is there anything wrong with this pose?
its boring
>>334153576
nope.
>>334153576
Makes it look like someone just told her she's got something on her back.
>>334153576
she's proud of her ass. i can respect that. males show off their muscles and it's called "personality," but a female proud of her body? "Totally unnecessary!"
>>334153576
inciting anal rape
It makes my wife's gay son sexually confused
>>334153576
does that look like the pose of a woman who is 95% full of spunk? didn't think so, shitlord
Doesn't highlight her ass enough, hope it's changed
>>334153576
Sexuality is wrong UGHHHHHHH
>>334153970
Why does first post always get it right. New pose is better than all her other ones and is sexier than the one they removed.It's still not really sexy, but it's more than it used to.
>>334153576
she doesnt look like a man, which according to 3rd wave feminists all women should look like men
>>334155447
whats a 3rd wave feminist?
Fixed.
>>334156834
wow what a baahabibat
>>334156834
>>334156834
halal/10
>>334159138
Whoops saved.
>>334159138
>>334159138
Yes she is fat.
>>334159138
THICK
H
I
C
K
>>334159395
And a chink.
Why do feminists complain about shit like this and then do slutwalks to show that they can dress how they want without being judged? How the hell does that make any sense?
>>334153576
>>334153970
This guy got it right.
Not only is the new pose more interesting, it's also more sexual, and I love it for that.
>>334153576You can't refute this
>>334159138
Fixed
>>334159138
>>334159372
>>334159462
>women
>sense
>pragmatism
>brain
>>334159569
Where can i buy these?
>>334159458
Except chinks don't look like that.
>>334159569
she taps them like how mario jumps on goombas
>>334159504
>take the lazy way out when posing your characters! Keep it flat and stiff, no dynamic poses!
You can always count on Dobson.
Plus she totally changes height from the first panel to the second.
>>334156834
I find full body burka hot and I ain't ashamed of it
>>334159569
>>334159138
is there a nude model for D.Va?
>>334159673
Fuck off, raghead.
>>334159686
I don't know why this keeps getting posted (probably americans) but there's nothing appetizing about having fucking bagels for a pancake.
>>334159138
source?
>>334159138
... this is porn, right? Not a real image?
>>334159686
HNNGGGGGGG THICKER
>>334159868
>projecting faces on food because of your sexual frustration
>jannies delete cutie pudgemonster
Confirmed for Irishmen.
>>334159779
>bagel
Please kill yourself, you fucking uneducated, imbecile.
>>334159504
She is posing, retard
>>334160091
And faggots. What's their fucking problem? It wasn't even pornographic
>>334159462
Because feminists aren't a hivemind that all share the same beliefs. There are varying levels of feminism
>>334160280
>>334160280
>you're forced to eat it afterwards
>you feel the hot butter/jizz mixture going down your throat
>>334160172
>>334160117
>uneducated, imbecile.
Oh the irony.
>>334154087
> males show off their muscles and it's called "personality,
It's called either a) catering to a white male power fantasy endorsed by the fitness industry, b) catering to the sexual fantasies of gay men
>but a female proud of her body? "Totally unnecessary!"
Being proud of your body != I have sexual assets that conform to the fantasies of a specific demographic of men in their 20s - 40s
>>334159462
Different groups calling themselves the same thing.
One woman might call herself a feminist because she wants everyone to have equal right and opportunity, and promote autonomy of the individual, even celebrating women wanting to be housewives.
Another woman also calls herself a feminist while claiming that the previous woman isn't a true feminist, and that she's a traitor to her gender. These are the kinds of people that say all sex involving males is rape, that want to get rid of the concept of family, and basically want to subjugate and destroy masculinity.
>>334160564
why would you type out so much when you can easily summarize your post?
>people who are more attractive than me shouldn't allowed to be seen!
>>334160531
Yes indeed. It's also pretty sad you can't tell the difference between a scone/bagel and a soufflé.
>>334160564
>>334160564
So if I have sexual assets that conform to the fantasies of a specific demographic of men in their 20s - 40s then I can't be proud of my body?
What about actress and models?
>>334160564
>you're not a real gamer unless you play derivative pixel shit indie games
this hurts to read
>>334160608
why would you type out so much when you can easily summarize your post?
