>Reviews for Starfox-0
>Too much like 64
This is what we wanted for almost 2 decades! Don't let shitposting memesters ruin that for you. SF-0 hype thread?
Playing it right now actually it's pretty good so far.
PS: I hate phoneposting
>>334942970
I've been playing it for a few days. The gyro controls are actually pretty good once you git gud, and you only use the gamepad screen like 3 times.
Guard is also fucking awesome
I'm pretty hyped. I only ever played the SNES game and I liked it. All the gameplay footage looks fun and campy. Maybe $60 is too much for a arcade-style game that is more about replayability rather than the typical 10+ hour campaign modern games follow, but I'm still getting it day 1.
>>334943363
I wanna fuck that frog
>>334943420
Don't do that.
>>334943302
For a first time starfox player is it worth the 60?
The only thing thats making me want to cancel is the fact that its short, how long have you played the game so far?
>>334943074
>>334943302
Nice to hear Anons. Still waiting for US release.Does the dialouge have the same feel as SF64/KI:U?
>>334943296
Been looking for this image for a while
>>334942970
Fuck's sake. The point of a sequel isn't to do something retardedly different like Adventures, but it's also not to make the exact same thing again. You're supposed to expand on the original to create something better, not a copy.
>>334943363
Stupid sexy frog.
>>334943296
I liked Wii sports, it is one of the top selling games.
>inb4 it came bundled with the Wii
Pic related
>>334943674
So Assault/Command got the right idea?I thought Assault was okay, but it needed better on rails sections.Command can eat a dick though
>Mandatory gimmick controls
>no multiplayer
>worse bosses
>shitty walker and gyrowing
No, it's not exactly like 64. That's the problem, Miyamoto thinks because the stages and plot are the same, it's what we wanted, I just wanted the same experience as 64. 100% ships and vehicles at fast paced speeds. Not this trash.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oz8a-WctBS8
>When you get to play as Peppy, he says "Barrel roll!" every time you do one
Goddammit Nintendo.It made me laugh.
hopefully it sells well enough for the series to continue. I'm looking forward to playing a new Star Fox after all this time
I heard mission select let's you play levels without having to start the game from the beginning. Thoughts?
>>334942970
>Too much like 64
What the hell did they expect?
Its a rehash of a remaster of a snes game
Ita fucking horrible
>>334944319
Rumors say that Falco gets a solo mission with Katt but Slippy doesn't get shit. He's part of that shitty protect the mine mini game. Anyway, these little side missions are basically like those filler episodes in anime, they don't tie into the plot at all and there's no explanation why Fox is only with one of his wingman at the start.
>>334942970
Actually looks good. Obvious probelems, but it actually looks fun.too bad I only have 1 friend with a Wii U
I've played it. Admittedly not very long. An hour maybe. But, considering I was fifteen minutes in a slow stealth helicopter solo mission with your perky robot buddy, I stopped giving a fuck. Now, I get that not every mission has to be Area 6, but basically, it has been so far:
"Hey, enjoyed Cornedia's run? Good, engage all range mode and call Falco a faggot (he's absolutely less edgy btw). Busted the boss' shield? Now go kill it with a walker section!" "Hey, some fun run through that blockade am I right? Now how about getting inside that big ship, and kill it in a walker section! The core's the same as last boss btw."
"Alright alright, now let's have fun. That all range mode stage (without map btw) is gonna be great, and there's gonna be pigma and all... Alright, done! These thirty targets sure were a handful. Now time to cutscene-transition into a walker section inside that station!
Haha, just kidding, the walker's just to get the gyrocopter. It's a slow-ass vehicle that can turn, and has a perky robot buddy! Couldn't fit any evasive manoeuver in the controls btw. Now go hack these invincible robots... Oh, and that awesome giant gorillabot taken in chains? Yeah, hack it. It'll kill ennemies for you so you don't have to do anything!"
"Great. Now, get to that teleporter, because you know, makes sense to have both safe teleporters and space travels. Alright, stealth mission! time!"
