awesome
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
Aw yeah.
das1 remaster when?
NEVER EVER
>>333682981
why is he giving me a thumbs up
>>333683492
because he knows that dark souls is awesome and pretty much the only modern video game series truly worth a fuck anymore
he's like, fuck yeah bitch, this game is the shit, *thumbs up*
praise miyazaki san, the literal saviour of modern vidya.
>>333683621
>because he knows that dark souls is awesome and pretty much the only modern video game series truly worth a fuck anymore
This is why Souls fans are fucking annoying.
>>333684002
lol. name a better modern game. telling you in advance that you're wrong tho.
>no DaS1 or DeS remake/port
Fuck that shit.
>>333682981
What is that piece of shit to the left?
Why is Dark Souls 2 rated T while Dark Souls 3 is rated M?
>>333684520
The souls got darker? Perhaps even... Three times as dark?
>>333682981
Just play it on PC.
What we really need is an HD DeS with a framerate that actually goes above 18fps
>>333684520
Because is shiT.
>>333684107
He didn't say they weren't good he just said you're a faggot
>>333685091
i just asked him to name a better modern game :^)
in advance, youre wrong tho, and you know it lmao
That's what you get for getting a PS4 you fucking faggot.
Should've got a Xbox One so you should've got Dark Souls 1 as well but no you just had to be a dumb fucking ass and get a PS4. Go jump in a lavapool you piece of shit faggot.
>>333683621
hahahaha my nigga
>>333684520
one word, titties.
>>333685565
You sound upset.
>>333685245
Make me
>>333685565
>xbox one
That's a really nice joke
>>333684107
Bloodborne and Witcher 3
>>333685814
i cant because its literally impossible. you cant post a better modern game than soulsborne, thats the point. thanks for proving it :^)
>>333684107
Witcher 3.
Demon's Souls remaster FUCKING WHEN SONY!?
>>333685974
>>333685989
>Witcher 3
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
sorry games with trash gameplay are trash, period. i got better things to do than walking around like a faggot pretending I'm a wizard to escape irl.
core rpg is a genre for fucking losers
>>333685245
You said only series worth a fuck. Even if no other series exceeded, there can still be series worth fucks.
>>333682981
>actually buying Dark Souls III: 20 FPS EDITION
>>333682981
isn't that the remaster right there on the right?
and i'd much rather have a demon souls remaster
>>333686112
you sound like a homosexual
>tfw DkS is backwards compatible on Xbone
>>333686112
this fucking guy right here
>>333686145
>autism speaks
>>333686270
>no rebuttal
yup, stay told. witcher 3 is for faggots.
>>333686315
>emulation backwards compatibility
No thank you.
>>333682981
Start a petition, remaster race.
>>333686112
>walking around like a faggot pretending I'm a wizard to escape irl
What even is a video game to you?
>>333686230
>Caring about PC gaming
Phew lad
>>333686385
>no rebuttal
you need to have a point in the first place to warrant a rebuttal ;^)
>>333686385
Better plot, lore debatably better combat, more interesting characters
>>333686385
>Illiteracy speaks.
>>333685565
You sound exactly like an Xbox fan.
>>333685989
Witcher 3 sucks though.
>"Big News"
>>333686387
At least it works and it's free.
Fuck off and get cancer faggot.
> remastered edition
> means 70% performance of PC version
>>333685974
>>333685989
>Witcher 3
In all seriousness... that game is boring as fuck. I only liked the artstyle and creature design, the rest was boring ass skyrim techniques of gameplay. Attack then chug something then keep attacking with your numerous flivorous damage dealers thingies, It's plain.
>>333686725
>it works
Ayyyy
>>333686725
Or you could just get it on PC and enjoy 4k 60fps instead of your 1024x720 24fps bullshit
>>333686880
And what? Spend over 1k just to achieve something people, including I, literally don't give a shot about? Suck my dick bitch.
>>333686831
You can literally take any game and describe it poorly to make it sound bad. you seem to be pretty good at that.
coming out late 2016
>>333687025
It does not take a super powerful PC to run Dark Souls.
You also don't have to pay monthly for the right to play online.
>>333687251
>assuming I pay monthly
>assuming I even pay close to $30 for a yearly subscription
>>333682981
>Bloodborne
>chinese+english version
>JAPANStudio
>Japanese
What the fuck is this cover.
>>333682981
Does bb pal version come with dlc on the disc? Or is it just a code.