>people who don't conform to my beauty standards shouldn't be allowed to be seen!
what's with the australian pricing for this game
it's kinda fucked desu
>>334160449
> you start jerking off to the thought
> he sees it
> gets on table to cum on your face
>>334160740
>he's still posting
>>334160564
>that picture
>>334160740
>That feel when you grew out of your nice guy phase unlike these 30 year old numale virgins
surely a woman will sleep with you after you've dedicated so much time and effort to protecting them on the internet
>>334156834
is that the german edition of overwatch?
>>334160564
believe it or not tumblerette there are men who like to be dominated by strong women like Zarya which do exist in this overwatch game, Tracer is suppose to be Captain America, probably a thumbs up pose like Cammy does in SF would of got the fans up and yelling rip off.
>>334159504
Women do that in real life Dobson you fucking BEAR FUCKER, go and pander to some SJWs to support your "realistic" cause.
>>334160564
Sex sells and since men have most of the money, you do the math
>man I HATE SJWs SO MUCH, they constantly make a big deal out of NOTHING!
>this is only one of 50 threads we'll have about Tracer's ass today on /v/, all of which will pass 400 posts
You hate SJWs because you hate yourselves.
It doesn’t fit her character.
>>334160630
All I'm saying is that the resemblance between the two foods don't mke it appealing unless you're a sick fuck who gets a perverse sexual thrill from fantasizing about sticking their dick in it.
>>334161005
more like i hate them because they're taking a fat shit in my hobby
>>334161005
No one is exempt from scrutiny. Including SJWs
>>334160280
Why?
>>334160630
You should reread his post.
>>334160873
>there are men who like to be dominated by strong women like Zarya
Believe it or not, there are also people who have fantasies involving zarya where neither party gets crushed or degraded.
>>334160449
>not making him eat it while you're pounding his ass
Nigga you gay.
>>334161123
There is a difference between shoving opinions down peoples fault....
And people in positions of 'power' listening to one side or the other. /v/ can spout all it wants, but the louder a group, the more likely it'll get what it wants.
You can't feed a baby if it's not making a noise, even if it's hungry. You go and feed a baby that's screaming it's head off nonstop though.
>>334161170I'm not one of those people.
>>334161123
>Artists who actively support people who shit on freedom of expression
Is there a worse human being?
>>334161170
Well done captain obvious, you have a pure innocent mind. Now go and play with your fucking fairies and unicorns and let us be. Fucking Twat.
>>334161238
If you're comparing yourself to a baby, you're not really paying yourself a compliment.
>>334160848
>british character
>where britain is filled with sharia zones and a shitty nanny state
you had everything set up and youblew it up
>>334160564
This has got to be a joke.
>>334161238
If that's your analogy you've clearly never worked with babies.
>>334161486
were having this conversation aren't we?
>>334161315
>>334161486
>/v/ - NO ANALOGIES ALLOWED
>>334161486
Incorrect, but thanks anyway. You don't ignore a baby that's crying. This meme of "oh ignore it or it'll just do it anyway" has to stop. A baby cries for one reason or another. So you don't just ignore it.
>>334161315
I'm comparing both sides to babies, actually. Just the side that the image claims /v/ is on isn't crying loud enough to get attention. SJW are. I don't care about either side. I'd like it if things were catered to me, who the fuck wouldn't? But I'm not going to stop shit from happening.
>>334161535
nigga if a baby's screaming its head off it's likely very belligerent and will slap most of the shit you put in its face away for a few tries, and then a lot of it'll dribble down its stupid baby chin until its calmed down enough to eat. A calm, hungry baby is easy to work with. Either way, you hit the nail on the head on one point: Both sides are babbies
>>334161616
see
>>334161628
I argue that you can feed a calm hungry baby, and in fact cannot feed a screaming baby because in all reality the baby's screaming and it doesn't fucking know why.
>>334153576
No, people bitching for the sake of it.
So I haven't been following. How did people react to the new pose?
>>334161757
Everyone acted like their faction won and the opposing faction lost. Blizzard sat back and smiled about making everyone happy. In reality both sides are still mad at nothing and happy about nothing.
>>334161616
>I'm comparing both sides to babies, actually.