I just wanna fly a fucking arwing
>>334944319
I don't know but that level looks fun.
>land arwing gimmick shit
>second screen and gyro faggotry
>planet, boss, and story rehashing with far too few twists and mix-ups to really matter (To clarify, they should have done new planets or starships or whatever, anything to be less uninspired, and honestly, to use another anon's words, fuck doing a "zero mission" of the old games anyways. Keep the good gameplay of the old games, improve it a bit, and give new planets to explore and new better bosses to fight.)
>andross is a fucking joke mix of every nintendo boss with bad fight design
>starfox fights are fucking lame now
>all VAs except andross sound unenthusiastic as fuck
>somehow they ruined starwolf's theme
Fuck shiggy, fuck platinum, and fuck all of you.
I've got it preordered still. Looking forward to it on Friday, Splatoon really turned me onto gyro aiming, really hope at least the gyro in controllers continues into the next-gen and we get that as a standard option from here on.
>>334944385
A different fucking game? Not a literal rehash of a game from the n64?
Jesus christ
>>334943074
can you play solely on the gamepad? my TV just kinda broke, short circuit problem I guess
My only issue is how much I wish I was using a joystick instead of forced Gyro controllers.
We have two motherfucking sticks and two shoulder buttons for a reason now.
>$60 bucks for 20 years old 1 hour game
Why should I buy WiiU instead of PS4 again?
>>334944203
>no multiplayer
Oh god I forgot this shit.
Instead we get "co-op" where one player flies and the other guns. And the pilot is stuck with a shitty single laser if they actually want to shoot. This is worse than fucking luma co-op in mario galaxy.
>>334943542
Emulate 64. Zero is like that, but like, %60 more content.
If you don't like replaying games then Zero is NOT for you.
>>334943542
if you only get it without guard, its 50 dollars or 45 if im not mistaken
>>334944573
>too bad I only have 1 friend with a Wii U
What do expect to do with them?
Have online versus matches?
Ignore Sony shitposters. Do not reply to Sony shitposters. They have other threads to waste their time at.
>>334943674
They tried that with Assault and everybody just bitched that it wasn't like the 64 game.
Am I the only one who felt like SF64 was nothing more than an average on-rails shooter aside from it's presentation?
>>334943674
They are playing it safe, maybe after this they start doing a flip and do something drastic
>>334943581
The dialogue is the best in the franchise second only to 64. If you liked 64's hammyness, you'll like Zero.
>>334944873
>Splatoon really turned me onto gyro aiming, really hope at least the gyro in controllers continues into the next-gen and we get that as a standard option from here on.
Fuck you.
>>334943535
why
>>334944319
Alright.
Okay.
I'll give them this meme.
>>334943870
Assault was fucking trash
>>334945018
Better than paying 60 bucks plus a (30 or 50 dollar season pass) for AAA games with less interactivity and mechanics than posting on 4chan.
>>334945303
>implying they'll ever make another SF that isn't a rehash again
>>334945136
>>334945120
Alright thanks i'll keep my order than. If its atleast 3 hrs/playthrough than i'll be happy
If I dont like it i'll just never buy a SF game ever again.
>>334945006
Gyro is strictly superior to twin-stick aiming though. You're like the next generation of these people.
>>334944319
I wish memes weren't a thing.
It would just be an inside joke otherwise.
>>334945323
Not, its treehouses meme shit again. Falco says his smash bros quote at one point, Peppy never stops saying Barrel Roll and Slippy actually says "You just got Slipped" when he downs and enemy and is the most chatty person in the missions. Fuck this game, fuck treehouse and fuck Miyamoto for that gyrowing, stupid robot cute pandering and chicken walker that's shoved into damn near every mission.
>>334944319
What the actual fuck, this is gold
>>334944319
Fucking stupid.
>>334945280
Name a better rail shooter then.There's only one right answer.
