What went wrong?
>>333186168
>54 critics
>69 critics
>25 critics
It's not over yet, Snake.
>>333186168
>caring about reviews in the lamestream media and arbitrary numbers based on the dumb american education grading system
DARK SOULS 2 CONFIRMED FOR GOTY ALL YEAR EVERY YEAR
HATERS B T F O
BTFO
T
F
O
>B-UT MUH LORE
>MUH LEVEL DESIGN
BEEE TEEEE EFFFFFF OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>333186686
WE DID IT RED- I MEAN /v/
Who cares? I am watching Game Grumps play Dark Souls 3 and that is good enough
>>333186168
All the review numbers end up within 3-4 points of the other titles.
Would that make Dark Souls one of the most consistently well-reviewed series in gaming?Like that is really a badge of honor
>>333186763
no it just means that each game is the same fucking thing
This picture is the best example of why you should never trust ''professional'' reviewers.
Dark Souls 2 should be like a 75 and not a goddamned point higher.
Its because DS2 is the easiest one, meaning the casual faggots that review games professionally were able to get to the end.
>>333186916
bloodborne got a 92
bloodborne casual confirmed
>>333186168
>release same game 5 times
>le epic difficult meme
>reviewer pretends he played it when he didnt but needs to have gamer cred with fuccbois
>writes same review 5 times
Such a fucking joke of a franchise.