>>335829785
>The whole of nintendo
In a span of time? In its lifetime? Of all time? Where is the timeframe?

>>335829785
Literally who

Most of that revenue doesn't go to Sony, though. Nearly all games on PSN are third party, while all the best selling games on Nintendo consoles are all first party.

>>335829948
>During the financial year ending 31st March 2016, Sony's PlayStation Network generated 529.1bn yen in sales.

>During the same financial year, the whole of Nintendo pulled in 504.4bn yen in sales.

>In terms of operating income, or profit, PlayStation made 88.7bn yen (£538m). Nintendo made 32.8bn yen (£207m).

>>335829948
Only the fiscal year. Nintendo is still worth more than Sony as a whole. Without the Playstation, Sony would be belly up.

>>335830201
This, and who the fuck cares when as long as they both make profit we get games? Oh wait some people don't care about games but like to start shit

>paid online is good

eat it up ponies

>Sony makes PS+ mandatory for online this gen
>Nintendo doesn't
>Sony made more money

Whoooooooaaaaaaaa

>>335830632
That doesn't have anything to do with sales though.

>>335830632
I just found out recently PS+ shit doesn't count as sales
Reason being is because it's not a product that goes in your cart, it's a service you pay

tl;dr they're completely unrelated

You can check what I'm saying is true, try to add PS+ subscription to your cart. You can't.

>>335830632
Nintendo is so afraid of people making contact through the internet that charging for online play would be fucking retarded, nobody would even bother paying.

>>335830603
Nintendo Gold coming soon only $50 a month