Well, that's certainly true, can't argue with that. Both sides even behave similarly, really, screaming buzzwords all the time (SHITLORD vs. KEK, etc.)
>>334161842
I have a hard time believing SJWs would be happy with the new pose after people pointed out it's taken straight from a pin-up poster.
In any case, the new pose pleases my dick so I don't care.
>>334161721
That is probably a better analogy.
>Baby is making a noise, but isn't going mental
>parent comes
>feeds baby
>baby goes to sleep, content
>Baby is making a fucking racket, is going mental
>try to feed it
>it just pukes in your face, shits in it's diaper until it dribbles and overflows onto your neck and down your top
>keep trying to feed the baby but nothing is stopping it
>eventually do so
>baby is quiet while it's happening
>finishes
>then starts screaming again cause the milk was slightly too cold or hot, has a shitty diaper, puke all around it's mouth and snot coming out of it's nose
>so you try and fix those things
>it carries on
Former is /v/, latter is SJW. Nothing seems to please them. For /v/? You can release total dross like DOAX3 and they lap it up, even paying extortionate import fees to play it.
>>334161913
50s pinups are empowering to SJWs for some bizarre reason. It's "classy AND sexy". I couldn't make this shit up.
>>334161842I like the change
>>334161947
But where are the extortionate fees in your analogy! I need humorous imagery for your stance to make sense for I am a simpleton.
>>334161757
Like this.
>>334159569
I want to fuck those cakes.
>>334162047
Fucking hilarious.
>>334162047
>doesn't realize its a pin up pose
>discovers it is
>Acts offended
average libtard
>>334162047
>the new pose is fine
>WHY IS IT STILL A PIN UP
top kek
>>334162036
The milk cost $150 in the first set of humour chevrons.
>>334153576
Here's the deal:
The complaint was not made by some radical feminist group, but by the beta testers. The issue was that this one character was being portrayed as simply another sex symbol when her personality clashes with that idea.
In fact, Widowmaker is a highly-sexualized character, but there hasn't been an uproar regarding her poses or clothing. The reason: she is a femme fatale, which completely matches her design.
Look, I'm not saying that we need to censor every female character in video games. However, we cannot ignore the fact that female characters in video games have mostly pigeonholed into very specific, and many times degrading, stereotypes. The industry has evolved a bit, but giving a female character a unique personality, but then dressing them ALL as over-sexualized fantasy dolls is upsetting.
Femme fatale = Sexy femme fatale
Spunky = Sexy spunky
Nerdy = Sexy nerdy
Proper = Sexy, closeted dominatrix
Can you see the problem? Again, the goal isn't to censor female characters, but to give them the same diversity as their male counterparts.
I mean, ffs, the biggest male video game icon is a fat Italian plumber in overalls. Try to think of the top female video game characters that haven't been sexualized in their respective games. You'll probably think of one eventually, but how long did that take? How many times did you think of one (i.e. Samus from Metroid), and say to yourself, "That one counts... no wait, nevermind."
And that's the problem, and this pose highlights the problem exceedingly well.
>>334162047
I bet he edited it later.
>>334161757
Someone said the pose was just lewd for pandering to boys rather than a pose that would be natural for Tracer's character. Blizzard agreed. This sent antiSJWs and 8gag faGGots and so on into a chimp-out frenzy as they started revving up their meme machines to cry about Tracer being put in a burka and so on.
Then the new pose came out and it was still pretty sexy, but more in character for Tracer. Why antiSJWs thought Blizzard were going to somehow delete Tracer's ass is a mystery. And so just because you can still see evidence of her ass existing, antiSJWs claimed a victory.
>>334162149
I think you oversee the fact that female models solely exist as bonder inducing eyecandy because the majority of "gamers" is still male and most of them are around 12~16 years old.
>>334162149
>wasting your thyme typing that up on /v/
Look buddy, I agree with you, but the only responses you'll get will be ad hominem trash, e.g. (ISRAEL!!! SJW!!!)
>>334162149
If "Sexy X" is the problem, why not make Tracer fuck ugly? Or any of them for that matter?
Is it because humanity as a whole is shallow and don't want to waste their entertainment time looking at hideous fucking caricatures of humans doing outlandish shit? Holy fuck it's like the companies want to make money.