>>333686604
>Better plot
HAHAHAHA
yeah
no
I've had my take of generic story telling. There is just nothing that compares as to what Demon's, Dark 1 and Bloodborne do with their storytelling. Of course, Bloodborne was very Lovecraft-esque so we all knew what to spect. But by all means everything else drives away from the generic and common, but still manages to drive you into this insane world with it's own sets of rules and mysteries, in which you don't solve by having it spitted out for you in a plot twist on a cutscene, but on a piece of dialogue, a geographical setting or piecing together one of many artifact's description. If you tell me The Witcher does that, please give me an example, because I've played that to completion and enjoyed it, but it's still just no where near as good as souls games. Not in that aspect I think.
>more interesting characters
Yeah, also no. Just all very folklory and pretty I know, but don't misguide yourself with character design. It's not the same as what makes a character interesting. First of all The Witcher series is already has an already uninteresting main character, since he is undeniably a Mary-Sue-esque guy. Has all the powers, is a badass, everyone knows he is a badass, and everyone wants to fuck him because he is oh-so hot and mighty.
Meanwhile I just feel so much more compeleed for character that say so little but mean so much such as the Firekeepers.
>>333687086
What I meant was that the stakes are higher in one than the other, thus requiring more technique and skill development, which serves to make the player feel better and accomplished or something along those lines
>>333687515
>HAHAHAHA
>yeah
>no
oh boy
>>333687680
makes sense.
>>333686604
All three wrong, well done.
>better combat
that's just fucking hilarious
>>333684520
because From wanted a wider audience for DaS2 so they toned down the blood and didn't add partial nudity.
>>333687680
Ciaran had a nice ass
>>333688896
Ciaran had a nice everything
>>333686698
thats why it got game of the year right??
>>333690285
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqMblpSqhgM
>game of the year meaning anything at all
>majority sure means it's correct amirite nazi party?
At least use sarcasm that isn't reatrded
>>333686445
>caring about console slideshows
Phew lad
![IRXrvap[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/NJY6Hue.png "IRXrvap[1].png")
>>333685974
>>333686112
>>333686831
uhhh.. senpai..
I don't know what to tell you guys.
The Witcher 3 is OBJECTIVELY superior in every aspect. Dark Souls is mostly known for its combat, and Witcher 3 soundly beats it in that department.
Dark Souls combat is needlessly convoluted with options that aren't viable most of the time. Witcher 3 does multi-enemy combat INFINITELY better than DaS. Witcher 3 human combat is RPG combat at its finest. The only thing DaS does marginally better than Witcher 3 is probably boss fights but the best boss fights in Witcher 3 are better than anything in DaS.
I mean, I can understand basing your preferences off a bunch of /v/ memes and actually fooling yourself into believing Dark Souls is a game that you can compare Witcher 3 to. I really do. But it's just not possible. It's like comparing the Mona Lisa to a drawing by an autistic 13 year old (you).
>>333686831
>target enemy
>side step around until you get a backstab
repeat 500x
>big enemies
>same 2-3 attacks, learn them
>attack after they miss
whoa miyasucky did it again
>>333692715
> Dark Souls is mostly known for its combat, and Witcher 3 soundly beats it in that department.
>>333693018
Witcher 3 combat + Boss design
Vs
Bloodborne/Souls combat
>das1 remaster when?
dark souls players need to be shot
>>333692715
>Witcher 3 does multi-enemy combat INFINITELY better than DaS
Yeah because it holds your hand with an auto lock, even if you don't want to autolock, it autolocks anyway and forces you to attack an enemy even if you're trying to fight something else.
Witcher 3 combat is fucking dog shit
>>333693018
that's a glitch, senpai. I am not autistic enough to compile a laundry list of .webm's showing terrible hitboxes, hilariously predictable attacks that require no strategy and straight up UGLY textures
>>333693126
That looks nice, which is unfortunate because the game doesn't look or play like that at all. It's basically Dark Souls sped up a bit with babby's first tim burton movie paint splashed on it.
>>333693245
Sounds like you need to git gud, senpai. I had no trouble with combat in my 250+ hours of Witcher 3. I wish I could say the same for my playthrough of DaS. I played it solely because DaS fags kept shitposting in my Witcher 3 threads, now I can safely say that Dark Souls fags have a huge inferiority complex and love defending their C- tier excuse of an RPG.
Dark Souls has no lore
Dark Souls has no story (a shit story doesn't count)
Dark Souls combat is trash, its only gimmick is that weapons have weight, whoa. Fucking revolutionary. Monster Hunter did it first, and better.
Witcher 3 combat is objectively better.
Source: over 250 hours in Witcher 3 and 50 in Dark Souls
You queers can stop shitposting now.
>>333693473
b-b-b-but muh gaym is haaaaard!
