>>333247497
What

no can't say I have, if I didn't like it I usually drop it instantly.

what are some things you liked that are bad?

>>333247497
I have quite low standards It's part of the reason i can still stand it here so i can play a shit game, enjoy the better elements of it while realizing its still not a good game.

>When you know it's bad.

I bet you just saw some negativity on /v/ and want to bandwagon. You can disagree with /v/, it's okay, you'll still fit in you fucking faggotcunt.

OP these are serious questions that I can't answer. Good luck.

GARY?

>>333250390
GARY!

Sure. There are plenty of games I know are outright bad or poorly made, but I still enjoy them. Alpha Protocol, for example, is a terribly made game but was fun to play. I don't rationalize it, I just realize it's bad but that it had parts I personally enjoyed. It's nothing complicated. I don't make up any excuses. If something is bad then so what. You enjoyed it, you don't have to justify that enjoyment.

>>333247497
One day, I will die and be free from it.

>>333247497
Focus on what you enjoy, while still realizing it's bad as a whole.
It's ok to enjoy bad things. Bad movies, bad shows, even bad games. As long as you arent a cunt and try to prove that it's objectively good

>>333247497

Sinister City comes to mind. /v/ basically convinced me to buy it when it was on sale because selling the cards would net me more money than buying the game. For a game that I effectively was paid to play it wasn't awful. There were a couple bits that showed real promise even if the game decided to abandon it about 1/3rd of the way through. It has that "You fucked up but you really tried" charm going for it so I can't help but think of it fondly.

I don't rationalize things I like. I don't have to defend my tastes to anyone but myself. Somethings I've enjoyed because they were mindless entertainment and that's a good enough reason to enjoy them.