>>334945090
>One player flies, the other guns
Granted the player is the gunner whilst the AI does the flying for you, but I liked that in Battle Clash/Metal Combat
Fzero faggot here. I'm worried that if a new Fzero ever gets released, normie reviewers/shitposters will play the "le 2 hours long xd" meme.
>>334945483
lol, I was literally just posting this image in another SFZ thread
Krystal is best
>>334942970
>giving a fuck about what "pro" reviewers say
>giving a fuck about what /v/ says even more
It's not hard to do your own research.
>>334945626
No one on 4chan matters. 4chan is literally disregarded by anyone.
>>334945580
>Falco says his smash bros quote at one point
So?
>Peppy never stops saying Barrel Roll
In ONE level.
>You just got Slipped
That's fucking awesome tho. Whats the problem?
>>334944873
This. I'm not into Starfox at all so I won't be getting the game but it's fucking obvious everyone whining about gyro controls have never used them before. If they did, they'd know they work perfectly fine.
>>334945626
No, because for some reason people understand that racing games take mastery and practice as you aim for the best times, or test your skill against other players.
I guess that last element is missing from Starfox Zero though, so if a reviewer fails to grasp the arcade aspect of Starfox games then it's a bit lost on them.
>>334944319
Ancient memes. If it's just this one mission with Peppy then that's alright actually.
>>334945483
No, it fucking isn't.
Gyro has to be calibrated and you can only do shit while positioned in a certain fashion.
Twin sticks you can do however the fuck you want.
Sitting down, laying down, upside-down, whatever the fuck.
>>334942970
Does anyone know if it'll have Japanese voice acting?
>>334943420
>>334943772
she probably smells
>>334945423
>with less interactivity and mechanics
What game are you talking about? Witcher? Souls? Far Cry? GTA? MGSV?
Come the fuck on, nigger, you're playing 1-hour long on-rails shooter and telling me about interactivity.
>>334945272
Everyone bitched about the land sections
Free-flying StarFox when?
New F-Zero when??
New Metroid side scroller or Prime successor WHEN????
Open world Legend of Zelda when???
I fell for the Wii U meme, don't believe the shills. There's nothing here to justify a $300 purchase.
>>334945607
uh panzer dragoon?
>>334944873
It's out TOMORROW
>>334945874
>not liking smelly girls
You gay, Anon?
>>334945931
>free flying Star Fox
What the fuck is this you want pilot wings?
>>334945987
Subhuman taste, anon.
>>334945897
>Witcher? Souls? Far Cry? GTA? MGSV?
Thanks for naming PC games but what about the PS4 games you were talking about?
>>334945931
>faggot frank
opinion discarded
>>334945280
it's hands down the best game on n64
>>334946087
>PC
Who?
>>334945931
Smash Bros, Mario Kart 8, Bayonetta 1 & 2, Splatoon, Pikmin 3, Donkey Kong Tropical Freeze, Super Mario 3D World to name a few.
Not that there haven't been missteps like Kirby and the Rainbow Paintbrush or Game And Wario though.
They need to do some of their other franchises better, they really do.
>>334945607
Kid Icarus Uprising
Sin and Punishment
>>334945854
And you can very quickly recalibrate it by pressing a button. It just works.
>>334945018
sauce
>>334943363
I wonder if Slippy would try and get with Tsuyu
>>334945931
Playing Wii and Gamecube games with digital audio output isn't worth $300? I have a small list of Wii U exclusives I want, so if the NX is a flop I'll snag a Wii U bundle if possiblebecause the VA medical centers sell Wii U's and they are tax free.
>>334945018
sauce plz
>>334945607
Sin and Punishment for 100 Alex?
>>334945854
Did you know mouse+keyboard is also better for first person shooters, and allows greater, more reflexive controls too? And realistically, you can't do them upside down or laying down, or whatever, but you don't hear people complaining about that shit.
And no, gyro controls don't need calibration. That's motion controls, with pointing. Unless you're talking about adjusting sensitivity, a thing all control schemes of FPS generally have, including twin-sticks.
