[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>Dark Souls 2: Scholar of the First Sin >Full 60 fPS on
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 39
Thread images: 6
>Dark Souls 2: Scholar of the First Sin
>Full 60 fPS on next gen consoles

>Dark Souls 3
>Next gen game only
>~17fps

WEW LAD
>>
keep telling yourself that $3000 pc was a good use of money fat boy
>>
>>334974436
mine was only 1500
i got it in 2011 and i only changed the graphics card a year ago which was 250 to 300 i think
>>
File: EjJopdb.jpg (16 KB, 600x600) Image search: [Google]
EjJopdb.jpg
16 KB, 600x600
>>334974348

>Implying they both have same level of creative detail
>Implying they have the same lighting, alpha effects, and shadow qualities
>Implying they run the same amount Physics simulations
>>
>>334975093
They do. Have you even played them? Probably not cause you casual. You probably play peggle all day. Nigga.
>>
Im running it with a 970 maxed out at 60fps constant but it is true that the game is an unoptimised piece of shit.
It has the same technical issues as the witcher 3 on consoles and even the most retarded soulsdrone can see that witcher 3 is leagues ahead in terms of graphics + it is an open world.
Tl;dr from is useless and so are all chinese devs
>>
File: 4L_Is4CdSAq.jpg (186 KB, 970x782) Image search: [Google]
4L_Is4CdSAq.jpg
186 KB, 970x782
>>334974436
I spent 2700$ and I would do it again right now

Endless free games on a huge 4K monitor in front of my comfy leather sofa

It's living the dream man
>>
>>334975337
>they do

No they don't, try actually playing the game. A game made to run on 10 year old machines runs better on current consoles than a game made some months ago with new platform as a target

No shit Sherlock
>>
>>334974436
>I got my '93 Dodge Neon for just $600, you wasted your money if you spent more
>>
>>334977596
You'd just think they would have avoided targeting 60FPS if it was going to outclass the next game by so much.

Particularly since DS3 barely looks better.
>>
>>334974436
but I'm running it at 60FPS maxed out with my 970
>>
>>334977383
b-b-but you can't play PC games on a sofa
WHY WOULD THE XBOX SALESMAN LIE TO ME?
>>
>>334978181
>DS3 barely looks better.
Are you blind?
>>
File: 56544-48244.jpg (186 KB, 899x598) Image search: [Google]
56544-48244.jpg
186 KB, 899x598
>>334974348
DAILY REMINDER OF WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_JFDPCtXFY
>>
>>334978649
Daily reminder that this shit is unplayable on the console it was targeted for.
>>
>>334978181
>barely

Play the game. Seriously.
It literally looks like something made a decade after its prequel.

Also they didn't know the game was going to be so much heavy on current gen platforms, they didn't even finish optimizing Bloodborne back then
>>
>>334979078
DaS3 have some of the worst 'optimization' I've seen in modern games.
I mean, why the fuck do you still have the whole fucking level rendered even though its behind the wall and can't be seen?
>>
>>334979579
Works on my machine
>>
>>334979579
>We want the Gamecube audience
>>
>>334979579
Except it uses culling. It actually uses a lot of technical tricks to get this shit working. Those coupled with the excellent art design really helps to even get any of this shit on screen at this level of detail.
>>
I have a decent PC but got souls on ps4 just in case of hackers on PC.

Also
http://www.pcinvasion.com/dark-souls-3-banned-cheating
>>
>>334980297
>Except it uses culling

Explain why the performance fucking tank in Crystal Sage boss arena everytime you have the camera face the previous area.
Same shit happened in firelink shrine.
>>
>>334974436
Keep exaggerating the cost of a good gaming PC, so you can convince yourself it's not worth it while you play on your shitty console.
>>
60 fps is nice but I got DS3 on PS4 because it's painfully obvious that from cares about consoles more than PC. Remember that durability fix in DS2 that only came when it became a problem on consoles? kek
>>
>>334980302
people who edit files on pc generally are caught pretty quick
im sure there's trainers already though
>>
>>334981267
>people who edit files on pc generally are caught pretty quick
Got any satisfacts to snack that up my snicker?
>>
>>334980297
This game has a very low level of detail, it's last-gen as fuck dude.

It's also using piss poor culling, just look at how fog gates appear at Firelink as a perfect example.

The game runs poorly on all platforms, the developer is just garbage at optimization.
>>
>>334979078
>It literally looks like something made a decade after its prequel.
it looks exactly the same as dark souls 1
>>
>>334981593
I saw a screen that said that the user edited files and the game was starting in offline mode and if they wanted to play online that they fix the files. Didn't save the screen though.
>>
>>334977383
spends $3k
plays only f2p games
kek
>>
>>334983206
Free =/= free to play nigga

The only legitimately free shit I played is probably that Doom beta a few days ago
>>
>>334979579
>>334979579
I'm playing on a 980ti and the only time the game isn't locked on 60fps is when I'm picking up objects for some reason

I think they fixed it with a patch but I never upgraded
>>
>>334981708
>it's last gen as fuck
I fucking wish many similar games on old gen looked that good
>>
>>334984812
they looked better
>>
File: 1461166341808.jpg (101 KB, 768x1024) Image search: [Google]
1461166341808.jpg
101 KB, 768x1024
>>334974436
I spent 600 and I'm running it at full 60 maxed out.
>>
>>334974436
I use my pc for more than just dark souls 3 you fucking dumb shit.
>>
>>334974436
spent 800 10 years ago and i'm running it at around 50 fps.
think it's time for an upgrade, but idgaf.
>>
>>334986615
[citation needed]
>>
>>334979579
>I'm running the game on my desktop that my parents bought a decade ago
>b-b-b-b-but it has really bad optimization because I can't run it well :(
Thread replies: 39
Thread images: 6

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.