>>334162047
>I swear the amount of backlash to a developer showing even an inkling of "maybe we shouldn't sexualize the female figure at every opportunity..." gets completely shit on.
This is hurting my head.
>>334153576
That ass isn't in my face that's wrong.
>>334162149
>a character can't be sexy because i dont want her to be
lol
>>334162185
Oh no, I got the original story, that was impossible to miss.
It's easy to understand why people reacted the way they did considering how Jeff Kaplan responded. But really, if people had known beforehand how much stupid shit Kaplan says on a near-daily basis, they probably wouldn't overreact like that.
Especially if you've followed Blizzard in the past, you'd know this isn't the first time they'd censor something because of a single offended idiot. Ji Firepaw comes to mind.
>>334162269
>the majority of gamers is male
That's wrong.
Also, the issue isn't around what the majority is, but rather shaping games and the industry to be more inviting to people ther than male teenagers.
>>334159504
Anybody else does the 2nd one? I find stick my ads out like that but it's still out.
>>334162185
Again, for the millionth time, the complaint wasn't the removal of the pose.
The complaint was:
1. It took 11 hours for a fucking reason from the Devs
but mainly
2. The fact ONE SINGLE PERSON. ONE SINGLE FORUM POST. Could alter the fucking development of a AAA game. Despite the HUNDREDS of people who disagreed with the person, Blizzard still caved in. That was the complaint. They said they wanted all players to feel "strong" and "comfortable". Then released some dross about "not caving in to peoples pressure and we have other poses ready".
My guess? They just put a Patch/DLC pose in, which was sexy, to make it A-OK. They please the SJW who said it wasn't in character and they pleased the others with ass.
So, tl;dr the complaint was Blizzard gave in to a single persons opinion, despite hundreds of people disagreeing with said person. No poll, no question, no research. 24 hours after post is made, the pose is gone.
>>334162149
>he's trying to make a point on /v/ without just greentexting, shitposting, or using a reactionimage while using ad hominem
You came to the wrong place
>>334162149
>The issue was that this one character was being portrayed as simply another sex symbol when her personality clashes with that idea.
>her personality
She's not real. Her personality can be anything. You don't get to decide how an imaginary person should behave because you are not the creator.
>>334160740
Shit, I'd wear that Affleck t-shirt
>>334162149
Except most male videogame characters are also sexualized. I dare you to name one (that isn't chibi like Mario) who isn't either handsome, muscled, or baring skin. Good luck. The difference is, women are fucking hypocrites (particularly so tumblrinas and sjws) and have literally never complained about sexualized men. But Tracer gets a pose that isn't even sexual at all or revealing (it's her outfit) and people throw a fit because god forbid, we see the outline of a female butt in a game, but blowing people's heads off is a-okay.
It's fucking fantasy. Who the fuck cares if it's realistic, demeaning, sexualized or whatever the fuck? IT'S FUCKING FANTASY.
Fucking people these days, I swear to god. I honestly don't want to see what it'll be like in 10 years, because I know it'll be much worse than what it is now.
>>334153576
The ass is too small.
>>334160740
I wonder if TIIIIIIIIIITS is any good.
>>334162451
>That's wrong.
I don't include "gamurgirls" who play candy crush the whole and the first 15 minutes of any Zelda title.
>Also, the issue isn't around what the majority is, but rather shaping games and the industry to be more inviting to people ther than male teenagers.
Casualization of the AAA-titles wasn't enough you think?
>>334153576
her legs are way too long
>>334160740
This picture is missing something. It's missing the black guy that tried to be friends with all of them but then he gets kicked out and shunned.
>>334162663
I grew up playing pong which had almost no gameplay whatsoever. If I can play that and be considered a video game player, people can fuck around with games on their phones and be considered one too. You've got to start somewhere.
>>334162610
>But Tracer gets a pose that isn't even sexual at all or revealing (it's her outfit) and people throw a fit
You're seriously more mad than any of these so-called "fit-throwers"
I mean damn, look at how mad your post is
>>334156834
fun story
was in germany last week, and i see this muslim chick with her head scarf or what ever
only eyes and bit of face visible
but her body? Some semi transparent dress, while she rocks a fucking 10/10 body with big tits and big muscular ass and tights and cut abs, what a hotie
and im like, its this shit ironic or does she seriously think she looks fine?
wanted to ask but she didnts speak english so i will never know
she doesn't have a thick enough ass for it to matter
>>334162149
>The industry has evolved a bit
Fuck off if anything it's degrading
>>334162792
Get the fuck out.
