Entertaining, optimized and you can find it real cheap

8/10 for me

>>333826885
Bland, forgettable and mediocre.
Quantity over quality, tons of repeated shit.
Shit script and story.
Shallow combat.
Decent driving, but gets old.

>>333826885

I'm not a big fan of sandboxes but I really loved Mad Max. I actually wanted to go and uncover all the loot, car combat was great, the custom made bases to capture were great, hand to hand combat was mediocre

Story ending I should have saw coming but still hit me in the gut.

The best post-apoc game since FO2, and rather faithful to Fury Road too.
8/10, but not worth the non-discounted price.
Just copy it, nigga.

bad game design, good graphics

>>333827013
>>333827060
>>333827141
Listen too much to these posters and you will set yourself up for dissapointment.

>>333827195

Let's almost as though with over 7.5 billion people on this planet, there's a wide variation of preferences.

>>333827013
this
Way too short though.

FUCK THIS GAME STRAIGHT TO HELL!
i could played it befoe when steam was in offline mode.
but now when i wanna do the singple player campaign it forces me to be online. which i cannot do much since it eats all data.
( being on 3g mobile isn't helping )

This "drm" bullshit has now killed the last enjoyment i had in gaming.
yes, am butthurt

>>333827195
>I don't like driving
>I don't like Bamham combat
>I don't like open world

FUCK I FORGOT ABOUT THIS GAME

still need to play it