You are just too much of a scrub to understand how good Call of Souls is!
>>333693473
The Witcher 3's combat mechanic is technically inferior to souls combat. Geralt moves like a fucking tank during combat and actions are queued in addition to autolock. Geralt always focuses an enemy, even if you don't manually lock onto them which means that the camera doesn't even do what you want most of the time. "Queue" refers to the way the game handles attacks. Sometimes it doesn't actually register that you clicked a button and sometimes you click the button, Geralt ignores the command and then executes it a second later because he still needs to finish his current animtion. It's something known from ARMA where canceling animations was a pain in the ass and your character would spend 5 days opening a bottle and closing it because the game queued animation after animation. The autolock is also done in a very similar way to Shadow of Mordor/Batman Arkham Series or Assassins Creed which means that Geralt follows the monster he is focusing, he kind of jumps at them. This causes a shitshow the way combat currently works since sometimes you queue an attack, Geralt starts executing it and the enemy dodges left or right or backwards and since Geralt is a fucking magnet he will follow whichever direction the enemy jumped instead of striking into empty air. This usually makes him end up at a different location than the player expected. Player expection is "attack enemy -> enemy dodges -> you hit empty air and character stands roughly at the position the enemy stood" while the game looks more like this "attack enemy -> enemy dodges -> Geralt follows it through autolock, doesn't actually strike it but kind of jumps halfass in the general direction of the monster and its current location usually fucking up the camera in the process, disorienting the player and fucking up any sense of direction you might have had".
You like the combat and think its better, because its easy. That's all.
>yfw Souls III isn't even the best game coming out in April
>>333693473
This is correct, the Witcher could have benefited a lot from free-form combat. No autolock, no dumb "tank-movements" during combat where Geralt moves slow. Bloodborne's camera is just 100 times better. Each weapon has a different moveset whereas with w3 is all the same shit. Hamers, swords and everything else have the exact same animations... The dodge mechanic in w3 simply doesn't work because Geralts hitbox is huge. Sometimes enemies also trace their attacks making them do some weird 180 attack moves even if you dodged away. The sign spells are boring as Fuck. Even with BB's limited item spells there is still more variety than in W3.
>>333694074
Nobody cares about your port of a N64our game. If Nintendo is going to make milk yet another franchise and make shitty rail shooters at least bring something to the table.
>>333694074
Remember to activate that invincibility mode, lad!
I rather have demon souls
>>333694318
actually quite a few people care you fucking jaded faggot
>>333684652
Fuck you
>>333694664
>actually quite a few people care
Only Nintendo fans give a shit about it and its primarily because it's a Nintendo game.
You release starfox on any other system with a different name and people will literally think it's an indie game, a short indie game that's a flavour of the week most will be happy to skip and miss out on.
Instead it'll be glorified because its got the Nintendo seal of approval on it, that's the only reason.
>>333684775
That'd be nice, but it seems that From are committed to keeping DeS and BB as playstation exclusives. Not to mention the torrent of shitposting we'd have to endure from people spouting that a higher framerate somehow ruins the atmosphere.
>>333687025
>some people including myself don't give a shit
Gee you sure told him faggot
>>333684107
Tropical Freeze's Hard mode is harder than any Souls game. Just letting you know as someone who enjoyed all the Souls games and BB, beating each multiple times (except DaS2, it was kind of meh, so I beat it and moved on).
>>333694917
I want Demon's Souls, regardless of what /v/ says...
Land of the Giants boys...
I miss my DeS...
>>333694318
No one cares about your early access game either.
>>333694318
>nobody cares about your re-imagining of a game from 3 generations ago!
>my 5th identical game in a series that is only a generation old is so creative and great!
I hate being a Souls fan because it means I have to be lumped in with brainless cunts like you.
I can't stand Witcher because it's like watching Game of thrones : the video game. I dont care Geralt Barbosa Riviera and his past, or his friends and the shenanigans they get into. I would play witcher if I could play as myself. ken-sama a lvl 99 meiji period samurai
>>333693934
Dark souls also queues inputs but it's usually beneficial, like queueing up a stance switch. Also leads to stamina drain and vulnerability from spamming the attack button too much if youre playing mindlessly, but I found that more prominent in 2 than 1. Not sure if thats what you're referring to.
>>333695223
This is a actually re-imaging of a game, using the basic formula while simultaneously being new and different and completely adding a new level of distinguished thematic beauty. Actual work work into Bloodborne and it shows.