>>334162671
For a white person yeah
It's the future though they probably got some fucking gene manipulation shit so they gave whites the long leg gene from blacks
>>334162835
>being a thickfag
Kill yourself, my main man. Use this gun.
>>334153970
>it's boring
AND the new one is much better.
>>334162543
I bet you liked BvS too faggot.
>>334156834
This is literally why nobody will cater to you, you fucking overreacting retards
>>334162970
>gun porn.jpg
>no porn
>>334162970
FUCKING TRIGGERED
>>334153576
ITS LITERALLY 2016 UGHHHHHH LITERALLY 2016 YOU BIGOT
>>334162149
Are you saying sexy is bad?
Are you saying sexy women don't deserve representation?
That'ssexyism.
>>334162149
I see a couple problems here, though.
First, Tracer is sexy spunky to begin with, and the pose in OP doesn't change that. You'd have to get rid of her skin-tight outfit.
Secondly, a pose is an expression of an individual, and I don't see why an individual can't want herself to appear sexy sometimes; that doesn't make her inherently a sex-object. Variety is the spice of life.
>>334162801
How dare anyone be mad at people who are advocating and often accomplishing censorship of videogames.
>>334163221
This. Women dress up sexy and put on make-up mostly to feel sexy and good about themselves. Feminazicunts will never understand though because they're upset about being ugly so make-up and shit won't fix that, but they'll hate on people who can.
>>334162451
Okay then, the majority of gamers that this game specifically is targeted toward are male teenagers-twentysomethings
>>334163221
Right. To say a female character can NEVER appear sexy is itself female oppression.
All I care about is the black guy,what does he do.
>>334163403
feminazis in a nutshell:
we're ugly and we're upset that people would rather see attractive people than ugly people.
>>334163131
>Are you saying sexy is bad?
I don't know how you could read that from the post unless you were absolutely braindead
>>334162792
>I grew up playing pong
No you didn't
>which had almost no gameplay whatsoever
Yeah you definitely didn't
>>334163293
Changes =/= censorship
Should people not have complained when they didn't like the ending of Mass Effect 3? Were they pushing for censorship? Get a grip, faggot.
>>334162854
You mean for a human being. Blizzard has an exaggerated art style.
If you could show me a picture of an actual person with legs that long, I'd be very interested.
>>334163523
>No you didn't
You can rewrite history?
>Yeah you definitely didn't
You're delusional. Pressing up or down is rudimentary gameplay. What you're thinking is strategy which is not the same thing.
>>334163442
He speeds around and buffs/heals people.
He's probably the most fun support.
>>334163564
Using the word Changes in place doesn't absolve something of being censorship, if you are hiding something because it might offend people, you are censoring, regardless of context, who made the decision, etc.
eg. the people who wanted Gone Home removed from Steam.
Man, GamerGate really ruined this place. It brought the worst of /pol/ and /tumblr/ here and these people just won't go away.
>>334163668
>You can rewrite history?
I can easily see that you're lying, I don't need to rewrite anything.
>More buttons=more gameplay
Oh so phone games have no gameplay since they don't use any buttons.
>>334161170
You want a fucking cookie or something? Fuck off retard
>>334163741
8gag died so they all came crawling back. I'll never forget the beautiful 2 weeks or so here when the kids ran off on their exodus and we all got to talk about videogames instead of obsessive over twitter screencaps and constant shitflinging.
>>334163741
This, you can't talk about a game without /pol/ bitching about how the black guy in it was put in because of the Jewish Conspiracy, and then Tumble complains about the girl wearing a bikini. I bet they don't even play vidya.
>>334159504
I've actually had 'male gaze' used in a sentence against me.
As part of an actual argument.
That's perplexing to me. Isn't the use of that kind of term like an immediate admission of bigotry? "I am a tribalistic sexist fuck. One gaze is EVILER than another."
How have we let shit slide this far?
