo again but a few of the halo novels take place like a million years in the past and focus on the ancient ayy's of that series and the battles in it are basically just sci fi/cosmic horror war of creation; it's legit biblical level insane and it's super sick
Not having everything behind some giant multiplayer unlock wall.
That or have the ability to decide for yourself what to unlock instead of it being random with packs, or linear with progression.
>>336402337
>last 5 fucking bf games were modern day
>you want it again
wtf is wrong with you
did you not get your fill with bf3, bf4, bad company, bad company 2, or hardline?
>>336431898
I liked the sort of balance 2142 struck, where it was far enough into the future for some cool stuff like hover vehicles and walkers, but near enough where it was still kind of clunky and everything wasn't all chrome and plasma.
>>336402337
I have none OP. Regardless of what they announce, I guarantee they'll season pass, dlc, microtransaction, and weapon skin the fuck out of it.
It hurts.
>>336430807
1943 was just like a stripped down version of 1942, why would you want that?
>we're going to break the internet guys
They said that about the Battlefront reveal and it didn't even get that many views, Dice hyping their shitty games to unreachable levels, fuck Dice/ea.
>>336419026
I don't know what this video is trying to say
I'll give for bf3 farts theme but rami's warsaw theme is the best theme I've ever heard
>>336432182
BFHL
BF4
BF3
BC2
1943
4, not 5.
And yes, I want a 5th modern combat game regardless.
Desert Combat was more fun than vanilla 1942
BF2 was the best period.
BF3/BF4 are on par with the entries in other settings.
So yeah, I'd rather they stick with what is clearly the best way to go.
>>336432827
why not just keep playing bf4?
>>336432909
Because maybe I'd like updates, new features and mechanics, better graphics, new weapons handling and mechanics, new maps, renewed community interest, the usual things that go with a new game.
So, if I had my say, BF5 would be another modern war combined arms game, which would improve over everything on it's predecessor and launch without the bungled netcode and connectivity that tainted BF4s launch.
>tfw you'll never be podsurfing onto the enemy Titan ever again
>>336402337
>>fully destructible fucking everything
Yeah lets make it even worst for infantry so they cant hide behind anything and tanks and aircraft can steamroll like they already do what a good idea.
Destructible terrain was a mistake. You cant prove me wrong. Its cool for realism, but realism shouldnt ever trump gameplay.
>>336433432
Thank fuck. DICE couldn't do netcode and collision detection then and they sure as fuck haven't gotten better at it a decade later.
2142 only has so much nostalgia appeal because it had a cool setting
The actual game itself was complete dogshit and full of cancerous nu-gaming bullshit.
>>336433291
You'd think DICE would fix some of the shit in BF3, but BF4 has shown they've either stepped to the side or made it worse.
>>336433585
Easy Fix: Give soldiers a shovel, and/or let them dig with mines and shit like in the BF3 Beta before they gutted it.
>>336404889
Stingers and IGLAs are pretty easy to avoid. Passive and active radar missiles need to go.
>>336433585
>Destruction is bad
Only when it's done poorly. If shit actually falls apart realistically like it does in real life instead of just poofing into the fucking nether in a cloud of dust like it did in that shittle console babby bad company shit then heavy bombardment actually creates the conundrum of forming MORE cover for infantry most of the time.
There's a reason urban combat is considered the most deadly shit in warfare. DICE are just incompetent. No destruction is gamey as fuck even by battlefield standards and leads to retarded shit like tanks being stopped by skinny trees and fences, and more shitty chokepoints and pillboxes where static faggots are stupidly difficult to remove.Mostly because developers are too pussy to put in stuff like flamethrowers, chemical weapons, white phosphorous, etc. in a realistic capacity.
Why make a war game that tries to be quake? If you don't like it, play CoD and enjoy your corridors.
>>336433902
I miss the digging. It was actually a use for C4 other than cheesy jeep bullshit.
God forbid engineers or supports get any extra functionality.
>>336433902
They gutted it because it literally broke the game with people sliding through or getting stuck in the ground.
>>336434109
The last thing engineer needs is to be able to do even more shit.
>>336434214
>Removing it instead of fixing it
>Being surprised by the issue and more or less proving they barely even played their own game.
Classic DICE.
>>336434214
No shit, it was the Beta. And the BF3 Beta was a fucking mess. But instead of fixing it they just removed it entirely.
>>336434298
Hey, don't look at me, I'm not the one that decided that every class in Battlefield needs to be a one many army with weapons for every situation. I was perfectly fine with kits that had specialized purposes being gimped with situational weapons like shotguns or PDW's.
It's the 2142 fags that encouraged the whole 4 kit system cancer that killed battlefield.
>>336403950
>WWII setting with advanced technology.
Thats Resistance and Wolfenstein right?
>>336404304
>Yfw it was Dice that made that shitty BF1944 shoop a few days ago
>tfw Dice tricks everyone and ties in BC3 with a prequel to 2142
>>336434412
DICE are incompetent and their engine is held together with string and tape that even they don't understand. They would never be able to fix it.
Reminder that all the weapon stats, suppression effects etc. were kept in a client side file that could just be edited by the user with no server side checking so you could just turn suppression off and give your weapons whatever stats you wanted. They tried like 4 times to fix the metro glitch that let people climb through the ceiling and I don't remember if they actually ever succeeded. They randomly made the underslung shotgun shoot the bullets of the gun it was attached to instead of pellets. All the sound on a server could just suddenly disappear. Bugs that were in BC2 managed to be carried through to BF3 AND BF4.