>>334945272
the land sections were trash and the story was 3EDGY5ME
>>334946181
Uprising's flying sections are much worse than the on-ground ones though, and definitely aren't on par with Star Fox 64 or Sin and Punishment.
The on-ground part's great though.
>>334945580
i hear a lot of bitching but all I hear is "WHERE'S MUH KRYSTAL?"
>>334946305
>and Gamecube games
>>334945272
I'd just bitch that the game was trash in general. Everything controlled like absolute shit and the level design was terrible.
On-ground missions were a godsend in that if only because they were so janky that you could get it done fast instead of having to suffer through it longer.
>>334943674
Have you actually looked at any gameplay past Corneria? It's an entirely different game with entirely different levels and entirely different mechanics.
Shockingly, being in the same genre with a similar control scheme does not automatically make it a rehash, no matter what everyone else says.
>>334945408
Ain't going to argue for it. It was a hit-or-miss game. Multiplayer was amazing though.
>>334945580
Sounds like they made Slippy even better than before, rad.
>>334945625
Dude that game and the first in the series were fucking awesome. It's crazy that Intelligent Systems of all teams was the one that made it.
>>334945345
It's legitimately more accurate anon.
I prefer it to control sticks, and would say that it's only slightly below k+m.
>>334944764
damn this makes me not want this game like legit
>>334946586
What the fuck did you just say, you little bitch?
>>334946624
A Gamecube component cable costs $250+. A Wii U is a much more practical solution.
>>334944764
>Stealth helicopter section
>Fast paced action game
JUST
>>334944319
>the Salvadora's design is taken straight from SF2
neat
>>334942970
>buying a literal n64 game for $60
and I thought sonykeks were starved for games
>>334945897
Man shitposter are truly cancer and evolving at the same rate
First it was 3 hours
Than 2 hours
Now 1 hour game
I spent atleast 60 hours with the N64 version trying to get all routes medal + all routed on hard with medal
>>334946858
I know right? If there's any fucking franchise that deserves to coming back it's Standing Tank combat.
It's amazing they never considered it for WiiWare or something. They didn't even get Virtual Console releases.
We wanted an n64 game?
don't be retarded. we want that magical feel of playing 64 for the first time again.
>>334944319
On one hand, I can see that getting annoying after a bit. Plus the 'Conductor's' new voice is a little odd.
On the other hand, Peppy took down an entire ship by himself and proved why he was on the original team in the first place.Plus, the Conductor's old voice is given to the lizard guy in Sector Beta so it's fine.
I'm okay with this.
>>334947273
Good luck with that impossible requirement Anon. You are not a kiddo anymore.
>>334945018
SAUCE!!!
>>334947273
That feeling will never comeback, you will never get the same feeling of playing your favorite series for the first time no matter what a review says.
The reviews are reminding me a lot of Uprising's when it first came out since everybody is bitching about controls. Uprising is in my 3x3 so I'm extremely hyped.
>reviewers in charge of gitting gud
DELETE THIS!
[ - ]
>Nintendtards on suicide watch
>>334947578
Uprising still got a decent score and actually had content
>>334947068
You can't even play gamecube games on a Wii U, and a Wii component cable is like a tenner
>>334947570
>>That feeling will never comeback
sure it will
not on the wiiu. maybe virtual reality star fox
>>334947810
>What is Nintendon't
>>334946128
and that's why the n64 is shit.
>>334947606
>says the Nintendo marketer
>>334945718
Yeah, but it's expensive.
>>334947570
Maybe not this time, but with them returning to the roots it will likely mean that they start expanding it again from scratch.
If they ever make another Starfox again of course.
>>334945931
>Open world Legend of Zelda when???
You'll get that one eventually, but consider yourself damn lucky if it stays a WiiU exclusive.
>>334945483
I like to rest my arms and change my position why I play. Gyro controls are not suited for long play times.
toryah toryah
>>334948238
then get a good job and worry about video games second
I genuinely feel bad for Nintendo fans, the Wii U is such a fucking disaster.