>>334164030
You think that's bad?
https://forum.starmen.net/forum/Games/Mother2/EarthBound-s-Misogyny
Why is it okay when women have absolutely no interest in a male character until they're sexually objectified, but men are scum when a female character they already like is presented in a mildly sensual pose?
>>334156531
the current generation of feminists.
1st wave was woman's suffragists, 2nd wave were bra burners.
>>334163768
>only young people lurk /v/
Now you're on about buttons which has nothing to do with gameplay. Are you really confused as to what gameplay actually is?
Ask someone who is /in/ something about the game
>>334164184
how mediocre is it
>>334164102
tl;dr please
I don't have the time to read all that.
>>334153576
You never expose your back to the enemy?
Shit, even a retard like faggot op should know that basic rule.
>>334164102
what a faggot
>>334164231
There's only one female party member, and that's misogynistic.
>>334164102
THE GAME CAME OUT IN 1995 BEFORE ANY OF THIS BULLSHIT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>334164231
basicallydespite that all playable characters are stereotypes, the fact that Paula is the only girl makes it misogynistic as male players have more options to relate toeven though its pointed out that Ness, Jeff, and Poo are bad caricatures.
>>334164310
it's a victory pose, they're dead
>>334164179
>I'm not obviously lying to make a non-point, he just thinks everyone's really young!
You were the first person to dictate that only moving up or down is rudimentary gameplay, by that logic, not even being able to press up or down at all is nonexistent gameplay.
Pretty simple to understand.
If you actually played Pong you'd know full well what the difference between it and Candy Crush is, Candy Crush requires luck, Pong requires you to play well, despite your mediocre attempt at disparaging "strategy" as we all know, gameplay is not encompassed by the amount of actions you can take but rather how you can use those actions, including what you called "strategy" (of which Pong requires none, by the way)
>>334160564
>You didn't reply for 18 minutes you're not a real gamer!
>>334164227
It's good but it's only 6v6. You can't have mad fun with 12v12 or whatever.
>>334159504
shouldn't you be busy starving to death dobson?
>>334162149
>The complaint was not made by some radical feminist group, but by the beta testers
It was a complaint made by A SINGLE forum user, who said, and I quote:
>I have a young daughter that everyday when I wake up wants to watch the recall trailer again. She knows who tracer is, and as she grows up, she can grow up alongside these characters.
>What I'm asking is that as you continue to add to the overwatch cast and investment elements, you double down on your commitment to create strong female characters. You've been doing a good job so far, but shipping with a tracer pose like this undermines so much of the good you've already done.
http://us.battle.net/forums/en/overwatch/topic/20743015583?page=1
Stop lying please, fagola.
>>334164102
world war 3 when?
>>334160740
>life size Power Girl
>insinuating PG is sexist
>>334153576
Yeah, she has no ass
>>334164718
Oh boy... where to begin
>>334162269
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i08CVkBxvBM
>>334162318
Glad to see someone understands. Thanks.
>>334162350
I always love the "extreme opposite end" arguments. Yes, majority of the time you need characters that are physically appealing, but physically appealing does not mean they have to sexualized.
>>334162526
Yeah, I was bored with /b/
>>334162409
Straw man, bud.
>>334162534
Seriously, you're a moron.
>>334162610
How about 5: Gordon Freeman, Link, Master Chief, Scorpion, Agent 47. But again, the point is that the males have a variety while females are mostly pigeonholed. I agree there are plenty of sexualized male characters (Kratos, Duke Nukem, Dante) as well, but the problem isn't nearly as bad as it is with female characters. Also, you are confusing appealing with over-sexualized, which I addressed previously.
>>334162840
"We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas." I fail to see the point of your comment.
>>334164845
DELETE THAT POST!
WHY IS THE PPG REBOOT SUCH SHIT?! REEEEEEEEE!
>>334164962
it's degrading we have plenty PLENTY of no sexualized female characters but all of a sudden people are caring more and more about sex appeal. It's degrading with each passing year. Soon we're going to have faggots like you say how Samus before other M was sexist and other new age radical left ideas make everything worse
>>334164653
It takes one spark to start a fire. The argument would not have gained traction is people did not agree with the statement.
Are you arguing that it wasn't an outcry because many people did not simultaneously come to the same conclusion without conversing with one another? Hate to break it to you bud, but the vast majority of the time opinions are made because of what people hear from others and agree or disagree with them. You're really grasping at straws with that one.
