>The best Souls games are Playstation exclusive
Why is that?
because you've deluded yourself for the sake of post-purchase rationalization
>>334827272
Oh look, it's this out of context quote again!
>spending hundreds of dollars to enjoy one sub-par game
buyer's remorse, cognitive dissonance, and plain ignorance
bloodborne is boring after a few playthroughs though, what the fuck kinda souls game gets boring
>>334827167
Scamco Bandai is not related to them.
>>334827607
I replayed Bloodborne more than any other Souls.
So many viable weapons and combat is just so damn satisfying.
>>334827384
the context was him talking about returning to direct Dark Souls
I'm sorry that makes it harder for you to justify dropping 400 bucks on a brick of locked hardware that's about to be "side-graded" into obsolescence within its own generation for shoddy upscaled 4k support
>>334827774
>I replayed BB more than any other souls
same here
it also helps that it's so much shorter and easier
>maybe if i spam this shit enough it will become true
Every Bloodborne shill on /v/ ever.
you gotta face it kiddies, there's no reason to own a console.
>>334827927
There's no reason to play videogames.
I don't know which one I should get people dark souls 3 or bloodborne?
>>334827815
The context was the Bloodborne doesn't allow for suits of armour or fantastical magic, and he began to miss working on those things.
In no way is he implying Bloodborne is gimped, just that it doesn't allow for some of the aspects of Dark Souls.
>all that extra bait at the end
Don't care for your consolewar shit, m8. Just correcting the context of that quote.
>>334827774
lol no there isnt, people who replay bloodborne so much are straight up weirdos
>leather coats and weird weapons build #1
>leather coats and weird weapons build #2
etc
>>334827698
>>334827698
truth
based sony
>>334828054
Can't go wrong with either.
Personally, I'd say Bloodborne is better, but Dark Souls III is still fantastic.
BB is 10/10, DaSIII is 9/10.
>>334828082
>the context was me adding this stuff that was literally never said by him nor by the interviewer
>just want to set the record straight
okay m8
>>334828112
(You)
>>334828205
bb wins out for me just for the original setting
it's not a lot but it does count for something
Because they were codeveloped with japan studio.
>>334827774
Really? I couldn't replay it more than once. Tried making new characters to try different things, blood+skill just feels the same as regular ol' strength and skill. Just with projectiles that hurt more, I don't know.
>>334827167
>the best souls games run at 25fps
cool
>>334828223
>or features magic
>or allows players to wear awesome suits of armour
Try reading.
>>334827607
I agree. Boring, boring, boring.
>>334828334
>>334828205
Ive only played dark souls 2 out of the series so far does that make any difference to what I should get?
>>334827167
>Dexfaggots
>PS4
smells like weeb spirit
>>334828391
yeah what I read is that the lack of variety in armor and a magic system limited mechanical choices in BB
he's not a concept artist, chum
try reading.
>>334828389
The best Zelda games ran at 20fps.
>>334828391
>the quote is out of context!
>the context is in the quote, read it!
try making up your mind
I bought a PS4 just for Bloodborne, it's a good game, but it's not as good as consoleplebs want you to believe it is, totally not worth buying a PS4 for.
>>334828582
>OoT runs like shit and is the best game in history argument again
>>334828082
>Bloodborne doesn't allow for suits of armour or fantastical magic
Just proves how gimped Bloodborne is. It's not like he couldn't implement thaumaturgy, or magic of chaos, void or other aspects to which the game world lends itself.
Time to accept that Bloodborne is simply a gimped game.
>>334828296
no argument of course, there never is
probably because i left out that theres ONE armor set that isnt leather
so stupid of me
>>334828082
Bloodborne didn't had fantastical magic, but they had paranormal magic.
Any souls games stomps bloodborne out completely just by having equipment.
also
>t-that interview doesnt mean anything!
>>334828752
>its a no argument again
>>334828638
No game is worth the purchase of a new system. I still regret buying my 3ds for dream drop distance instead of waiting for more games to come out.
>>334828754
>fantastical magic
who told him that it had to be that way though? He could have tried different magic than the ones in DS. I'm sure they could also work on the amor stuff. Just look at the cainhurst armor. Why not wear Great Ones as armor?
>>334828754
Armor useless and boring in BB. Pain in the ass going back to gather those stupid fucking blood vials. Fight mechanics completely one-dimensional. Do the little BB hop, heavy attack .. repeat. No good items to pick up. Gems were most ignorant idea ever.