>>334948335
Gyro controls don't require you to permanently have your arms in the air.
>>334948474
blip blip blip
>>334948531
Then why do you shill it?
>Wanted comfy Starfox thread
>Console war assholery takes over as usual
What did I expect
I just assume now that Nintendo gets bad scores because they don't pay people off.
That that Nintendo is great or anything but the stuff that gets scores much higher lead me to this conclusion.
>>334948537
MISSHUN COMPREE
>>334947578
Uprising still had good reviews though.
>>334944940
WAT TAT
YOU WAN ANNUTA STA KITSUNE ADUVENTURUS
>>334948691
I don't, don't own a Wii U or Wii, last Nintendo console I owned was a Gamecube.
>>334947578
That game was pretty much a poor man's Sin and Punishment with godawful controls and "witty" dialogue.
>>334948741
They don't prostrate themselves to journo, more like. The fact they do Nintendo direct basically cuts them out and they are mad salty about it.
>>334945626
F-Zero GX had ridiculous amounts of content though. Star Fox has always been a throwaway series you finish in a few hours.
That said, Nintendo games are often light on content and GX was the exception. Guess it took an ageing SEGA to show them how to make a game with content.
>>334945018
gonna need sauce asap
>>334949359
>Act like he knows shit
>Say that Nintendo game have no content
400 hours into Xenoblade, my little shitposter
>>334942970
I'm going to go out on a limb and say this game is going to end up like Kid Icarus Uprising.
Cult favorite, extremely demanding controls and mixed to poor "journalist" reception.
>>334949652
Sounds about right. People will play it, shitposters will stutterpost or screams rehash like they do for everything, and i'll be trying to 100% it.
>we
What's this 'we' shit?
>Gyro Wing
>chicken shit
>the exact same scenarios
>forced gimmick controls
Nobody wanted this.
AND HERE I AM SHITPOSTING ON THE EDGE
>>334949359
Starfox 64 had a decent amount of content though. It took me probably 30-40 hours to 100% everything. Even Assault had content, but mostly through multiplayer.
>>334948703
>>334948703
>expecting actual discussion of a Nintendo game on /v/
>>334950003
>>chicken shit
>caliming nobody wanted SF2
Blow me shithead.
>>334950003
>>the exact same scenarios
I've only seen the promo videos and can already tell you're full of shit.
>>334944319
Fuck that's actually funny
>>334950003
>gimmick controlsThis and the music are like the only reason I'm buying it. The controls sound genuinely interesting.
When is the anime short?
>>334951601
this
>don't know much about the reception for SNES Star Fox
>hate Assault and Adventuremight as well include itfor not being 64
>hate Zero because it is 64
Alright explain to me how the new Starfox should be.
>>334948273
>If they ever make another Starfox again of course.
>it took them ten years just to make a new star fox game that wasnt a re-release
>if this doesnt do great, they'll probably never bother with the series again outside mandatory Fox in Smash
>>334949359
I dunno, Mario 3D world is pretty surprising with how much content it has. The game feels like you've reached the last world about 3 times until you finally do.
Xenoblade was also pretty damn large and full of mechanics the game hardly tells you about, but that's diminished by weird pacing and a lackluster main story
>>334951601
>>334951657
3pm PDT, 11BST. 2 hours.
>>334950834
You can want SF2, but still change parts of it. After all, there are no Pepper Medals, no missiles headed for Corneria, and I don't recall Hunters in SF2, either.
>>334950862
Then you'll be shocked when you see the full game. Even some of the bosses are the same.
>>334951563
That's all good and well, the problem is that they were forced on everyone instead of being an option, like SF643D Gyro was.
I damn sure would have at least tried it out if it were optional. Now? Nah, I'll just pass on the entire game, as will many people burned by Command.
>>334951801
>wasnt a re-release
It's as much a re-release as Mario 64 DS
>>334951880
thanks
>>334943674
>but it's also not to make the exact same thing again.
