Would you run it?
There's no deck that would be able to make use of that card.
>>336225121
Stealth is rated too highly so there are no viable minions. Master of disguise is not worth it either. And comboing it with concealment is retarded.
>>336225121
this is why blizzard designs the cards and not you anon ;)
>>336225261
Gomen ^^"
>>336225261
>blizzard
>>336225121
too little rng
>>336225381
Fills a 10 mana slot so random effects can be less useful
>>336226127
Replace 10 with 1 and the same inane statement can be said about OP's card.
>>336226285
That's not true. There are very few 10 mana minions, so any effect that gives a random 10 mana minion (forbidden shaping and evolve) of which there are a non-negligible number of viable cards, is affected by the faceless behemoth. The 1 mana spell in the OP, on the other hand, is less likely to have an impact on random results both because there are more 1 mana spells than 10 mana creatures and because there are less random cards that give 1 mana spells than give or create 10 mana creatures.
>>336226478
http://www.hearthpwn.com/cards?filter-show-standard=y&filter-cost-val=10&filter-cost-op=3&filter-type=4&filter-token=0
Plenty of 10 mana minions without him and I don't see how his inclusion is significant for random effects.
>>336225381
>use that priest spell spend all mana and summon a minion of the same cost at 10 mana
>it summons C'Thun, a 6/6
>mfw
>>336225381
>War Golem is 7 drop 7/7 with no text
>but a 10 drop 10/10 with no text is bad
fuck off
>>336225121
No, awful card.
Also lowercase titles and improper syntax for the effect.
>>336227083
>War Golem is 7 drop 7/7 with no text
>it is bad
>Behemoth is 10 drop 10/10 with no text
>it is bad
what seems to be the problem
>>336226709
10/10 with no effect, battlecry or deathrattle desu
>>336227169
People have already pointed out it's for 10 mana slots for the new RNG cards.
>>336225381
It's for Evolve and Evolution Master you dumbfuck.