>>334828754
Doesn't fit in the world of Bloodborne, just like having excessive weapons or enemies dropping weapons/armor doesn't fit the lore.
What argument is there for any game other than DaS 1 being the best?
I'm not even a big fan of the series but that game is obviously leagues above the rest.
>>334829092
>Fight mechanics completely one-dimensional
Which is why it has the most amount and variations of combos in any Souls, right?
>>334829267
Combat, music, art direction, atmosphere in BB are all better.
>>334829350
combat lol ya sure, hey while we're on the subject let's all thank bloodborne for solidifying the "spam r1 to win" mechanics in the souls series
thanks bloodborne!
>>334829538
You obviously haven't played it, stay mad PCuck
>>334829538
Literally get good.
It's not the game's fault you chose not to parry, combo, or trick your weapon.
You can trivialise Souls just as easy by saying it's nothing more than R1 then L1. But we both know that isn't true either.
I don't give a single fuck what one of your DS retards think. BB is THE BEST souls like game made to date.
The theme, setting, weapons, combat, gameplay are all better than any other souls game.
Just because it's on PS4 only doesn't mean it deserves shit. I'm PC mustard race 100%, but I'm not enough of a stupid shitfuck to say BB is bad because it's not on PC.
BB is a masterpiece, and none of you fuckers deserve it. That's how a new souls game should be. DS3 was a step in the wrong direction.
>>334829275
>>334829029
>>334829350
>>334829693
>>334828082
>>334827384
>>334828391
>b-b-b-but muh context
>he just meant aesthetics!
>>334827167
>Bloodborne
>a Souls game
>>334829119
>Doesn't fit in the world of Bloodborne
The word "gimped" aptly describes the world of Bloodborne.
>>334829820
>It doesn't necessarily mean Bloodborne was bad
It's almost like he tried to do something different!
>>334829928
yeah anon
not bad
just limited compared to dark souls!
totally wild!
>>334829914
>>334829990
Ebin
Guess DaSIII is gimped because it doesn't have half to the combinations of BB, trick weapons, or rally system!
>>334829774
but the game was easy?
maybe the devs should "get good" at making original games, you fanboy clown
>>334829693
umm yeah i played a spam r1 to win game, pretty sure it was bloodborne?
the dumbest fanbase ive seen holy shit
do you even see any other fanbase scream "p-p-prove you played it!"
isnt that an obvious tell that its shit?
>>334829538
>spam R1 to win
Yeah you just try that PCuck. R1 spam in BB gets you killed really fucking quick.
>>334830035
not in the eyes of its creator, cuck
that must sting
>>334830145
>spam r1 to win
The second boss will literally push your shit in if you try that.
It's quite literally his entire purpose.
>>334830284
Not really, I get to play both (:
Sony always wins baby
name a game more fun to shitpost than bloodborne
u cant
>>334827167
money hungry cucks
>>334830326
good thing they gave you the most broken dodge that like 90% i-frames right?
joke of a game
>>334830584
Encouraging aggressive playstyle =/= broken
Starting to suspect you haven't played the game at all.
>>334830489
Its just so easy, even when it wasn't announce too.
>>334830392
So do I. You can play Bloodborne without pathologically becoming a sonygger blind to all its flaws.
>>334830392
>Option A: play a game that's built around perfecting this mechanic!
>OR, now hear me out,
>Option B: play that same game AND then basically keep playing the same thing, extending the total game by roughly 8 hours! Who wouldn't want that!
>It'll cost you literally 8x option A
I don't understand why people like these games so much. I tried DS2 and I just don't get it.
>>334830708
How does stating the fact that BB literally doesn't allow for the same items or mechanics as DaS make me blind to it's flaws?
Further more, your argument was that because BB didn't have the exact same things as DaS it was gimped.
I replied that following your logic DaSIII must be gimped for not having the same items/mechanics as BB.
Then you said "b-but Miyazaki said this you cuck!!!"
Your argument is flawed.
>>334830860
that's because you tried DS2
>>334831024
>then you said
nope
>>334827167
Not sure if "the best" is the right word, but in terms of gameplay DkS1/2 are shit compared to DeS, and DkS3 is strictly worse than BB. Japan Studio is actually the A-Team, not From, and that seems to have something to do with it.
>>334830847
>Same game
>Option C: Play one game and never bother with the other games.
>>334830847
But BB was built around perfecting the combat of Souls, not DaSIII.