Then I won't be buying it. Simple as that. I want a similar near identical experience of something that I enjoyed. So I can enjoy it again. Why the fuck would I waste my money on something that I would not enjoy?
>>334942970
I've played it for a couple of hours and so far I like it. The gyro control is surprisingly intuitive, but it is a bummer that it loses tracking and you have to reset it constantly.
The only thing I don't like so far is the gyropcopter stealth section. I think there's enough value to a rail shooter by it's mechanics alone and I don't feel like it needed these tacked on levels.
>>334944331
I think Nintendo knew this will flop. The review scores sealed its fate too.
>>334952031
how do you know you won't enjoy it?
>>334944319
That's actually pretty amusing. They should have went full Xenoblade and have him shout all the moves.
>BOOST!
>BOOST!
>BARREL ROLL!
>SOMERSAULT!
>>334949542
Nintendo didn't develop Xenoblade.
>tfw I never beat SF64 because I'd only ever rented it from Blockbuster
Guess I won't notice the rehash thing too much.
>>334942970
>New starfox/Lylat Wars game
Finally
>Branching paths are useless
>You can just play any map when you need to
Well fuck it then
its an 8 that EVERYONE will forget and not care about once beaten.
Neeeext
>>334951951
>the problem is that they were forced on everyone instead of being an option
What if the level or enemy design is dependent on them? What if they want to make bosses that you fly under while shooting up at or enemies that block you from different angles and you have to remove them while you navigate corridors?
Making the controls optional removes any positive change they could have on the game's fundamental concepts.
>>334945931
>Open world Legend of Zelda
Open world is where good level design goes to die. If you enjoy Zelda with clever puzzles, lots of hidden shit, and interesting side quests. The last thing you want it to do is go open world
>>334945931
>>334952437
But the first Zelda is open world.
>>334952435
>dependent upon an alternate control scheme
You don't do that. PERIOD.
>>334947570
But you can still get a sense of wonder from new games. It's been a while, but the last one to do it to me was Nier. I played it completely blind, just found it in a bargain bin. And something about it just drew me in more then any game in a long time. Point being, you don't have to recapture childhood wonder in order to have wonder
>>334952759
What's alternate about it?
>>334944319
>people says now dank this meme is
How come Zelda can get away with "Its dangerous to go alone" and "It's a secret to everybody" but Star Fox can't?
>>334947570
I got that feeling playing w101. It was such a magical thing I don't even care it'll never get a sequel
>>334952582
And how many people claim it as their favorite? I know there's a few, but its not nearly as many. There are people who claim stuff like Skyward Sword is their favorite, after all
>>334952374
it's on the wii virtual console, faggot
>>334953096BIGBANGLITTLEBANG
>>334953096
Oh shit, I forgot about W101. I'm with you on that one. It's like I was a kid again
>>334953096
The beat part about W101 is that I knew nothing about it going in except that it had that Viewtiful Joe looking people, and I just got it for free off Club Nintendo.
I was so pleasantly surprised, loved the shit out of it.
>>334944940
they did that and it was shit are you really that retarded
>>334944940
They did that.
They did it twice.
Both attempts were bad.
>>334945018
Because the WiiU has games instead of interactive movies.
>>334952928
Are you seriously asking that question right now?
Are you really asking how a dual-screen, third person/first person view combo is considered alternate -in a series that is traditionally a rail shooter-? And not completely All-Range?
>>334945018
me on the left
>>334945090
I think it's a great idea, I always wanted something like that in rogue squadron
Then again I always found starfox's competitive multiplayer boring as fuck
>>334949079
It's got a handful of fun exclusives and it can function as a free gamecube and wii.
>>334942970
I can't speak for people who are not literally me, but no, this isn't what we wanted. We wanted a Star Fox 64 sequel, not Star Fox 64 againand those who DID want Star Fox 64 again got it 5 years ago on the 3DS.
>>334945090
You're telling me that Starfox Zero's co-op is "Lucky & Wild" Mode. That doesn't sound bad at all.
