Now that we know the PS4K is real, I'm curious how this changes new adopters. If you DON'T have a PS4 yet, would you go for the PS4K at $400 or the regular PS4 at $300, probably with some games bundled with it?
>now that we know it's real
Are we time traveling and pretending E3 already happened
>>334859458
It's already being given out to devs
I'll wait and see. It's not like there are any games out yet to justify buying either version.
>>334859373
>we know the PS4K is real,
you have less proof than the NX control ever had and we remember where it went.
>>334859373
It's a flop already.
Sonyggers can stop shilling for their Nogamestation4.5
>>334860446
Fuck of nintenbabby, NX is done. PS4K killed it before it was even revealed.
>>334860565
The NX killed itself.
kek
How butthurt will you be when normies AND developers refuse Sony's judaism?
Early adopting consoles is already a really dicey proposition, more so now that they are moving to accelerated hardware cycles.
I can't predict the market, though, so maybe it will do well. I'm personally glad I held out on a PS4, though. I was just about to pull the trigger a while back when these rumors started floating around.
>>334860724
inb4 Vita situation happens to PS4
>>334859373
So glad I didn't buy one
And I'm selling my Xbone too. Fuck Gen8
>>334859373
I'll just wait. If Sony's gonna force devs going forward to make their games compatible with both, might as well get the one where the games will run better.
Sony knows its king of the hill and can do whatever bullshit it wants. It's not like the people are just gonna jump Sony ship into Microsoft's XB 1.5 not especially they put soo much money into Sony's closed ecosystem.
What I don't get is why we need 4k consoles right now. What's so bad about waiting 7 years until.the current cycle ends and then we can experience 4k at 60fps with technology significantly faster than today. As a ps4 user i will not be buying this shit. . Nope.
>>334860446
So just like any other console platform
>>334861023
PS4 actually sells
>>334861372
You aren't getting 4K consoles. It won't render games at 4K, it will just output in 4K, allowing for watching 4K movies if you have a TV capable of it.
Sony is hoping their audience won't know the difference, and won't know that they need a 4K TV to take advantage of it even if the system could run games at 4K.
>>334861176
lol fuck that
Do you really think devs are gonna put in THAT much effort towards optimizing for a system that's probably not gonna result in that many more game sales?
Wait, yeah, but wait for a huge discount on the base model and snatch that up for like $200-$250
>NX BTFO before it even releases
>>334861384
>So just like any other console platform
No, it really isn't sonygger.
Keep making exuses as even developers are rejecting this.
>>334861516
>Sony's audience won't know the difference
ftfy
>>334861372
>he thinks the new PS4 will render 4k
top kek
You'll be lucky if that thing can handle 1080p at 60fps
>>334861534
>Do you really think devs are gonna put in THAT much effort towards optimizing for a system that's probably not gonna result in that many more game sales?
No, but why settle for an inferior version?
I don't have a PS4, but I'm not getting a "4K" if it's just the standard 500gb non-bundle at $400.
Either bundle it at $400, or some like a 1tb unit at $400.
>>334861023
it'll happen to the 4K, maybe, but that's even assuming the thing will ever see the light of day.
the N3DS was a fucking terrible idea and so is this.
>>334861628
Stop using never ever pictures you butthurt PCuck.
>>334859373
Surely you want to play FFXV in 1080p and 60 fps, so you have no other choice than to buy this cheap piece of fine hardware. Yes you are still salty that you payed $400 for a bloodborne machine, but get over it. Consoles are only expected to last 2 years max.
>>334861923
How about this one then, sonygger?
Reminder that developers hate your console already.
>>334861640
>Game Library
lol
>>334862053
Always winning, baby. tubie.