DaSIII is essentially the same formula as before, with some minor adjustments. Not that it's a bad thing.
1. SCE brings a level of greatness
2. no namco jewing
>>334831141
Alright, doesn't negate the rest of the post.
>>334831465
you calling miyazaki a liar?
>>334831639
If he ever said that DaSIII would perfect the combat of Souls, yes.
BB was a huge leap in progression in that regard, and although DaSII offered some progression compared to DeS/DaS/DaSII, it was a big step back after BB.
>>334831843
*DaSIII
>mention Bloodborne on /v/
>PCfags piss themselves in anger and ruin thread immediately
Now that my honeymoon phase is over with dark souls 3 I can confirm Bloodborne is the better game. DaS3 is riddled with balancing issues, bullshit enemies, retarded boss fights, re-used assets, chalice dungeon tier level design, baffling story/lore, and overall just feels like a rushed job. Just the thought of playing through it again sickens me...
>>334831989
holy shit sonybros calm down, your game is fine geez
>>334827167
Because Dark Souls 3 fell short and it was supposed to be the chosen one.
>Shitty weapon arts.
>Shitty movesets (again) after the masterworks that are BB movesets.
>No instant stance swap.
>PvP infinites.
>Character handles like shit compared to BB.
>Requires a catalyst to cast (kek)!
>Dumb canned BS sensing that feels and looks like shit.
>Charge R2s are awful compared to BB.
It's fucking shit m8.
>>334827774
Played BB 3.5 times (One character with different build for each ending, plus a DLC character). I couldn't possibly bring myself to replay it again, the experience is too much of the same. Whereas I replayed Dark Souls 8-9 times and loved each playthrough. I even replayed Dark Souls 2 6 times with different builds and enjoyed it, albeit a little less than DS1.
>>334827167
Because Sony owns the trademark for Bloodborne.
Are you really that dumb?
>>334831989
>Mention literally any game that isn't Bloodborne on /v/
>Sonyggers try to bring Bloodborne into it
>Doubly so for any Dark Souls discussion
>Bloodborne gets dragged into any discussions by Sonyggers because it seems like all they have
>mfw you cunts make me almost embarrassed to own a PS4.
>>334829538
>spam r1
If anything it's charged r2
>>334827774
same, I have 7 characters in BB when I have 5 in DaS, 4 in DeS, and 2 in DaS2
I have one for beast claws, kos parasite, reiterpallasch, ludwig's blade, logarius wheel, simon's bowblade, and am in the middle of making a saif build
this no weapon variety meme needs to die, there is a shit ton more variety in BB with it's 27 or so weapons than the 10 categories in DaS
>>334830708
Inb4 screenshot your ps4 and BB copy
>>334832976
Sure
>>334833375
It's a natural reaction since the usual reply to anybody critisizing Bloodborne in any way is "You haven't played it Pcuck! Never ever!"
>>334827167
Save your breath OP. I play primarily on PC but these two are objectively the best. You're never going to be able to convince the Xbabbies and Petition Creation race that they're the best because they're too retarded, bitter, and blinded by it being exclusive to actually appreciate the objective superiority of Demon's Souls and Bloodborne.
>>334833375
>inb4ing a post made an hour ago
Based retard
>>334830698
What the hell is Project Beast?
>>334833730
>i think im smart: the post
>>334833730
>objectively
>objectively
You clearly don't know what that means. Jesus this is the /v/ equivalent of normies saying using "literally" when they want to exaggerate something
>>334833824
Working Title for Bloodborne
>>334833824
Working title for Bloodborne, images got leaked here and on Neogaf.
>>334833894
I clearly do because Demon's Souls and Bloodborne are objectively the pinnacle of the series.
Both of them were fresh concepts. Bloodborne built upon Demon's Souls instead of rehashing it like Dark Souls did. Bloodborne was also a fresh and unique setting while Dark Souls has always just been a poor man's cheap knock-off of Demon's Souls.
>>334828389
>you will never drink one of those
I wonder what do they taste like
>>334834105
>objectively
There you go, keep using that word.
Dark Souls is literally better than Demon Souls friendo
>>334834220
It's literally not. Dark Souls wouldn't have even existed without being able to copy the majority of the concept of Demon's Souls.
The best part is Dark Souls isn't even a better copy. It's inferior to Demon's Souls. Both in atmosphere and mechanics.
>>334834220
Except of course for the gameplay.
>>334834305
>>334834307
Literally objectively better. You're both wrong.