>>334954439
If the gameplay is built around it, there's nothing wrong about that. I'd never heard alternate used for unconventional
>>334942970
>Wanted Star Fox 64 again
>a 3DS version exists
I'd rather see another Adventures.
>>334942970
>We
Go fuck yourself. You don't speak for me. Quit defending this garbage.
>>334949652
Kid Icarus: Uprising got good reception.
>>334945280
well these games are mostly about the presentation
>>334955139
It also looks beautiful for a 3ds game and took far longer to complete because it forced you to go through all levels
>>334942970
>remake 64 on the 3DS
>do it again for Wii U
>surprised people are tired of 64 and want something new
fuck off,faggot
>>334949652
>83 on metacritic
>mixed to poor reception
Starfox Zero wishes it could just have some negative reviews from by people like Jim Sterling and a bunch of really positive reviews from everyone else.
>>334955352
Then you change the control scheme and everyone bitches its not the traditional scheme
itt metacritic wars
>Star Fox Zero was Nintendo's big game shown off at E3 2015
>It even got delayed by half a year to ensure quality at release
>it's still shit
I wanna believe that the Wii U will live on through the end of this year, but this shit makes me feel like they gave up a while ago and might just release NX this year.
>>334942970
>Things people never said for $500
Take out the forced motion controls and its a done deal. Otherwise Nintendo can fuck itself.
wait until the game comes out or people are just going to shit post immensely
>>334955923
They're doing it right now.
>>334955006
Oh it's definitely alternate, my friend, because this same mode is not exclusive to All-Range mode, it's also shoehorned into On-Rails where it doesn't function well at all independent of players' skill levels.
And that's the most beloved part of Starfox games.
>That's your opinion.
Just read the major reviews from Adventures through Zero. User reviews, too.
>>334955795
This. I wouldn't be bitching if the Gamepad controls were optional (i.e. the enemy and stage designs weren't built around it).
>>334955013
Play Zelda then.
Why is it called Star Fox Zero if it's a retelling of the second (or third counting the unreleased SF2) game?
this game was ahead of its time, get chills and tear up every time I play it
>>334956971
Starfox and Lylat Wars tell the same story. Starfox Zro is technically a retelling of the first game.
Starfox Zero should really be a game where you play as James.
>>334945018
pls sauce
>>334946872
I don't think anyone can honestly say gyro controls are bad. They are objectively the best controls and most accurate. You are a shitter if you don't use them in Splatoon.
>>334955054
Have you played it kid?
I wish they'd release a demo of this so I can decide if I want it or not.
>>334957489
It looks like shit and the reviews say it's shit.
>>334954391
The Order is the best "game" on all consoles.
>>334944319
HOLY SHIT THESE ARE THE WORST GRAPHICS I'VE EVER SEEN
IPHONE GAMES CAN DO BETTER THAN THIS
>>334957617
>paying attention to reviews
>>334957154
>Star Fox Zero
>play as James
>watch the end credits
>unlock what we have now as Star Fox Revengeance
>THIS SEQUEL IS TOO MUCH LIKE THE ORIGINAL, IT'S SHIT!
>THIS SEQUEL IS TOO DIFFERENT FROM THE ORIGINAL, IT'S SHIT!
It's all meme to me.
Wasn't today the day they were showing that animated short? What happened to that? Did everyone forget or was too busy bitching at reviews? Nobody seems to be talking about it.
>>334957960
in an hour
>>334957869
Dark Souls 3 is a good sequel. Star Fox Zero is just a rehash.
>>334957960
it's happening in an hour
check Nintendo's twitch/YouTube
>>334957617
>Pays attention to reviews
Wow, usually shitposters are smarter than this. Are you new child?
I'm seeing mixed answers from various people in different places.
Can you, or can you not turn off gyro controls? I don't even know what to believe anymore.
Were they even trying?
>>334957617
Wow so you've never played the game.
