I'm looking around 80 or high 70's

The only complaints being people stupid not to learn tne controls

>>334912738
Aren't these games usually short as shit? I could see reviewers slashing a few points for that alone

>>334912738
why wouldn't it get a solid 85-90? what's the flaw? The control? We all know "literallywhoblog" will bash it but the big sites usually don't care.

>>334912738

> I know nothing and have a vested interest in a game being bad

xD

>>334912738
>unresponsive controls
>difficulty spikes
>too much space
>7/10
>read more on IGN

/v/ used to hate reviews. Now everyone can't wait to jump on that review dick for shitposting purposes.

>>334914196
>looks bad AND has frame rate drops
>very short
>bad controls
>no multiplayer other than the gimmicky co-op shit
>ultimately is just a rehash of star fox 64

>>334914196
Several chunks of the game are dedicated to gimmick vehicles and some shitty hacking segments rather than an actual shoot em up.

>>334913923
And saying it's short of course.

>>334914276
Somebody fored Metacritic on /v/ and I'm guessing it's most likely Reddit and Tumblr cross posters.

So what's the point of Guard? Is Zero so short they need to pad it with artificial content?

>>334914105
Length doesn't matter, everyone prefers 5 hours of great action than 15h of grinding and doing repetitive stuff.