>people SAY the best souls games are sony exclusive so they can feel better about their brand loyalty
ftfy
idort here
best souls game is still Dark Souls PC with dxfix
only souls game i've replayed more than twice
>>334834390
Nope, sorry shitter. Just because you're a bitter little bitch who can't accept that their multi-platform generic-brand tier version of Demon's Souls and Bloodborne isn't the best doesn't mean Dark Souls is better.
>>334834467
No because I don't even own a PS4. I had to borrow my brother's to play Bloodborne. I did own a PS3 when Demon's Souls was still new though and by new I mean before it ever was even thought of being localized in the west. I played both versions actually, that's how good Demon's Souls was.
I played the Asian version for countless hours, and then I played the North American version even more to wreck new players who would be playing Demon's Souls for the first time while I had already had a ridiculous amount of experience with the game.
>>334834624
Idort here, best souls is still Demon's Souls. Only Souls game I've played through dozens of times, several layers deep into NG+++++...(continuing)
>>334834624
Objective rankings
BB > DaSIII > DeS > DaS >>> DaSII
>>334834794
Haven't played Dark Souls 3 yet but I'd say
Bloodborne >/= Demon's Souls >>> Dark Souls II Scholar of the First Sin >>> Dark Souls Prepare to Die Edition >>>>>>>>>> Dark Souls >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dark Souls II
>>334834676
>hurrrr demonsouls is objectively better because I prefer it and don't know what objevtively means, or I'm autistic and cannot comprehend that the same things that are important to me aren't neccessarily important to others
>>334834783
demon's souls will always feel like a tech demo to me
>>334834794
DaS = BB > DaS3 > DeS > DaS2
I honestly don't get how people are saying BB is the best. I would put it in between DaS2 and DaS3. It seriously wasn't even that great.
Then again I liked Dark Souls for the slow melee gameplay and BB felt like a musou at times, which I do not like
>people in this thread confusing "objective" with "subjective".
Thats how I know none of you have graduated high school.
>>334834927
I played DaS 2 but never bothered with Scholar of the First Sin.
What about it made it so much better? DaS 2 was extremely disappointing.
![7ifpqpS[2].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/l85jYbs.jpg "7ifpqpS[2].jpg")
>>334834220
>no unique bosses, with the exception of 1 that was so bad miyazaki publically apologized for it
>atmosphere is dogshit compared to boletaria
>level design isn't as good (b-b-but it's interconnected! who cares)
>dark magic is completely broken
>bonfires in DaS encourage running through everything whereas the shortcuts in DeS encourage careful play
>fucked up invasions by making it possible for the host to ignore the invader and just go to the boss
>can go all the way to tomb/demon only to be told to get the fuck out, and have to trek all the way back after O&S because of limited bonfire warps
>characters in firelink weren't as good as the characters in the nexus, pretty much everyone is a merchant or lautrec who is a shitty version of Yurt
>>334835009
>>hurrrr darksouls is objectively better because I prefer it and don't know what objevtively means, or I'm autistic and cannot comprehend that the same things that are important to me aren't neccessarily important to others
>>334834794
yup, this is my ranking too
it's hilariously obvious when people put BB as the second worst next to DaS2 that they've never played it
>>334835384
That would work if I even once tried to pass off my opinion about a game as "objective" truth.
Keep trying though.
>>334835270
No confusion here.
Only literal retards would put any of Dark Shits over Demon's Souls and Bloodborne.
Dark Souls has been nothing but a cash-in rehash spin-off of Demon's Souls from the beginning looking to profit off of being multi-platform.
>>334835293
It overhauled the game quite a bit on top of adding the DLC and "fixing" the lighting and shaders.
>>334835402
>anyone who doesn't share my personal feelings about Bloodborne hasn't played the game.
There we go, knew that would show up at some point.
>>334835464
Demon's and Bloodborne are objectively the best though. It's not about opinions, it's about facts.
>>334827272
Or its just fact
>>334835009
Fuck off Dark souls is just a pale copy of demon's souls everything from dark souls is just a pale copy and more than that fromsoftware find a way to made the game fucking horrible in term of design.
Even the boss are just a fucking joke in dark souls Hur dur a wolf hur dur a buterfly hur dur some giant rat bullshit.
>>334832821
but the movement in DaS is shit
>>334835801
>being this mad
>the city of you
>>334835634
There is no "objective" way to say one game is better than the other, any way than there's no way of saying one soda is "objectively tastier" than another. There are only opinions about the game, personal feelings. By this very virtue you cannot "objectively" say one game is better than the other.