All games suck dick because there's never been a game with a 100 on metacritic. I refuse to buy any game that isn't 10/10.
Gr8 Logic
>>334958074
>5 games in 7 years
vs
>A sequel to a near 20 year old game
Kill yourself, affiliated drone
>>334957639
I guess it would be if you had to pay $400 dollars to play it.
>>334958259
20 years later and this is all they have to show for it.
LOL
>>334956429
>On-Rails where it doesn't function well
Why not? Past games felt limited for me in the sense that you had to turn in the enemies direction to hit them. Considering how in on-rail sections you're already moving forward wouldn't it be a positive to e able to explore the stage without having enemy positioning forcefully guiding you away?
>>334958205
You cannot. If you want to play without gyro, you can set up a co-op campaign, but you will only have one laser without an actual partner.
Why does this look like an indie game?
>>334958259
>sequel to 20 year old game
>looks and controls like one
>for 3 (THREE) gameplay hours
Missed the point?
>>334944319
how are you supposed to dodge the attacks? I have no clue about the depth and some of them won't harm you, but others will
>>334958074
Dark Souls 3 is the prime example of a rehash, like NSMB tier.
>>334958394
Well shit, at less I can save my money. Thanks.
>>334958602
0/10 b8
>>334958447
Did you even have one?
>You only play through a starfox game once
You don't even play star fox games and you sure don't care about this one.
>Looks and controls like one
A rail shooter controls like a rail shooter
Are you even reading as you type?
>>334958394
>>334958205
Like that other guy said, you can play it coop and use a regular controller, but it sorta is designed for the gamepad stuff. There are often cutscenes happening where you can look around with the gamepad and shoot stuff for bonuses.
I think it's essential to learn to control the game with the gyro stuff, if you wanna get something out of it.
>>334958259
>Dark Souls 3
>the fifth in the series
Even if that was the case, why does it matter? If the game is good, then it shouldn't matter when the previous title came out. Same for a shitty game. I mean, Duke Nukem Forever is a sequel to, at the time, a 15 year old game, but that doesn't mean it gets its slack cut.
>>334957727
>>334958189
>>334958243
Not that guy, but frankly normies do listen to reviews. If it gets shat on as hard as it already is, it's gonna flop.
T. fucking gamestop employee
>>334958074
Duuuuuude
>/v/ will defend this
>>334958259
Dark Souls 3 is actually good unlike this trash.
>>334958654
Wow, so with 3 replays, I can have 9 (NINE) hours for 60 bucks? For an arcade shooter with iphone graphics?
What an incredible deal!
>>334958729
>giving a fuck about normies
>>334958818
Its literally Dark Souls 1 but easier.
>>334958872
They're the ones who buy games, whether they play or like them is irrelevant as long as they give the money.
Why is almost no one talking about Guard?
>>334957727
>>334958189
You guys would be high fiving each other singing songs of praise to Nintendo if the game got a 90.
>>334959013
Because it's shovelware.
>>334958684
>implying that the souls series hasn't got worse with each sequel
>>334943074
I know right? I do most of my posting on my phone out of convenience, and I fucking hate it
>>334959013
Who gives a shit about some low budget fnaf clone?
>>334944319
DO A BARREL LOOOLZ!1!!
ZINABRE!
>>334959060
It's getting (some amount of) better reviews than the main game.
And the term shovelware doesn't even fucking apply to an original project released for a single platform.
>>334944994
No, it's almost impossible.
>>334959134
I wouldn't know. I've only ever played Bloodborne. Never played Demon's Souls or any Dark Souls game.
>>334958818
You havent even played it but okay
Yeah dark souls 3 is fun why cant both games be the sequels to the games they were made for?
Who fucking cares, shit, all I care about is finally a starfox game that isn't yiffing adventures or 3rd person throwing grenades at bugs.
I just want rail shooting.
And this game will be so average that I will have no choice but to care since its all they have made, but it'll still be a new rail shooter which the market is famished of.
>>334959013
What do you imagine a Guard discussion to consist of?
