Any questions?
>>333922394
yeah what to retro games look like on an HD monitor?
epik 4 the weiin
>>333922481
Like this.
>>333922394
why do you keep posting this?
>>333922394
None at all. CRT TVs/monitors will always be the best way to play games designed for standard def. Filters on PC emulators are alright but its no replacement for the real thing.
>>333922394
Filterfags are mostly nostalgiafags. And you know what? That's a perfectly acceptable reason to slightly alter how the game looks. It's not like they're using gamegenie on their first playthrough, it's just a little blurry. Who gives a fuck?
Clean pixel purists are demonstrably correct if literal accuracy of the game is given priority over replicating how it would have looked. Now, I see two groups in the filter camp. And that 'if' changes for people, you can't correct someone on what kind of visual experience they like. One is people just trying to recreate what they saw growing up and there's nothing wrong with that.
The other is people getting into these games for the first time and trying to make it more authentic for some kind of social capital, people you might call hipsters. Don't lump those two together when you're getting your panties in a bunch over how people emulate their games. Having personalized video options is one of the benefits of non-console gaming.
>>333922637
that looks really good imo
>>333922394
*Raises paw* I have one: Can you take a picture of a game that isn't played on a shitty TV? You see, I have a few old boxy TVs left. However, they all had very good picture. They don't make games look like the smudge you posted.
What retro games looked like
>>333922394
More like autists on /vr/
>>333926726
OP
B
T
F
O
>>333922394
>autist
Stop misusing this word you dumbfuck.
>>333922394
Why does it matter that other people experienced something differently than you? Why does it make you angry?