>>334835959
Yes there is. Just because you don't want to accept that Demon's and Bloodborne are better doesn't mean it's just a matter of opinion.
Some things are literally objectively better than others. That's just the way life is.
>>334836091
>Some things are literally objectively better than others
And comparing video games isn't one of them.
>Pepsi is "objectively" better tasting than Coca Cola.
>>334827167
idk why people even defend souls games on PC
DS1 port required durante fix to be playable
DS2 was well optimized but had framerate bugs
DS3 is a shit port with stuttering and framerate incosistencies even on high-end setups and the worst netcode in the series
>>334836213
>DS3 is a shit port with stuttering and framerate incosistencies even on high-end setups and the worst netcode in the series
Had 0 zero issues with stutter/framerate running at max and my rig is average-to-good at best.
>>334836584
lucky you, still most people are complaining about these issues.
I can play witcher 3, fallout 4, rise of the tomb raider or even arkham knight with better performance at high settings, but not this shitty textured POS
>>334834390
No it's not. Poise alone wrecked Dark Souls:
>Small weapons become spammy as fuck.
>Half the small weapons become completely ineffectual (short swords, 1-handed axes, small blunts, daggers) because of Poise.
>Call and response gameplay reduced to smashing R1 and taking advantage of Poise.
>Spacing is gone: just run up and smash because there is zero risk if you can absorb the stagger of the first hit.
>Timing is gone: just run up and smash because there is zero risk if you can absorb the stagger of the first hit.
>Properly timed and spaced attacks mean Jack shit; you can run right through an attack and BS someone making the game devolve into BS tactics.
That's just Poise. DWGR, strictly worse movesets, kick being useless compared.to shove, weapons causing you to stagger like a retard if you miss, and basically unusable ultra weapons really make Dark Souls 1 a terrible piece of shit compared to DeS. This is even being fully aware of DeS's flaws (grass, mandatory SC, ineffectual armor, etc).
DaS may or may not be a better game, but the combat in DeS is objectively unequivocally better.
>>334827167
Bloodborne is excellent and one of the best. Demon's Souls is mediocre and easily the worst. Even Dark Souls 2 is slightly better than it.
>>334828040
This
>>334837085
>Demon's Souls is mediocre and easily the worst.
How to spot a Dark Babby
>>334835614
not sharing my feelings is one thing, putting the game almost last because you know you'll get called out if you put it below DaS2 when you havn't played it is another thing
there are certain aspects that BB just flat out shits on souls, the only thing souls does better is armor and magic variety
>>334837608
Not even close. I bought a PS3 for Demon's Souls when the game launched. I didn't play Dark Souls until it hit PC because Demon's was so underwhelming. Demon's has garbage level design, easily exploitable bosses, and the much ballyhooed "atmosphere" was only good in two or three areas. It's a mediocre game.
>>334827167
I'm playing through it for the first time right now so I'm biased as fuck.
Also listening to all the DS3 criticism it seems weapons haven't received anywhere close to as much effort as they did in BB, hopefully someone can clarify that for me. I'll be fucking salty if that's true, most of BB's weapons I felt have a good character to them.
>>334827167
BB and DeS fags are the worst
>>334839029
weapon arts don't come close to trick weapons
>>334839052
both those fanbases shit on the cancer that it the dark souls community, especially DeS
>>334839008
> never played des
> shit taste
OH=AotA>DaS3>DaS>BB>DaS2DLC>DeS>DaS2
>>334839267
>no argument
>shitposter
Shame on me for falling for it I guess.
DaS1 = BB > DaS3 > DaS2 > DeS
Counting the best versions of each game, so PtDE for DaS1 and SotFS for DaS2.
>>334839052
That's because they are consolefags who need exclusives to rationalize their purchase. They don't care if any multiplat game is better.
>>334839145
Well that's a shit and a half. I was kinda hoping my old friend Winged Spear would have some new moves.
>>334839052
While I liked DeS I don't think its that good in comparison to DaS 1 and I had to play that on a fucking gimped ass M+KB.
So i beat DS1, should i get Demon souls US version or EU? Which is has more people playing invasions?
Will the Bloodborne shitposts ever end? It's been for more than a year nonstop.
>>334839794
Whatever helps you sleep at night, PCbro. Bloodborne is legitimately great, though I don't know if it's better than Dark Souls. Demon's Souls isn't too hot though.
