8 production from terrain, 13 total production.
>>334393427
8 production from terrain, 12 total production.
What's happening
>>334393481
7 production from terrain, 13 total production.
>>334393427
building a settler converts growth to production 2 to 1 (not sure about ratio)
food contributes to settler production
>>334393590
>>334393627
What is the correct ratio?
>>334393427
>>334393481
>>334393573
>Default focus
>>334393970
focus is irrelevant if you're locking all your tiles
>>334394108
when your city grows, that new citizen produces something and what it produces is decided by focus
why does the AI always start off way better than me? I could reset for hours and never get a better starting capital location than them. I'm pretty tired of seeing massive sprawling AI civs with negative gold and obvious negative happiness for hundreds of turns yet they never have to suffer because of it
>>334394369
Because they're AI, they cheat.
>>334393856
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5vSKAahXT4
from what I gathered the contribution is less and less with each unit of surplus food
>>334394369
A lot of these kinds of games manage difficulty by giving the CPU nations improved productivity or resource output.
>>334394369
>yet they never have to suffer because of it
They definitely suffer. I've crippled huge Civs before by doing nothing more than building roads in their territory
>>334394740
I thought that was only once you go past prince?
>tfw my friends refuse to play this game even though you can get it and all the dlc for $13 right now
>>334394369
I think the game places their settlers throughout the map before you do, and if you have competing start bias with another civ you might get shafted and stuck somewhere crappy like tundra or jungle
that said if your start sucks you can always just reset, on deity if your start sucks you're probably going to lose anyway
>>334393427
>Not playing Glorious Nihon Master Race
Do you want to fucking lose?
>>334393427
>>334393481
>>334393573
Food is converted to production when and only when building Settlers.
It is also why it disables growth, all your extra food is used to produce the guy.
>>334393427
Is it ever possible for Sid Meier to make a new Civ that will surpass 5?
Stop making me want to play Civ V, I don't want to waste the whole day.
>>334394915
on all difficulties the AI plays on Chieftan, with all the handicaps Chieftan would give the player.
>>334395068
they already did, it's called Civ 4
>>334395212
Sorry, I should have mentioned "moving forward." Civ 3 and 4 are obviously superior.
>tfw spending hours playing as venice before realizing city state locations are all absolute shit and you're fucked
>want to play Alpha Centauri
>graphics are high contrast 90s PC gaming ugliness
HD remake when?
>>334394298
it won't grow while it churns out settlers, unless you find a ruin.
when he's done with that settler, odds are he'll make another or switch the focus after unlocking tiles
>>334395471
Reminder that there is literally nothing wrong with genejacks
>>334395471
AC's turn system confuses the fuck out of me. I guess I'm just too used to Civ.
>>334394792
Civ 5 newfag here, why does building roads near other civs hurt them?
>>334395917
if it's in their land they pay the maintenance for it
>>334394792
>I DEMAND THAT YOU CEASE MAKING ROADS ON MY LANDS!
made me chuckle
>>334395534
whether you lock the tiles or not isnt the point. the point is that growth and production arent given at the same moment during a turn. by locking ur tiles as u want them and putting it on production focus, youre getting a couple hammers extra every time you grow, while you wouldnt have gotten extra food (given at the end of the turn).
>>334395917
the person who constructed the road pays for it unless its in someone else's territory. even counts for building roads in nobody's territory; the builder pays unless someone grows around it
>>334394916
unless youre venice. they always get first roll on coastal starts
>>334394369
This right here is what prevents me from playing games from this genre.
I'd love to play SMAC but I got frustrated when I learned that the Planet will always punish you for ecological disturbance even if it's the work of a fucker like Morgan.
>>334396426
>Planet will always punish you
Will it always punish the player or does it punish everyone?
>>334395471
They shouldn't look like that, the color depth is wrong, you are doing something wrong
>>334393427
You probably have the liberty policy that increases settler production in the capital.
>>334396426
>Planet will always punish you for ecological disturbance even if it's the work of a fucker like Morgan.
The correct response is to exterminate anyone who dares to hurt Planet.
![2[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/Wqqs550.png "2[1].png")