Meanwhile, Star Fox 0.. a fucking independent developer could've made starfox at least 50 games just like it come out everyday on Steam and they're better, look better and are twice as long. Star fox is a completely safe game, there's nothing inherently different about it, all Nintendo dose is rely on old established franchises give them a graphics upgrade. Its still a shitty and extremely linear rail shooter that's 2 hours long and looks like a direct port with some graphics upgrades.
I hate people who applaud incredibly low effort games, I hate people who pat Nintendo on the back and encouraging them to keep their standards so low. I fucking hate people who will justify anything Nintendo puts out, because they own the wiiU and need to justify it.
Star fox is a fucking pedestrian game in every sense of the word, there's nothing unique or special about it and its only being glorified because its a Nintendo game, period.
Go fuck yourself manchild.
>>333695223
Why does every game that gets popular also have to attract a cancerous fanbase?
>>333682981
dem box artssotfs is trash, vanilla is superior
>>333695703
Star fox is a shit game, and dark souls is a shit rehash of an ok game, go fuck yourself soulsposter.
Cuhrayzee souls game when? BB was a step in the right direction, but I need more
>>333682981
> buying the same game 4 times
>>333695703
gr8 b8, etc.
Enjoy your (You).
>>333695703
This is some top quality bait
>>333695763
>somebody unironically holds this opinion
SotFS is much better. The new enemy placements make the levels flow better and aren't just spammed everywhere without much thought, and the new NPC invaders are actually challenging.
>>333695703
>This is a actually re-imaging of a game, using the basic formula while simultaneously being new and different and completely adding a new level of distinguished thematic beauty
So Star Fox Zero, then.
>all that bait
>le 2 hours meme
Swell. I assumed that Soulsfags would know a thing or two about replay value. I guess I assumed wrong.
>anybody could make it
>50 games a day better than it come out
Yeah, okay, sport. Whatever you say.
>>333695913
7, or 6.5 times actually,
DeS>DaS>DaS2>DaS2Sins>BB>BBDLC>Das3
>>333695703
You're not entirely wrong since star fox is a series with only 1 worthwhile game, but pretending that from hasn't rehashed the same formula for 5 games now is fucking absurd, despite how good the games are. Also calm your autism, it's fucking embarrassing.
>>333696068
>since star fox is a series with only 1 worthwhile game
The original, 2, and 64 are all good. Assault is okay. Zero looks like it's shaping up to be fantastic.
>>333696058
I'm playing dark souls 2 right now for the first time via sotfs, and I have to say from what I've seen of the vanilla game via walkthroughs, the new enemy placement is fucking horrid. Most levels did fix some questionable placement, but also added a clusterfuck of enemies for the sake of difficulty. Perfect example being the area in iron keep outside of smelter demon's fog. Alonne captains everywhere and having 5 alonne knights rush you at a time isn't fun or challenging, its just an annoying grind to get to one of the few good bosses in the game. Especially if you end up dying to said boss.
>>333686014
I don't know if it can.
Atlus and Namco own the distribution rights to DeS in US and EU. Sony can't sell DeS in those regions without thier cooperation.
A remaster would need to be different enough so that it was legally not the same game, upping the resolution and fixing a few bugs probably wouldn't qualify. And Sony wouldn't want to let Atlus and Namco sell it because it would just be wasted profits. That's if they are even interested.
>>333696058
>have to go through 50 hordes of enemies just to get to Pursuer.
>random dragon here because why not
it sure is
>>333696152
Assault had a couple good on-rails flying missions and fun multiplayer, the rest was filled with awful on foot combat and tank missions, which have always sucked.
>>333696421
You can run past most of those asshats from the bonfire at least after you open the shortcuts.
>>333696363
In SotFS, if there is a large clump of enemies, there's an easy way to deal with them. In your example, you can bait out the early knights, and the later ones you can tank on the end of the bridge while blocking the arrows with the pillars.
In vanilla, enemies were spammed without consideration of things like this.
>>333684107
Bayonetta/2 shits all over Souls combat and lore
>>333696064
That's depressing that they keep getting away with selling level packs for full price
I wish the souls had not been created. I would've been over video games by now if it weren't for from
>>333683492
you ranked up and bought the latest Call of Souls. Be sure to pre order the DLC and to buy all the hilarious new t shirts.
>>333687373
your logic is about as faulty as your console.
the point is you could very well pay no subscription if you weren't such a stupid consumer
>>333682981
It's already outon pc
>>333696064
>>333697353
>Implying these games are of the same quality on any level
>>333686445
>not caring about better resolution and fps
It's like you hate yourself
>>333698179
And I'll gladly buy the next one as soon as it's available. This series is the best thing this industry has produced lately, like it or not.
>>333700369
>pc
ew