>>334165276
"I want equality, but only if it doesn't involve taking away something I have or want."
>>334164962
>let me reply to 8 posts at once, my opinion on an anonimous image board matters!
>>334165546
The existence of FICTIONAL characters does not harm real world equality period no matter how much you believe it does.
Men can be just as sexualized as women in fiction fuck women have an entire book genre that does just that. However it's existence doesn't affect male equality because the people who are sexualized are fictional
>>334165276
anon if you think that sex and being sexy is degrading then the problem lies with you. I suggest a visit to a sexologist
>>334165276
inb4
>that one charcter
>not sexualized
>>334165762
>>334165276
fuck I replied to wrong anon. Sorry
>>334165407
Your statement was slanting it as if the entire beta testing community was finding it to be an issue- "the complaint was not made by some radical feminist group, but *by the beta testers*". I was correcting that. Obviously multiple people can have a complaint at the same time. However, looking at that thread, the people making the complaints were in a stark minority out of the testers. That's what I was pointing out. Not "grasping for straws", but calling out bullshit.
>>334165757
I feel affected. I want them to fetishize me and not just stupid words scribbled on a page by another dumb girl. Why do I have to be marginalized so they can get their socks off? (Writer's note: the vagina may sometimes be euphemistically considered a "flesh sock".)
>>334153576
TRACER IS A CUTE GIRL AND I WNAT A GIRL LIKE HER TO BE MY GF AND MARRY HER
TFW NO GF
>>334165757
Yep, because no work of fiction has EVER had any real world consequences.
>>334166150
*maximum over-tipping*
>>334160564
>that pic
I almost feel bad for women sometimes
>>334166150
The bible is a consequence of religion, not the origin.
>>334162149
1. you're not Tracer's creator to tell what she should or should not be.
2. she doesn't exist.
3. sex, sexy, butts and sexy butts: nothing wrong with these.
People that complained about this shit for any reason are wrong. Plain and simple like that.
YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS NON-REAL THING SEXY!
Just watch me.
Reminder that the new pose is much more interesting AND sexy.
The removal of the old pose was poorly timed and communicated. It wasn't "pandering to SJWs". It was getting rid of a boring pose.
The new pose has much more personality and highlights her ass way more. It's both hot and fits very well with her personality. If it was about pandering to feminists the new pose wouldn't literally be based off a pinup.
What did he mean by this?
>>334166150
What are you some kind of queer?
>>334160564
surely this is an elaborate fake... surely...
i can never believe how fucking cucked some men are
>>334164102
I think that's bad but I think my original complaint is worse because it's a little more-encompassing.
>>334162176
he fucked deleted everything
>>334166341
Seriously, what the fuck is he attempting to say here?
>>334165893
Ummm.... no. You're attempting to degrade the argument with semantics, implying my orginal position suggested ALL of the beta testers. My argument was that there were many of the beta testers that did not agree with the pose. If you want, I'll concede that very minor point and say I should have eliminated the word "the" before I said beta testers.
However, in contrast, you suggested it was ONLY ONE, which is factually wrong.
So yeah, I consider your position grasping at straws when you attempt to argue minor semantics. I'll give you half a cookie for trying though.
>>334153576
It's gross and icky and ...ugh. I literally can't.
I'm glad Blizzard did the right thing and listened to their REAL fans.
>>334166527
I think he means that removing the pose is a fair concession for not being raped as often.
>>334166663
protip, if you ever get mad at retarded, ugly feminists, you lose.
>>334166728
that's some nice kafkatrapping
>>334166806
that's some nice cuckkatrapping
>>334153576
There's nothing wrong anon ~
>>334166894
Go to bed, Timmy. The adults are talking now.
>>334166308
OVERSIMPLIFICATION IS ALWAYS THE ANSWER!!!
>>334153576
It's problematic.
>>334166934
>>334166663
I want to be in an open relationship with that.
>>334166958
not always
but usually the simplest answer is the correct one.
>>334166259
how much smarter was lex than the guerilla?
>>334167017
Usually =/= always
>>334167140
Yeah no shit. I just said that. Thank you.
