how the hell can reviewers give bloodborne 9/10 or 10/10 with the technical issues it has?
>>333462074
>how the hell can reviewers give bloodborne 9/10 or 10/10
They didn't.
AHHH NOT 60 FPS!! AHH
>>333462074
This just in; reviews are arbitrary baseless assessments of games by people who have no logical reason for anything they say
Inb4 this turns into another shitty attempt at idiots trying to bait people with platform "war" faggotry
NEVER EVER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JB7ehZ6nM5E
Reviews are subjective, some reviewers' feelings on a game aren't significantly affected by performance issues
>>333462153
i dont give a fuck if its 60fps i just care that its stable but even then its not and the load times dont help either
>>333462336
not true, shit load of reviewers shitted on games like devils third for pretty much the same issues bloodborne has yet it gets near perfect scores
>>333462367
Is your PS4 not connected to the internet by chance?
>>333462589
my ps4 is always connected
>>333462074
Having to go through two loading screens to reset mobs and vials is the dumbest design decision ever.
>>333462074
I BET GONE HOME WOULD BE A 10/10 GAME IF IT WAS IN 99999999 FPS THEN
why the fuck was spamming r1 till their poise drop the main combat
timing your attacks was a much better mechanic