Reminder.
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
Reminder.
I highly doubt Serious Sam HD: The Second Encounter is a low budget game.
Also
>Faut que je te dise. C'est un peu flou dans ma
kek
>>336038430
The ps3 is 10 years old. How butthurt are you, kid?
>>336038430
It's quite possible to use the same game engine software what the game companies use. Unreal Engine makers lets anybody uses their game engine. However, a comapnies has to pay 700,000 dollars if the game publishers uses make more than a million.
>>336039563
What are you talking about, UE4 only asks for 5% of profits
>>336038430
Reminder that uncharted looks like that on a system with 256mb o vram. SS wouldn't even load the menu with this much.
>>336038430
Fuck off, Frenchie.
>>336038831
The Serious Sam budget is estimated at around $500k. As in half a million.
Dragon's Crown was also made for under a million.
>>336042076
SS is as bare bone as a fps can get though.
>>336042576
LOL
>>336042576
Are you implying Uncharted DOES have depth?
>>336038430
>PS3 - strongest console on the market
well you're right about that
>>336038430
Doesn't the graphical quality of Serious Sam have to do with their liberal use of Photogrammetry?
>>336042649
Uncharted blows SS out of the water in terms of enemy animation, motion, collision detection, AI, etc. etc.
As much as I love SS, the animations are all canned and static (in that always the same) where as Uncharted has different animations based on where the enemy it hit and with what weapon.
I'd take SS over Uncharted any day of the week, but Uncharted has more impressive technology when you get down to it. You know, when you go more in-depth than two cherry picked screen shots.
>>336043031
I think it's so cute how you post all of this like you would actually notice any of that while mindlessly firing from behind cover like you do in every Uncharted game ever. You are more likely to hit enemies in the head 9 times out of ten because thats the part poking out from cover
>>336043269
How noticeable it happens to be is irrelevant though. It's still there.
>>336043269
Why do we even have this discussion then when to you any dev effort is unimportant. Cro team wouldn't be able to make a game even half as good looking as UC if they were working on the ps3.
>>336043660
you can't prove that though :^)
>>336038430
A $300 PC blows a PS3 out of the water.
>>336044028
Good thing the PS3 is only $200 these days :3c
>>336043947
I can SS3 was on ps3 and 360 and it's mediocre in the graphics department.
>>336044163
and uncharted is mediocre on ps4
i think it might be ... follow me here... the inferior hardware??
>>336044283
>and uncharted is mediocre on ps4
Can I borrow your time machine so I can go back in time and get myself to stop playing WoW and do homework instead?
>PC's best exclusive in years
>>336043031
None of that has anything to do with gameplay depthm,though?
>>336044283
So now it's about hardware and not dev abilities? Better go back to >>>/reddit/.
>>336044468
from the very beginning of UC4's announcement their focus has been on how good the graphics look, although we all know how that turned out
>>336044559
The thread is comparing graphics.
Like I said, I'd take SS any day over Uncharted.
But it still is less graphically impressive.
>>336044646
>although we all know how that turned out
Except you, apparently, because that last screenshot is Uncharted 1.
>>336044934
The post that started the discussion complained about SS lacking gameplay depth: >>336042576
>>336044550
>source: my ass
>>336045027
you know naughty dog aren't going to hire you for defending them on 4chan right?
you are doing this for free.
>>336045027
nigga, game journos can't even tell the fucking difference;
http://techlives.co.uk/is-uncharted-4-a-thiefs-end-too-formulaic/
>>336045149
Don't care about Uncharted, do care about blatant lies.
>>336045053
Slavshits makes uninspired shooters can't even compete.
>>336044028
Except the PS3 can play BF3 & 4, a $300 PC can't.
>>336045296
>http://techlives.co.uk
I love how some website no one has ever heard of is suddenly the paragon of honesty when they shittalk and upcoming AAA.
>consoles
Reminder
>the naughtydog shitposting is starting again
>>336045452
Earth to retard;
The linked article is a so-called Uncharted "veteran" playing Uncharted 2 HD under the impression it was Uncharted 4, because he couldn't read the signs in Japanese.
>>336045032
Yet since OP was talking about graphics, I immediately thought that "bare-bones" referred to animations, weather effects and the like.
Not the guy you've been talking to, just saying.
>>336044028
PS3 is 199
>>336044550
Those trees are familiar
>>336045540
Aww shit, is it time?
I played serious sam HD the first encounter when it came out and was extremely disappointed. I was expecting something like Quake 1 with a good mix of of old school fps action, exploration, and atmosphere. Instead I got an extremely bland experience of arena battle after arena battle that all feel exactly the same to one another.
Very disappointing.
>>336045540
Also GTAV has actual gameplay compared to ArmA
>consoles
>>336046179
Needs more bloom and over saturation
Even if SS had worse graphics which the originals do, the gameplay is what people play them for. PC fanboys just like to start shit
>>336045528
>not pictured: the infinite HP invader about to backstab the guy on PC and Well, What is It all over his corpse
>>336047258
Isn't that firelink though....
>>336038831
Serious Sam 3 had budget of $0.5mln and it was the most expensive game made by Croteam. And SS HD was made simply so they could afford SS 3.
>>336045540
>using literal bullshot
but no worry, I got you covered!
>>336038430
>PS3, strongest console in the market
Wasnt the 360 more powerful? all the games played and looked better in the 360
>>336048442
Most developers were incompetent and couldn't use PS3 well
>>336045424
M8, a $200 laptop can play BF games
>>336048442
The cell was a piece of shit that nobody but the Air Force wanted to figure out.
>>336048442
"powah of da cell"
Sony decided to be special snowflakes and use architecture most devs didn't know and didn't need. Rather than rebuilding their engines from ground up, they just made them run "good enough", whatever "good enough" was by their standards.
>>336038430
>>336048442
>Wuman
Kek. If I ever see that attention whore in real life I'm going to call out to them in that fashion. "Yo, Wu man! Holy shit!"
>>336049017
>buy all my multiplats on ps3, almost all objectively look worse
>buy em on xbox, risk a red ring console
Suffering.
>>336049283
>>336038430
I don't understand the point of this thread.
Are you saying that PCs are objectively superior to consoles?
>>336048442
The problem was that even though Cell had a lot of SIMD processing power, PS3's GPU and memory architecture were objectively inferior to 360's GPU and memory architecture.
So overall, the PS3 was pretty much worse than 360 despite being more expensive and released a year later. Absolutely pathetic.
>>336044550
Not gonna lie that game bored the fuck out of me and I don't understand the popularity.
>>336049350
This picture is pure cringe.
>>336048442
>Wasnt the 360 more powerful?
Yes, but /v/ is The Playstation Board and pretend xbox dont exist
>>336048003
>heavily compressed youtube screencap and an unrelated map comparison
Retard
>>336048442
Exclusives for PS3 were better, since the cell was so tricky to work with.
Ports always looked worse, since you needed to work with the cell from the ground up to get anything out of it.
>>336048003
>using PS3 screenshot
>not using PC screenshot
>not even using PS4 screenshot
![kaz-hirai-laugh[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/gLUjnEc.jpg "kaz-hirai-laugh[1].jpg")
>>336048904
