>that sequel so shitty it made you jaded about games for the rest of your life
Metroid Other M
>>333504342
pic not related, I seriously hope.
SH1-4 were all gold. If anything, it was Origins that dropped the bomb, and every sequel that followed added one more nail to the coffin.
>>333504342
Your pic not related.
>>333504739
Origins was better than 4. Fight me irl
>>333505348
shit taste tbqh famm
>>333505348
>>333505348
Neither deserve to be SH titles. Roomfags are desperate to fit in.
>>333504342
>>333505348
>Origins was better than 4
yeah, no. Origins was not only a super clunky and fugly game, it was also a complete lore rape towards SH1, and thus the entire fucking series. It was also the first game where that terrible SH movie's influences started to show.
SH4 was a lot better horror game and SH title.
>>333506021
SH4 has all the right to be one, as it was made by the original team, and always was meant to be related to SH series. First as a spinoff title, but soon after as a numbered sequel.
>B-but RoS fixed EVERYTHING.
>>333505348
You sure you want to fight a mob?
>>333505348
>dat final boss
>>333504342
>type out long-winded response
>realize this is bait
>delete entire response
>type greentext reply instead
>>333505348
This.
But fungo fags will keep denying it because "not muh japanese devs"
>>333504342
I thought 4 was more interesting than 3.
3 stayed more consistent.
As a series, 1-4 are all great
Origins was an alright american imitation but failed to deliver something new
SM was a quirky offshoot and was fun for what it was, but comes nowhere close to the original four games
Homecoming was a ripoff of that shitty movie and made me physically ill when I played it.
Didn't even try downpour because no akira
fight me
>>333504342
How it is to live with garbage opinions, OP?
>>333506371
>SH movie's
But the first movie is good. Now, the second movie, that's the shitty one.
It's been 4 years and I'm still mad
>>333507279
>But the first movie is good.
No. Not as a standalone, not as a Silent Hill movie. It is an awful mess that isn't scary, tense, or interesting. It is a mediocre movie at best.
>one sequel making you jaded for life
Wow. Autism at it's finest
>>333507279
I agree, first movie was pretty entertaining. Obviously a movie adaptation isn't going to have everything or be perfect, but considering how wrong it COULD have went, I'd say it did pretty well.
Shit, look at the RE movies.
2nd SH movie was shit though, god damn.
you'r mam
>>333505348
>Lore rape
>Character rape
>Monsters are shitty
>Gross combination of cult and inner demons story
>Every weapon breaks, no matter what
>Non-Japanese devs
>>333507452
I'd disagree, It at least tried to follow the concepts of SH1, while also being it's own thing. 2 is a fucking train wreck of a story.
>>333507474
See, it's at least one of the better game adaptations, right next to Postalshockingly by Uwe Boll somehow.and that's it. I do like the first RE film, but that's because it stays in one location and works like that.I still think SH2 could be adapted, but as something like a Netflix series, not as a movie. You can't do that game in 2 hours.
>>333507549
It's like they shoved a story about travis's past in for no reason other than for the game to be more like SH2.
>>333507940
It's like there isn't a point to Origins existence in the first place.
>>333507279
>But the first movie is good
No, it's not. It was terrible, and the sequel somehow managed to be even worse.
The acting sucks, writing and directing sucks, it's a real lore-rape towards games (inb4 "muh artistic freedums!"), and the creators were total SJWs.
>>333508231
The point was that konami wanted to give the series to americans so that americans would maybe buy more of the games so they could make more dosh
