What's the best gen and why it's gen 2?
cus it had 2 regions, and no autistic shit like the ones that followed
>>336231067
/thread
>Poorly designed core area
>Gutted bonus area
>New mons are mostly shit
6/10
>>336230971
I like gen 4 personally.
>>336231067
Autistic shit like what?
>>336230971
>pokemon
>literally playing games designed for children by a bunch of wops
Isn't there a pokemon containment board? Fuck off to there
gen 4 contains a remake that improves on gen 2, therefore gen 4 is the best.
>>336230971
You mean Gen 4.
>Platinum is maximum comfy
>remakes of GSC with everything intact and more shit thrown on top of it
>best PMD game
I definitely have a huge soft spot for Gen 2, though, especially its aesthetics.
Best starters by far
>>336231067
Kanto was a joke, trainers and even leaders would have pokemon in the 30s and 40s after you had already beaten the League. Glad HG/SS gave Kanto the attention it deserved.
>>336231067
too bad johto wasn't that exciting and kanto was literally empty.
it was only exciting when you were 10.
gen 4 and 5 are the only worthwhile ones
>>336232387
>forgetting Emerald
>>336232387
Gen 4 a shit aside from the remakes.
Gen 3 was pretty good and FR/LG are still solid single player RPGs.
I'll agree on Original Gen 2 and Gen 6 being shit, though.
5>4>3=2>1>6
>>336233746
emerald is sadly in a region which mostly consists of shitmons.
>>336234001
good taste anon.
I had the most fun with 3 competitively and Emeralds frontier is the most fun I had ingame so my answer should be obvious.
>>336234182
wasn't gen 3 still a huge stall fest competitively?
Gen 4 remakes are all you need to play from this shit series.
>>336234454
That's gen 2
>>336230971
1st gen. the rest are rehashes.
>>336231067
it already had autistic shit like held items, apricorns, breeding etc.
>>336234001
Good taste, exactly my opinion if you switched 4 and 5.
>>336234454
No. Matches were a lot slower but it wasn't just stall.
