You guys will argue about anything
>>334310383
They're the same
Is OP the biggest faggot alive, or just the biggest faggot on /v/? Discuss.
First one
>you attract casuals that will drive your sales, while actually developing for your hardcore audience
>2nd option gets you accused of casualizing the game, like SMG2 and DS3
Easy game with hard mode
What's the point of an easy mode that will lack challenge because you just beat the game on hardest difficulty?
I like games with no difficulty settings.
Difficulty settings just do stupid stuff like inflate HP pools or make enemies hit harder.
Balance your own fucking game before releasing it.
>>334310383
Second one that mocks the players for easy mode.
Which side will you choose?
I would assume an easy game with hard mode to be artificial difficulty, in having a simple boost to enemy health and whatnot. Whereas an easy mode on a hard game would simply give room for error.
Either way that isn't necessarily true and a normal mode is preferential
>>334310383
NO WE FUCKING WON'T
>>334310757
The right one obviously you faggot nigger
>>334310757
Right is right
>>334310757
right for optimal left hand-to-mouth-distance minimization
>>334310383
I rather have a challenging game play as designed with an option for easyI most rather have a game on normal with both easy and hard options
>>334310757
Left twix is SJW
Right twix is Trump.
>game makes you play through normal to unlock hard
>Easy game with optional hard mode
Dead Rising 3's hard mode was really fucking easy
>>334310383
i miss difficulty options
>>334311643
I need to replay this.
>>334310585
>attracting casuals
>good for any game
>>334310383
I rather the easy with optional hard mode since I will get used to play on easy then jump on the hard one and get stomped (in teory) while if I play the hard one with optional easy means that I will not get any extra satisfaction from a second run since I already did the first one on the hardest difficulty.
This is not even a dilemma.
Forced easy mode is the superior option.
