>>333837808

It looks like a Nintendo 64 game, a ps2 could probably run this at 60fps you fucking desperate autist

There's already 2 threads for this. Check the catalog before you shitpost

>>333838049

>One threadin the catalogue when searching Star Fox
>The OP is literally a shitpost

Nah I'll stick to my own thread, thanks

>>333838217
There were 2 at the time I posted that, but the second one died. There is no need for another thread when an active one already exists.

>>333839347

Yeah let's just let shitpost threads run rampant, great idea. Totally want to post in a thread where a guy says the game looks worse than Star Fox Adventures.

>>333837808
>games running decent is the obligation of the hardware manufacturer, not the software engineers

Okay.

>>333839468
>my shitposting thread is better than another shitposting thread
Neither deserve to exist in my eye, but that would mean the mods cared

>>333839715

How is my thread a shitpost? Because I said Sony and Microsoft should feel embarassed? They should, getting games to even touch 60 should be staple to them.

>>333837808

>Game runs at constant 60fps in 1080p + second screen
More important to me than any graphical bells and whistles desu.

>>333839869
Breaking the no flamewars rule you piece of garbage

>>333839869
I just don't think this topic really warrants a thread to begin with, let alone 2 (where one is a shitpost response to the other shitposting one). Two wrongs don't make a right, anon.

>>333839993

I don't see how saying a company should feel embrassed constitues a flame war?

>>333840054
You don't understand because you are a shitposter.

>>333839948
>+second screen
>it's a low quality video stream

The PS4 and XB1 also stream video. This is not impressive at all.

>>333841257

Okay, nice non-answer.

>>333841408

It's a SD quality simultaneous render of a different view of the game.