MOD TOOLS
O
D
T
O
O
L
S
MAP EDITOR
A
P
E
D
I
T
O
R
A reminder that they posted this banner with the free DLC, its literally Wake island with an aircraft carrier with a WW2 plane on it
>>336435397
it's not going to be ww2
>>336435358
>things that will never happen
Unless those Venice guys are interested in modding a brand new BF
>>336410154
>>336410180
>>336421230
how to spot a bad opinion
>>336433998
>Why make a war game that tries to be quake? If you don't like it, play CoD and enjoy your corridors.
>not having stupid destruction of everything and ruining all cover and making hiding behind rubble problematic since its calculated clientside means you want the game to be quake
Ugh. Nice strawman. I just think its dumb when vehicles already steamroll pub servers. And maybe its "video gamey" because its a video game. again, gameplay trumps realism. why doesnt our guy stop to load his mags when he picks up ammo? Because it would be stupid. But thats realistic. Not loading your mags is video gamey.
>>336435397
BF1943 screenshot, IJN flattop is literally in the same place and facing the same direction as in game.
>>336435582
I can't believe Venice went with BF3, BF3 should be forgotten and all efforts for modding and mapping made for BF4 which is the superior of the two, especially after all the netcode, visual recoil and other fixes by DICE LA.
BF4 should have gotten mod/map tools
>>336435397
they have to compete with cod and the last dlc for bf4 had hover tanks and other 2142 type shit. fuck bf3 had a little EU drone thingy
>>336435573
The community wanted a WW2 Battlefield, especially on Frostbite since at least 2008. All we got was that shitty 1943 which was console-only anyway. We haven't had a WW2 BF since the 1942 release.
>>336435397
fake and gay
>>336402337
2143, they already developed the assets for 4's last DLC
>>336435647
>Corridor chokepoint simulators
>Good gameplay
Found the strike at karkand faggot.
>>336436424
Found the scrub who didn't know how to do anything but run directly at hotel.
I want BF5 to take place between the final stand DLC and BF2142.
That way it can be modern combat with some experimental futuristic weapons, gadgets and vehicles.
>>336436661
>Only three possible routes from spawn
>All across open ground
>All easily covered by one guy, let alone 32
>All endlessly shelled with grenades
>All lined with claymores if you get beyond the grenades
Karkand is quite possibly the worst map in Battlefield history. Which is saying a lot, given 2142 maps.
Any faggot that wants more of that shitty gridlock has nostalgia goggles glued right onto their fucking eye sockets. Destruction is pretty much the only good thing about nu-BF. All you static pussies have to actually move and be a part of the match now.
>>336436424
>>Corridor chokepoint simulators
No. My favorite maps are the larger ones. I played mostly kharg island in 3 and mostly golmud in 4.
I like jeeps and choppers. I don't much like getting hammered by jets who have their flare cooldown finished by the time they circle around again, and I dont much like fighting tanks who get healed faster than I can damage them with my rockets.
I just think that between all that and also not being able to really take cover anywhere because the first thing tanks do is mow down any buildings makes for a shitty scenario. I think its a little imbalanced.
I absolutely loathe corridor choke stuff like metro and locker.
Also paracel storm is GOAT
>>336436943
Kakand was only really terrible with infantry only, and mainly because of support causing infinite grenades (which was a terrible design decision).
>>336433951
>Passive and active radar missiles need to go.
Nope.
They should keep them, but they should bring below radar back as the counter.
Or, you know, encourage teamwork to take the enemy's weapon away. Don't like the MAA shooting choppers down, maybe get some tanks on their ass.
Battlefield 4 premium worth 20 bucks? haven't played 4, but i've played 3 and enjoyed it
>"2143" has been placed in a few different locations in BF3 and BF4
If it's not 2143 or something similar I'm going to be pissed.
>>336437401
Nobody plays DLC maps so no.
WW2 is the most perfect setting desu
>already established and tested iron-sight bolt-actions
>Berlin and Stalingrad being literally perfect maps for levolution and destruction
>the sound engine can shine while bringing in the horrors of war
>portable mortars
>vehicle arty is literally katyusha
>different environments which were tested in Battlefront
>jungle tech
>snow tech
>battle of england as air superiority mode
>kursk as tank superiority map
They literally wouldn't have to even bring in new mechanics as all the existing ones are well tested and would work perfectly for a WW2 game.
Even more so when it comes to balancing the automatic SMGs vs bolt action weapons, all thanks to the bullet drop.
>>336437726
>the sound engine can shine while bringing in the horrors of war
nah, I doubt they can PTSD you like Red Orchestra.
>>336437726
there's no reason to get it if the mechanics don't evolve
>>336437726
As much as I would love a WW2 shooter, normies are going to hate it if they can't slap gold camo with 20 attachments on their guns.
>>336437975
RO doesn't even have good sounds. The only thing RO does right is the soldiers screaming and gore.
And seeing how Battlefront did the sound I'm confident that the new BF will do it even better.
>>336438005
Well they could build on top of what the have already. I can see room for some new stuff like mag check from RO2 or completely overhauling the Hardcore mode to be a mode of it's own. Zeroing the iron sights wouldn't be bad either.
super far future (halo/star wars level) > vietnam > near future > far future (2142) > >colonial era > modern/gulf war > ww2
prove me wrong.I wish battlefront wasn't shit
>>336438145
>The only thing RO does right is the soldiers screaming and gore.
Which is what he was talking about. PTSD. It's not a matter of technology either, it more of a design philosophy. Having people scream bloody murder as they slowly bleed out is probably not something they're going to be shooting for.