>>334166150
>It's the book that no one reads that's the problem
>Not the people that run the churches
>Not the political/historical stuff that happened
>It's the book's fault
>>334153576
Why are her shoes so dirty?
>>334159616
Japan
>>334166958
LET'S MAKE A HUGE CLUSTERFUCK OUT OF A FUCKING STUPID, INOCUOUS AS FUCK THING! THAT'LL SOLVE EVERETHENGE!
>>334166150
That shit happened before modern day equality and the human race was incredibly ignorant then.
Current year is way more logical than they were in 1095
>>334153576
Yes, shes not wearing a burka.
>>334162149
Here's the deal:
The new pose is a verbatim copy of a 1950's pin-up art.
Now, people liked the new pose until some witty folks found out it was a pin-up pose. And now it's problematic again.
Face it, it has nothing to do with "not fitting the character". Prude faggots just don't want any 'problematic' things in their kid-friendly M-rated games.
>>334167223
Are you a pseudo intellectual ?
Without the bible, it wouldn't have nearly been as potent at converting people. Just the teachings alone couldn't have redecorated so many religions.
>>334167009
where can i get one?
>>334159569
>>334166578
>One person makes a post on a forum saying the pose is sexy
>few people hop in and minorly agreeing
>SO MANY BETA TESTERS OFFENDED
Go find me the original thread anon
>>334167445
So if you trawl through the internet you can find people who don't like a thing. Big whoop, who fucking cares? Why does /v/ have to obsess over the opinions of a handful of idiots? You're just giving them a voice.
I and many other people would never ever hear about someone being mad about a pinup pose if faggots here didn't go looking for the 10 people who don't like it only to screencap it and bring it back here.
Hell, everyone already knows that the vast majority of SJWs are happy with the change. AND YET dumb kids who just HAVE to stay mad (while accusing SJWs of never being happy and needing to be outraged) go find some people who don't like the new pose.
>>334162047
kek'd
>>334167728
Shhh... go back to your room son. The adults are talking.
>>334167728
people didn't agree
>>334167740
This.
>pose changes
>10,000 sjws like it
>5 don't
>8gag fedoralords screencap those 5 people and claim sjws can never be happy
Meanwhile waifufags finally got the Fatal Frame localization they begged for months for, but without some panties and they sperged out for weeks. But god forbid /v/ acknowledged how unreasonable, childish and demanding they are. Nope, that's just a sjw trait of course.
Pissbabies really embarassed themselves this time.
>>334162149
>""beta"" testers
there's your problem
>>334167504
>The bible is the origin of christianism
>Not the other way around
The writing of the bible was inevitable. Also, if it were not catholicism to dominate europe during those times, it would have been another thing.
>>334168074
I find the word pissbabies hilarious. It sounds like an insult a three year old would come up with. It's possibly the least insulting insult I've ever heard in my life.
>"this pose is sexist!"
>Blizzard's beta testers
Never have testers been so beta.
http://rule34hentai.net/post/view/155771#search=Mei_%28Overwatch%29
http://rule34hentai.net/post/list/D.VA/1
It's D.VA and Mei fap time.
>someone says they don't like Tracer's pose
>Blizzard agree with his point and say they're going to alter it
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE THE SJWs CENSORSHIP IT'S CULTURAL MARXISM FUCKING NUMALE KEKS FAT FEMINAZI DYKES SLIPPERY SLOPE SHARIA LAW IS NOW IN EFFECT BASED MILO WAS RIGHT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>it's changed slightly, still sexy and a better pose
>everyone is pleased and there was no reason to be mad
>SJWs BTFOOOOOO xD HAHA I CAN STILL SEE HER ASS NICE TRY AHMED RRREEEEEEEEEE
>>334168213
I also like "yucky" and "gross."
words I haven't heard since I left junior school suddenly being thrown around by people supposedly saving the world via their internet blogs.
>>334165276
>Lyn from Fire Emblem 7
I don't know if I can give you that one.
>>334168389
>http://rule34hentai.net/post/list/D.VA/1
there isn't enough d.va porn
>>334168452
>people supposedly saving the world via their internet blogs
Please do not insult gamergate
Is DVa the Marie Rose of Overwatch? Her fanboys seem to be the absolute worst part of the fandom.
